This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
 
Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Mark A at 10:02, 23rd August 2026
 
Upward-only rent reviews more generally and the frankly feudal nature of landlord-tenant law. *Shakes head*.

Mark

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 09:26, 23rd August 2026
 
From The BBC

Over the sea to Skye on the world’s last turntable ferry



This is the Kylerhea to Glenelg ferry, which I also have fond memories of. The location is stunning, high mountains all around and much wildlife in the turbulent waters. The ferry operation is extraordinary to watch as they turn the turntable around in midstream.

To reach it involves climbing over 1,000 feet up narrow mountain passes on both sides. I cycled this route and it was wonderful, as was the b&b in Glenelg which had one of the most helpful landladies I have ever met. From Glenelg there is a 10 mile dead-end road down the loch (well definitely up and down and running roughly parallel with the loch), which reaches a tiny hamlet in the middle of nowhere, where red deer graze on the beach and the very last terraced house does teas. At one point this road crosses a large scree slope on a 3,000 feet mountainside. Absolutely beautiful and remote.

The ferry is reported to be under threat and there's a petition to save it - at 38 degrees
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-the-glenelg-skye-ferry

Friends will know how very, very rarely I sign petitions but I have signed this one and I encourage other to do so.  I have very fond memories of this ferry - "romantic" isn't quite the word; making use of it what must have been around 50 years ago in a long hot summer around 1976, with my grandmother - Gran - who would have been 133 years old today (we made a strange touring couple).

"Over the sea to Skye" has changed with the opening of the bridge near Kyle of Lochalsh, with the ferry there closing and the other ferry routes at Mallaig to Armadale and Glenelg to Kylerhea becoming less significant in terms of connectivity.  The Glenelg ferry is indeed seasonal (was it always?) and I would not like to see a top-weight HGV on it; very much a tourist thing these days as I suspect that the local traffic between residents on both sides of the kyles is minimal.  A very, very long way around if it's not running.  Having said that, the trade and business it brings them is surely significant - important - as is noted by the somewhat overegged talk about the numbers of staff employed on the ferry and at the tearooms.

A petition that vilifies an individual in the way this one does concerns me slightly, and part of me suspects that the bloke probably isn't going to be minded to take actions that eliminate his annual income unless he has other intents - so I partly suspect the petition might be something of a negotiating ploy.  But then I also wonder if the income isn't a significant income to him, and it's more trouble than it's worth.   What price the overrunning of this quiet "Ring of Bright Water" land?  I can't see the area as being ripe for new housing or other development ... but you never know. Anyway - signed though with some concerns; the petition also provides wonderful publicity for the ferry and its operators and may bolster their business so they can afford the fees even if they stay on current terms.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Witham Bobby at 15:09, 23rd September 2025
 
He used a winch to raise the cable/chain from the river bed then hand pulled the ferry over  to pick me up....£1 per person.  I was the only passenger at the time but he told me he'd been quite busy with groups of walkers that day. Friendly chap too.


We'um all frenley in Asum.  Specially if ee loikes beeauns n plumz

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by johnneyw at 13:32, 23rd September 2025
 
The only manually operated chain ferry in the UK.

?   Isn't there a chain - or is it a rope - ferry across the river in Evesham,

I was on that ferry this July.  The ferryman doubled up a the general maintenance man for the surrounding grounds (he has been doing some mowing when I arrived on the far bank).
He used a winch to raise the cable/chain from the river bed then hand pulled the ferry over  to pick me up....£1 per person.  I was the only passenger at the time but he told me he'd been quite busy with groups of walkers that day. Friendly chap too.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Mark A at 12:13, 23rd September 2025
 
The (extinct) Hampton Loade ferry has come to mind somehow.

Mark


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampton_Loade_Ferry

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by TonyN at 09:06, 23rd September 2025
 
The Evesham to Hampton ferry is rope worked

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 22:28, 22nd September 2025
 
Another? Trowlock Island on the Thames has a user-operated chain ferry.

Mark

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/597000

I don't think this one is a public ferry.  Only used for private access to the residential properties on Trowlock Island.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 19:53, 22nd September 2025
 
The only manually operated chain ferry in the UK.

?   Isn't there a chain - or is it a rope - ferry across the river in Evesham, and rope ferries at the Weymouth Boating club (or whatever it's called) by the lifeboat station out to the moorings that aren't connected to the shore?

Wikipedia, and the bloke doing the winding, both say it's a chain ferry.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 19:30, 22nd September 2025
 
The only manually operated chain ferry in the UK.

?   Isn't there a chain - or is it a rope - ferry across the river in Evesham, and rope ferries at the Weymouth Boating club (or whatever it's called) by the lifeboat station out to the moorings that aren't connected to the shore?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Mark A at 19:01, 22nd September 2025
 
Another? Trowlock Island on the Thames has a user-operated chain ferry.

Mark

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/597000

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 18:52, 22nd September 2025
 
On the way home from Yorkshire I stopped off in Shakespeare town. Took a ride on a passenger ferry that I don't think has yet been mentioned in this thread.

The only manually operated public chain ferry in the UK.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:16, 13th January 2025
 
Please don't mention Guard's Vans - you'll set Broadgage off again. 


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Oxonhutch at 19:12, 13th January 2025
 
All newer than the last one I sailed on - Mallaig-Armadale 1980 with motorbike slung onboard by a crane. Undergraduate field trip to Arran. The bike went on the train in the guard’s van at half fare with Student Railcard discount. Good memories.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by GBM at 07:57, 19th November 2024
 
https://stmichaelsmount.co.uk/news/the-st-michael-is-unveiled/

Mostly used for staff runs, rather than public usage.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by froome at 03:47, 19th November 2024
 
I don't suppose Stornoway harbour looks that calm on many days!

