This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Disruption to train services between Reading and London - ongoing discussion
In "London to Reading" [376764/26735/7]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 18:27, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 
Likely to be axel counters going down rather than actual signals
I seem to remember that axel counters were going to make the railway "more reliable"

They’re generally perceived to be more reliable than the Track Circuits they replaced. 

Interesting read here:
https://www.railengineer.co.uk/train-detection/

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [376763/31359/18]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 18:01, 6th July 2026
 
The crossed legs express!

17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06
Facilities on the 17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06.
Toilet facilities are not available. Disabled toilet facilities are not available.
This is due to a fault on this train.

Re: GBR and 'Brand strategy'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [376762/32207/51]
Posted by Trowres at 17:49, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 
I have a few thoughts about the ideas presented in the article. As yet, they don't gel into a coherent argument, but here they are anyway:

1. The basic palette of British Rail's corporate colours happily allowed some branding while retaining a hint of a national identity. There was "Inter City" on blue/grey mainline stock; the reversed livery for Pullmans and the white/blue stripe for a while on DMUs - with some local PTE logos in addition.

2. Most of the time, the journeys that I take involve a combination of different trains (what might be branded local, regional, inter-city and so on). I am rather more concerned that the railway acts as a joined-up network. If it has separate  brands such as IC, it must mean something about that stage of the journey, such as "refreshments always available".  It seems to be reverse-logic that because a train's diagram is short-distance, its passengers are thought of as "commuters".

3. I'm not sure what sort of brand might be appropriate for the types of passenger experience currently being cooked up. The idea that a railway brand would guarantee anything nice seems err.... optimistic at the moment.

4. The article regarded "Regional Railways" as being less successful. In terms of branding this may have been so. However, as a piece of management structure, the idea of making a team responsible for "the rest" (and nothing else) may have worked rather well in giving the poor-relation services some much-needed focus. I don't regard things which grew out of that - such as hourly Cardiff-Portsmouth and Cardiff-Manchester - as anything other than successes.

Re: GWR First Class fares increases 5 July 2026
In "Fare's Fair" [376761/32128/4]
Posted by plymothian at 17:15, 6th July 2026
 
So it looks like GWR have decided at the last minute to put 1U1 and FWF up by £10 across the board, rather than £5 as intended.

Meaning a FWF London - Westcountry is now £45 and a 1U1 £70.
Worth it?

Re: GBR and 'Brand strategy'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [376760/32207/51]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 16:25, 6th July 2026
 
As I’ve said I expect little change, initially at least.

The main positive from day one will be a degree of certainty about the set up.  GBR has been ‘on the way’ for many years now and it will have affected all sorts of things from longer term strategies to, as the day comes nearer, day to day running.

There will no longer be accusations of shareholders taking all the profits or ‘zombie franchises’ and there will be less layers of complexity that various vested parties can hide behind when it comes to being held to account.

Re: Disruption to train services between Reading and London - ongoing discussion
In "London to Reading" [376759/26735/7]
Posted by broadgage at 16:19, 6th July 2026
 
Likely to be axel counters going down rather than actual signals
I seem to remember that axel counters were going to make the railway "more reliable"

Re: GBR and 'Brand strategy'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [376758/32207/51]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:38, 6th July 2026
 
It's been very interesting travelling around Europe over recent weeks and seeing differing / regional branding and how it's seems to have brought differentiation between service and local pride.

The German example of the ICE (Intercity Express) fleet is nationwide, there are some DB (red trains) regional services, but also a wide range of liveries for various areas.

Perhaps at a time the railway is struggling with reliability and reputation (I find myself getting an unprecedented level of of criticism when I post about day out opportunities) the time for a rebranding is as things get sorted out.  In the last six months, we have been moving towards that on the TransWilts and a new brand might give a new start opportunity.

That really depends on what tangible benefits you see GBR bringing to TransWilts in the customer context, and how that can be articulated and delivered.

What difference is it going to make? Is the question most will ask.

Is it going to mean improved reliability? Additional services?

Or is it just the same people in different ties, and the same trains in a different colour scheme.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [376757/31163/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:15, 6th July 2026
 
Cancellations to services between London Paddington and Reading

Due to severe weather between London Paddington and Reading fewer trains are able to run.

Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled, delayed or revised. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.

