This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
 
Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by george at 19:35, 14th July 2012
 
Hi

I'm new and was just wondering if anyone knew anything about what was happening with the new Go-Op Cooperative Westbury-brum services via Melksham . Has this proposal been dropped or just have they just not had enough news for a summer newsletter or any Twitter/Wikipedia updates.

Any info would be very much welcomed...

george

PS. Have I posted this in the right place?


Edit - changed subject line , 21st August, as this has turned into an update thread

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 21:24, 14th July 2012
 
Hi, George, and welcome to the forum.   There's three boards that are logical for the Cooperative proposals .. and this is one of them  . The others would be the one that deals with Oxford services from the West, and the one from Oxford to Banbury.

To my own knowledge, the newsletter at http://go-op.coop/workspace/images/GO-OP-Newsletter-Spring-2012.pdf is their most recent, but that's been moved on a little in the last few weeks for everyone in that the LSTF bid it mentions has been approved.  There's more on this at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=10956.msg113702#msg113702 and what it may mean at the TransWilts 'end' of their proposed route.  Others who are members here may have a further update.  Bear in mind that things often seem to take an age through the labarynth of rail management, and that a gap of what's said in public doesn't mean nothing's happening, nor that a scheme's gone away.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 08:22, 20th August 2012
 
For an update, Go-op, July 2012 newsletter is at http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/go-op_newsletterjul12.pdf

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by IndustryInsider at 13:28, 21st August 2012
 
Anyone care to take a bet with me that this service probably won't ever be up and running in any meaningful manner and certainly won't be operating before the next Olympics?!

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Btline at 13:54, 21st August 2012
 
If the new franchise operates the planned service to Melksham, then I expect this proposal will be axed as it will be unviable.

Shame for anyone with a Coop card, as I expect you will have been able to collect points!

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by dking at 16:29, 21st August 2012
 
According to a very good friend of mine Go-op (the new name was necessitated by threats of lawsuits over the 'Goco' name - think 'Gocomp***) is still on schedule to gain a Track Access Agreement. Ian Yeowart who spoke to the AGM on 21st June said that we had done quite well in navigating the bureaucratic maze so far. These things do take time and we don't have millions to throw at the process. Anyone can join Go-op - fifty quid a time and members' input is always valuable. Just click on <www.go-op.coop> and you can be part of a new Train Operating Co-op.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Btline at 16:34, 21st August 2012
 
I would imagine that the Coop have more/better lawyers than Go Compare!

The shops are still Coop...

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by dking at 17:01, 21st August 2012
 
Thanks for the quick response ... better than the ORR!

Go-op, while it's a co-operative organisation, is an entirely separate co-operative organisation from the Co-operative Group, which operates the majority of Co-op shops in the country. Or any other co-operative organisation, for that matter. You might just as well ask why Virgin Trains doesn't pick up the the tab for South West Trains - after all, they're both railways, aren't they?

We have links, though, and hope to have the same relationship with other co-ops as does the Phone Co-op <www.thephone.coop>, being mutually supportive.

We still need new investors, though.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 17:33, 21st August 2012
 
Just to add a pennyworth here.   When a new / changed service is being talked about, there are periods that it will naturally be in the public eye and periods where the things that are happening are happening behind the scenes.   With all the activity on the franchise side at the start of this year - the consultation from January to March, and the publication of the ITT in July, that's been in its "public eye" phase, whereas Go-op has been in a different phase.  Avid readers may have noted a comment I made a while back that there are five companies who could end up running trains on the TransWilts line.

Now that there is funding for TransWilts (LSTF and associated bid funds), it's a question of making it happen, and there are people working on that - and it involves talking and working with all potential operators.  The objective is to ensure provision of an appropriate level of service, and to ensure that it's provided and supported by everyone concerned in such a way that it works - for the area, and for whoever is operating the trains, so that it succeeds and carries on succeeding.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 17:45, 21st August 2012
 
Following up ... there's rather more comment that I wrote about the next 15 years here:

http://www.wellho.net/mouth/3826_TransWilts-trains-what-the-next-franchise-period-will-bring.html

and you'll probably note (if you make a study of these things) that the "it could look like this to meet the spec" example shows a service that also happens to fit in with the Go-op suggestions.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by dking at 12:43, 12th September 2012
 
Grahame: useful analysis.

On a related note - Go-op is looking for a venue for its bi-monthly (during the day) Board meetings.

Criteria: must be free, must be rail accessible (or reasonably so as we're trying to cut out car journeys) and be within about a Bristol/Taunton/Westbury sort of area.

Is there a BRSA/GWSA/union room anywhere? Or does anyone know of a handy venue?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by JayMac at 14:36, 23rd June 2013
 
latest Go-Op newsletter for June 2013 available here:

http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/go-op_newsletter6.pdf

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by anthony215 at 15:00, 23rd June 2013
 
Glad to see some sort of update. I think it would be nice to see a new open acess operator but like Wrexham and Shropshire I have my concerns about how long they will last.

The issue about rolling stock is interesting, I thought they were looking at ordering some trains from CSRE which would have given the chinese manufacturer a chance to prove that they could build good reliable trains although that looks like it is dead in the water.

The comments about trams is another interesting point especially after  the failure of their proposed service using a parry people mover of course I believe Parry are under threat of being wound up. Still I wouldnt mind them trying to run a tram route through Bristol City Centre which would be better than the BRT

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by John R at 22:26, 29th November 2013
 
http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/go-op_newsletter7.pdf

Latest update now available.

I have to say that the section on progress (or otherwise) of the track application tends to confirm my long held thoughts that this project will never see the light of day.  The thought that investors will put up enough capital to buy brand new trains for the route in question seems far fetched. Added to which, the credibility of the co-op movement has not been enhanced of late, and the one part of the route where they could genuinely have provided a service is about to have a meaningful service reinstated.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 00:06, 30th November 2013
 
Posting personally, rather than as an Admin on this forum: I share John R's concerns that the 'go-op.coop' proposition is now, rather sadly, an apparently dead duck.

 

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 01:19, 30th November 2013
 
On the path to a new train service there are both steps forward and setbacks, and if we look back at the Go-op Cooperative plans and schedules from a few years back, it would seem that the weight of the setbacks and delays along the way wasn't realistically factored in - if "2 years from now" in 2010 had been correct, their service would have been up and running, and it would also have helped in the credibility of their case.   Indeed they have been surprised by just how long some of the matters have taken, but at the same time they presented their team as being fully versed in these matter and thus (one assumes) knowing how long to schedule.   They are also in something of a quandary, I suspect, by being caught between being a co-operative / community lead outfit on one hand, and challenging (for commercial reasons) requests by others for paths which will provide services for that very community from which they wish to draw their co-operative members.

... and the one part of the route where they could genuinely have provided a service is about to have a meaningful service reinstated.