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 23:09, 4th July 2024
 
And there is a button expressly for the purpose so I've pressed it Jay

That's hwicked, sweet, awesome.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Western Pathfinder at 21:18, 3rd July 2024
 
And there is a button expressly for the purpose so I've pressed it Jay

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 17:24, 3rd July 2024
 
I've just learnt of another ferry service in the UK thanks to a YouTube channel I subscribe to - Auto Shenanigans. Which incidentally is a great channel if you want to learn quirky facts about the motorways and roads of the UK. Just the right balance of nerdiness and humour I enjoy. The channel features occasional diversions such as this video about an amphibious ferry that crosses the mouth of the River Towy in south west Wales, between Ferryside and Llansteffan.



And the amphibious ferry's website.
https://www.carmarthenbayferries.co.uk/

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by chuffed at 08:18, 2nd July 2024
 
Could this be the start of a lucrative Youtube career for the ubiquitous Finn ?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by bobm at 07:51, 2nd July 2024
 
The current bridge has proved so unreliable there are now electronic road signs on the outskirts of the town advising whether it is in operation or not.  This has saved council staff going out with A-boards everytime the service is suspended.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 23:56, 1st July 2024
 
The Cowes chain ferry has always been known as the Floating Bridge.

The first vessel began service in 1859. Commissioned by the Floating Bridge Company. That company was later purchased by The Isle of Wight Steam Packet Company (today's Red Funnel) who commissioned the second and third vessels in 1882 and 1896.

In 1909 the ferry service was taken over by the local authorities West & East Cowes Urban Councils, passing to successor authorities, Medina Borough Council in 1974, and Isle of Wight Council in 1995.

There have been six vessels under local authority ownership. 'Named' Bridge No.1 to Bridge No.6. The latest, Bridge No.6, entered service in 2017 but, after a catalogue of faults, groundings, and failures, it was announced in March 2024 that it would be replaced.

When Bridge No.6 was due to enter service, Isle of Wight Council sought suggestions from residents to give it a proper name. A petition for Floaty McFloatface garnered over 2,000 signatures. The naming competition was postponed by local elections in 2017 and was never restarted after problems with the vessel started becoming apparent. The vessel remains Bridge No.6. A bridge too far?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 23:17, 1st July 2024
 
Finn and I had a couple of rides on this one last week. It was actually working for a change. Fighting a very strong current on the River Medina, I hadn't realised the chain ferry had side thrusters to help with lining up with the slipways against tidal flows.

So that's like a transporter bridge on the water and not suspended above it?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:20, 1st July 2024
 
How does Finn cope with all that intake?   


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by bobm at 21:15, 1st July 2024
 
That was in between a trip on an open top bus, a visit to a distillery, a pub - oh and a coffee!

One plus point.  The burger in the distillery pub didn’t come in the ubiquitous brioche bun.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 21:02, 1st July 2024
 
Finn and I had a couple of rides on this one last week. It was actually working for a change. Fighting a very strong current on the River Medina, I hadn't realised the chain ferry had side thrusters to help with lining up with the slipways against tidal flows.



Edit. The video thumbnail was chosen by YouTube. A little disconcerting that the AI and algorithms chose him without prompt. Should I be worried about Finn's personal data?!

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:17, 1st July 2024
 
Now done. 

Whenever possible, I've preserved the original topic headings here, for clarity and context.

I hope, as ever, that this helps.

CfN 

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:28, 30th June 2024
 
Mods: this (and maybe some above) may be better placed in the foot ferry thread.

I give in: I'm merging them all into one hopefully definitive 'ferries' topic. 


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by froome at 11:30, 5th May 2024
 
In the Domesday Book two ferries were recorded crossing here, and for much of the time since there were several ferries crossing. Gravesend Town Council bought the ferry rights in the 1600s and the commander of the fort at Tilbury also managed to gain ferry rights, so until the 19th century two ferries crossed here, one run from each bank. There was a vehicle ferry crossing until 1964 and various proposals for a tunnel to be built from the early 19th century onwards, but this was always considered to be too expensive.

It is a real tragedy that this crossing has now closed. Let's hope funding can be found to get it reinstated soon.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 08:50, 4th May 2024
 
Add to this list the Gravesend to Tilbury Foot & cycle ferry across the Thames. Last service March 31st. Thurrock Council pulled their support & Kent couldn't afford it on their own.

https://www.jetstreamtours.com/about-us/news

Ouch, that's going to hurt.

Mark

It's gone - and businesses are hurting, let alone (no doubt) the people who made the 100,000 journeys per year

https://www.kentonline.co.uk/gravesend/news/struggling-business-owners-call-for-ferry-s-return-305903/

https://www.essexlive.news/news/essex-news/jetstream-ferry-sail-between-gravesend-9197556

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Mark A at 21:13, 10th March 2024
 
Ouch, that's going to hurt.

Mark

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by ChrisB at 19:06, 10th March 2024
 
Add to this list the Gravesend to Tilbury Foot & cycle ferry across the Thames. Last service March 31st. Thurrock Council pulled their support & Kent couldn't afford it on their own.

https://www.jetstreamtours.com/about-us/news

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Oxonhutch at 16:19, 10th March 2024
 
There are a couple of survivors on the Manchester Ship Canal where the free foot ferry (bankrolled by Peel Ports - the canal owner) proved access between public footpaths that were bisected on its construction in the 1890s.

Mods: this (and maybe some above) may be better placed in the foot ferry thread.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 14:17, 10th March 2024
 
Very much East Anglia orientated

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-68428422

but I do wonder about the smaller ferries. Is the limit for MCA inspections 12 persons, which would put the Haying ferry at risk? Not sure what the capacity on the Hamble and Itchenor ferries. The Gosport ferry only runs one boat on weekends now.

I get the impression that the Shepperton ferry, on the Thames, is largely a one man band. This is the most upstream ferry, so all the foot ferries in Berkshire and Oxfordshire have presumably (long?) gone. Have not been on other small Thames ferries.

Hammertons near Richmond only operates 10:00 - 18:00 so was never into the commuter market. Hampton ferry is only seasonal.

