Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368598/31133/5] Posted by GBM at 12:51, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
Sharing Geoff Brown, Lib Dem for Newquay, on Facebook
..................
We did look at electric buses but the length of most routes and very hilly nature of Cornwall meant that they were not suitable. That said going forward electrification of the Park & Ride in Truro will be a distinct possibility in the future, should funding become available.
[/quote]..................
We did look at electric buses but the length of most routes and very hilly nature of Cornwall meant that they were not suitable. That said going forward electrification of the Park & Ride in Truro will be a distinct possibility in the future, should funding become available.
(Electric) Busses already ordered last year!
At least one in a depot' oop narf' somewhere, I believe.
Photo's have been taken of it.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368597/29711/14] Posted by charles_uk at 12:22, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
And yet another short-form which will impact on tomorrow's London bound peak:
Facilities on the 19:53 London Paddington to Hereford due 22:57.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
so tomorrow's 05:23 Hereford to London Paddington train is likely to be short-formed for the third day running.
| Re: Mining in Cornwall In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368596/29414/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:12, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Redruth sinkhole car still stuck after three weeks

Malcolm McKenzie's Mini fell into the old mine workings on 1 November
The owner of a car that has been stuck in a sinkhole for more than three weeks is no closer to getting it out and is finding the situation "really stressful".
It is believed the 10ft (3m) wide hole opened up due to old mine workings in Redruth, Cornwall.
The owners of a bakery beside the collapse are unable to use part of the building and some nearby residents are facing access issues.
Cornwall Council said the area would remain fenced off until it was able to determine who owned the land, which appeared to be unregistered.
Car owner Malcolm McKenzie said: "My insurance company has offered to recover the car for free, which is good of them, but Cornwall Council says they can't take the fence down until they get written permission from the landowner - and there is no landowner.
"Until I can find somebody to buy the land from or give me permission, I'm stuck. Even if I did buy the land, then I'd have to make the area safe which would cost a lot of money which I don't have."
He added: "Although it was funny at first, I'm finding the whole thing really stressful now."
...
A spokesperson for Cornwall Council said: "While we have every sympathy with the car owner, this collapse did not occur on council land. We have made the area safe and advised the car owner that we will arrange to lift the barrier to enable him to recover the vehicle. As the land is unregistered, our barriers will remain in place until land ownership has been determined, and we will continue to monitor the surrounding area to ensure public safety."
Historical mine expert Dan Berriman said it was likely the old workings were linked to the Pednandrea Mine, one of many in the Redruth area, some dating back hundreds of years. He said there were more than 20,000 mine shafts across south-west England and probably "less than 10% have been properly fixed".
Mr Berriman added if heavy equipment, such as a crane, was needed to remove the car, it may not have stable ground to stand on, causing further problems for any recovery team.