Yes indeed .... BUT 

Go-op trains added to the Westbury to Swindon section won't now make such a dramatic, life changing difference that they would have done added to a line served at 07:18 and 19:47 only.   But - added to a line served at 0720 0748 1004 1203 1430 1631 1848 1947 - a couple of early trains - 05:48, 06:48 then 08:48, 10:48, 13:48, 17:48 and 20:48 shall we say, you're getting up to an hourly service and I suspect that the traffic would actually be higher per train than on the two hourly (yes, we have done some maths on this and a big question in early 2011 was whether an appropriate service was hourly or twohourly on the line).    I remember talking to a jeweller who's competitor had just gone out of business.  "But isn't it great - you get the business" I commented.   He looked at me sadly as he replied "but with two jewellers in competition, people came into town to visit us both - now they don't because there's only the one player in town".

I'm also going to point out the Swindon - Oxford flow that's still not covered.   I took at early train last Saturday from Chippenham to London.   As we pulled in to Didcot, still in the dark, I could hear the Thames Turbo pulling out as it left for Oxford, and there is a flow that could and perhaps should be watered and grown.

I'm not commenting on the likelihood, but rather on the case.   I'll leave the likelihood and technical matters to Go-op people, some of whom read and occasionally post here, and who are informed and invited to TransWilts meetings as potential operators with an active interest in services in the future.  I did note that paperwork distributed to every seat at the Railfuture meeting in Oxford a few weeks back talked about the possibility of a service starting in 2014, though the lady from Wantage (there's another station / flow for them to cover) did say when I asked that it's probably more like 2015 now.    These things can - once the ducks are all in a line - progress very well.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by eightf48544 at 09:21, 30th November 2013
 
Grahame's anecdote "  "I remember talking to a jeweller who's competitor had just gone out of business.  "But isn't it great - you get the business" I commented.   He looked at me sadly as he replied "but with two jewellers in competition, people came into town to visit us both - now they don't because there's only the one player in town".

Reminds me of a very early economics lecture where we were posed the question, There is long beech with currently one ice cream seller along the whole length. You have just won a licence to open a second stall where do you site it? The answer surprised me next to the exisitng one. But when expalined it was the same reason Graham quoted it gave people a choice.

Not sure it's quite the same with public transport hopefully we've got away from the rival 08:30 buses on the same route, but I do agree that a near hourly service is going to attract more passengers than a two hourly one whoever runs the trains.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 14:06, 30th November 2013
 
... But when expalined it was the same reason Graham quoted it gave people a choice.

Not sure it's quite the same with public transport hopefully we've got away from the rival 08:30 buses on the same route, but I do agree that a near hourly service is going to attract more passengers than a two hourly one whoever runs the trains.

The biggest selling factor on public transport is the time at which it runs, if it follows a similar route. "Right in front" works competitively / commercially for the front operator, unfortunately.  Fare income isn't important during the day, as most people riding are on concessionary passes.   It's an odd model.   The ice cream and jeweller models differ in that there are product factor that separate the products even in the same physical location.  It all a matter of degree though.

It could be "all change" on our rival bus routes around Melksham from January.   Faresaver have registered changes for most of their routes. It's possible to see the title boxes like

PH0004798/3 JOHN VALENTINE PICKFORD T/A FARESAVER, THE COACH YARD, VINCIENTS ROAD, BUMPERS FARM CHIPPENHAM SN14 6QA. Operating between CHIPPENHAM, BUS STATION and FROME, SAINSBURYS given service number X34 effective from 02-Jan-2014. To amend Timetable.

but the actual timetables come by post or fax on payment and clearance of a fee by cheque - or at least they did six months ago - and I'm not following that route.   The following routes / route sets are listed
X83/68/Zigzag
77/87/L1
X72
X31
228

Back to the trains ...

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 22:35, 23rd July 2014
 
Latest Newsletter - http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/going_forward8.pdf

It has also not escaped our notice that, while we strive to bring our product to market, the market itself continues to grow. The travelling public^s demand for rail is unstoppable. Indeed the investment being made by Network Rail to meet that demand ^ including the electrification of much of our intended route ^ can only be good for the rail industry.

Alex Lawrie, who wrote this is part of his report, is correct in identifying the public's demand - and indeed the growth of passenger numbers on the Westbury - Swindon section that is part of the Go-op has been working on has been spectacular.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Btline at 22:10, 24th July 2014
 
Surely now that Melksham has a decent service, this proposal will come to nothing?

I doubt it would make a profit anyway!

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Rhydgaled at 09:08, 25th July 2014
 
Surely now that Melksham has a decent service, this proposal will come to nothing?

I doubt it would make a profit anyway!
Maybe now Melksham has a service to speak of, Go-Op will change their plan to run from Bristol, providing the Bristol - Oxford service some on this fourm have mooted in the past?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by TeaStew at 17:03, 16th September 2014
 
Personally from a work perspective decent Melksham -> Oxford rail links would be fantastic and being able to go further to Birmingham would be no bad thing. At the end of the day I wouldn't say no to a renewed Bristol -> Oxford from GO-OP if that happened instead.

Nothing not roughly echoed by other forum members in that I would imagine. I would be interested to know if anyone on here has decided to become a GO-OP member though...

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 17:29, 16th September 2014
 
There are a noticeable number of passengers travelling between Melksham and Birmingham / north thereof (yes, myself included) ... but that's just one flow.  I was taking [hotel] bookings from Milton Keynes earlier today, and Oxford is a very popular destination.

Make no mistake - the current service on the TransWilts, with passenger numbers running at several times target, still has a long way to grow and will surely need additional stock / seats / services if it's not to become stifled like a plant that's pot-bound. Passenger numbers have already overtaken other single-train lines with similar end to end running times in the South West.

All options / approaches have their good and bad points ...

I made a conscious decision quite a long time ago that it wouldn't be wise for me to become a member / shareholder in any of the companies who might be providing train services that call at Melksham, as it could lead to suggestions of a potential conflict of interest.  I would probably make an exception in the case of a charter train company (such as the one who's steam trains have called here), and I would have little option but be a shareholder if Direct Operated Railways provided services, as in effect we're all shareholders in them.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Andrew1939 from West Oxon at 17:33, 17th September 2014
 
On rail privatisation 20 years ago the then government said that privatisation would enable new entrants to provide new rail services and give competition to the existing franchise holders.
Since then govenments seems to have done everything it can to prevent new entrants to the rail industry and protect present franchise holders who have protested that new entrants would cream off their trade.
Go-op seems to have been caught up in these problems. I know nothing about potential Melksham traffic but I feel sure there are many people from Oxford, my local area, Banbury and further north that would like the opportunity of direct rail travel to and from Swindon but years after first proposed, nothing much seems to be happening.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by John R at 17:48, 17th September 2014
 
I'm not sure Go-op have got far enough to encounter the problems that you suggest are an entry to open access operators.