How is the situation further west coastal?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Mark A at 13:54, 10th March 2024
 
A curious way to close the article. If you need to cross water and there's no bridge or tunnel, and you're not prepared to swim, you're going to need a ferry. (Also, gauging the need for a ferry or bridge from the number of people swimming the river... not the best approach to the issue, that...)

Mark

'So what is the future for ferries like Mr Zemann's?

"There's an endless [list of] ferries which have closed," he says.

And yet there is something "old school" about foot ferries, he says, like vinyl records or artisanal goods that might just be in their favour.

Being on the water, he says, gives people a completely different and memorable experience of a place - the type of "cool" mentioned by teacher Mr Hunt.

"I really think these things will come back again," Mr Zemann says. "But I think with a bit of clever marketing loads more ferries could work.

"I don't think it has to be the end."'
[/list]

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 12:30, 10th March 2024
 
A story from East Anglia, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-68428422

Foot ferries were once a vital cog in the UK's transport network, but those keeping these ancient river crossings going tell of an aging workforce, rising costs and an uncertain future.

A few weeks ago, the operators of the Horning Foot Ferry in Norfolk announced the service was ending because of a shortage of volunteers and a drop in the number of people using it.

For those in the ferry world, the demise of the centuries-old crossing of the River Bure was sad but not surprising. It was, they say, emblematic of the kind of issue they face each and every day.

Department for Transport figures show a decline in river ferries usage - down more than 10% from 20.1m passenger journeys in 2012 to 17.4m in 2022.

The nation's foot ferries come in all shapes and sizes, from small rowing boats to large motor-powered vessels carrying dozens of passengers at a time.

One wonders at the regulation and control systems that allow the DfT to maintain statistics like this.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by froome at 16:04, 3rd May 2023
 
From The BBC

Over the sea to Skye on the world’s last turntable ferry



This is the Kylerhea to Glenelg ferry, which I also have fond memories of. The location is stunning, high mountains all around and much wildlife in the turbulent waters. The ferry operation is extraordinary to watch as they turn the turntable around in midstream.

To reach it involves climbing over 1,000 feet up narrow mountain passes on both sides. I cycled this route and it was wonderful, as was the b&b in Glenelg which had one of the most helpful landladies I have ever met. From Glenelg there is a 10 mile dead-end road down the loch (well definitely up and down and running roughly parallel with the loch), which reaches a tiny hamlet in the middle of nowhere, where red deer graze on the beach and the very last terraced house does teas. At one point this road crosses a large scree slope on a 3,000 feet mountainside. Absolutely beautiful and remote.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by bradshaw at 14:12, 3rd May 2023
 
Marazion & St. Michael’s Mount

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by johnneyw at 11:04, 3rd May 2023
 

Salcombe-East Portlemouth

The Salcombe-East Portsmouth ferry is all year round but there are seasonal ferries for Salcombe-Kingsbridge and Salcombe-South Sands (with it amphibious landing stage).
Would the Bigbury on Sea - Burgh Island sea tractor count?  It's all year round I believe.  I think that there's still a seasonal ferry at nearby Bantham too.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 06:51, 3rd May 2023
 
If you have got as far as Eastney-Hayling I would add the Itchenor ferry. Nice pub at Itchenor on the road down to the ferry, and check the tides if you want to cycle/walk to Bosham the other side, the road can be flooded at high tide.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by TaplowGreen at 05:17, 3rd May 2023
 
Tamar

More correctly, Torpoint.

Then there's Lymington-Yarmouth, Southampton-East/West Cowes, Portsmouth-Ryde Pier, Southsea-Ryde, Portsmouth-Fishbourne, Southampton-Hythe, Eastney-Hayling, Hamble-Warsash, Portsmouth-Gosport, Starcross-Exmouth, Teignmouth-Shaldon, Salcombe-East Portlemouth, Plymouth-Mount Batten, Admirals Hard Plymouth-Cremyll, Polruan-Fowey, St Mawes-Place Creek, St Mawes-Falmouth, Falmouth-Ponsharden, Helford Passage-Helford Village, Penzance-St Mary's, Padstow-Rock, Bideford-Lundy, Appledore-Instow, Ilfracombe-Lundy...

That'll do. Pretty much every non-international/crown dependency ferry service on the south west peninsula. Dart crossings already mentioned.

You missed out Bryan!

Torpoint Ferry is more correctly called a floating bridge...........and is called quite a few other things by locals when one or more of them break down or aren't running!

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 01:21, 3rd May 2023
 
Tamar

More correctly, Torpoint.

Then there's Lymington-Yarmouth, Southampton-East/West Cowes, Portsmouth-Ryde Pier, Southsea-Ryde, Portsmouth-Fishbourne, Southampton-Hythe, Eastney-Hayling, Hamble-Warsash, Portsmouth-Gosport, Starcross-Exmouth, Teignmouth-Shaldon, Salcombe-East Portlemouth, Plymouth-Mount Batten, Admirals Hard Plymouth-Cremyll, Polruan-Fowey, St Mawes-Place Creek, St Mawes-Falmouth, Falmouth-Ponsharden, Helford Passage-Helford Village, Penzance-St Mary's, Padstow-Rock, Bideford-Lundy, Appledore-Instow, Ilfracombe-Lundy...

That'll do. Pretty much every non-international/crown dependency ferry service on the south west peninsula. Dart crossings already mentioned.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by johnneyw at 23:17, 2nd May 2023
 
From The BBC

We have a handful of ferries in the south west ... Sandbanks, Weymouth harbour, Tamar, Plymouth to France and Spain,  .. and I'm going to leave it at that for others to come in and add to the list. 

