Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts) In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380255/10737/21] Posted by Red Squirrel at 13:22, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
That damn-well IS a pedestrian crossing. It was there before they started to use that area as a car park. I was a regular user of the crossing at that time.
Well the sign in the photo in MarkA's post clearly says it isn't. Which is, I will grant you, eccentric.
The station map issue is indefensible - they have had years to update this, and it looks like no-one thought it was their job. Putting up an out-of-date map at the new entrance that doesn't show the new entrance is farcical.
I don't have a strong view on the No.8 bus stop issue. By my reckoning it is actually closer to Platform 13/15 than the old stop, and an easier walk, but it it does look like it could have been closer.
As to the northern entrance (past the Old Station and Midland Shed) - this is actually the busiest entrance to the station, and is due to be greatly improved over the next few years. The car parking will be moved to the new 'Southern Gateway', which will allow the Midland Shed to become the station foyer. All this is laid out here: https://bristolrailcampaign.org.uk/temple-meads-masterplan-november-2019-update/
| Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts) In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380253/10737/21] Posted by IndustryInsider at 13:10, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
A general point: when it comes to airport connections, why are passengers heading for an airport often given priority treatment when it comes to bus stops - the airport flyer bus being the only service with a stop close to the station entrance? The number 8 stop there will probably have been a bit of a lifeline for people with poor mobility travelling to Temple Meads from other parts of the Bristol bus network and the new location is ... unconvincing and the eastern entrance stop is a poor replacement, it's less secure and, on the walk from the station, exposes people to a *lot* of weather.
Presumably some of the airport passengers have poor mobility due to luggage for their flight as well as any general mobility issues they might have?
Granted they are exposed to the elements to get to the eastern entrance from the No. 8 stop, but that route through to the station subway, from which you access the large majority of platforms and trains, is much nicer than walking through the cramped concourse, busy main gate line and down narrow steps or a lift. The route from the eastern entrance to the subway is wider, quieter and level.
Not suggesting your points are wrong as such, but that there are nearly always counter arguments that can be used.
| Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts) In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380252/10737/21] Posted by ChrisB at 13:07, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
A general point: when it comes to airport connections, why are passengers heading for an airport often given priority treatment when it comes to bus stops - the airport flyer bus being the only service with a stop close to the station entrance?
Because the bus company pays for it to be there.
The ad-hoc use of the train shed as a car park - that's so 1960s, as is the vehicle route to it that crosses the walking route for people approaching the main entrance.
That damn-well IS a pedestrian crossing. It was there before they started to use that area as a car park. I was a regular user of the crossing at that time.
| Re: Rail fare action against inflated fares runs out of "steam" - or electricity In "Fare's Fair" [380251/32566/4] Posted by Mark A at 12:57, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Is this close to it?
https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=17528.msg215807#msg215807
| Rail fare action against inflated fares runs out of "steam" - or electricity In "Fare's Fair" [380250/32566/4] Posted by grahame at 12:48, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
From the Law Gazette
The ill-fated collective proceedings over allegedly unlawfully inflated fares on the London to Brighton rail line have been decertified by the Competition Appeal Tribunal. The claim, filed in 2021, had a turbulent history including the death of the original class representative and a court battle between would-be replacements.
Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway has been stayed since June last year when the original class representative, David Courtney Boyle, died from Parkinson's disease. A judgment published by the CAT this month reveals that no new class representative has emerged and the collective proceedings order has been revoked.
An update on the GTR Collective Proceedings website informs potential claimants that the proceedings have been decertified on the basis of a CAT order in April. A hearing to determine the parties' costs has been adjourned for the next available date after 6 November. 'Please note this website will be closed shortly,' the update concludes.
Boyle v Govia Thameslink Railway has been stayed since June last year when the original class representative, David Courtney Boyle, died from Parkinson's disease. A judgment published by the CAT this month reveals that no new class representative has emerged and the collective proceedings order has been revoked.
An update on the GTR Collective Proceedings website informs potential claimants that the proceedings have been decertified on the basis of a CAT order in April. A hearing to determine the parties' costs has been adjourned for the next available date after 6 November. 'Please note this website will be closed shortly,' the update concludes.
I have made a - fruitless - search of the Coffee Shop for a previous thread on this which as I recall involved ABC - the Association of British Commuters - I fee sure I should know what it's about already as it rings muffled bells, and I seem to be staring a thread very late in the day - or rather very late in the decade due to the (lack of) speed of legal activity.
Can anyone fill me in?
Can our merge master from somewhere near Backwell find the relevant started thread and merge?
A clue from https://www.catribunal.org.uk/cases/14047721-david-courtney-boyle. Southern, Gatwick Express and Thamslink - each operating trains from Brighton to London - and perhaps misleading people by appearing to compete with each other? That's my reading of it but I could be wrong, and if I am, sorry for my misunderstanding - happy to add a correction.
Status
Application by David Courtney Boyle and Edward John Vermeer to commence collective proceedings under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998. The proposed collective proceedings would combine standalone claims against the Proposed Defendants for loss and damage caused by alleged infringements of the Chapter II prohibition on abuse of dominance in section 18 of the Competition Act 1998.