Isn't their problem lack of capital, lack of rolling stock, and lack of experienced railway management that can go through the necessary process to establish a TOC?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:05, 17th September 2014
 
Posting here in a personal capacity: that was certainly the impression that I formed, too. 

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Oberon at 08:03, 1st October 2014
 
This seems to be their latest update: -

http://www.go-op.coop/info/

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:31, 1st October 2014
 
So, a two-page newsletter, one page of which is devoted to the town of Swindon, and the other with a couple of short articles blaming a whole host of things for there being very little progress on their intended open access franchise and a promise of things moving forward in the next year - but very little detail and certainly no clearly defined targets.  I wonder how the Annual General Meeting (AGM) went?

I'd still rate the chances of this coming to anything as somewhere between 0 and 5%.   

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Essex exile at 19:27, 1st October 2014
 
In view of the recent push by 10 MPs including Duncan Hames to introduce a Bath to Bedford service - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29430204 -would it be worth considering pushing for a link up to the Trans Wilts service? Perhaps literally, attaching/detaching the two at Chippenham using bimodal units? After all, Duncan Hames has been heavily involved with the Trans Wilts too.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 06:02, 31st December 2014
 
The issue about rolling stock is interesting, I thought they were looking at ordering some trains from CSRE which would have given the chinese manufacturer a chance to prove that they could build good reliable trains  ...

Reuters report CSR and CNR (chinese rolling stock suppliers) to merge ...
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/12/30/china-cnr-ma-csr-corp-idUKL5N0SN05020141230?rpc=401

A joining of the firms - which have so far competed against each other to sell trains abroad - will help solidify China's campaign to sell its high-speed technology abroad.

On the main subject of this thread (Go op) - I have no recent update; the latest news I've read is their newsletter No. 8 mentioned above.   Several prominent people in Go op are members and occasional posters, and we would love an update - and especially to co-ordinate on responses to the Route Consultation which closes in a few days.  Growing traffic in several sectors already puts a strain on resources, especially between Chippenham and Trowbridge, and there are indications that additional capacity is needed both in terms of services to handle freight and passenger flows, and in terms of infrastructure to handle those services.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by TeaStew at 14:07, 23rd March 2015
 
First news since last summer: http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/going_forward_issue_9.pdf

Of interest is

By 1848 the line heading
south that Go-op services will use was open to Westbury as part of the Wilts
Somerset & Weymouth railway, which remains open and increasingly busy

and

Westinghouse's successors Siemens (for signalling) continue on the
same site, with Knorr-Bremse (for brakes) nearby in Chippenham.

  these hams, all very similar!

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 14:31, 23rd March 2015
 
I'm very sad to read of the passing of Tim Pearce - a real gentleman and very much committed to and passionate about the cooperative movement and its venture into rail.  He will be much missed.

It is with great sadness we must report the death of GO-OP founder member Tim Pearce. Tim died peacefully in St Austell after a long and courageous fight against cancer. He is survived by his wife Maggie and daughter Eleanor.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 11:36, 6th April 2015
 
AGM - Saturday, 18th July 2015, Chippenham.
http://www.go-op.coop/info/ (currently includes link to financial statement, posted 1st April 2015)
http://www.go-op.coop/info/go-op-newsletter-spring-2015/

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 19:01, 10th July 2015
 
Warning ... guest speaker amended for the AGM (18th July 2015, Chippenham)   

About the talker

Graham Ellis runs a business in Melksham, and President of the Chamber of Commerce. He is vice chair of the Melksham Railway Development Group, and Community Rail officer with the TransWilts Community Interest Company.

About the talk

Passenger services from Chippenham, via Trowbridge to Westbury were a victim of the Beeching axe in 1966, but reopened with a very limited commuter service in 1985 which stumbled along for the next 20 years.  Franchise changes in 2005, with a new austerity, meant that what little traffic remained was driven away with trains running at times to meet the contract, rather than at times they were needed.

In his talk, Graham will summarise the history of the line, then concentrate on the last 10 years. He^ll tell you how the line has moved from a sleepy backwater service carrying fresh air into a line with a train running up and down all day, and with some services full and standing.  And finally he^ll look forward to where we may be in a further ten years.

About the venue and agenda

The Citadel Hall, First Floor, The CitadelBuilding, Bath Road, Chippenham, SN15 2AB.
* 2 p.m. Light refreshments
* 2.15 Welcome and speaker
* 3 p.m. AGM

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by ChrisB at 12:12, 11th July 2015
 
Oh shame, I now can't make this, too many other places to be

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 17:29, 16th June 2016
 
The Go-op Co-operative's Annual report (in preparation for their AGM) is online at http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/go-op_2015_annual_report.pdf .

The board report - I'll quote it completely rather than picking out any key paragraphs:

As we began 2015, our task seemed clear: Network Rail were able and willing to put their support behind our proposals, as long as we could demonstrate that the capacity existed on the network. With that support, we could at least prove our standing in one crucial respect.

As our members know, the process did not meet our expectations. A combination of industrial action, policy changes and personnel changes imposed delays and compromised the quality of the feedback we received. Frustratingly, these very delays meant that new timetables were coming through which we had to adapt our thinking to.

Finally, in September, we concluded that we had no realistic way of securing Network Rail support within a reasonable timeframe. While we have continued to consult with them, and take account of their view of capacity, we decided to proceed with an application to the ORR directly based on the evidence we have that our timetable does not cause disruption to any other scheduled services and adds value to the rail network.

In support of that, we launched a competition for a fresh exercise in demand forecasting, and we were most impressed with the submission from the Railway Consultancy. By the end of the year, they had begun work on a complete update of our revenue projections using the most recent ticket sales data and meeting the standards set by the ORR. This has now begun to deliver some very interesting results, and has prompted a radical reworking of the intended route: instead of Westbury – Birmingham Moor Street, we have now changed origin and terminus stations so that it runs Taunton – Nuneaton. This longer route requires four rather than three diagrams, and so rolling stock – already an issue that had seemed irresolvable throughout the early part of the year – now becomes critical.

Fortunately, in December a highly significant announcement was made regarding the Northern franchise. Its award would lead to a major investment in new diesel rolling stock – the first such order for many years. These units would, moreover, be identical in specification to our requirements: 100mph capable, and in 2 or 3 car formations. We could now ride on the coattails of this order, our modest requirements made much more cost effective by the huge scale of the Northern franchise.

This still left an outstanding problem. Delivery of these new units would not take place until 2019. How could we begin a new operation before then? We have developed a plan for a transitional service, operating between Taunton and Swindon only, using the 'D-train' being manufactured (or remanufactured, as they are based on old London Underground trains) by Vivarail. While these are relatively slow vehicles, this section of the route is suitable for their use and they will enable us to build up traffic on the western section (where the need for service enhancement is most pressing) prior to the introduction of a full service from 2019.