Malcolm McKenzie's Mini fell into the old mine workings on 1 November
The owner of a car that has been stuck in a sinkhole for more than three weeks is no closer to getting it out and is finding the situation "really stressful".
It is believed the 10ft (3m) wide hole opened up due to old mine workings in Redruth, Cornwall.
The owners of a bakery beside the collapse are unable to use part of the building and some nearby residents are facing access issues.
Cornwall Council said the area would remain fenced off until it was able to determine who owned the land, which appeared to be unregistered.
Car owner Malcolm McKenzie said: "My insurance company has offered to recover the car for free, which is good of them, but Cornwall Council says they can't take the fence down until they get written permission from the landowner - and there is no landowner.
"Until I can find somebody to buy the land from or give me permission, I'm stuck. Even if I did buy the land, then I'd have to make the area safe which would cost a lot of money which I don't have."
He added: "Although it was funny at first, I'm finding the whole thing really stressful now."
...
A spokesperson for Cornwall Council said: "While we have every sympathy with the car owner, this collapse did not occur on council land. We have made the area safe and advised the car owner that we will arrange to lift the barrier to enable him to recover the vehicle. As the land is unregistered, our barriers will remain in place until land ownership has been determined, and we will continue to monitor the surrounding area to ensure public safety."
Historical mine expert Dan Berriman said it was likely the old workings were linked to the Pednandrea Mine, one of many in the Redruth area, some dating back hundreds of years. He said there were more than 20,000 mine shafts across south-west England and probably "less than 10% have been properly fixed".
Mr Berriman added if heavy equipment, such as a crane, was needed to remove the car, it may not have stable ground to stand on, causing further problems for any recovery team.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368595/29711/14] Posted by charles_uk at 11:59, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
The 8:18 Worcester Shrub Hill to Paddington train was another 5 car short formation, but it ran non-stop from WOS to Oxford as it was running late due to crew being delayed. It departed Worcester 46 minutes late, Oxford 21 late and arrived 30 late at Paddington.
The following 8:56 Great Malvern to Paddington was reported "full and standing" before Hanborough.
| Re: Isles of Scilly sea ferry and air services - merged posts In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368594/11098/5] Posted by TonyK at 11:20, 25th November 2025 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
I assume a Boeing 737 was all they could find available. It would have been cheaper to hire a dozen limousines with liveried chauffeur, but that wouldn't protect the slot.
| Re: Re-opening the Cowley branch to passenger traffic In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [368593/27074/9] Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:16, 25th November 2025 Already liked by Richard Fairhurst | ![]() |
I haven't seen this posted elsewhere, but apparently this is the infra work planned as part of the Cowley reopening:
I hadn't seen it either, but it kind of tallies with what I'd heard. There was also talk of a turnback siding at Hinksey, but the extension of the Up Oxford Relief to just before Radley would probably replace that. Good to see new crossovers at Kennington Junction - presumably 40mph ones to replace the current 25mph ones.
It should be relatively easy given there used to be a third passenger standard track running through to Kennington Junction and the railway boundary south of Kennington Junction to Radley is nice and wide. Though having said that, infrastructure takes up much more space than it used to in order to comply with modern standards.
| Re: Advertising of misleading minimum pricing which is scarcely available In "Fare's Fair" [368591/31116/4] Posted by Timmer at 10:36, 25th November 2025 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
Maybe that’s what they mean when they say ‘Book early and save’.
Aren't the recognised standard units for this kind of measurement "Double Decker Buses" and "Olympic Sized Swimming Pools"?
Until someone can tell me how these distances compare with the size of Wales I will have no idea what you are all talking about 

Well a blue whale's length can be typlcally about thirty metres so, no, hang on... ah...
Mark
| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368588/31150/31] Posted by Red Squirrel at 09:08, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
Trying to put that 115 feet in to perspective.
So if we say the height of ceilings in a terraced house is eight feet
so if we take into account a two story house that's 24 feet.
That would be mean FIVE terraced house's on top of one another,
that's quite some distance to pile down.
So if we say the height of ceilings in a terraced house is eight feet
so if we take into account a two story house that's 24 feet.
That would be mean FIVE terraced house's on top of one another,
that's quite some distance to pile down.
An IET carriage is 26 metres long and we are talking 35 metres (115 feet) of piling - so that's a carriage and a third.
Until someone can tell me how these distances compare with the size of Wales I will have no idea what you are all talking about

| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368587/31150/31] Posted by grahame at 08:22, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
Trying to put that 115 feet in to perspective.
So if we say the height of ceilings in a terraced house is eight feet
so if we take into account a two story house that's 24 feet.
That would be mean FIVE terraced house's on top of one another,
that's quite some distance to pile down.
So if we say the height of ceilings in a terraced house is eight feet
so if we take into account a two story house that's 24 feet.
That would be mean FIVE terraced house's on top of one another,
that's quite some distance to pile down.
An IET carriage is 26 metres long and we are talking 35 metres (115 feet) of piling - so that's a carriage and a third.
| Re: Re-opening the Cowley branch to passenger traffic In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [368586/27074/9] Posted by Electric train at 06:16, 25th November 2025 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
....the other factor to aid the case will the be decarbonising fright
Had to record this typo before it got edited

If you stand at track level freight is frightening
| Man dies after being hit by car on walk to station - Maghull, 22 October 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368585/31156/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 05:13, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
From the BBC:

