GDPR / Cookie acceptance [about our cookies] • • • Cookies expire in a week!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380984/32628/52]
Posted by grahame at 07:47, 16th October 2026
 
I've done my best in trying to keep up with the amendments to the heading of this topic.  At least I think I've got the date right. 

Thanks for that, Chris - initial reports were confused and as ever there's a conundrum for news organisations who have to decide between propogating information that may need to be updated as things become clearer and the driver of getting initial reports out fast.  Good that we have folks around who both share the news and can come back to update the headlines so that we reflect the true situation as it becomes clear.

Re: Devizes 52-year wait for train station could end
In "London to Kennet Valley" [380983/19298/8]
Posted by grahame at 07:42, 16th October 2026
 
From the Wiltshire Times


Plan for Devizes train station and London rail link progress

At the full council meeting at Devizes Town Council on Thursday, October 15, the council will hear an update from the Devizes Gateway Steering Group (DGSG) on work to restore the rail link that was scrapped in the 1960.

According to the agenda for the meeting, the group has met four times since February 26, and has a number of forthcoming meetings already in the diary, with planning continuing in earnest.

The report states that Andrew Robinson, senior strategy planner for the South-West at Network Rail, has recently presented to the DGSG to give an update on the technical side of the project.

Mr Robinson has told the group that following the Wiltshire Railways Improvement Plan study into Westbury station, further investigative work was done to look at operational and timetabling work for Westbury’s Platform 0.

The plan is for an hourly service from Paddington to Westbury, calling at Devizes Gateway, which had required technical analysis of track provision, track layout and signalling.

The analysis has demonstrated the planned layout can be delivered and Platform 0 reinstated, with the costs having been identified.

An economic appraisal is set to get underway, looking at the benefit to cost ratio. Westbury station improvements would also support additional services from Warminster to Swindon.

and

The feedback the town council has reported included concerns that the lack of a rail link is costing business in the town, and is doing nothing to relieve traffic, another “real issue” for business.

The key messages to date were:

* Devizes is central to Wiltshire but so poorly connected it loses out on business

* People don’t want to drive to Devizes but there is no other way to get people to the town

* Traffic is a real issue for businesses

* Demand for station is quite diffuse across both residents and businesses/ schools etc

* Inbound and outbound marketing travel increasing to pre-pandemic levels but is slowed by slow local connections.

Don't quite believe everything you read in key messages even when the paper prints them.  "People don’t want to drive to Devizes but there is no other way to get people to the town" is somewhat false; Devizes is at the hub of an execellent (for not-a-city) network of but routes, with about hourly departures to Bath, Chippenham, Swindon, The Lavingtons, Salisbury and Trowbridge, and less frequent services to Westbury, Pewsey, Lackham, Marlborough, Bradford-on-Avon and Upavon.   There are two town bus vehicles too, and demand responsive services available to the really awkwardly unclustered villages to the east.   That is not to say that a railway link is NOT needed - it is, but initially traffic flows would look much more like Pewsey, where 56% of 209,000 journeys last year were to or from London rather than like Melksham, where just 10% of 60,000 journeys were to or from London. (Food for thought there - what a direct service does!)

Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380982/32628/52]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 01:09, 16th October 2026
Already liked by JayMac
 
I've done my best in trying to keep up with the amendments to the heading of this topic.  At least I think I've got the date right. 

Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380981/32628/52]
Posted by stuving at 00:49, 16th October 2026
 
Small correction to thread title needed. Not a Eurostar train involved. Was Le Shuttle.

There are a number of such confusions in the reports, such as those saying Eurostar trains were stopped for 90 minutes - that was passenger shuttles. The most up to date report I can find is from The Independent, and it quotes a press statement from the prefecture:
Detailing the sequence of events, she explained: "Two trains were on either side of the platform.

"One was being loaded by heavy goods vehicles ahead of a cross-Channel journey, and another train that had previously been loaded was departing.

"For a reason that currently remains unknown, the minibus collided with the departing train.

"The bus did not overturn, it is still upright – but the shock and the collision caused injuries to the people involved."

That does sound to me like the departing train was moving, and presumably then stopped abruptly and is on the right in the photo below (from la Voix du Nord). The bus was spun round by the impact, and nearly turned onto its side, but not quite. The force of such an impact would explain why everyone on board was injured, even if the bus was not going at all fast. However, the position of the bus still looks wrong, whatever happened.