Customer Advice
-
We are sorry for the disruption to your journey.
-
What has happened?

The extreme heat that is forecast for today can lead to an increase in points failures.
Points are the moving pieces of metal that enable trains to change tracks.

What are we doing about it?

To reduce the risk of this happening, a number of points will be set for one route and not moved, protecting the route to and from London Paddington.

....................plenty more standard paras follow re: explanations/alternatives, and of course "you may wish to consider postponing your journey until our service returns to normal"


Re: GBR and 'Brand strategy'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [376756/32207/51]
Posted by grahame at 13:09, 6th July 2026
 
It's been very interesting travelling around Europe over recent weeks and seeing differing / regional branding and how it's seems to have brought differentiation between service and local pride.

The German example of the ICE (Intercity Express) fleet is nationwide, there are some DB (red trains) regional services, but also a wide range of liveries for various areas.

Perhaps at a time the railway is struggling with reliability and reputation (I find myself getting an unprecedented level of of criticism when I post about day out opportunities) the time for a rebranding is as things get sorted out.  In the last six months, we have been moving towards that on the TransWilts and a new brand might give a new start opportunity.

Re: Disruption to train services between Reading and London - ongoing discussion
In "London to Reading" [376755/26735/7]
Posted by bobm at 12:55, 6th July 2026
 
If there are indeed 15 different types of points equipment, I wonder if any lessons are being learned about which are more reliable than others?   (Or are they all just as bad!)

GBR and 'Brand strategy'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [376754/32207/51]
Posted by Mark A at 12:50, 6th July 2026
 
An engaging read on the branding of rail services, including comparisions with practices elsewhere in Europe.

Mark

https://www.freewheeling.info/blog/gbr-needs-a-brand-strategy

Re: Cardiff woman dodges flight luggage fee by posting her clothes
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [376753/31706/5]
Posted by grahame at 12:13, 6th July 2026
 
To me it sort of makes sense that it's cheaper that way. The clothes have several days to be carried by the most cost-effective and efficient means rather than space having to be provided at the same time as the passenger is travelling.  It's clearly less convenient though and I'm glad the railways haven't generally tightened up on luggage carrying, although Lumo have started down that slippery slope.

I see this morning that Lumo are saying

We’ve achieved a new record in reducing carbon emissions today, operating the highest capacity domestic intercity train in the UK!

The sold-out service had the potential to carry 772 customers in each direction between Edinburgh, Newcastle and London - that’s more than 1,540 people onboard the record-breaking return service.

That's a 10 car train - for comparison 2 x class 800 GWR IETs coupled provide 652 seats.  I appreciate that Lumo is standard class only and I have not (yet?) tried them - how are they for luggage, cycle, pushchair, wheelchair and seat pitch?

Re: BBC article Warleigh Weir Swimming and rail crossing
In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [376752/32195/20]
Posted by stuving at 11:50, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Mark A, rogerw
 
Crossings for road traffic that have instructions as to the process when crossing with vehicles or animals but also are unstaffed and have the gates padlocked - the two qualities are in conflict and I'm wondering what is the status of these crossings and whether something needs to be formalised. Crofton level crossing is another example.

Mark

Claverton is a User Worked Crossing, i.e. is it provided for "users" who are the inheritors of the occupiers for whom the accommodation crossing was built.  Its purpose includes users crossing with animals and vehicles. It also provides a foot crossing that is not padlocked, and for which public access depends on the status of the footpath.

The obvious problem with the signage is that it is addressed to several different groups of potential users. There are "users" in the technical sense, who have keys to the gates and may cross with vehicles or animals. There might be other such users (e.g. drivers of vehicles) who need to get a "user" to unlock the gate for them - but the railway does not regard it as their business to tell them that.

There are people of foot, who may also have animals with them (but perhaps not in the legal sense of "users crossing with animals"), who need different instructions. However, signage does not usually identify its audience. Nor does the signage clarify who has what right of access, you are expected to know that.

Re: BBC article Warleigh Weir Swimming and rail crossing
In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [376751/32195/20]
Posted by Mark A at 11:15, 6th July 2026
 
Crossings for road traffic that have instructions as to the process when crossing with vehicles or animals but also are unstaffed and have the gates padlocked - the two qualities are in conflict and I'm wondering what is the status of these crossings and whether something needs to be formalised. Crofton level crossing is another example.