A CMC took place on 16 December 2021.
A hearing to consider the Proposed Class Representatives' request to re-amend their collective proceedings claim form took place on 5 July 2022. The President issued his ruling in relation to this request on 5 July 2022 ([2022] CAT 30).
The CPO Application hearing took place on 13 to 15 July 2022. Judgment was issued on 25 July 2022. The Collective Proceedings Order was made on 5 October 2022.
A CMC took place on 14 October 2022. The President made a Reasoned Order in relation to costs on 28 November 2022 ([2022] CAT 54).
A CMC took place on 17 March 2023. The Tribunal issued a judgment dated 24 March 2023 vacating the trial listed for the last quarter of 2023, staying the proceedings (subject to a limited number of exceptions) and providing further case management directions ([2023] CAT 19).
A CMC took place on 12 October 2023. The Tribunal gave a ruling on the modality of trial on 19 October 2023. A CMC to consider (i) the Class Representative's (CR) application to amend his Claim Form; and (ii) the next steps in the proceedings took place on 6 and 7 February 2025. On 6 March 2025 the Tribunal issued its ruling refusing an application by the Class Representative to amend his claim form ([2025] CAT 16).
A further CMC took place on 26 and 27 March 2025 (the March CMC). The Tribunal issued its ruling on consequential matters arising from the CR's amendment application on Day 1 of the March CMC ([2025] CAT 23).
On 1 May 2025, the Tribunal issued its judgment on costs and next steps following the March CMC ([2025] CAT 26).
By Order dated 15 December 2025, the proceedings are stayed until 30 January 2026, save in relation to any work that is necessary for the identification and application for approval of a suitable class representative. A hearing to consider the next steps in the proceedings and costs took place on 15 April 2026. The Tribunal issued its judgment on the costs applications brought by the Estate of Mr Boyle and the Defendants against Mr Merricks on 12 May 2026 ([2026] CAT 45).
On 20 April 2026, the Tribunal made an order in relation to the future conduct of the proceedings.
Application by David Courtney Boyle and Edward John Vermeer to commence collective proceedings under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998. The proposed collective proceedings would combine standalone claims against the Proposed Defendants for loss and damage caused by alleged infringements of the Chapter II prohibition on abuse of dominance in section 18 of the Competition Act 1998.
A CMC took place on 16 December 2021.
A hearing to consider the Proposed Class Representatives' request to re-amend their collective proceedings claim form took place on 5 July 2022. The President issued his ruling in relation to this request on 5 July 2022 ([2022] CAT 30).
The CPO Application hearing took place on 13 to 15 July 2022. Judgment was issued on 25 July 2022. The Collective Proceedings Order was made on 5 October 2022.
A CMC took place on 14 October 2022. The President made a Reasoned Order in relation to costs on 28 November 2022 ([2022] CAT 54).
A CMC took place on 17 March 2023. The Tribunal issued a judgment dated 24 March 2023 vacating the trial listed for the last quarter of 2023, staying the proceedings (subject to a limited number of exceptions) and providing further case management directions ([2023] CAT 19).
A CMC took place on 12 October 2023. The Tribunal gave a ruling on the modality of trial on 19 October 2023. A CMC to consider (i) the Class Representative's (CR) application to amend his Claim Form; and (ii) the next steps in the proceedings took place on 6 and 7 February 2025. On 6 March 2025 the Tribunal issued its ruling refusing an application by the Class Representative to amend his claim form ([2025] CAT 16).
A further CMC took place on 26 and 27 March 2025 (the March CMC). The Tribunal issued its ruling on consequential matters arising from the CR's amendment application on Day 1 of the March CMC ([2025] CAT 23).
On 1 May 2025, the Tribunal issued its judgment on costs and next steps following the March CMC ([2025] CAT 26).
By Order dated 15 December 2025, the proceedings are stayed until 30 January 2026, save in relation to any work that is necessary for the identification and application for approval of a suitable class representative. A hearing to consider the next steps in the proceedings and costs took place on 15 April 2026. The Tribunal issued its judgment on the costs applications brought by the Estate of Mr Boyle and the Defendants against Mr Merricks on 12 May 2026 ([2026] CAT 45).
On 20 April 2026, the Tribunal made an order in relation to the future conduct of the proceedings.
| Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts) In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380249/10737/21] Posted by Mark A at 12:47, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
I'd really like Temple Meads not to put me into snark mode every time and, the reasons it does, it would be easy to turn some of them around. Spend more than a few minutes and you'll quickly encounter passengers who are struggling with public transport's idiosyncratic ways, and its not difficult to find staff being dismissive towards them.
A general point: when it comes to airport connections, why are passengers heading for an airport often given priority treatment when it comes to bus stops - the airport flyer bus being the only service with a stop close to the station entrance? The number 8 stop there will probably have been a bit of a lifeline for people with poor mobility travelling to Temple Meads from other parts of the Bristol bus network and the new location is ... unconvincing and the eastern entrance stop is a poor replacement, it's less secure and, on the walk from the station, exposes people to a *lot* of weather.
The new station entrance. A big board shows 'Next fastest trains' to destinations, and their departure times, but doesn't that need to have some way to factor in the walking times from the east entrance to the platform and then to the train, as many of the listed departures will be well out of reach 5 to 10 minutes before they disappear from that list? (Personal experience of this in that at 16:22 it was still directing me to the 16:22 departure some way across the station rather than saying 'In through the gates and up to platform 13 for the 16:30' which, by the way, is non-stop to your destination'. )
Then, people will need directions for onward travel and particularly the new stop for the number eight, visible from the entrance but at a considerable distance - and the walking route to the bus isn't obvious. (Hint, ignore the steps and ramp that look as though they might take you to the bus stop, keep close to the university building and that'll take you straight there).
Within the new entrance, there are information screens, including this one which may be displaying onward destination information - and an out-of-date map of the station itself:

