This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Transport Secretary wants end to "perverse half cycle lanes"
As at 24th November 2024 02:07 GMT
 
Re: Transport Secretary wants end to "perverse half cycle lanes"
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 08:59, 15th November 2024
 
Within the specified Road.CC article is a quote from Louise Haigh concerning pavement parking and the necessity of a quick response to the consultation. Yes, the consultation that was organised in 2020 by our previous waste of space Conservative government who then proceeded to do the square root of not very much with all the responses they received (including mine!).

In essence this is not a difficult subject; Obstruction Of The King's Highway is an offence under the 1980 Highways Act. I have always believed that Obstruction Of The King's Footway and/or Cycleway should be similarly treated with a very small number of specific exceptions e.g. emergency services vehicles responding to an actual emergency.

Re: Transport Secretary wants end to "perverse half cycle lanes"
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 11:07, 14th November 2024
 
It might be difficult with the level of expertise in most local authorities https://road.cc/content/news/end-half-cycle-lanes-ministers-long-term-funding-hint-311231. Not sure that making LTN 1/20 Cycle infrastructure design https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cycle-infrastructure-design-ltn-120 mandatory would solve the problem.

I'd love them to do that. Oxfordshire County Council fully understand LTN 1/20, they just believe they know better. (Spoiler: they don't.)

Transport Secretary wants end to "perverse half cycle lanes"
Posted by CyclingSid at 16:48, 13th November 2024
 
It might be difficult with the level of expertise in most local authorities https://road.cc/content/news/end-half-cycle-lanes-ministers-long-term-funding-hint-311231. Not sure that making LTN 1/20 Cycle infrastructure design https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cycle-infrastructure-design-ltn-120 mandatory would solve the problem.

Still too much nimbyism and scaremongering around the subject, and not enough publicity and emphasis on successful schemes. Not sure you can ram the revised Highway Code down motorists throughts.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules ( graham AT sn12.net ).

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 13th September 2024
From https://greatwesternrailway.info/t29474.html?topic=29474.msg354273 - go insecure