As we approached the end of the year, it became clear that these opportunities would come to nothing if we did not put our finances on to a stronger footing. We consulted with our members: should we acknowledge that the project had run its course, and write off the investment we had made? Or should we make every effort to take our proposal to the ORR and at least give it the chance of success? We were humbled by the solidarity and determination displayed by our members, and we gratefully accepted the further investment that would enable us to turn these developments into a comprehensive business case. We will overcome the systemic inertia and the practical challenges to make a serious and detailed case for a major enhancement to the rail network that is financed, owned and controlled by the people who use it.


AGM is:

Room 4Q07
(Room 07, Q Block, 4th Floor)
Frenchay Campus, University of the West of England Coldharbour Lane, BRISTOL BS16 1QY
2pm Thursday 23rd June 2016

Agenda at : http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/go-op_agm_2016_agenda.pdf

In my CRP role these days, I must admit that I've become far more concerned with getting extra passengers onto the (now) existing trains and their incremental improvement - little changes, big difference stuff ... so I had rather lapsed in looking out for the cooperative's activities.

Undoubtedly, there is still passenger growth opportunity on the Swindon to Westbury section of their route, and the Oxford to Swindon run is another hole.   Frome could really do with a rather better service from Westbury, and the service linking it to its county town of Taunton must be one of the worst train services from any town of 20,000 plus to its county town in the UK - so there's another gap.  All along, the organisation has done a fine job in identifying gaps where services are sadly lacking, but have a good case.   Headed north to Nuneaton, I'm limited in how I can comment as I don't know their route nor the area.  Melksham to Motherwell with a change at Nuneaton would be attractive personally rather than other change options.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by ChrisB at 18:16, 16th June 2016
 
Hmm.

D-stock on the 125mph Taunton-Westbury? And how do they fet to Nuneaton? If via the obvious Leamington-Coventry-Nuneaton corridor, no chance until Kenilworth is open *and* the part-doubling is conplete. Even then, current XC/NR thinking is that XC won't be able to route their second service that way & will still need to go via Bordesley Junction.

I s'pose they could go that way too? But the Didcot/Oxford line is full until electrification speeds the current services up & releases a couple more

I doubt they'll get started with D-stock, even to Swindon. They'll be waiting for the build off the back of the Northern order I reckon

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Oberon at 20:15, 16th June 2016
 
This whole thing has an air of unreality about it. I must admit when I read of their aspiration to use D-stock I could not contain my mirth. An alternative might be running every day from Exmouth/Exeter - Okehampton.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by John R at 21:11, 16th June 2016
 
I've been very sceptical of them for a while now, and the proposed use of D-Stock has completely blown their credibility now in my eyes.  60mph on the main lines, even as far east as Swindon?  Shurely not...

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by SandTEngineer at 21:31, 16th June 2016
 
I've been very sceptical of them for a while now, and the proposed use of D-Stock has completely blown their credibility now in my eyes.  60mph on the main lines, even as far east as Swindon?  Shurely not...

...err why not? Its all about timetabing and pathing.  A lot of freight trains on that section don't exceed 60mph.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by John R at 21:51, 16th June 2016
 
Fair comment, although they often sit around for ages along the route awaiting a suitable path.  Which would be less acceptable to passengers.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by SandTEngineer at 21:58, 16th June 2016
 
Well I would rather sit stationary in a loop for 10 mins to let a fast train pass than have to make an awkward cross country journey by changing trains.  It used happen all the time in the olden days you know

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 22:31, 16th June 2016
 
I have just been on the phone while writing this and when I posted it said "Warning - there have been five more posts since you started writing this".  I'm tired ... posting anyway and will review!

Hmm.

D-stock on the 125mph Taunton-Westbury? And how do they fet to Nuneaton? If via the obvious Leamington-Coventry-Nuneaton corridor, no chance until Kenilworth is open *and* the part-doubling is conplete. Even then, current XC/NR thinking is that XC won't be able to route their second service that way & will still need to go via Bordesley Junction.

I s'pose they could go that way too? But the Didcot/Oxford line is full until electrification speeds the current services up & releases a couple more

I doubt they'll get started with D-stock, even to Swindon. They'll be waiting for the build off the back of the Northern order I reckon

Good questions ... and I don't know the answers; something to ask at the AGM, perhaps?   I wish I could go, but having overlooked (? assuming informed) the meeting I'm committed to both running a course and voting in a referendum that day.

The "Somerset Circle District Line" team - http://somersetdistrictandcircleline.com - have also looked at the D train or similar, and concluded that services on Berks and Hants from Taunton are sufficiently spaced to allow for the speed differential. I'm not convinced on paths from Royal Wootton Bassett into Swindon though when there are 6 or 7 much faster passenger trains sharing the line ... not convinced, but I have not done the work.  Gut instinct suggests that 60 m.p.h. trains coming up from Westbury would be better turned in a bay at Chippenham, but that's an unanalysed comment and anyone with inside Go-op Cooperative is welcome to comment / fill us in.


Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 23:10, 16th June 2016
 
Well I would rather sit stationary in a loop for 10 mins to let a fast train pass ....

That's called "Frome" in Berks and Hants terms 

I'm going to suggest that if trains have WiFi and are a good working environment, speed of journey is no longer the vital component it once was ... rail journey time is no longer wasted time.    I know I will have difficulties pitching this view to the folks who want to get from Xxxxx to Yyyyy in less than three hours, even if they have to wait some considerable time at source / destination for the next service or for their appointment at Yyyyy.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 20:36, 5th July 2016
 
http://www.somerset.coop/2016/06/going-places-co-operative-transport.html

Thursday, 30 June 2016
Going places: co-operative transport solutions



Our events for Co-ops Fortnight will conclude tomorrow with 'Going Place' in Taunton. We will have two presentations - one from Alex Lawrie on GO-OP, the new co-operative rail operator proposing a new route form Taunton to Nuneaton (an ambitious plan, that still requires the consent of the Office of Rail and Road); and one from Mark Hodgson of Co-Cars who will bring their hi-tech car club operation to Taunton soon.

These two projects show how grassroots activism in communities can meet real needs and give rise to fast growing, technologically sophisticated social enterprises. What's more, those enterprises can remain firmly connected to the communities that gave rise to them, using membership participation to continually improve and adapt to the changing world.
Come along to 10 East Reach between 1pm and 3pm to find out more - and please stick around for the Annual General Meeting of SCS CIC at 4.30pm.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by ellendune at 21:03, 5th July 2016
 
Seem to recall there are some serious capacity issues on parts of that route from Taunton to Nuneaton. 