... about five seconds after you attempt to engage with this dense mass of text (that for many is rather too small to read), you'll find that the information board will turn the page and display one of its seven or so other more vacuous pages in its carousel. That £23 million pound space really needs some printed information boards. That would save the several members of staff from being understandably snarky to passengers when they're asked for the nth time where the No 8 bus is.
The main entrance, the top of the ramp at the former stop for the number 8, a notice with passenger advice on the change of location would be good, and indeed we have this, and there are issues:

The ad-hoc use of the train shed as a car park - that's so 1960s, as is the vehicle route to it that crosses the walking route for people approaching the main entrance.
Turning to the west side *major* passenger exit from the station, is this environment (and attitude) the best that the railways can do? How about a solid white line for vehicles, plus a pedestrian-priority crossing - and a mahoosive virginia creeper for that palisade fence?

| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [380248/28982/26] Posted by John D at 12:30, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Let's see if it actually runs, there have been many paths from Wolverton that were in, but then cancelled (sometimes twice).
There are still lots of 3 car units at Wolverton (and some have been there for 18 months), so potentially could be more than one unit coupled
| Re: Hereford / Ross on Wye / Gloucester - new campaign for re-opening In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [380247/32562/28] Posted by Mark A at 11:37, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
I'm reminded of this video from the line, a wedding party at Mitcheldean Road. Thoughts of travelling from there into the Forest of Dean would have been far from their minds, particularly as this was filmed in the late fifties and the line to Drybrook had seen the rails lifted during the first world war - without so much as use by a single train in service.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeL0uYzH2hY&t=2s
| Re: High Streets - thriving, changing, dying in 2026? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380246/32553/31] Posted by Mark A at 11:29, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Bath's most recent iteration of 'Post office'. That aside, you wonder how losing that slew of shops impacts magazine sales.