Mark

Re: Sleeper train fire disaster at Taunton - 6 July 1978 - remembered
In "London to the West" [376750/3153/12]
Posted by grahame at 10:40, 6th July 2026
 
Morning

You may be interested in this site for some info
and pics:

http://www.tauntontrains.co.uk/MEMORIES.htm

Scroll down under info regarding D1071.

Regards

Karl.

The page is now at https://www.tauntontrains.co.uk/oldsite/MEMORIES-SLEEPERFIRE.htm

Re: 1st August 2026 - direct train Avonciff to Weymouth
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [376749/32206/34]
Posted by grahame at 10:06, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 

1st August 2026 - direct train Avonciff to Weymouth
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [376748/32206/34]
Posted by grahame at 09:33, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
Avoncliff no longer has a direct Weymouth train on Saturdays (or on Monday to Friday) suitable for a day trip.  On 1st August, at the request of the West Wiltshire Rail User Group, train 2O73 will make a special call there at 09:37 to help in the marketing and promotion of the station to residents who have missed this Saturday opportunity since services were recast for the Bristol Metro.  Direct trains back from Weymouth to Avoncliff at 17:34 and 20:40 that day.

Adult day return fare - £24.30. Groupsave and rail card discounts take a third off.  Children half price, babies and dogs travel free of charge when accompanied.   Buy your tickets on the day - there is no ticket machine at Avoncliff so if you join the train there you can buy from the train manager.

Thanks from WWRUG to GWR for arranging this special call - really appreciated by the residents around Avoncliff

Re: Disruption to train services between Reading and London - ongoing discussion
In "London to Reading" [376747/26735/7]
Posted by ChrisB at 09:17, 6th July 2026
 
Likely to be axel counters going down rather than actual signals

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [376746/31163/26]
Posted by GBM at 09:12, 6th July 2026
 
Alterations to services between Westbury and Reading

Due to a fault with the signalling system between Westbury and Reading fewer trains are able to run on some lines.

Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed or diverted. Some stations between Westbury and Reading will not be served. Disruption is expected until 08:00 04/07.

"Disruption is expected until the end of the day on 06/07/26" (!)

Alterations to services between Westbury and Reading
Due to a fault with the signalling system between Westbury and Reading fewer trains are able to run on some lines.
Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed by up to 20 minutes or diverted. Some stations between Westbury and Reading will not be served. Disruption is expected until the end of the day on 06/07/26.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
There is a fault with the signalling system in the Hungerford area.


true to their word -
Delays to services between Westbury and Reading
Due to a fault with the signalling system between Westbury and Reading fewer trains are able to run on some lines.
Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed by up to 20 minutes. Disruption is expected until the end of the day on 06/07/26.

Some difficult fault this one!

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [376745/31359/18]
Posted by grahame at 08:59, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby, Mark A
 
Not a great start to the week with the first two trains cancelled, but after that everything ran through Melksham to give a 98.28% reliability score for the week.
Looked like they were running bus replacements through Melksham at least one day over the weekend (can't remember when I noticed it); presumably that was planned?

First train to Swindon and back was - planned - replaced by a bus to Chippenham on Sunday. Yes, preplanned.  We pragmatically accept that this first train is more prone to pre-planned engineering bus replacement than other services. An eye is kept on ensuring that connections work, especially at Chippenham where there have been very long waits for Swindon in the past.   Yesterday, the bus arrived at Chippenham at 09:03 and the train left onwards at 09:26.   In the opposite direction, the bus left for Westbury at 09:23 and the first train from London - due at 09:08 - arrived at 09:25. I hope the bus waited.  Although trains and local buses here have real time tracking, rail replacement buses don't and.

But the service is more reliable than it has been - far more reliable. We still keep a watchful eye, and get loads of criticism on social media from both historic reports from people who have been put off, and we must remember that if a train is cancelled, there isn't another one along half an hour later.

Re: BBC article Warleigh Weir Swimming and rail crossing
In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [376744/32195/20]
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 08:54, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Mark A, rogerw
 
.....there still remains a duty of care to the public who use the crossing.

Indeed there does and in my view the rail industry has fulfilled that duty by providing, as evidenced by the picture, instructions regarding how to use the crossing safely. If some individuals choose to wilfully ignore those instructions then that is on them not the railway.