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by paul7575 at 22:07, 5th July 2016
 
The proposed Leamington to Nuneaton service via Kenilworth and Coventry (usually known locally as Nuckle) was cut back to an improved frequency Nuneaton to Coventry service into a new up side bay platform, (yet to be built), and a separate Leamington to Coventry service terminating in the down slow platform at Coventry, because it was impossible to path it right across the layout at Coventry.

Assuming those two services happen in the next year or two, following the completion of Kenilworth's new station, surely if paths suddenly became available across Coventry they would not be giving them to the extra open access service, but the existing locally managed project?

Paul

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by ChrisB at 10:25, 6th July 2016
 
Indeed - and there is no capacity for anything else Leamington-Coventry - even XC can't get their second train/hour across there, so Go-OP have zero chance - until such times as that gets completely double-tracked - and NR have just pushed that project into the long grass, doing just enough to enable 1tph to stop at Kenilworth.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 13:06, 4th August 2016
 
Post-AGM updates:

http://www.go-op.coop/train/

http://www.thenews.coop/106682/news/co-operatives/go-op-co-op-presents-somerset-rail-improvement-plans/


Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by TeaStew at 08:35, 21st April 2017
 
Sorry to keep resurrecting this thread but the Go-op website is one on a list "to check very occasionally" and there is a new newsletter (cannot find it posted elsewhere).

http://www.go-op.coop/workspace/uploads/files/issue11.pdf

The picture painted by this latest one looks pretty bleak.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by paul7575 at 10:23, 21st April 2017
 
Will never happen, IMHO and as I've suggested before. 

I believe this is little more than an enthusiastic amateur one man band;  but OA is something of a minefield even for the qualified.

GNWR/GC, despite their backing from Arriva and much actual operating experience, are still no further on with their ORR approved West Coast OA service, I have a feeling they can't get the rolling stock required before their ORR "use it or lose it" deadline expires.   GC also abandoned various proposed OA services that were about to be approved on ECML branches because they didn't wash their face without cross support from the London Edinburgh service that went to First Group.

Paul


Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by ChrisB at 10:55, 21st April 2017
 
Any sugns of the latter making any progress also?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by paul7575 at 11:03, 21st April 2017
 
Any sugns of the latter making any progress also?

The ECML?     Haven't seen anything - but at least you'd hope the probability of First Group being able to organise a handful of extra AT300 variants for that service would be quite high, rather than vanishingly low...

Paul

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 09:43, 25th March 2018
 
Update ... Alex Lawrie of Go-op spoke at West Wilts Rail User Group last Thursday (23rd March 2018); I have written up my notes and posted in the TransWilts members area at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19541.0 - coffee shop members who are not part of that area, please ask.  Not posting in public - far too many of my typos, and I am asking the other members who were there to check my memory and ensure I have it all correct.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by TonyK at 15:01, 2nd January 2019
 
I can't see that much has happened since, although the plans for Taunton to Nuneaton have been picked up by the Minehead rail group as a possibility for a service to Bish Lyd.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by JayMac at 16:38, 2nd January 2019
 
Six and half years since this topic started.

In that time porcine aviation could have been achieved.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 19:22, 2nd January 2019
 
Six and half years since this topic started.

In that time porcine aviation could have been achieved.

I am very conscious, gentlemen, that it took from 2005 to 2013 - that's 8 years - to get from a service that isn't useable to the current rather paultrey - but at least enough to make is useable - service on the line.   Things don't happen quickly in Wiltshire unless they're cutbacks.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by TonyK at 00:22, 3rd January 2019
 
Bad news arrives on horseback, good news on crutches.

21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 18:22, 8th March 2019
 
Headline - "Rail Firm Plans for New Services", Wiltshire Times, first edition in March 2019 (7th?). Posted here to flag up public meetings.




Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by Timmer at 20:15, 8th March 2019
 
Respect to them that they don’t give up. I think they’ve been around as long as this forum has.

Perhaps with changes coming to the way the rail network is run with the franchise system falling out of favour; this could be their moment.

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by ellendune at 21:09, 8th March 2019
 
We can hope, but open access has been such a success in the bus industry, please forgive me if I am a little sceptical. 

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by johnneyw at 21:14, 8th March 2019
 
Passing loop to be built? Ouch, that's got to be an expensive hurdle.

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 21:46, 8th March 2019
 
Passing loop to be built? Ouch, that's got to be an expensive hurdle.

Capacity is beginning to be a bit of a problem.  "Passing loop" is a bit of a shorthand; "capacity improvements - for example a passing loop" is what's needed and indeed Paul said "such as a passing loop".  Just under 2 years ago we had a thread that looked at the options ... I started with a dozen and found that other suggestions were added - http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18449 .   A further thread at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=20765 and yet more at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=17602.msg203553#msg203553

As you suggest, none cheap.  Keeps coming up.  Capacity enhancement has moved from being a silly joke to a serious  question and is heading towards being an absolute necessity!

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by Reginald25 at 07:28, 9th March 2019
 
I applaud Co-op for promoting these additional trains on the TransWilts sector and indeed providing change free access to stations both North/East if Swindon  and South of Westbury.
However there are the issues of the single line capacity between Thingley and Bradford-on-Avon, and I imagine that there are also capacity problems on the rest of the route together with such issues as the Westbury 4th platform. I also wonder where the financial return is going to come, it would have to shared with other TOCs.
I does seem that this time Co-op are making a real push to get something going, but there have been  previous attempts over several years when the signs were right, yet nothing happened.


Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by Red Squirrel at 09:31, 9th March 2019
 
Passing loop to be built? Ouch, that's got to be an expensive hurdle.

Somewhere between £7.8 and £35 million, according to this - Melksham's platform might possibly be a bit too short for the Penryn solution; maybe the Highley solution would work?

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by johnneyw at 12:13, 9th March 2019
 
Passing loop to be built? Ouch, that's got to be an expensive hurdle.

Somewhere between £7.8 and £35 million, according to this - Melksham's platform might possibly be a bit too short for the Penryn solution; maybe the Highley solution would work?

Ah yes, takes me back to my visit to the Severn Valley in 2017. Just an observation but this would be a provision that would be of benefit to every TOC using the line, not just Go-Op, so presumably this raises some issues of who should be contributing what to the cost.
As an aside, should a passing loop go in at Melksham, would there still be space there to provide passive provision for a possible second platform in some distant future?

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 13:33, 9th March 2019
 
I also wonder where the financial return is going to come, [capacity improvements] would have to shared with other TOCs.

Indeed - from input from the Melksham Rail User Group to last year's Swindon and Wiltshire Rail study,  a mapped diagram of the flows along the Trowbridge (24)to Chippenham (22) line:



As an aside, should a passing loop go in at Melksham, would there still be space there to provide passive provision for a possible second platform in some distant future?