There's the higher and lower River Dart ferries in Dartmouth.....I won't  include the numerous foot passenger ferries In the region as I'm assuming it's vehicle ferries that we are talking about here.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 17:11, 2nd May 2023
 
And there was one across Loch Leven - http://www.ballachulish.org/see-do/ballachulish-ferry-and-bridge/


The ferry at the Ballachulish Narrows first carried cars in the early years of the 20th Century, at the time they were driven onto planks laid across large rowing boats, and then rowed across one at a time, straddling the boat. Of course, it was not until around 1927, or perhaps later that the current road around Loch Leven through Kinlochleven was completed, so in the earliest years of motoring the only alternative was the military road over the Devils Staircase and through the Lairig Mhor.

As the vehicle traffic on the ferry increased, so the standards of the boats improved, and by the 1960s the crossing was run by 3 turntable ferries, each capable of carrying 6 cars. These operated as roll-on, roll-off ferries, with a single ramp and without the need for reversing. The turntable did, however, need to be loaded fairly evenly to ensure that it turned smoothly.

All this came to an end, however, in 1975 when the Ballachulish Bridge opened.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Oxonhutch at 08:39, 2nd May 2023
 
The Kylesku to Kylestrome one features strong in my memory on a university field trip to the Assynt region in 1979. Other ferries well used include the Windermere chain ferry from Bowness to Hawkshead in the Lake District and that from the Kyle of Lochalsh to Skye (now a bridge).

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 08:04, 2nd May 2023
 
From The BBC

Over the sea to Skye on the world’s last turntable ferry

I have fond memories of using this ferry ... and others at Corran (now a larger boat) and from Kylesku to Kylestrome (now a bridge). We have a handful of ferries in the south west ... Sandbanks, Weymouth harbour, Tamar, Plymouth to France and Spain,  .. and I'm going to leave it at that for others to come in and add to the list. 

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Reginald25 at 17:18, 14th August 2020
 
For very short crossings, there is a lot be said for chain ferries, since they may be hauled by relatively clean and green electric power rather than by diesel engines.
For slightly longer routes, battery power is now available.

In my view, existing diesel power powered ferries should continue in service for their economic lives, perhaps being re-deployed on other routes.

Newly built ferries should be electric, unless there is some compelling reason to do otherwise.
The two chain ferries I am familiar with, Torpoint and Cowes, as far as I know, rely on the chain dropping down behind the ferry so other vessels can pass. As a result, they are diesel powered on board (one I think with electric transmission and one with hydraulic), rather than from a motor on shore. I imagine it would be possible to use batteries or some form of battery/mains hybrid, but mains only operation seems non-viable.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Trowres at 22:50, 13th August 2020
 
The idea of overhead electrification for a ferry sounds...well...implausible...BUT:-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_boat#Wired_electric_boats

and a brief video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JjIpbso29s

Applied to canals: https://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2009/12/trolley-canal-boats.html

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by broadgage at 12:43, 13th August 2020
 
I agree, but electric ferries should produce a lot less noise than diesel powered ships.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by froome at 09:12, 13th August 2020
 
Yes I believe that electric ferries would be suitable for the shorter channel crossings.
When ships are considered, bigger is better, within reason. A larger ship uses less fuel per ton than a smaller one.
A cross channel ferry could charge, briefly at each end of the route, both the UK and nearer parts of Europe have well developed grid systems that can supply the charging load of many megawatts.

Some routes to small islands may only allow charging at the mainland end, due to limited electrical infrastructure on some islands.

Yes, this is obviously true, but there will be many other impacts. Perhaps most importantly will be noise pollution that affects many maritime creatures ability to navigate.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by broadgage at 21:16, 12th August 2020
 
Yes I believe that electric ferries would be suitable for the shorter channel crossings.
When ships are considered, bigger is better, within reason. A larger ship uses less fuel per ton than a smaller one.
A cross channel ferry could charge, briefly at each end of the route, both the UK and nearer parts of Europe have well developed grid systems that can supply the charging load of many megawatts.

Some routes to small islands may only allow charging at the mainland end, due to limited electrical infrastructure on some islands.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Bmblbzzz at 12:32, 12th August 2020
 
Good. A lot about the size of the ferries, though it would be good to know the maximum range they can cope with. Would the range be suitable for a short Channel crossing, for instance?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by GBM at 11:50, 12th August 2020
 
Whilst we on a Norwegian cruise last year, our guide pointed out an all electric (Norwegian) car and passenger ferry.
https://electrek.co/2019/08/21/worlds-largest-electric-ferry/
Whilst fjord crossings are of limited distance, they could be used here in the UK for many crossing routes

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by broadgage at 16:29, 10th August 2020
 
For very short crossings, there is a lot be said for chain ferries, since they may be hauled by relatively clean and green electric power rather than by diesel engines.
For slightly longer routes, battery power is now available.

In my view, existing diesel power powered ferries should continue in service for their economic lives, perhaps being re-deployed on other routes.

Newly built ferries should be electric, unless there is some compelling reason to do otherwise.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by infoman at 06:55, 10th August 2020
 
Thats good news, and nice to hear.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Bmblbzzz at 00:19, 10th August 2020
 
On a very local level, the cross-harbour ferries from Hannover Quay to the SS GB in Bristol have recently restarted.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by TonyN at 16:27, 9th August 2020
 
I think its been in use about 4 years. however its not very reliable. Last time I was there at the end of 2018. The hinge on the West Cowes end ramp had snapped. Its not the sort of thing Screwfix keep in stock.

On an earlier visit the new ferry had just been put into use but was having some work done the day I was there.

So I have only got to use it once and then there was a hold up. It was high tide and someone discovered that the front of his Aston Martin hit the road when unloading in East Cowes. Much to the amusment of the locals queuing to board.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 14:20, 9th August 2020
 
Isle of Wight (Cowes) chain ferry is out of operation:
https://www.iwfloatingbridge.co.uk/update-on-cowes-floating-bridge-essential-works-required/
How long have they had this new ferry?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 08:07, 24th May 2020
 
From On the Wight

A well written explanation which - although this is a ferry - could be applied to buses and trains too.

