I'm sorely tempted to associate those words with a certain train service...

 

I will never vote "green" again, unless they reverse the recently announced anti-Semitic policy is reversed.

 

The trench itself was shallow, though whatever was being excavated into was a bit concrete-chunky. It was difficult to make out exactly where the displaced roof blocks were in relation to the ground above. I had the impression that they weren't beneath the trench at all (which in any case hadn't reached the ground above the tunnel). They may have been below the road's west side pavement which has been resurfaced using tarmac, and probably using a plate compactor, the vibration from which may have exposed a couple of stone blocks where the mortar was failing.

It made me think of Devonshire Tunnel, which is lined with 'Shaped rubble' that may have gained a fair amount of additional cohesion courtesy of limescale among other things. Not, thankfully, that Devonshire is a streaming wet tunnel.

 

Is it really fair to blame GWR here?

The infrastructure itself currently can't really handle anything more than what is already running, so any frequency or journey time uplift is dependent on a significant amount of work by Network Rail (which is being seriously discussed - but its a fair amount of work).

And a lot of the recent issues I have seen are due to track issues (e.g. the other day when engineering work resulted in damage to the track). Which again are Network Rail.

Yes there is the rolling stock issue, but again that isn't really down to just GWR - they are doing what they can whilst limited by the DfT (and hopefully the 175s and extra 158s from TfW will help too).

I think the main criticism I would have is largely information / communication - it seems that unclear, incomplete or downright incorrect information is often communicated which then results in things like replacement / additional bus services not service stations when people expected them to, or downright refusal to organise replacement buses / taxis and instead force people onto the stagecoach bus which is a very long and winding route!

 
Rather surprised that someone with the pedigree of Richard Bowker should confuse the M5 Avon bridge with the Gordano viaduct 2 miles further south.....

 

Sure, but then that's the nature of the beast of any franchised train operating company.  Provide:
1. Enough to fulfil your contract with the DfT
2. Whatever else you can make a profit on by local authority, EU and other scheme grants.
3. Any extras where you have the resources and can make a significant extra profit (but far better if your resources are scarse to proved under option (2) - grants)
4. Where you have leeway, arrange items 1, 2 and 3 to maximise the farebox take.
5. There will be occasional circumstances for "PR Reasons" where extras are provided - I can think of the Barnstaple bus strengthening which may be an example.


Maybe after nationalisation something might happen but are there any Labour MPs in situ?
[/quote]

 

Scheduled time, yes ... actual running times, no.   Here is the bus I photographed at Melksham Station at 15:15 on Monday, and how it is shown on Real Time Trains:





And here are pictures from 14:58 and 15:13 showing the line very much in use.   Passenger train too - pity it didn't stop to serve passengers!

 
GWR have to be hauled screaming and kicking to any improvements in service unless someone else is paying. The Paignton half hour service only came about by being kick started by EU funding an extra shuttle train between Paignton  and Newton Abbot.

Before then, The Torre schools return traffic was served by a London HST stopping there.

Maybe after nationalisation something might happen but are there any Labour MPs in situ?

The Kingskerwell by-pass only got authorised, after 40 years lobbying, by the 2010 coalition government because Torbay had a liberal MP>

 

The half crown was demonetised before D-day - I know because it caused me to have a 20% pay cut, which as a 10 year old stung painfully. My grandma, bless her memory, used to give me a half crown when I visited her, and this reduced to a florin when the half-crown was withdrawn. Sixpence bought a 10 year old quite a bit in 1970.

 
Posting on behalf of  "Kai (posts as kai_oddcorners)" ... not verified by myself, so can't vouch for how tall the story is, but it looks feasible.

 

No, not in the slightest! Hopefully the new owner is able to do something with it.  It'll look great restored and in use again but it will take a huge amount of money to make progress and a lot of determination to navigate the way forward given access is only across the railway or through the storage facility behind the platform (and I have no idea how amenable they are to helping.)

 
Only the copper coins were changed at decimalisation - the silver 6d, 1/-, 2/- and 2/6 (half crown) coins stayed in circulation, along with the 50p coin that had replaced the 10/- note. So it eased the transition to keep a sixpence as 2^1/2p and the half crown as 12^1/2p.

Plus I remember plenty of people being very angry that prices had been rounded up to the nearest half pee. Bear in mind that a half pee was worth more than an old penny.

 

Norman Tebbit

 
Can't find it mentioned herein but RRB timings generally appear on RTT so if anybody is required to use an RRB recording of the booked & actual start and end journey times and locations might be a good idea.

If it all goes pear-shaped you should then have some data to use in a DR claim.

 

The railway is ... riddled ... with mis-leads and opportunities to do better.

Brickett Wood
Bridge of Allan
Bridge of Orchy
Bridgend
Bridgeton
Brighton

... what the ticket machine (that was upgraded last week!) ... offers when I start typing in B-R-I ... for where I want to buy a ticket to.  Most sold Melksham tickets BRI are Temple Meads (which IS on the quick front panel) followed by

Bristol Parkway
Brighton
Bridgend
Bridgwater
Brighouse
Brixton

And, surely, it would be best to offer the most popular six first, not the first six in the alphabet?