Should there be a second track actually at Melksham Station, I believe there would be space for a platform alongside it too.  I'm not so sure, sadly, if there would be space at the rear of the platform for bridge and/or shelter, though it would get a bit easier with a staggered platform.   There is also space south of the road bridge for a platform on what would be the northbound side, and level (though a bit longer than is ideal access around - using the main road bridge to cross between the platforms, with a light controlled road crossing, could save the cost of an access for all footbridge, and have the traffic calming benefit (program the lights on the brow?) to provide a protected bus stop called "Melksham Station" and providing integrated transport opportunities.   Somewhat academic, as I would expect the line through Melksham itself to remain single track with most of the viable loop options, only being doubled if the whole line was.



Key for diagram

To the South West
Green 1 - passenger flows Frome, Taunton and beyond
Green 2 - passenger flows Yeovil, Dorchester and Weymouth
Green 3 - passenger flows Stonehenge, Salisbury, Southampton Central, Southampron Airporrt
Green 4 - South West to London (diversion route) flows
Blue 1 and Blue 2 - Mendip Quarries (stone)
Blue 3 - Quidhampton (spoil / landfill)
Blue 4 - Southampton Docks (containers; various goods)
Blue 5 - Westbury (Track panels)

To the North East
Green 11 - Oxford, Milands, North
Green 12 - Oxford, Milton Keynes, Bedford, beyond
Green 13 - Reading and London
Green 14 - South West to London (diversion route) flows
Blue 11 - via East / West rail to northern home counties
Blue 12 - via Banbury to Midlands and north of England

On line
Red 21 - Swindon (current stations)
Red 22 - Chippenham
Red 23 - Melksham
Red 24 - Trowbridge
Red 25 - Westbury
Grey 31 - Royal Wootton Bassett (suggested)

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 11:20, 16th March 2019
 
Press release from Go-op, updating their plans and with more specific meeting info {{here}}

Community owned rail operator submits proposals for new services to connect market towns to the rail network

Rail travel could get a boost in Somerset and Wiltshire as a new train operator proposes a significant addition to the rail timetables from summer 2020. Unusually, the operator is a co-operative: a not- for-profit business owned by those who travel on its trains and work for it. GO-OP Co-operative Limited is keen to hear from potential new members – which could be both prospective travellers on the new service, and those seeking employment.

[continues]

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 15:11, 21st March 2019
 
From This is Wiltshire - a Swindon centric version.   With - I note - a new event date of 6th June for Westbury.

TRAIN passengers could speed between Swindon and Oxford in under an hour, if a new railway co-operative has its way.

Go-Op, a company founded a decade ago by frustrated rail passengers from Somerset, hopes to run regular services between Somerset and Nuneaton.

The firm hopes to launch the project next summer, with the service up and running by 2031. It needs to raise £3.5m over the next three to six months.

Alex Lawrie, operations director and a founder member of the co-operative, said: “The technical difficulties are hard to overstate. The UK railways are for good reason carefully regulated and we must prove in great detail that our ideas stack up.

[snip]

Go-op will run a consultation event in Taunton, Somerset, tonight. Other events to show off the plans to the public will be held in Frome on April 4 and Westbury on June 6.

I can't help feeling that a typo has crept into the article with the proposed service start date;  talk last week was of summer 2020 - perhaps the date in the article should be 2021?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 17:10, 21st March 2019
 
An update from the Go-op web site ... http://www.go-op.coop/info/go-op-announces-new-route-proposal/

For update meetings / briefings - see diary at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=21172.0

GO-OP has been working on its plans for several years, with a group of frustrated rail travellers from the south west first meeting as a co-operative in 2009, ten years ago. Alex Lawrie, the Operations Director and a founder member, said, “The technical difficulties are hard to overstate. The UK railways are – for good reason – carefully regulated and we must prove in great detail that our ideas stack up.”

The proposal is for two trains made up of newly refurbished class 769 units to work a complex series of trips between Oxfordshire and Somerset. Even though there are only two, a carefully designed timetable will complement the existing services (many provided by GWR) and provide useful connections so as to introduce a large number of useful journeys than you might imagine.

“A particular goal was to give some of the market towns of Somerset and Wiltshire a regular, functional service where at present the low frequency makes it hard to give up the car”, said Alex Lawrie. “In addition there are two long distance services a day that go all the way to Nuneaton, where connections to the north of England are available.”

The timetable (which will be put forward in terms of the overall number of services, rather than committing to specific times at this stage) provides:

• four direct trips each way between Swindon and Oxford, including some in peak hours and two extending through to Nuneaton via Leamington and Coventry.

• five trips each way between Castle Cary and Swindon, including some in peak hours and others that extend the day with early and late departures. That will make a total of 25 departures a day from Melksham, close to an hourly service. Frome too would see a big jump in service levels, close to hourly.

• from Castle Cary, four of our trains continue to Taunton, and two go to Yeovil. Combined with the existing Heart of Wessex services this should provide a more or less two hourly service between Westbury and Yeovil; and the Taunton trips combine with GWR's planned service improvements to provide close to hourly departures in the peaks. Again, we are extending the travelling day with early and late trains.

• the trips to Coventry from Oxford should connect at Banbury to good trains for Solihull and Birmingham.

• the Yeovil services, coupled with some carefully timed interchanges at Castle Cary, should create a viable Taunton - Yeovil option with eight trips a day each way (including some direct services). At present, this journey is rarely considered possible by train. From Taunton, there are connections all over the south west.

• Swindon will be connected to Taunton and Yeovil, with up to eight viable journeys a day (three being direct, others requiring one or two changes).

“As we are a co-operative, we want to engage with the potential users of the service early – and we’d also like to hear from people who’d like to try out with the team now, with view to maybe becoming employee members with us later”, said Alex Lawrie. “We are holding our first public meeting in Taunton on March 21st, and following up with an event in Frome on April 4th. We’d encourage anyone who’d like to find out more to come to these events, or visit www.go-op.coop for more information. This is just the start – we need to start planning bus services to bring people to the stations, and consider how we can further develop and enhance the service. Anyone in the area we serve can be part of the conversation.”

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 17:13, 21st March 2019
 
This is a "diary" thread about meetings ... update on the "Go-op update" thread:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=11010.msg260888#msg260888

Noting that 2031 is the end date of the plan (2020 to 2031) rather than the start date - solves the mystery of where that year cam from in the press report.