Earlier today (Friday) members of a Facebook Group called ‘Restrictions on Isle Of Wight ferries’ sent emails to the leader of the Isle of Wight council, Dave Stewart, voicing their concerns over a possible influx of second-home owners and holidaymakers for the bank holiday weekend.

Some within the Group had tried to book ferry crossings from Portsmouth to the Isle of Wight for today, but found the 1pm, 3pm and 5pm crossings were fully booked. This understandably led to concerns that people weren’t heeding the council leader’s message to ‘stay away’.

Investigating further to find out what was going on, News OnTheWight has discovered something that sheds some light.

Understanding the capacity issues

News OnTheWight got in touch with Wightlink who confirmed that capacity on their vehicle ferry crossings has been much-reduced since the Coronavirus lockdown.

An example given is that their flagship ferry, Victoria of Wight, usually has a capacity for 1,170 passengers per crossing.

Since the lockdown this has been reduced to 100, with typically there being only around 20 passengers per crossing. Most of Wightlink’s foot passengers have switched to using the Hovercraft and other passengers are required to remain in their vehicles for the duration of the crossing.

Distancing and freight

Wightlink say it’s important to factor in that vehicles comes in all shapes and sizes and although there may be capacity for say 100 vehicles, once the spacing out of those vehicles is implemented, it could take the capacity down to 50 vehicles.

In addition, freight lorries obviously take up the space of several cars and so before long, a crossing could be fully booked, but well before reaching the new reduced capacity level.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by GBM at 11:38, 25th April 2020
 
One morning last week I watched 2 flights on FlightRadar24 leave Isles of Scilly for Lands End about 10 minutes apart. I looked to see if that was normal but the Isles of Scilly Travel website is not currently displaying timetables.
From the Isle of Scilly Steamship website, I gather freight goes on the Gry M; whilst essential passenger travel still goes by air.
Also wonder if it's the way of keeping pilots hours up.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Surrey 455 at 11:30, 25th April 2020
 
The Sandbanks ferry has also stopped.

From BBC on 20th April
A ferry that links Poole and Studland on the Dorset coast is to be halted, with operators blaming a lack of financial support from the government.

Sandbanks chain ferry said it asked the Department for Transport (DfT) for help to keep running for key workers but it had "not been forthcoming".

The ferry, which saves a journey of up to 25 miles, will stop on Monday night.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Surrey 455 at 11:25, 25th April 2020
 
One morning last week I watched 2 flights on FlightRadar24 leave Isles of Scilly for Lands End about 10 minutes apart. I looked to see if that was normal but the Isles of Scilly Travel website is not currently displaying timetables.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by GBM at 08:11, 25th April 2020
 
Heard the occasional aircraft fly over to/from LEQ/Landsend airport, mostly enroute to the Scillies.
I had assumed that the type of aircraft they utilised had to be 'run up' and fly so many hours hours a month; plus keeping their MoT (do they have MoT?) up to date.
Fully aware the jumbo's need services at -so-many-hours- so guess the smaller ones also require a similar service.
Also aware pilots need to perform so many hours a month flying, and would that apply to the Scillies craft?

Whilst the Scillonian and Mali Rose are laid up, the Gry Maritha is taking freight from Penzance.
Of course, the all three would have been working flat out for the past few months as the World Pilot Gig rowing championships would be next week (1st-3rd May).  There would be no accommodation to be had on the Scillies anywhere!

Plus of course, this year the newly reformed Tresco helicopters would have been flying to Tresco and St Marys.
I understand they were having to use a smaller helicopter as their new 16 seater was stuck in China under the Chinese lockdown.
However, they ceased operations within a few weeks of opening in March.


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 18:41, 24th April 2020
 
The government is giving a hand to the ferries
Emergency fund of up to £10.5 million to support lifeline transport links to the Isle of Wight and the Isles of Scilly
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/emergency-fund-of-up-to-105-million-to-support-lifeline-transport-links-to-the-isle-of-wight-and-the-isles-of-scilly

Also announced, BBC Live
Drones trial for Isle of Wight hospital announced

We just heard the transport secretary say there is going to be a review looking at how drones will be used during the pandemic. Here's a bit more detail on that.

The Department for Transport says it will fast track the launch of a new trial using drones between the mainland and St Mary’s Hospital on the Isle of Wight.

It follows £28m awarded by the government earlier this year to Southampton and Portsmouth councils to carry out drone trials of this kind as part of a wider future transport zone trial.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by paul7575 at 20:32, 7th April 2020
 
Portsmouth to the island stopped now too, from SWR journey check.

Please be aware that the Wight Link ferries between Portsmouth / Lymington and the Isle of Wight have been suspended until further notice. 
I expect SWR are probably reporting about the Lymington to Yarmouth and the passenger service from Portsmouth Harbour to Ryde, But as of today the Wightlink site still has the Portsmouth to Fishbourne ferry operating two hourly.

Paul

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by MVR S&T at 19:03, 7th April 2020
 
Portsmouth to the island stopped now too, from SWR journey check.

Please be aware that the Wight Link ferries between Portsmouth / Lymington and the Isle of Wight have been suspended until further notice. 

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by GBM at 17:44, 29th March 2020
 

No ferry services?  Reckon there would be a shortage of Food and Toilet Rolls very soon
[/quote]

Where's broadgage when you want him.. 

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by smokey at 17:40, 29th March 2020
 

No ferry services?  Reckon there would be a shortage of Food and Toilet Rolls very soon

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 15:05, 29th March 2020
 
The government has suspended competition rules for the Isle of Wight ferry operators
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-suspend-competition-law-to-support-isle-of-wight-ferry-routes
This is primarily to keep essential goods flowing, and allow access to mainland health services.

At about the same time Wightlink has suspended the Lymington - Yarmouth ferry https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-52071468

Some islanders want all ferry services suspended to protect them from the virus.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Reginald25 at 15:25, 27th March 2020
 
There must be numerous small ones, particularly those of pedestrians such as that at Christchurch. The definition of small appears here to be crossing a river or estuary where there is an alternative land route. Looking at the lists that have been identified, there are significant ones that are unlikely to fail, mainly those for vehicles. To the lists above I might add the Woolwich ferry, one that I know well, and of course the Ferry cross the Mersey!