Not so sure it's a *new* campaign - see https://www.passenger.chat/r23538.html from six years ago, but it doesn't seem to have gained much traction since then. Having said which, the drip, drip, drip approach is often the ways things are achieved in the long term - took us 7 years from 2006 to 2013 to get a generally usable train service back at my local station.
The scale of Gloucester - Hereford via Ross on Wye is several orders of magnitude different to Melksham, of course - it's a (re)build-a-line job, and I have not seen the support for it at at the same level and Tweedbank to Carlsle, or Skipton to Colne. But then, perhaps, their campaigning is better targeted towards the movers and the shakers which I am not.
The scale of Gloucester - Hereford via Ross on Wye is several orders of magnitude different to Melksham, of course - it's a (re)build-a-line job, and I have not seen the support for it at at the same level and Tweedbank to Carlsle, or Skipton to Colne. But then, perhaps, their campaigning is better targeted towards the movers and the shakers which I am not.
Your positivity is always refreshing to see.
However, from what I can see on the map:
* The four proposed stations at Holme Lacy, Brampton Abbotts, Weston Under Penyard and Longhope would serve villages with a combined population of about 3000.
* Rotherwas is an industrial estate on the outskirts of Hereford and a station on the nearby existing main line would look to be a much better way of serving that area of south Hereford...if it needs to be served.
* Grange Court Junction, Oakle Street and Highnam on the existing Gloucester to Newport main line don't really serve anywhere apart from distant tiny villages.
* Ross-On-Wye itself is a much bigger settlement of course, but is still less than half the size of Melksham.
* There would need to be about 25 miles of railway reinstated and even if the old alignment is free of housing (and roads, car parks, solar farms, cycle paths, newts, bats, etc.), it's quite twisty and challenging terrain which I am sure would need all sorts of expensive work to stabilise it for a modern railway reinstatement.
You wonder what planet some people are on.
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [380244/28982/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:36, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Strange route keeping, which could be more than one unit, off the mainline as much as possible. Does it show the confidence in these ready to run units?
That's kind of how STP diagrams work. The computer will offer a path based on there being a path available, and taking into account any route availability restrictions for the type of train concerned.
Anyway, I'm not sure what's strange about it? The logical way to get from Wolverton to Didcot now is via EWR rather than snaking around north London and apart from that it runs main line all the way apart from the bit through Melksham. In fact you could argue that routing it via the main line from Westbury is a more risky way to send it than the route via Bristol because at least the latter has bi-directional signalling part of the way.
| Re: Cornwall: more council control of Cornish buses to be considered In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380243/32563/5] Posted by grahame at 10:34, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Can I point (bus-y) members towards the TravelWatch SouthWest meeting on 9th October where the theme of the day will be "socially necessary bus services".
See https://www.passenger.chat/r32460.html
| Re: "Can I take my dog on the train?" and other questions In "The Lighter Side" [380242/32564/30] Posted by grahame at 10:29, 30th September 2026 Already liked by ChrisB | ![]() |
Silly morning - also found https://www.facebook.com/reel/1068506312823674 - many a true word spoken in jest.
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [380241/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 10:16, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Strange route keeping, which could be more than one unit, off the mainline as much as possible. Does it show the confidence in these ready to run units?
| Stagecoach, Exeter - The good, the bad …… In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380240/32565/5] Posted by bradshaw at 09:46, 30th September 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
The other day I had to travel to Spa Medica near Exeter Airport to have the prelim assessment for a cataract lens replacement.
Grandson drove me to Axminster to catch the 12.14 train to St Davids. Then the aim was to catch the Stagecoach 4A bus to the Airport at 13.15. However that did not arrive, neither did the next one, due 35 minutes later. The Stagecoach app would not reveal the presence of the 4A and kept directing me to the 4 instead!
The result a £24.80 taxi fare to Spa Medica.
After the assessment it was a short walk to the airport for the 4A back. However, this was running 35 late meaning I would miss the train to Axminster. Decided to walk to Clyst Honiton and catch the 4 to Cranbrook where I could catch the train. I got off in Cranbrook only to see the bus go off to the station, not shown on the screen or the timetable.
Naturally, the GWR Axminster service was cancelled but caught the SWR on a little later, arriving in Axminster in time for the last bus to Bridport, where grandson picked me up.
Following a strongly worded email to Stagecoach, I received a reply saying if I had the taxi receipt I could claim a refund. Not expecting them to do this I only had my Apple Pay record. This they accepted and £24.80 found its way back into my account, a good result and a thanks to Stagecoach.