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by ChrisB at 18:37, 21st March 2019
 
These meetings, according to their website, all have different main topics. Only tonight's deals with the train service; April 4th appears to be concerning being an entrepreneur (1530-1700) and June 6 appears to be a Stakeholder update and AGM

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Lee at 18:48, 21st March 2019
 

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Western Pathfinder at 18:56, 21st March 2019
 
Ah The Norwegian Blue beautiful plumage.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by rogerpatenall at 11:19, 22nd March 2019
 
Interesting to see that 'some Taunton to Yeovil direct' services are planned. Where would the reversal take place? Is the signalling infrastructure in place to cross back east of Castle Cary? My knowledge of the current layout is insufficient to visualise this.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:39, 22nd March 2019
 
I hope I’m wrong but it seems the announcement is nothing but the usual vague and probably unworkable plan and totally unrealistic timescale for implementation given the many hoops they’ll have to jump through before a train can turn a wheel.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by paul7575 at 11:41, 22nd March 2019
 
I hope I’m wrong but it seems the announcement is nothing but the usual vague and probably unworkable plan and totally unrealistic timescale for implementation given the many hoops they’ll have to jump through before a train can turn a wheel.
Spare bedroom fantasist takes in naive and gullible local journos...

Paul

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by TonyK at 12:52, 22nd March 2019
 
I hope I’m wrong but it seems the announcement is nothing but the usual vague and probably unworkable plan and totally unrealistic timescale for implementation given the many hoops they’ll have to jump through before a train can turn a wheel.

I worry that if it drags out too long, there will be problems not just with bats, but re-evolved dinosaurs.

Spare bedroom fantasist takes in naive and gullible local journos...

Paul

A bit harsh, maybe, but time will tell.

See you all again next year.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by paul7575 at 13:20, 22nd March 2019
 
Possibly harsh, but how many massive and random route variations have there been since first proposed?  Nuneaton, Moor St, Taunton, Yeovil, Weymouth? 

Seems like sticking pins in a map...

Paul


Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 13:36, 22nd March 2019
 
Possibly harsh, but how many massive and random route variations have there been since first proposed?  Nuneaton, Moor St, Taunton, Yeovil, Weymouth? 

Seems like sticking pins in a map...

Paul



The core of Yeovil - Castle Cary - Frome - Westbury - Swindon - Oxford - Banbury - Leamington Spa has been pretty much there from the start, and covers a number of excellent flows that are distinctly poorly provided for at present. I share concerns but would see route changes more as a flapping of the limbs at the end and not "massive and random".

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 12:23, 24th March 2019
 
Oxford Mail published 6 hours ago

TRAIN passengers could speed between Swindon and Oxford in under an hour, if a new railway co-operative has its way.

Go-Op, a company founded a decade ago by frustrated rail passengers from Somerset, hopes to run regular services between Somerset and Nuneaton.

The firm hopes to launch the project next summer, with the service up and running by 2031. It needs to raise £3.5m over the next three to six months.

Alex Lawrie, operations director and a founder member of the co-operative, said: “The technical difficulties are hard to overstate. The UK railways are for good reason carefully regulated and we must prove in great detail that our ideas stack up.

Continues with familiar text (from press release  )

As ever, so much interesting to see where comments lead people ...

Why do they hate Oxford so much? Next, they will be proposing dialling the 420. No one wants Swindon to be any closer - in travel times, or any other respect. No one wants that.
Err ... there's an awful lot of people on the Swindon to Oxford journey already - by car, bus, and train changing at Didcot.  I wonder where the poster's evidence is that none of these would like a faster travel time.


I wish them all the best and hope the schedules are workable for commuters.
I also hope they'll consider a late train in both directions too.
Ditto - if we clarify that "late train" is a train scheduled at the very end of the evening, and not one that has a schedule but runs far behind it!.   A late Oxford to Swindon (and on via Westbury) is very much in the plans as I understand them and fills a very real gap which no-one else (GWR / DfT / Wiltshire council) has plugged.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by IndustryInsider at 13:15, 24th March 2019
 
If it ever comes to pass I would hope Swindon to Oxford would be in well under an hour!

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by didcotdean at 14:16, 24th March 2019
 
Although I can guess at the reasons why they have omitted a stop at Didcot on their suggested route they can't expect to garner support from the local councils in Oxfordshire as a result, as it won't assist in their objective in getting Didcot-Oxford(-Bicester) up to a 4 per hour frequency.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by IndustryInsider at 15:15, 24th March 2019
 
With such a limited service they wouldn’t do much to help any 4tph service aspirations even if they did stop at Didcot.  Best to avoid it if you ask me as I’m sure it would make a higher hurdle to jump if they tried to argue that it wouldn’t be primarily abstractive.

That’s before the try and shoe-horn in a path at Didcot station!

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 15:29, 24th March 2019
 
As ever, so much interesting to see where comments lead people ...

Why do they hate Oxford so much? Next, they will be proposing dialling the 420. No one wants Swindon to be any closer - in travel times, or any other respect. No one wants that.
Err ... there's an awful lot of people on the Swindon to Oxford journey already - by car, bus, and train changing at Didcot.  I wonder where the poster's evidence is that none of these would like a faster travel time.

I think that's just the traditional Oxford-Swindon rivalry. Oxford United and Swindon Town are sworn enemies in a Spurs/Arsenal or Man City/Man United fashion. Just a few divisions lower down...

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 15:54, 24th March 2019
 
Although I can guess at the reasons why they have omitted a stop at Didcot on their suggested route they can't expect to garner support from the local councils in Oxfordshire as a result, as it won't assist in their objective in getting Didcot-Oxford(-Bicester) up to a 4 per hour frequency.

Open Access operators are between something of a rock and a hard place when it comes to selecting where to stop - or to propose to stop.   Trawling back through things that half-sunk-in with various open access startups a few years back, I can recall instances where they had to miss out what seemed like blindingly obvious calls because (with such calls) they would be dupicating franchised journeys to the extent of signficant abstraction of passengers.

[Above was on my screen / written when I got called away ... see the IndustryInsider has the same thought]

Also to note - the relative infrequency of the service would be nothing like as big a hurdle to building traffic as it would be if there was no practical alternative ...  put in the 06:30 from Frome into Oxford at 08:05, a return at 17:45 from Oxford that calls at Frome at 19:20 and you're providing key peak services - 07:30 Swindon to Oxford and 17:45 back to Swindon at 18:20.  But that return service ain't the end of the story if someone gets delayed ... there are other options (currently 18:10, into Swindon at 19:00, change Didcot is the next one).  People have the convenience and speed of a direct train at their normal time, but a fallback that's not too shabby for occasional use.



Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by didcotdean at 15:54, 24th March 2019
 
With such a limited service they wouldn’t do much to help any 4tph service aspirations even if they did stop at Didcot.  Best to avoid it if you ask me as I’m sure it would make a higher hurdle to jump if they tried to argue that it wouldn’t be primarily abstractive.

That’s before the try and shoe-horn in a path at Didcot station!

Maybe they could bring forward the long term aspiration of a building platform on the west curve. After all there is already an undercover route now half way from the main station through the multi-storey carpark

(Didcot-Oxford paths are precious in themselves too of course. The councils probably think their aspirations could be solved in part by the XC franchise being forced to stop there, even if that means building yet another new platform, this time on the avoiding curve - or even the fantasy new station further east.)