Re: Jonathan Jones-Pratt, RIP
In "Who's who on Western railways" [380980/32626/2]
Posted by Western Pathfinder at 00:40, 16th October 2026
 
A very sad loss indeed,RIP JJP.

Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380979/32628/52]
Posted by JayMac at 00:26, 16th October 2026
 
Small correction to thread title needed. Not a Eurostar train involved. Was Le Shuttle.

Re: What's new? request stops!
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380978/32515/52]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 00:05, 16th October 2026
 

The MIB is an odd little line which can be done completely during a brief interval ...


From my waking up, somewhere in a parallel universe:

"The Melksham Into Bath is an odd little line which can be done completely during a brief interval ... "


Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380977/32628/52]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:44, 15th October 2026
 
No problem, broadgage. 

I find it increasingly frustrating in my quest to find links to any 'news website' which isn't now hidden behind a firewall, subscription-only or membership sign up.

All I want to do is widen their readership.

CfN.

Re: The future for trains in the South West when nationalised?
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [380976/32155/40]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:23, 15th October 2026
 
Not quite sure where to put this (and it is opposite of cuts as per thread title) so happy for mods to find better thread

A speech at TransCity South 2026 said potential for £14bn growth and 238,000 jobs in South West if Rail is improved


I have cheated (because I can - I'm an admin  ) and amended the heading of this particular topic to make it more neutral, while still reflecting its point.

CfN. 

Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380975/32628/52]
Posted by broadgage at 22:55, 15th October 2026
 
With thanks for your alert, broadgage, I think the link you actually meant to post is at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c6zxz4dyvdq4t

CfN. 

Yes, the link that I posted was to Breaking news" but goes to whatever is the CURRENT breaking news story. I tested it immediately after posting, and it worked then.

Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380974/32628/52]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:38, 15th October 2026
 
With thanks for your alert, broadgage, I think the link you actually meant to post is at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c6zxz4dyvdq4t

CfN. 

Re: Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380973/32628/52]
Posted by broadgage at 21:56, 15th October 2026
 
News report
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cqy7lxd104xet

Collision between bus and Le Shuttle, in France - 15 Oct 2026
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380972/32628/52]
Posted by broadgage at 21:52, 15th October 2026
 
Reported as 19 injured, 2 critical.
Note that these are very early reports, and that later reports may be more accurate, or more detailed.

Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380971/32623/1]
Posted by Trowres at 21:31, 15th October 2026
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
I am not aware of anything costing less than 5p

I've just found, in a UK online supplier, a surface-mount "zero ohm resistor" priced at 0.2p + VAT. The minimum order quantity is 10, which would set you back 2p. Handling and postage charges (and the inability to pay with coins) ruin the idea.

Re: What's new? request stops!
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380970/32515/52]
Posted by RailCornwall at 21:21, 15th October 2026
 
Similar exists in Switzerland

On my bucket list is this little Swiss gem where you press a button and get let onto the platform when the train arrives.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=872240239294812

Sadly I can't see an equivalent in the Avon Gorge staying unmolested by vandals for long.


The MIB is an odd little line which can be done completely during a brief interval at Meiringen on the Luzern - Interlaken line. I seem to recall when I did it that the car was really drafty yet from whence the draft came was difficult to identify.

Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380969/32623/1]
Posted by RailCornwall at 20:56, 15th October 2026
 
Fuel and loose foodstuff inflation would be hit if values under 5p were abolished.

Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380968/32623/1]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:35, 15th October 2026
 
My personal view is that we may as well do away with the current copper (cupro-nickel) coins.  We'll just deal in multiples of 5p.  That's the least you'll get, these days - even in a charity shop. 


Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380967/32623/1]
Posted by bobm at 20:19, 15th October 2026
 
The minimum stamp for a second class letter is 91p.

Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380966/32623/1]
Posted by broadgage at 19:59, 15th October 2026
 
Incidentally, why ‘dismalisation’ CfN? Old money was a bit of fun, but the ‘new’ stuff is a lot more practical isn’t it?

It strikes me that had £sd survived, we would by now be on the brink of withdrawing denominations below the shilling anyway - can anyone think of anything that costs less than 5p? And then there’s the general abandonment of cash: without the need to fiddle for change, I suspect a lot of people are quite vague about the precise cost of things below £1.

That having been said, I have of late brought cash back into my life - partly for contrarian reasons. I am surprised how often people gasp in amazement when you try to pay them with, er, money.