The incident happened on Station Road, Maghull, on 22 October
A man has died after he was hit by a car as he walked to a railway station on his way to work, police said.
The 51-year-old was walking towards Maghull railway station when he was hit by a black Range Rover Velar on Station Road, at the junction with Tailors Lane, on 22 October.
He was taken to hospital with serious injuries after the incident, which happened just before 07:00 BST, but he died on 7 November, police said.
A 64-year-old woman arrested at the scene on suspicion of causing death by careless driving and driving whilst unfit remains under investigation.
The family of the man, who is from Maghull, paid tribute to him. They said: "We are devastated by the tragic loss of life, following being hit by a car, on his regular walking journey to Maghull [Railway] Station and work. We are heartbroken that his life has been cut short and we have lost a brother, uncle, nephew and good friend."
They said he would be "forever in our hearts", and urged anyone who saw the incident to contact police.
Det Sgt Simon Duffy said: "We are determined to establish how this tragic incident occurred, and we are following numerous lines of enquiry to establish all the facts. Despite a suspect being identified, this investigation remains ongoing and we remain very keen to speak to anyone who may have witnessed the incident or was in the area at this time."
He added: "We know motorists were in the area. I would urge any drivers and pedestrians who were heading towards the nearby Maghull train station to come forward so we can establish if you may have relevant information."
He also asked people check dashcam footage "for any vital evidence which may help with our enquiries".
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368584/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 05:05, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
Tuesday November 25
As flagged up above, but still (05:00) unreported on Journeycheck, both the first two trains are short-formed as five-car sets this morning - both 1P11 0516 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington (07:24) and 1P02 05:23 Hereford to London Paddington (08:24).
| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368583/31150/31] Posted by infoman at 04:39, 25th November 2025 | ![]() |
Trying to put that 115 feet in to perspective.
So if we say the height of ceilings in a terraced house is eight feet
so if we take into account a two story house that's 24 feet.
That would be mean FIVE terraced house's on top of one another,
that's quite some distance to pile down.
"A bridge that has been hit 12 times by drivers over nearly two years in "avoidable" incidents has cost taxpayers £50,000 in repairs"
What a silly intro. The bridge hasn't cost taxpayers anything. Drivers who are unable to read signs have.
I haven't seen this posted elsewhere, but apparently this is the infra work planned as part of the Cowley reopening:
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368580/29711/14] Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:30, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
RTT reports that 1W11 0553 Pad to Gt Malvern was cancelled, "unknown cause"
As (obviously) was the return journey, which was the one I was going to catch into Oxford. I'd swear I was cursed were it not for the fact that a friendly conductor the other day asked "Have all the trains you've been on this week been delayed, or is it just me?"
Yes indeed. Brent Mill Viaduct
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
It is natural for the Highways authorities and Network Rail to contract and pay for the repairs initially - I would not want it to be up to the [insert words] driving the log lorry to engage people and manage the show - (s)he has caused concern that (s)he can't even drive in a safe manner. Having said which - yes - it costs Network Rail and the experts as Rebecca Watling has pointed out - but I would hope that she (or, rather her team) can then present the bill onward to the driver and his/her insurer. I wonder if any expert here can tell us what the cost will be to Network Rail ... and how much of that they claim back.
Yes - it will cost the public purse. But then the public pure should be getting it back ....
Network Rail should be able to recover all their costs from the lorry company (or their insurers) assuming they are caught. And clearly this one wasn't able to run away. Their costs would include any compensation to a train operator.
Fire service cannot charge for attending road accidents, but ambulance service can recover cost of any treatment they give. Police can charge for removal and storage of vehicles causing a hazard. Breakdown and Recovery services will also charge the driver or their insurers.
train operators delay repay payouts are based on percentages of ticket values, not the amount from Network Rail, so could be cost (or a gain) to this part of public purse.
Ultimately the public will end up paying for time and inconvenience of consequential delays as indirect costs are usually not recoverable.
From Time Out