And don't we love the information system gems that have two trains leaving from the same platform at the same time:

 

Sure, that's what the public are hoping for.   But let's look

1. There are no offers of a general better level of service, though there may be some bright spots.  Indeed nothing much is said about level of service and could we be in for another Beeching, or Serpell? That could save money.  I won't give any pointers in the South West ... but I could look at East Anglia and and ask about lines such as those through Berney Arms, East Tilbury and Emerson Park, and to such places as Sheringham, Sudbury and Southminster and wonder about their economic case.

2. More reliability and fewer breakdowns could be achieved by reducing the number of services run and increasing running times, could it not?  Swiss timekeeping has an excellent reputation, but I've made a number of journeys where we have paused to make up time.  And modern technology (I've see demos) can hide that slowing down by programming the trains to run slower than they could - not awaiting time at stations but running a little slower between

3. "Fare Simplification" is what is suggested, and can be achieved, can't it, by simply scrapping some of the lower fares?  Let's get rid of super off peak - no, it's not in headlines terms putting "fares up" but it'll sure as heck make a substantial difference in our parts to weekend travellers!

 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/cx7vpe1p070mo


I find myself looking at this report and wondering if there are crossover lessons and alerts into public transport matters. 

 
This, in a nutshell.

The Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander says that she wants to see subsidy levels fall. Meanwhile, Network Rail has acknowledged a squeezed budget means difficult choices, and shoring up the network against the effects of more extreme weather requires investment.

Prof Glaister says: "When the public is hoping for a better level of service, more reliability, fewer breakdowns and lower fares, what they're really asking for is more money to be put into the railway.

"I don't think it's likely the government is going to be able to find more money, probably [it will have] less, actually. And so I think there's a real problem with ministers raising expectations from this policy."

 
Our "rules of engagement" - the forum agreement - is written for direct (human) posters and not for automated agents. In the current environment / with concerns about AI, it makes sense to me for Coffee Shop posting to remain in principle limited to real people who we may meet on the train, who have life experiences, and who can agree to / sign up to our forum agreement.   

Occasionally in our many years, a real person has "gone rogue" and our team has been able to take actions which bring our posted content back within our guidelines, often with the agreement of that person though very occasionally through enforcement mechanisms we have, underpinned by the background of that agreement which does include a couple of safety nets that lets it cope with the unexpected.  I am uncomfortable with the thought of moderating an agent which does not have the characteristics / bounds of a real person, and so sign up requests from automata will be / are declined at present. That does not stop automata reading the public areas of the Coffee Shop, nor does it stop them communicating with us through our official email address, nor does it stop them making use of public material "scraped". 

At present, we've had very few sign up requests indeed from automata, and such requests where they want to sign up to "comment on a particular story" will be answered by an invite to email to us what they would like to say, and the admin or moderator team will consider sharing what's suggested, and with reference to the source as appropriate.  This policy means that we welcome and share information from the widest range of sources, but at the same time provide members and (in public areas) guests with a re-assurance that what they read is submitted with true thought, intent, and over which our team has backup tools to look after.

 
From around 10 p.m. on 12th, our server loads ballooned ... requests to the worker server up from around 350,000  to around 650,000 over the 24 hours of 13th (October).  And most of that extra loading was before 18:00, at which point I identified and diverted the loads - which were ... in my view ... from 'bots not useful to the Coffee Shop.  There's an element of this identification being a manual process - though I do have code in place such to help me describe a pattern and automate ongoing rejection once I identify it (and I can even do so from a very limited internet connection!)

 

Delighted that it worked ... I posted in some trepidation as to whether it might sink like a lead balloon as so many of our members don't get very far from the platforms - let alone the stations - on their travels.    In recent years, I have travelled to some of the furthest points in Europe and there's more of that to come in my current window between retirement and increasing limitations, but I wrestled with whether and how to share those experiences.

 
Railway YouTuber Geoff Marshall recently visited the Tarka Line (Exeter - Barnstaple) to tick off some stations, discuss the line, its history and its future. Some excellent detail on possible future work to increase capacity and frequency provided by RichardB of this very parish.

 

I'm going off at yet another slight tangent here (and I can, because I'm an admin ), but it struck me, even as a twelve-year-old at the time when our currency was dismalised, in February 1971, that there shouldn't have been provision for a 'half-penny' in any new decimal coinage - it was a contradiction in terms.

CfN. Grumpy Old Git.

 
You weren't tempted into making a bid, RichardB, for a possible retirement residence - close to the railway?

CfN. 

 
This topic has been moved to Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA) as the 'campaign' has (at last!) come to fruition.

https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=231.0

 
What's needed for XC in Cornwall isn't more trains, it's capacity on the existing, more coaches far more important throughout the week, a virtually impossible need I'll agree.