I am not aware of anything costing less than 5p, but there is still a use for smaller coins. What about cheaper food stuffs that sell for say 15p. In the absence of smaller coins, the minmum price increase would be to 20 pence, an increase of over 30%.

Re: Ivybridge Station - services, facilities, incidents and events (merged topics, specific to Ivybr
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [380965/104/24]
Posted by John D at 19:25, 15th October 2026
 
There is a large variety of platform lengths in South West and really, not sorting out historic deficiencies, and adding some modular sections seems a bit penny pinching.

Really platforms on the main and secondary lines (I am not including branch lines which only see short trains) ought to be minimum of 145 metres.

145m allows pairs of 3car units when busy (or triple 2car units), although I hope future stock doesn't have 2car units.  It is also long enough for 5car IET or cross country voyager.

Having lived in Kingston upon Thames 1998-2020, and commuted into London, more than familiar with the Waterloo 10car scheme where a kit of modular platform extensions was used to extend most platforms from 165-190m to about 205m.  There were standard bits for cuttings, embankments, filling in former loading docks etc.  At Kingston even built an extension over a road and beyond other side of road bridge.

If all these modular standard parts can be used on dozens of South West London stations, why can't they be used for Bristol suburban and South West England.   Platform extensions when line is closed are relatively cheap compared to building lifts

It would also fix the operationally difficult (and therefore more costly) problem of forming mixed fleets of 2car + 3car trains, and problems like XC voyagers can't call at Ivybridge as they don't have selective door control

From Swindon - East and West good, what about south and north?
In "Swindon to Gloucester / Cheltenham" [380964/32627/38]
Posted by grahame at 19:16, 15th October 2026
 
From the Swindon Advertiser

Mixed response as direct Birmingham to Swindon route questioned

Plans to restore a direct rail link between Swindon and Birmingham have sparked a lively debate on social media, with many residents welcoming the prospect of easier travel while others questioned ticket prices, the economic benefits and whether the project will ever become reality.

[snip]

Under the plans, Swindon would be linked to Birmingham via Stroud and Stonehouse through a new hourly service. The route could provide more than two million extra seats every year and up to 130 additional trains per week.

[snip]

"We also need a direct train to Southampton."

Gary Timmins simply described the announcement as "About time", while Sally Cole asked the question on many readers' minds: "Great!!!!! When? ?? ??"

[snip]

Several people suggested that high ticket prices remain a bigger issue than the availability of direct routes.

Adam Czop said: "Train ticket prices are unacceptable; traveling by train is completely unprofitable. If you want to reduce car use, make a cheap tickets."

Alan Wilson agreed, saying rail travel can still be prohibitively expensive despite railcard discounts.

Some residents also questioned how much demand there would be for travel between the two destinations.

Chris Wheeler joked: "you don't know who to feel more sorry for, those going to swindon or those going to birmingham."

A second hourly train up the from Swindon via Kemble and Stroud, then via Cheltenham up to Birmingham would make sense.  The line is double track all the way apart from the junction north of Stonehouse, and there are significant intermediate flows.  Joking apart, Birmingham is very much the jumping off point for the rest of the Midlands, north of England, North Wales and Scotland.

Swindo to Birmingham ran under operation Princess (VS0) but that was short-lived.

Direct train to Southampton?   There already is one at 06:03.  There isn't a direct one back at all. Seriously, the Park Report of circa 2000 make an excellent case for a Swindon - Southampton service every hour, and a very constrained one ran from 2001 to 2006.



Re: Jonathan Jones-Pratt, RIP
In "Who's who on Western railways" [380963/32626/2]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:04, 15th October 2026
 
Oh, No! 

I never met him, but I have the greatest regard for him in his efforts on the West Somerset Railway - he has been featured and quoted here on the Coffee Shop forum, many times over the years.

My sincere sympathy to his partner Hollie Bowden, his family and his friends.

Chris from Nailsea. 

Jonathan Jones-Pratt, RIP
In "Who's who on Western railways" [380962/32626/2]
Posted by grahame at 18:51, 15th October 2026
 
From https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr2keqjvqp2wo

Tributes have been paid to the chairman of the country's longest heritage railway, who has passed away at the age of 42.

Jonathan Jones-Pratt ran the West Somerset Railway since 2019 and is credited by the company with guiding it through a "challenging" period.

His partner, Hollie Bowden said she was "utterly heartbroken and shattered" by his sudden death after a short illness.