Watford has been feeling the impact of cuts to its bus services in recent years. Now, a group of locals say that the Hertfordshire town’s transport system needs expanding, and have started a petition asking the council to commit to reopening a long-disused train station.
Watford West was last used as a railway station in 1996, nearly 30 years ago. It continued as a bus stop until 2003, when it was shut completely. In the subsequent decades it became rusty and overgrown, then was cleared in preparation for the ultimately doomed Croxley Link.
| Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k' In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368576/31149/51] Posted by Mark A at 20:58, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Not particularly relevant, but, looking at the photo in the article, it's not impossible that the roundel mounted on the bridge and stating the clearance is the same one recorded by Google Streetview in 2024 as mounted on a pole beside the bridge. (The height notice on the other side of the bridge is triangular.)
Streetview shows the signage there (not only bridge height related) has been revised several times in the last ten years.
Also, wondering where the start/end points for that delivery would have been. If it happened to be Kronospan at Chirk, wouldn't have thought that it would have taken the load up the A470.
Mark
| Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368575/31133/5] Posted by LiskeardRich at 19:59, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
What of the rest of First South West? I can't see the Somerset operation standing on its own two feet.
Will the Somerset operation be folded into First West of England, or maybe First Hampshire & Dorset.
Will the Somerset operation be folded into First West of England, or maybe First Hampshire & Dorset.
Cornwall and Somerset were folded into Berkshire, Hampshire and Dorset just before I left the business. I left in April 2023. They all fall into a new large opco called First South with common management. The current management team are mostly based in Hampshire and Berkshire
| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368574/30854/31] Posted by grahame at 19:47, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
I was under the impression that scrap dealers had to be licenced now, and there needed to be a paper trail of where they obtained stuff therefore, they can't allowed tout for business anymore.
We have one who visits Melksham too. I don't think there's any problem about touting for business - just that they have to be licensed to pass in afterwards, and perhaps have to complete loads of paperwork for each pickup.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368573/29711/14] Posted by charles_uk at 19:46, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
And there are short-forms this evening too:
And ominously for tomorrow morning:
And ominously for tomorrow morning:
Facilities on the 22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway Hl due 01:06.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46
And also, not mentioned on JourneyCheck, the 1953 Paddington to Hereford is another short form which will mean tomorrow's 0523 Hereford to Paddington service likely to be a short-form as well.
| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368572/30854/31] Posted by plymothian at 19:33, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
I was under the impression that scrap dealers had to be licenced now, and there needed to be a paper trail of where they obtained stuff therefore, they can't allowed tout for business anymore.
| Re: Working on the server today In "News, Help and Assistance" [368571/31138/29] Posted by grahame at 18:53, 24th November 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
I have been applying a few licks of paint in the last few hours, and will be continuing to fiddle during the day - including things like https certificates. [etc]
From 2004 to about 2018, I wrote over 4,600 blog articele on "The Horse's Mouth" and they have been slowly gathering dust with occasional views on what is now our backroom/worker server. I have now added a lick of paint so that they come up secure (https rather than http) and any shares on Facebook and Bluesky will correctly pick up images and titles.
Here's am example link: https://www.wellho.info/mouth/2457_Railway-Arithmetic.html. showing how a doubling of the very thin train service we had in those days would raise the number of day return opportunities form 1 to 8
Railway Arithmetic (written 2009-10-16)
1 + 1 = 1 If you have an early morning round trip out and back to a residential / suburb, and a similar evening round trip, you're just providing a single commute opportunity to the origin point of the train.
2 + 2.5 = 8 If you take the two round trips of the first example, and add two more round trips (plus - in my example - an extra single journey) you can increase the commute opportunities from one to eight (yes, 125% more trains - 700% more journey options).
How does this work? Let's see my example


2 + 2.5 = 8 If you take the two round trips of the first example, and add two more round trips (plus - in my example - an extra single journey) you can increase the commute opportunities from one to eight (yes, 125% more trains - 700% more journey options).
How does this work? Let's see my example


Plenty of navigation in the archive already - much more to be added. But be aware that lots of external links will be to pages no longer available, and many of the internal links have not yet had that lick of paint. In the future, indexes and searches can bring in these pages.
| Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k' In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368570/31149/51] Posted by grahame at 18:26, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
It is natural for the Highways authorities and Network Rail to contract and pay for the repairs initially - I would not want it to be up to the [insert words] driving the log lorry to engage people and manage the show - (s)he has caused concern that (s)he can't even drive in a safe manner. Having said which - yes - it costs Network Rail and the experts as Rebecca Watling has pointed out - but I would hope that she (or, rather her team) can then present the bill onward to the driver and his/her insurer. I wonder if any expert here can tell us what the cost will be to Network Rail ... and how much of that they claim back.
Yes - it will cost the public purse. But then the public pure should be getting it back ....
| Re: Advertising of misleading minimum pricing which is scarcely available In "Fare's Fair" [368569/31116/4] Posted by grahame at 18:14, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Here's an example I question ... "from £48" is the big headline. I took a look and I found that price or better (for the passenger) with only limited avaiabilty, and only from Euston on the 05:31 on Fridays.


