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [376743/31359/18]
Posted by JohnM at 08:39, 6th July 2026
 
Not a great start to the week with the first two trains cancelled, but after that everything ran through Melksham to give a 98.28% reliability score for the week.
Looked like they were running bus replacements through Melksham at least one day over the weekend (can't remember when I noticed it); presumably that was planned?

Re: Disruption to train services between Reading and London - ongoing discussion
In "London to Reading" [376742/26735/7]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 08:18, 6th July 2026
 
..............and there's the constant signal failures too (today being a good example), any idea why they are also so fragile?

Re: ITV west news on Thursday about Stonehouse
In "Heritage railways, Railtours, buses, canals, steamships and other public transport based attractions" [376741/5933/47]
Posted by Mark A at 08:07, 6th July 2026
 
*snip*

BTW...I can only imagine that calling the bridgeside canal pound "The Ocean" was done with tongue firmly in cheek.

It's one of a number of places that gain names that intentionally run counter to their natures. "Marble Arch' allegedly for the then rather visible and stately three arch overbridge south of Woodford Halse Station on the GCR, it would usually have been seen in silhouette against the southern sky. In the depths of Dudley Tunnel, the point at which a subterranean arm leaves to the left and a wider brick arch is thrown overhead - 'The Cathedral' and very useful it must have been, when taken a boat through by hand or leg power, to make it a landmark in the several hour long process.

There will be others, names that are all about creating a memorable local landscape and it might be that this is largely a practice of children and teenagers and many of these names are inexplicable to the rest of us. "Door One" comes to mind - the childhood nickname of a local area used for play by children local to it in Eastwood Lane, Kimberley.

Mark

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [376740/31163/26]
Posted by NickB at 08:03, 6th July 2026
 
Looks like the paper mache signalling system has failed despite cancelling most of the GWR services for the Thames valley.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [376739/31163/26]
Posted by NickB at 08:01, 6th July 2026
 
Due to a fault with the signalling system between London Paddington and Slough some lines are blocked.
Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed. Disruption is expected until 09:30 06/07.
Customer Advice
-
We are sorry for the disruption to your journey today.
-
What has happened?
-
Some axle counters, part of the signalling system, have stopped working in the Paddington area. Axle counters tell the signalling system if a section of track has a train on it. If an axle counter stops working, trains need to stop at the affected signal so that the Driver can speak to the Signaller to confirm if the track ahead is clear.

Re: Disruption to train services between Reading and London - ongoing discussion
In "London to Reading" [376738/26735/7]
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 07:58, 6th July 2026
 

.....2. There are 30 different models of points and motors across Network Rail, and no fewer than 15 of them may be found on the stretch from Paddington to Reading.  This brings a spares issue, and a knowledge issue with onsite staff not building up a daily knowledge of just one or two types, so that fixes are not routine daily jobs.....

Given the apparently high level of 'points failures' on the specified route this surely has to be relevant; on the face of it having such an extensive portfolio of switching control equipment looks pretty daft for a number of reasons but it maybe wouldn't be so bad if the kit didn't seemingly fail so frequently.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [376737/31163/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:48, 6th July 2026
 
...............just as the warm weather mass cancellations start again.

Delays to services between London Paddington and Slough

Due to a fault with the signalling system between London Paddington and Slough some lines are blocked.

Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed. Disruption is expected until 09:30 06/07.

Re: Railway bridges struck by road vehicles - merged topic, ongoing discussion
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [376736/8910/51]
Posted by grahame at 07:47, 6th July 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 
From the BBC, 5th July 2026

Why do lorries still keep hitting railway bridges?

For rail passengers, it can be galling to hear or read that your train has been delayed, putting your journey, your day, back into a land of uncertainty.

That is the obvious consequence when a vehicle, especially a lorry, hits a bridge carrying the service in question. It can lead to days of disruption, gridlocked roads - and also cost millions of pounds to fix.

Bridge strikes, as Network Rail calls them, have been factor for decades and, recently, one caused major disruption in Warwickshire, delaying trains across the country while engineers checked the structure was safe.

But why do they keep happening?

Between April 2024 and March 2025 there were 1,666 reported bridge strikes across the country's rail network, according to Network Rail, with crashes costing the operator about £23m a year in repairs.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025