Smaller ones like the Weymouth ferry are really not essential, but if it keeps someone occupied with very little overheads then good.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by SandTEngineer at 14:26, 27th March 2020
 
A few more lesser known ones:
Instow to Appledore (Torridge Estuary)
Gillan to St Anthony (Gillan Creek)
Helford River
St Mawes to Place Creek
Plymouth Sutton Harbour to Mount Batten Park
Wembury Point to Newton Ferrers and Noss Mayo (River Yealm)
Shaldon to Teignmouth (River Teign) (This is England's longest-running passenger ferry, with written records of the ferry dating back to 1296)
Turf/Topsham (River Exe)
Weymouth Harbour

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Bmblbzzz at 13:32, 27th March 2020
 
Depending how far back you want to go, there are loads of places where the road layout indicates there must have been a small ferry at one point. For instance this one, also not far from Tewkesbury. No idea when it last ran:
https://www.streetmap.co.uk/idld.srf?X=390672&Y=236601&A=Y&Z=120&lm=1

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Bmblbzzz at 13:26, 27th March 2020
 
Lower Lode ferry, just outside Tewkesbury: https://www.tewkesbury.town/tewkesbury-ferry-lower-lode/index.htm

Just to note Bristol Harbour has two regular ferry services: one runs up and down the river and harbour, while the other runs across the harbour more or less opposite the SS Great Britain.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by eightonedee at 13:11, 27th March 2020
 
add - Exmouth to Starcross and Topsham to Exminster Marshes. When I last used the latter, we had to wait because the ferryman suspended the service to rescue a yacht that had broken free from its mooring and was drifting down river!

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by SandTEngineer at 09:30, 27th March 2020
 
I searched for a photograph for East Looe to West Looe but couldn't find one......

If you do find one, please, please don't post it here

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 09:29, 27th March 2020
 
East Cowes to West Cowes



Sorry - couldn't resist.  Thank you to the Pioneer Woman for making this image available

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by ray951 at 09:17, 27th March 2020
 
East Cowes to West Cowes

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by eightf48544 at 09:00, 27th March 2020
 
in ex GWR territory.

The Symonds Yat ferry which swings acroos the Wye on a cable using the current. Carbon free!

Aren't there a coiuple of ferries near Severn Valley stations?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by SandTEngineer at 08:48, 27th March 2020
 
Some more to add:
Polruan Pedestrian Ferry
Bodinnick Car Ferry (Looe to Fowey)
East Looe to West Looe
Cawsand (Plymouth)

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 08:24, 27th March 2020
 
Perhaps some of these are slightly larger ... but in our area, I also think of

Dartmouth to Kingswear
Southampton to Hythe
Portsmouth Harbour to Gosport
Falmouth to St Mawes
Padstow to Rock
Bristol Harbour
Weymouth Harbour
Sandbanks
Cremyll Ferry
Torpoint Ferry
Penzance to Scillies
Ferry to Lundy

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 07:33, 27th March 2020
 
I am wondering how small local ferry services are going to survive Covid-19.

Hayling ferry – Suspended      https://www.haylingferry.net/
Itchenor ferry – season starts April   https://www.itchenorferry.co.uk/
Hamble ferry – Suspended      https://www.hambleferry.co.uk/
Keyhaven – Hurst Castle ferry – Closed   https://www.hurstcastle.co.uk/ferry-ride/
Mudeford ferry – Closed      http://www.mudefordferry.co.uk/
Shepperton ferry         https://www.nauticalia-marine-services.co.uk/shepperton-weybridge-pedestrian-ferry/
Hammertons ferry – Suspended      http://www.hammertonsferry.com/
Hampton ferry – Suspended      http://www.hamptonferryboathouse.co.uk/

Which are the ferries in the area I normally travel round. Most tend to be small family-type businesses (Hayling ferry now owned by a slightly larger marine services company) which provide useful links for the local community and help the local tourist trade (which will reappear eventually). Possibly fall in the gaps between the Chancellor's schemes.

If you are interested in other ferries I believe a comprehensive listing can be found at:
   https://charlesclosesociety.org/ferries
I think some of these were probably collated when the Hayling Ferry was insolvent.


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by broadgage at 09:18, 15th May 2019
 
Excellent news IMHO, electric power is the future and should be used wherever suitable.

I suspect that we will see an electric cross channel ferry within 10 years. Electricity is often used very wastefully on board ship and a limited supply from a battery might lead to more prudent use.

One caveat with electric ferries is the very substantial electrical input required to charge them in a reasonable time, more so if fast charging is contemplated.
With a ferry that runs between say England and France, fast charging at either end of the route should be easily achieved. If however a ferry runs between a small island and a mainland, then the island might not have sufficient electricity available for charging the ferry.
A larger battery that can complete the round trip is then required.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 15:01, 14th May 2019
 
Don't think they will be suitable replacements for our unreliable chain ferries.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by stuving at 12:04, 14th May 2019
 
Here's something that explains how the magic is done - from electrive.com:
The Swedish HH Ferries Group has launched two fully electric ferries named Aurora and Tycho Brahe on the stretch between Helsingborg (Sweden) and Heldingör (Denmark). Furthermore, they renamed themselves ForSea Ferries.

The ocean straight between Helsingborg and Helsingör can be crossed in about 20 minutes with the ferries. The route is run every fifteen minutes, 24 hours a day. At each of the docks on either side of the Öresund a fully automated robot arm helps charge the ferries during loading and unloading times; a process that is supposed to take between five and nine minutes.

