Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k' In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368582/31149/51] Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:41, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
"A bridge that has been hit 12 times by drivers over nearly two years in "avoidable" incidents has cost taxpayers £50,000 in repairs"
What a silly intro. The bridge hasn't cost taxpayers anything. Drivers who are unable to read signs have.
| Re: Re-opening the Cowley branch to passenger traffic In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [368581/27074/9] Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:32, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
I haven't seen this posted elsewhere, but apparently this is the infra work planned as part of the Cowley reopening:
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368580/29711/14] Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:30, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
RTT reports that 1W11 0553 Pad to Gt Malvern was cancelled, "unknown cause"
As (obviously) was the return journey, which was the one I was going to catch into Oxford. I'd swear I was cursed were it not for the fact that a friendly conductor the other day asked "Have all the trains you've been on this week been delayed, or is it just me?"
Yes indeed. Brent Mill Viaduct
| Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k' In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368578/31149/51] Posted by John D at 21:27, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
It is natural for the Highways authorities and Network Rail to contract and pay for the repairs initially - I would not want it to be up to the [insert words] driving the log lorry to engage people and manage the show - (s)he has caused concern that (s)he can't even drive in a safe manner. Having said which - yes - it costs Network Rail and the experts as Rebecca Watling has pointed out - but I would hope that she (or, rather her team) can then present the bill onward to the driver and his/her insurer. I wonder if any expert here can tell us what the cost will be to Network Rail ... and how much of that they claim back.
Yes - it will cost the public purse. But then the public pure should be getting it back ....
Network Rail should be able to recover all their costs from the lorry company (or their insurers) assuming they are caught. And clearly this one wasn't able to run away. Their costs would include any compensation to a train operator.
Fire service cannot charge for attending road accidents, but ambulance service can recover cost of any treatment they give. Police can charge for removal and storage of vehicles causing a hazard. Breakdown and Recovery services will also charge the driver or their insurers.
train operators delay repay payouts are based on percentages of ticket values, not the amount from Network Rail, so could be cost (or a gain) to this part of public purse.
Ultimately the public will end up paying for time and inconvenience of consequential delays as indirect costs are usually not recoverable.
| Re: Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos to illustrate press articles In "The Lighter Side" [368577/11558/30] Posted by grahame at 21:02, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
From Time Out

Watford has been feeling the impact of cuts to its bus services in recent years. Now, a group of locals say that the Hertfordshire town’s transport system needs expanding, and have started a petition asking the council to commit to reopening a long-disused train station.
Watford West was last used as a railway station in 1996, nearly 30 years ago. It continued as a bus stop until 2003, when it was shut completely. In the subsequent decades it became rusty and overgrown, then was cleared in preparation for the ultimately doomed Croxley Link.
| Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k' In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368576/31149/51] Posted by Mark A at 20:58, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Not particularly relevant, but, looking at the photo in the article, it's not impossible that the roundel mounted on the bridge and stating the clearance is the same one recorded by Google Streetview in 2024 as mounted on a pole beside the bridge. (The height notice on the other side of the bridge is triangular.)
Streetview shows the signage there (not only bridge height related) has been revised several times in the last ten years.
Also, wondering where the start/end points for that delivery would have been. If it happened to be Kronospan at Chirk, wouldn't have thought that it would have taken the load up the A470.
Mark
| Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368575/31133/5] Posted by LiskeardRich at 19:59, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
What of the rest of First South West? I can't see the Somerset operation standing on its own two feet.
Will the Somerset operation be folded into First West of England, or maybe First Hampshire & Dorset.
Will the Somerset operation be folded into First West of England, or maybe First Hampshire & Dorset.
Cornwall and Somerset were folded into Berkshire, Hampshire and Dorset just before I left the business. I left in April 2023. They all fall into a new large opco called First South with common management. The current management team are mostly based in Hampshire and Berkshire
| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368574/30854/31] Posted by grahame at 19:47, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
I was under the impression that scrap dealers had to be licenced now, and there needed to be a paper trail of where they obtained stuff therefore, they can't allowed tout for business anymore.
We have one who visits Melksham too. I don't think there's any problem about touting for business - just that they have to be licensed to pass in afterwards, and perhaps have to complete loads of paperwork for each pickup.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368573/29711/14] Posted by charles_uk at 19:46, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
And there are short-forms this evening too:
And ominously for tomorrow morning:
And ominously for tomorrow morning:
Facilities on the 22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway Hl due 01:06.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46
And also, not mentioned on JourneyCheck, the 1953 Paddington to Hereford is another short form which will mean tomorrow's 0523 Hereford to Paddington service likely to be a short-form as well.
| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368572/30854/31] Posted by plymothian at 19:33, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
I was under the impression that scrap dealers had to be licenced now, and there needed to be a paper trail of where they obtained stuff therefore, they can't allowed tout for business anymore.
| Re: Working on the server today In "News, Help and Assistance" [368571/31138/29] Posted by grahame at 18:53, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
I have been applying a few licks of paint in the last few hours, and will be continuing to fiddle during the day - including things like https certificates. [etc]
From 2004 to about 2018, I wrote over 4,600 blog articele on "The Horse's Mouth" and they have been slowly gathering dust with occasional views on what is now our backroom/worker server. I have now added a lick of paint so that they come up secure (https rather than http) and any shares on Facebook and Bluesky will correctly pick up images and titles.
Here's am example link: https://www.wellho.info/mouth/2457_Railway-Arithmetic.html. showing how a doubling of the very thin train service we had in those days would raise the number of day return opportunities form 1 to 8
Railway Arithmetic (written 2009-10-16)
1 + 1 = 1 If you have an early morning round trip out and back to a residential / suburb, and a similar evening round trip, you're just providing a single commute opportunity to the origin point of the train.
2 + 2.5 = 8 If you take the two round trips of the first example, and add two more round trips (plus - in my example - an extra single journey) you can increase the commute opportunities from one to eight (yes, 125% more trains - 700% more journey options).
How does this work? Let's see my example