The railway said it was "deeply saddened" by the news, and added Jones-Pratt had "demonstrated unwavering commitment, resilience and dedication to the railway".

Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380960/32623/1]
Posted by eXPassenger at 18:12, 15th October 2026
 
I remember the 50p piece being called a 'Wilson' as it was 2 faced and 7 sided.  The then prime minister was Harold Wilson.

Re: Delay Repay bouncing around
In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380959/32325/3]
Posted by JohnM at 17:40, 15th October 2026
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, TaplowGreen
 
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.

* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.   

I have to admit that change feels sensible
Sorry Graham, I don't understand. It's quite annoying to be delayed for 15 mins, but it's (usually) not the end of the world, and the current 12.5% of a return feels about right. If that's removed, how does it benefit the passenger?

If you just mean it's sensible because it reduces GWR's workload, then sure. But why stop at 15-29 min delays?

Apologies if I'm missing something.

You're probably not missing anything. I was expressing something of a personal view of the pallava of claiming a small amount - the cost to both sides.  I am not a fan of "compensation society" where we're looking at small sums where we really want to have the service we have bought, and not some sort of alternative to make up.  When it get to / above a certain level, then , yes.   I guess I am so used to over 100 minutes between trains that 30 minutes feels like nothing.
Ah ok - thanks for explaining.

About the "compensation society" - I see what you mean; it's not like I need the £1.25 they refund me for a 15 minute delay in my commute. But on the other hand, I work hard and I'm a tight northener - I don't like throwing money away. If I've paid for a service which isn't delivered then I feel a bit cheated, and the nominal compensation goes a long way in preventing that. And I think that's a benefit to GWR - people might be annoyed at being delayed, but they'd be even more annoyed if they didn't feel they had any comeback. That £1.25 is more than just money.

I fully agree that it would be much better to have a reliable, punctual service. But I don't see how taking away the existing compensation system helps that; in fact, doesn't it mean GWR feel less obliged to provide such a service? "Oh, we're only going to be 20 mins late, it won't cost us anything; no need to rush"

Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time?
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380957/32613/51]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 17:32, 15th October 2026
 

You set the parameters at "a general better level of service", you are getting rather specific now! 

Yep, that's why it's an e=x=a=m=p=l=e asking whether such a setup would be considered "better".   

Ticketing suggestions seem sound, and you would have thought that with one organisation rather than numerous TOCs consistency would be much easier in that context, but we'll see. I doubt anything that reduces overall revenue will gain much traction given her other comments about reducing subsidy!

Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................

Simplifying tickets - and truly doing so in a modernising way and not as a sneaky way for a general uplift of income while claiming "no rises" would be welcome. Sadly it would reduce the need for many of the skills and knowledge of members here, but that's progress.  It would also progress, with gates like they do in The Netherlands, for 99.9% of tickets rather than what feels like 80% and so the need for so much work looking after fare advise, collection and checking.

I think if someone promises “No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.” - most reasonable people would accept that as a "general better level of service" Graham, but hopefully your more exacting requirements will be met.

Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion
In "Introductions and chat" [380956/32623/1]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:09, 15th October 2026
 
Another comment from me, if I may, regarding the use of coins?

We are fortunate to have a family business, situated the other side of Clevedon from us in Nailsea, who run a free-range chicken emporium.  They deliver in Nailsea, and take cash only.  They ask £1.50 for half a dozen very fresh, organic, eggs.

They arrived at our front door this afternoon, so I grabbed £3 in coins from our money box in the lounge and bought a dozen.  Tesco charge £2.90 for six!   

CfN. 

Re: Delay Repay bouncing around
In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380955/32325/3]
Posted by grahame at 16:56, 15th October 2026
 
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.

* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.   

I have to admit that change feels sensible
Sorry Graham, I don't understand. It's quite annoying to be delayed for 15 mins, but it's (usually) not the end of the world, and the current 12.5% of a return feels about right. If that's removed, how does it benefit the passenger?

If you just mean it's sensible because it reduces GWR's workload, then sure. But why stop at 15-29 min delays?

Apologies if I'm missing something.

You're probably not missing anything. I was expressing something of a personal view of the pallava of claiming a small amount - the cost to both sides.  I am not a fan of "compensation society" where we're looking at small sums where we really want to have the service we have bought, and not some sort of alternative to make up.  When it get to / above a certain level, then , yes.   I guess I am so used to over 100 minutes between trains that 30 minutes feels like nothing.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025