At Axminster I even gad time for a swift glass of beer in the Ale Way, the old station master’s house!
| "Can I take my dog on the train?" and other questions In "The Lighter Side" [380239/32564/30] Posted by grahame at 09:42, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
| Re: Dawlish - permanent resilience work - ongoing discussions In "London to the West" [380238/22771/12] Posted by Mark A at 09:29, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Google Earth indicates that the Holyhead array of sidings there received an extensive fettling around 2020, previous to that they'd become a bit of a jungle. With what intention I don't know.
I think priority has to be to now get rid of the BR dmus. Certainly relatively easy win is to wire filton/Chippenham to Bristol TM and Weston-super-Mare this way you could get BEMUs on Cardiff to Taunton and Portsmouth Harbour services the latter will need tri mode units
| Re: Cornwall: more council control of Cornish buses to be considered In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380236/32563/5] Posted by LiskeardRich at 09:15, 30th September 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
Unfortunately this is a consequence of living in a sparsely populated rural location. Having a more regular bus to a village with a population of 1500, the majority will be car users who can’t be convinced to use public transport no matter how good the transport is.the rest of the 78 route passes through hamlets with less than a dozen routes each.
These people who move to these lovely rural villages don’t think, “what if I have to give up driving”.
Upton cross has its best service in several decades, until the current council tenders in 2020 they had 2 buses a day. They now have the 78 and 78A, which suffers from punctuality issues but always runs except in extreme circumstances.
As a rural bus driver myself at another operator, running times are unpredictable around rural country lane routes. You could have a perfect clear run through one day bang on time, the next day you’ll meet every farmer with their tractor and trailer and spend more time going backwards than forwards
| Re: Hereford / Ross on Wye / Gloucester - new campaign for re-opening In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [380235/32562/28] Posted by grahame at 09:12, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Not so sure it's a *new* campaign - see https://www.passenger.chat/r23538.html from six years ago, but it doesn't seem to have gained much traction since then. Having said which, the drip, drip, drip approach is often the ways things are achieved in the long term - took us 7 years from 2006 to 2013 to get a generally usable train service back at my local station.
The scale of Gloucester - Hereford via Ross on Wye is several orders of magnitude different to Melksham, of course - it's a (re)build-a-line job, and I have not seen the support for it at at the same level and Tweedbank to Carlsle, or Skipton to Colne. But then, perhaps, their campaigning is better targeted towards the movers and the shakers which I am not.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [380234/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 09:06, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Earlier this morning:
2E80 0700 Worcester Shrub Hill to Didcot Parkway cancelled between Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford due to an issue with the train crew (TH).
and also today:
09:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 12:48 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
13:18 Hereford to London Paddington due 16:25 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
13:18 Hereford to London Paddington due 16:25 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
| Re: High Streets - thriving, changing, dying in 2026? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380233/32553/31] Posted by bradshaw at 09:00, 30th September 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
While Bridport has a few closed shops, in general the High Streets(E, W & S) are in quite good shape. Yes, three of the big four banks have closed -HSBC is now a cafe bar, Nat West is being converted to a gallery and Barclays is a soft furnishing business. We still have TSB and Nationwide.
We have three artisan bakeries, three butchers as well as numerous small, local shops. A bookshop seems to do well despite Waterstones. RKL Tools, a hardware store has just moved to larger premises
Waitrose is on West Street and there is Spar and Premier on East Street. Morrisons, Lidl and Coop are on the edge of the town. Saturdays often sees Marion and I parking at the Coop and walking into town.
We even have a Hatter, Snooks, which still makes them on site. There is also a music store.
The cafe society is thriving with a number of artisan coffee shops preferred to Costa and #1.
There is an arts centre, an Art Deco cinema and a theatre, in an old chapel.
On top of this there is the twice weekly street market.
Trading estates occupy a number of old industrial site not far from the town centre offering a wide range of services.
We also have a busy Post Office
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [380232/28982/26] Posted by GBM at 08:40, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Another first for Melksham?
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K04812/2026-10-01/detailed
Melksham [MKM] pass 1309
Noticed this from https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/class-175s-to-gwr.272524/page-151#post-7964134
Argh - I'd really like to go to this, but Mondays aren't good for me 
Don't suppose anyone will be recording it?