2 + 2.5 = 8 If you take the two round trips of the first example, and add two more round trips (plus - in my example - an extra single journey) you can increase the commute opportunities from one to eight (yes, 125% more trains - 700% more journey options).
How does this work? Let's see my example


Plenty of navigation in the archive already - much more to be added. But be aware that lots of external links will be to pages no longer available, and many of the internal links have not yet had that lick of paint. In the future, indexes and searches can bring in these pages.
| Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k' In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368570/31149/51] Posted by grahame at 18:26, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
It is natural for the Highways authorities and Network Rail to contract and pay for the repairs initially - I would not want it to be up to the [insert words] driving the log lorry to engage people and manage the show - (s)he has caused concern that (s)he can't even drive in a safe manner. Having said which - yes - it costs Network Rail and the experts as Rebecca Watling has pointed out - but I would hope that she (or, rather her team) can then present the bill onward to the driver and his/her insurer. I wonder if any expert here can tell us what the cost will be to Network Rail ... and how much of that they claim back.
Yes - it will cost the public purse. But then the public pure should be getting it back ....
| Re: Advertising of misleading minimum pricing which is scarcely available In "Fare's Fair" [368569/31116/4] Posted by grahame at 18:14, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Here's an example I question ... "from £48" is the big headline. I took a look and I found that price or better (for the passenger) with only limited avaiabilty, and only from Euston on the 05:31 on Fridays.




| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368568/30854/31] Posted by johnneyw at 18:12, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
It's a similar story to CfN's with me. In the wider Johnneyw Towers locale there seems to be a fairly regular lorry that goes around picking up scrap metal. Items picked up from my drive over the years include an old TV Ariel, worn out wok and other pots and pans amongst other things. It seems to be the same outfit that covers not only Redland but a fairy wide area.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368567/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 17:36, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
And there are short-forms this evening too:
Facilities on the 15:18 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 17:29.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48
Facilities on the 17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street due 20:11.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48
Facilities on the 20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 23:40.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48
Facilities on the 17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street due 20:11.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48
Facilities on the 20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 23:40.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48
And ominously for tomorrow morning:
Facilities on the 22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway Hl due 01:06.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46
He wants to addres the ridiculous amounts of rain/climate change then, not the railway....
And ... flooded again
08:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central due 09:47
and all trains until mid afternoon
08:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central due 09:47 has been cancelled.
This is due to flooding.
and all trains until mid afternoon
08:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central due 09:47 has been cancelled.
This is due to flooding.
Not so long ago there was regularly issues with high water levels in the South Brent area closing the up line between Plymouth and Totnes, this seems to have been resolved so no doubt with permission from the Environment Agency this problem can similarly be resolved.
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money? Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.
| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368561/30854/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:51, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Here in Nailsea, we have the benefit of a latter-day Steptoe & Son, who drive along our road every week in their pickup truck with a loudhailer asking for 'any old iron?'
They aren't choosy - any scrap metal will do (I noticed that the only thing they didn't want was a neighbour's old fridge/freezer).
We don't have to do anything, other than put our unwanted metal items out on the drive, where they can be seen from the road. Even if we don't hear the loudhailer (unlikely), they will come to the front door, just to confirm, "Is that to go?".
Recently, we updated our cooker and removed a redundant overhead extractor fan unit. My daughter and I will put those out on the drive and see how long it takes Steptoe & Son to snap them up.

| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368560/31150/31] Posted by bobm at 16:30, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
That’s of little comfort to those people who are still having to traipse along the road from the temporary bus terminus at Osney Island.
Earlier this year I bought a new microwave from John Lewis and understood from the company website that it would take my old one for re-cycling. Not so, said the salesperson. My council offers some sort of limited collection service for heavier items, but it's always fully booked.
Then I discovered that Curry's would accept that sort of thing, even if it hadn't been purchased from them, and would even give a £5 voucher (IIRC) against a purchase.
A week after I'd handed in my microwave, another one was fly-tipped close to my house. For a while, no-one did anything about it, though my neighbour said that he'd reported it to the council. Eventually I took it to Curry's - for another voucher.
| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368558/31150/31] Posted by ChrisB at 16:11, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
On time since they commenced that piling.
It was shifting the underground utilities that over ran.....
| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368557/31150/31] Posted by bobm at 16:07, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
40m piling being used for the Oxford Botley Road bridge.
….and we all know how long that’s taking.
| Re: Shrewsbury train station bus stop suspended over safety concerns In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368556/31153/51] Posted by ChrisB at 16:05, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
By the time that the driver has put the ramp out for a wheelchair, there won't be enough space for the wheelchair to line up to board the ramp without backing off into the cycle lane.
The contractors ought to have stopped & reported to the authority when finding the underground utilities....

| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368555/31150/31] Posted by ChrisB at 15:57, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
40m piling being used for the Oxford Botley Road bridge.
| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368554/31150/31] Posted by John D at 15:33, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Replacement bridge requires piling to 35 metres depth.
Mark
Mark
35m is 115 feet, that is very long.
Normal size piling rigs would not be able to handle augers or insert the steel (either sheet or rebar cage) of that length. Sounds like specialist equipment will be needed
| Shrewsbury train station bus stop suspended over safety concerns In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368553/31153/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:06, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
From the BBC:

The BBC found the bus stop waiting area was smaller than guidance
Buses will not be stopping at Shrewsbury train station's floating bus stop due to safety concerns, Arriva Midlands has said.
The stop outside the station has come under fire, after the BBC found it did not meet Department for Transport (DfT) guidance. The waiting area for bus passengers is narrower than the minimum size.
Shropshire Council previously told the BBC that it felt "let down" by the contractors that built the stop, and the designs said it was the minimum size required.
The authority has been contacted for comment. Floating bus stops have a cycle lane between the stop and the pavement.
In a statement, Arriva said it had carried out a safety review of the floating bus stop, and based on its findings, its services would no longer call at the stop. "We have informed the local authority and our customers," it said. "Our priority is always the safety of our passengers, colleagues and other road users and we'll continue working with partners to identify a safe and workable solution."
It is not yet clear where customers will have to get off to get to the station.
The contractor, WSP, previously said the island ended up smaller than planned because workers found unexpected underground utilities that forced a change in the design.
The BBC measured the buffer area between the road and cycle lane at about 1.1m (3.6ft) wide. However, government guidance suggests it should be between 1.5m and 2m, meaning it is nearly 40cm (15.7in) short of the minimum width.
Disability campaigners and wheelchair users criticised the project, claiming the island is dangerously small and not-fit-for-purpose.
The chairman of Shropshire and Wrekin Fire Authority has previously said lives and safety were at risk, because of the traffic issues caused by the gyratory. Fire engines also used the new cycle lane to get away from traffic jams in the area.
A cross-party review of the works is taking place.
The gyratory project, which began in June 2024, has cost about £3.8m. It has been almost entirely funded by a Levelling Up grant awarded to Shropshire Council by the previous Conservative government in 2023.
| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368552/30854/31] Posted by ChrisB at 14:31, 24th November 2025 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, johnneyw | ![]() |
Are they recyclable?

| Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368551/30854/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 13:49, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
...
3. In North Somerset, we were previously required to keep quite separate receptacles for 'plastics' and 'cans'. Now, we have been provided with big red bags, into which all plastic and metal cans should be chucked together.
...
3. In North Somerset, we were previously required to keep quite separate receptacles for 'plastics' and 'cans'. Now, we have been provided with big red bags, into which all plastic and metal cans should be chucked together.
...
From the BBC:
North Somerset Council's recycling bags are 'falling apart at the seams'

Some red recycling bags handed out by North Somerset council are "falling apart"
A council has admitted that by trying to improve its recycling bags, they had "made it worse" after people reported them falling apart.
North Somerset Council was now in contact with its supplier after some of the bags began "falling apart at the seams."
Council cabinet member for planning and environment Annemieke Waite told a full council meeting on 11 November that the red bags ordered for the trial of the scheme last November were fine and had remained in "perfect condition". But after handing them out to residents, she said they found there was "a distinct problem with them".
"Some of the red bags are fading and failing," she said. "They are literally falling apart at the seams. We are not happy at all."
The council has now sent a team around to check what percentage of the bags are falling apart, as part of the council's agreement with its supplier.

Holes are appearing in some of the bags
"This is a very reputable firm. There are only two firms in the UK that do the bags that we are using and they are being used by so many different councils," Ms Waite said. "We know that we are not the only council that has a problem."
Chair of the council Clare Hunt added: "I know by trying to improve something we seem to have made things a little bit worse."
The red bags for plastic and metal recycling were introduced to 6,000 households in some areas in November 2024 on a trial basis. From the end of March this year they were rolled out to all households across North Somerset.
The bags were introduced to make recycling easier to sort with more space, which also helps improve the value of the recycling North Somerset collects, which is sold to offset the cost of waste collections.

Some red recycling bags handed out by North Somerset council are "falling apart"
A council has admitted that by trying to improve its recycling bags, they had "made it worse" after people reported them falling apart.
North Somerset Council was now in contact with its supplier after some of the bags began "falling apart at the seams."
Council cabinet member for planning and environment Annemieke Waite told a full council meeting on 11 November that the red bags ordered for the trial of the scheme last November were fine and had remained in "perfect condition". But after handing them out to residents, she said they found there was "a distinct problem with them".
"Some of the red bags are fading and failing," she said. "They are literally falling apart at the seams. We are not happy at all."
The council has now sent a team around to check what percentage of the bags are falling apart, as part of the council's agreement with its supplier.

Holes are appearing in some of the bags
"This is a very reputable firm. There are only two firms in the UK that do the bags that we are using and they are being used by so many different councils," Ms Waite said. "We know that we are not the only council that has a problem."
Chair of the council Clare Hunt added: "I know by trying to improve something we seem to have made things a little bit worse."
The red bags for plastic and metal recycling were introduced to 6,000 households in some areas in November 2024 on a trial basis. From the end of March this year they were rolled out to all households across North Somerset.
The bags were introduced to make recycling easier to sort with more space, which also helps improve the value of the recycling North Somerset collects, which is sold to offset the cost of waste collections.
| Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368550/31133/5] Posted by grahame at 13:10, 24th November 2025 | ![]() |
Sharing Geoff Brown, Lib Dem for Newquay, on Facebook
Naturally there is concern about FIRST buses withdrawing all services from Cornwall by the end of February next year. My advice would be not to worry as I am confident that other providers will step in and plug the gaps.
Although the time frame to replace services is very tight Cornwall has some very experienced bus operators - as I found out when, as the Cabinet Member for Transport I was responsible for the most recent bus contract which saw GoCornwall bus deliver numerous routes across the county and also invest in a new fleet of Euro 6 buses, the greenest diesels currently available.
We did look at electric buses but the length of most routes and very hilly nature of Cornwall meant that they were not suitable. That said going forward electrification of the Park & Ride in Truro will be a distinct possibility in the future, should funding become available.
Although the time frame to replace services is very tight Cornwall has some very experienced bus operators - as I found out when, as the Cabinet Member for Transport I was responsible for the most recent bus contract which saw GoCornwall bus deliver numerous routes across the county and also invest in a new fleet of Euro 6 buses, the greenest diesels currently available.
We did look at electric buses but the length of most routes and very hilly nature of Cornwall meant that they were not suitable. That said going forward electrification of the Park & Ride in Truro will be a distinct possibility in the future, should funding become available.