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 16:58, 31st March 2019
 
These meetings, according to their website, all have different main topics. Only tonight's deals with the train service; April 4th appears to be concerning being an entrepreneur (1530-1700) and June 6 appears to be a Stakeholder update and AGM

April 4th .... a second following meeting?  From The Wiltshire Times

A NEW community rail co-operative is to stage a public meeting in Frome next Thursday (April 4) for commuters to find out more about its proposed services.

[snip]

Alex Lawrie, Go-Op’s managing director, will brief commuters at the Cheese & Grain in Frome from 5-6.30pm. There will be another meeting at Bridge House, Trowbridge, on June 6, from 11am.

I wonder how many commuters will be (back) in Frome for a 5 p.m. meeting ...

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 17:25, 31st March 2019
 

I wonder how many commuters will be (back) in Frome for a 5 p.m. meeting ...

And an incoming message to prove my point!

Keep me updated as I cannot get to the meetings due to work commitments

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by rogerw at 18:23, 1st April 2019
 
A short news item on this in the latest "Railway Magazine" out on Wednesday (3 April).

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by ChrisB at 11:25, 12th April 2019
 
Ditto June 6th...a weekday meeting at 11am?....retirees only?!!

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 12:34, 12th April 2019
 
Ditto June 6th...a weekday meeting at 11am?....retirees only?!!

Massive nightmare setting up meeting times.  So - I am setting up a meeting and I want to attract ...

* Community members who commute to their 9 to 5 jobs, and find weekends precious
* Community members who are retired and don't like to be out after dark
* Young community members who will, after all, be using the services we set up long after us
* Independent and often knowledgable campaigners
* TV and other media, including local press

* Local and central government officials who are attending as part of their 9 to 5 job
* The local MPs (and AMs, MSPs and MEPs?)
* Local and regional councillors
* Mayors, Lord Mayors and - oh lord, how many mayors are there?

* Trains and bus operators directors and senior and specialist managers
* Local area managers and interested operational staff
* Government or transport industry (which are they?) types such as Network Rail, Highways England and Transport Focus

Some of the keener 'types' are very good - a number of excellent people who should come as a part of their regular 9 to 5 job will make time on the occasional weekend ... and community members employed from 9 to 5 doing something totally different may take a day off occasionally.

Add to this the "transport" element ... if a meeting (as this example) is in Frome but is about services that call there on their way from Taunton or Yeovil to Oxford, how do you co-ordinate with their travel?

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by Trowres at 00:17, 13th April 2019
 
Unfortunately the Wiltshire Times has given the venue for the 6th June meeting as Bridge House, Trowbridge.

It should be Bridge House, Westbury.

Re: 21st March and 4th April 2019 - Go-op Taunton to Swindon service public meetings
Posted by grahame at 04:56, 13th April 2019
 
Unfortunately the Wiltshire Times has given the venue for the 6th June meeting as Bridge House, Trowbridge.

It should be Bridge House, Westbury.

Bridge House, Westbury is just to the north of the station. The Go-op website, plans and events page reports

Thursday 6th June at Bridge House, Westbury BA13 4HR
1100 Stakeholder briefing (Q&A on our plans for all interested parties)
1400 AGM (for all members - new / prospective members welcome)

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 11:51, 24th April 2019
 
Further update - longer article - published today in the Railway Gazette

Co-operative proposes Wessex open access train service

UK: Ambitious plans to launch a network of open access regional passenger services in western England are being developed by independent not-for-profit co-operative society GO-OP Co-operative Ltd, which hopes to start operations in summer 2020.

GO-OP is proposing to offer at least three direct trains each way per day between Swindon and Oxford, including some in peak hours. Two would continue via Leamington and Coventry to Nuneaton, offering an interchange with services to northern England. There would be five trips each way between Swindon and Castle Cary. From Castle Cary, four trains would run to Taunton and two to Yeovil.

According to GO-OP founder member and Operations Director Alex Lawrie, ‘a particular goal is to give some of the market towns of Somerset and Wiltshire a regular, functional service where at present the low frequency makes it hard to give up the car’,.

[snip]

Whole article worth reading ... link provided above

Looking from a service level .... some sense.  I have "crayonist" played looking at Melksham departure times ... and I'm clearly wrong because I have one more train than proposed but this looks like the sort of diagram ... and I'm noting plugged gapped, unplugged opportunities still ... and only a couple of cases where they're close to the GWR service on the same line.

2 Yeovil - Swindon - Oxford
2 Oxford - Swindon - Taunton
3 Taunton - Swindon - Oxford - Nuneaton
3 Nuneaton - Oxford - Swindon - Taunton
2 Taunton - Swindon - Oxford
2 Oxford - Swindon - Yeovil
Running time circa 14 hours

3 Yeovil - Swindon - Oxford - Nuneaton
3 Nuneaton - Oxford - Swindon - Taunton
2 Taunton - Swindon - Oxford
2 Oxford - Swindon - Taunton
1.5 Taunton - Swindon
1.5 Swindon - Yeovil
Running time circa 13 hours


Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Lee at 12:15, 24th April 2019
 
There is a part of me that really wants them to suddenly announce the definate start of services, just to see the look of shock on everyone's faces 

All still sounds a bit Mitty though - sorry.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by IndustryInsider at 12:20, 24th April 2019
 
Yup, it's been an ambitious ambition, but nothing more, for getting on for ten years now.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by paul7575 at 14:50, 24th April 2019
 
Yup, it's been an ambitious ambition, but nothing more, for getting on for ten years now.
Great idea for Railway Gazette to mention “Wessex” in this context, given that the name is widely used in railway terms for the neighbouring Network Rail (NR) route and SWR franchise area...

Paul


Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by grahame at 09:38, 2nd May 2019
 
From the Coventry Telegraph

An hourly service running Monday to Saturday will see extra carriages connecting passengers between Nuneaton and Coventry, and for the first time, onward to Leamington Spa via Kenilworth.

Currently, the service only runs between Coventry and Nuneaton, and has just one carriage.

Though one train an hour will run, the extra carriages will massively improve capacity and passenger comfort.

Joining up - as a franchised service - Leamington Spa to Coventry to Coventry to Nuneaton, and replacing class 153 single car trains with 2 car class 172.  Does this cross-Coventry service reduce the gap identified by Go-op to a significant degree and effect their plans?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
Posted by Robin Summerhill at 09:46, 2nd May 2019
 
An hourly service running Monday to Saturday will see extra carriages connecting passengers between Nuneaton and Coventry, and for the first time, onward to Leamington Spa via Kenilworth.
[pedant mode on]

"For the first time" since January 1965 I would suggest

[/pedant mode off]

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025