On board of each of the electric ferries are a total of 640 batteries, weighing about 90 kg each. They are placed in four containers between the smoke stacks on the upper decks, and yield a total capacity of 4,160 kWh, which adds a considerable 280 tonnes the ship’s weight. Each crossing takes about 1,175 kWh, according to the operators, which means that there is a comfortable buffer between battery capacity and energy requirements. As the ferries will also keep the “old” diesel engines on board, the ships would be able to switch to combustion or hybrid propulsion in an emergency. The batteries can also be charged from the on-board diesel motors.

The budget for the project has cost HH Ferries, or ForSea, as they are now named, a total of 300 million Swedish crowns, or about 29 million euros. The EU contributed about 11.5 million euros for the project. According to the operators, the new ferries will allow them to cut emissions down by about 65%. This will help Sweden’s long term goal of becoming climate neutral by 2045, meaning they plan to be mathematically emissions-free.

So this may - perhaps - be the near future of 4 km crossings, but longer may take a bit longer.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Red Squirrel at 11:08, 14th May 2019
 
This video on the 'Fully Charged' channel drew my attention to what turns out to be a fairly old piece of news, but hopefully interesting nonetheless:

ForSea (formerly HH Ferries Group) completes conversion of the world’s largest battery ferries, powered by ABB

Inauguration of Tycho Brahe and Aurora marks successful completion of a high-profile conversion project with ABB’s technology at its heart.

The largest emission-free ferries in the world have been officially welcomed into service after guests boarded Tycho Brahe in Helsingborg, Sweden and Helsingør, Denmark on November 9 for a special inauguration ceremony marking completion of an all-electric conversion.

“We are delighted that the entire system is in place to support the emissions-free operations we envisaged from the outset,” said Johan Röstin, CEO, ForSea. “This is a truly groundbreaking project and the work we have done with ABB will offer invaluable lessons for those following our lead. In shipping, innovation takes time and patience, and we always kept sight of the environmental benefits at stake.”

“This project signals a profound shift for the maritime industry, and shows a path towards zero-emission operations, aligned with International Maritime Organization’s goals for decarbonization,” said Marcus Högblom, Head of Passenger, Dry Cargo and Ice Segment, ABB Marine & Ports. “We congratulate ForSea on the inauguration of these vessels, and we are proud to have worked closely with them to deliver this pioneering solution.”

Source: ABB

Full article: https://new.abb.com/news/detail/10434/forsea-formerly-hh-ferries-group-completes-conversion-of-the-worlds-largest-battery-ferries-powered-by-abb


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by bobm at 20:52, 26th November 2018
 
Only took him just over a month. 

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:48, 26th November 2018
 
Q.  What's brown and steaming out of cows?

A.  The Isle of Wight ferry.



Oh, how we miss those pier end comedians. 


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 15:26, 21st October 2018
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-45932147

A ferry has hit several yachts and run aground off the Isle of Wight.

The Red Falcon "came into contact" with a number of boats while trying to berth at Cowes Harbour, operator Red Funnel said.

None of the 40 passengers onboard were hurt, a spokesman said. The Coastguard confirmed nobody is missing or in the water.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by froome at 09:37, 4th October 2018
 
I used the Glenelg ferry when I cycled around the Scottish coast in 2005, and it was one of the highlights of that trip. It is the original ferry route to Skye, and its location is quite stunning. On both sides, it can only be reached by small lanes that climb over passes above 1,000 feet high, and on the mainland side in particular, the route up is especially steep. When you are down at the ferry and look all around you, you realise just how cut off that area is from the rest of Britain, hemmed in by mountains on all sides. Habitation is very sparse, though there is a small community at Glenelg, two miles from the ferry slip, and one of Britain's most isolated communities can be found at the end of the dead-end lane that runs from Glenelg south, at Arnisdale and Corran on Loch Hourn.

The narrows that the ferry crosses are subject to strong tides and strong winds, so can be challenging to operate. They also cross an area of sea that teams with wildlife, and when I crossed it was wonderful to watch the many seals that followed the ferry as it crossed, undoubtedly attracted by the fish it was dragging up.

The operation of the ferry is something to behold. When I was there, the operator would walk round the turntable on the outside of the safety railing as it turned while the boat was crossing. I would imagine Elf and Safety would not have been happy with this, but their eyes would have been transfixed by the views all around and the feel of the wind and smell of the sea, which made the crossing quite magical.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by froome at 09:19, 4th October 2018
 
The simple answer to Graham's question is no, there haven't been any. The Aust ferry comes closest, but was a different operating system.

I would put a slight caveat on the 'no', in that historic records of ferries are not comprehensive and it is not always clear precisely what operating system any boat used, but I'm pretty certain none have ever operated in this area.

Most other vehicle carrying estuary ferries, both existing ones like King Harry in Cornwall or at Sandbanks in Dorset, and ones that stopped running during the 20th century, like the Arlingham to Newnham ferry across the Severn in Gloucestershire, are or were chain operated and allowed vehicles to enter at one end and drive off at the other. The few island ferries we have, such as to the Scillies, were drive on and off ships large enough for vehicles to manoeuvre within the vessel.

Manually operated turntable ferries seem to have been a Scottish speciality, used mostly to cross narrow lochs. AFAIK the Glenelg ferry was the only sea crossing ferry, i.e. to reach an island, to ever use this system in this country.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by bradshaw at 08:23, 4th October 2018
 
Travelled on the Aust ferry just the once, on the way to a shed bash in South Wales. It was an interesting experience.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 23:24, 3rd October 2018
 
Not quite the same but the Aust Ferries, replaced by the Severn Bridge, had turntables on the decks to aid the side loading and unloading of vehicles.


Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by grahame at 22:28, 3rd October 2018
 
The other day we were discussing "Stromeferry - No Ferry" and I recall Kylestrome and Corran ferries .... just one left

From The BBC

Falling tide leaves historic Skye ferry high and dry

A rapidly dropping tide left a historic ferry aground on its slip on Tuesday.

The MV Glenachulish, the world's last sea-going, manually-operated, turntable ferry, operates on the Kylerhea Narrows between Glenelg and Skye.

It was left high and dry on its slip at Kylerhea in Skye during a falling tide on the fast flowing narrows.

Kyle of Lochalsh and Mallaig RNLI lifeboats along with two passing ships went to the aid of the ferry's crew. The boat was refloated at high tide.

Did we have any swivel ferries in the South West?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by LiskeardRich at 00:07, 13th September 2018
 
A Wightlink season ticket is £1725 a year.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by CyclingSid at 08:08, 12th September 2018
 
There was an item in the I newspaper yesterday, about a gentleman who got fed up with the delays, up to four hours(?), commuting from the New Forest to Portsmouth.

His solution; cycle to Lymington, catch the ferry to Yarmouth, cycle to Fishbourne and catch ferry to Portsmouth. He did this for some years before resorting to the car (because of ill health?). In the paper because he had done it one last time to mark his retirement.

Wonder how the costs compared?

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by ChrisB at 13:50, 15th May 2016
 
Shouldn't this appear in the bridge bash thread?! :-)

Looks as though they tried to go under the pier but the tide was in

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:05, 14th May 2016
 
From the BBC:

Passengers rescued as ferry collides with Hythe pier


Coastguards were called at around 21:20 BST on Friday and sent rescue teams from Southampton and Lymington

Twenty passengers and three crew members have been rescued from a ferry after it collided with a pier near Southampton, coastguards have said.

The ferry struck the Hythe Pier, in Hampshire, damaging its wheelhouse, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency said.

Coastguards were called at around 21:20 BST on Friday and sent rescue teams from Southampton and Lymington.

Three people were treated at the scene for minor injuries. The Marine Accident Investigation Branch has been notified.

Passenger Olivia Pearce said she heard somebody shouting "brace, brace" before the ferry "ploughed into the pier".

She said: "The wheelhouse completely collapsed and bits of it fell into itself. That's when we realised that actually not only had we overshot the jetty but we'd crashed into the pier and we were underneath it."

The incident involved the Hythe ferry, which runs a twice hourly shuttle service between Town Quay, in Southampton, and Hythe Pier.


Passenger Olivia Pearce said she heard somebody shouting 'brace, brace' before the ferry 'ploughed into the pier'



The vessel's wheelhouse was badly damaged in the in crash

According to the ferry's owners, White Horse Ferries, the vessel became wedged beneath the pier and the wheelhouse on top of the ferry was severely damaged.

Those treated at the scene received minor neck and back injuries.

Southampton Vessel Traffic Services, Hampshire Police, Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service, and South Central Ambulance Service were also involved in the rescue.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by TonyK at 20:51, 28th September 2014
 
Bristol will still be using a large fleet of diesel vans for the foreseeable future.

And MetroBust. It seems the normal rules of cost-benefit ratios are far from fixed. Reading between the lines, this boat was doomed to the sidelines once the Jury Panel's report had been made, without mentioning it. Had it been given a few lines, then it would have remained in service, trundling VIPs around the harbour, until 2016.

It's a shame, but it was never viable, especially not at the premium price charged for the journey when compared to Bristol Ferries et al, who cover a much wider area. Hydrogen for commercial use is made by using superheated steam to knock carbon atoms from methane, usually at a pressure of 20 atmospheres or so (300 psi). Enough could have been made for this project using electrolysis, powered by a solar panel or Economy 7 electricity. The lack of political will did for the Hydrogenesis in Bristol. Hopefully, all is not lost, and somewhere else can make better use of it.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 22:12, 9th September 2014
 
And a university is the right place for such technology to built and funded by.

I disagree with Mayor Ferguson that the hydrogen boat served it's purpose. River transport in Bristol is a tiny percentage of the overall use of public transport in the city. Money would have been much better spent on hydrogen fuel cell technology for land based vehicles.

Bristol successfully won with it's bid to be European Green Capital in 2015 and the hydrogen fuelled waterbus was part of the submission. It wasn't however referenced in the Jury Panel report and only received one line in the Expert Evaluation Panel report. Copenhagen's submission was far more comprehensive with regard to hydrogen fuel cell technology. Their plan is to have all the vehicles used by the city running on either electricity or hydrogen by 2015. Bristol will still be using a large fleet of diesel vans for the foreseeable future.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 20:55, 9th September 2014
 
From the BBC:

Keith Dunstan, director of Bristol Hydrogen Boats, says the vessel is the UK's first hydrogen fuel-celled boat.

Nope! Birmingham University built one a few years back - a narrowboat called the Ross Barlow.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:41, 8th September 2014
 
From the BBC:

Bristol hydrogen-powered ferry a 'vanity project'


The 12-seater prototype ferry operated for just six months in Bristol Harbour

A hydrogen-powered ferry in Bristol has been criticised as a 'wasteful vanity project' by Conservative councillors.

'Hydrogenesis', believed to be the first commercial fuel cell boat in the UK, was commissioned by Bristol City Council in 2010 at a cost of ^225,000.

It ran for six months in the harbour last year but has since been moored.

Councillor Richard Eddy called it a "white elephant", but Mayor George Ferguson said it had "served us well in terms of... environmental credentials".

The 12-seater passenger ferry was designed and built by Bristol Hydrogen Boats, a consortium of ferry operators and Auriga Energy.

It was operated as part of a six-month trial last year, but has not been used since.

"If you want a low-carbon boat, having a motionless boat moored up is a triumph because it's not going to create any carbon footprint," said Mr Eddy. "In my view it's been a wasteful white elephant."

Mr Ferguson, who was elected in 2012, said it would "never have happened" under his regime. "I don't think councils are here to do research and development projects but having said that it was a factor in our submission to European Green Capital," he said. "It has served a purpose but was not good value."

But Richard Rankin from Hydrogen Boats, said it would be "viable" if there was a hydrogen station "in place".

"We had to rent a filling station for six months at a cost of ^59,000," he said. "But we're converting the ferry to run on bottled hydrogen and will be running it next year."

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025