Don't suppose anyone will be recording it?
No, Graham will be speaking live.
Oh, I see what you mean.
Oh, I see what you mean.

Lisa has spoken several times at the Atworth History Group, including March 2026, and her talks have not been videoed nor broadcast online.
My own talk will be a new one, though sharing much of the material I used in July 2014 at the Melksham Heritage Day. I'm open to presenting it again (if any speaker bookers are reading this) and hopefully nothing like as long as gap this time.
No, Graham will be speaking live.
Oh, I see what you mean.

| Re: 5th October 2026 - "History of Melksham Station" talk in Atworth - 5th Oct 2026 In "Diary - what's happening when?" [380229/32416/34] Posted by JohnM at 08:05, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
Argh - I'd really like to go to this, but Mondays aren't good for me

Don't suppose anyone will be recording it?
| Re: High Streets - thriving, changing, dying in 2026? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380228/32553/31] Posted by grahame at 07:55, 30th September 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
At the risk of looking just the same as other pictures ... from Swindon last month:

Selling the WHSmith High Street outlets to a company that had closed Claires and Factory Shops has had not unexpected results. Whilst there are cals for new ventures / subPostmasters to set up, that's not an investment I would encourage friends of family to make. It may be that there are more premises available if there's the predicted reduction in vape shops, but somehow I would find it hard to trust the company that's inherited a persona from the Horizon scandal, and has now found itself loosing lots of customer serving outlets with the TGJones closures.
An update, from the BBC:
Restoration work on historic pier 'astonishing'

The restoration of Birnbeck Pier is now a quarter of the way through
A crumbling historic pier which is currently undergoing a major restoration will reopen next summer, a council leader has said.
The Grade II*-listed Birnbeck Pier, in Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, closed to the public in 1994 due to safety concerns, and has since been battered by storms.
North Somerset Council leader Mike Bell said: "At the moment [we are] 100% confident. We're on time, on budget, you can see the progress they're making. It's astonishing."
A quarter of the pier is now restored, with the remaining deck spans being installed over the coming months. Work to create a new cultural space, restore the historic clock tower and turnstiles, repair the 1888 boathouse and renovate the pavilion buildings began in February.
Bell said: "We're about a quarter of the way down on the build now. It brings to life we're doing it, we're refurbishing and restoring the pier. It will reopen next year. It's one of the biggest heritage projects in the country at the moment. I'm really confident we're going to deliver and it's going to make a huge difference to Weston-super-Mare. The benefit it'll have in terms of heritage, culture, tourism and the wider economy in Weston will far outweigh the cost of doing it," he added.
(BBC article continues)

The restoration of Birnbeck Pier is now a quarter of the way through
A crumbling historic pier which is currently undergoing a major restoration will reopen next summer, a council leader has said.
The Grade II*-listed Birnbeck Pier, in Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, closed to the public in 1994 due to safety concerns, and has since been battered by storms.
North Somerset Council leader Mike Bell said: "At the moment [we are] 100% confident. We're on time, on budget, you can see the progress they're making. It's astonishing."
A quarter of the pier is now restored, with the remaining deck spans being installed over the coming months. Work to create a new cultural space, restore the historic clock tower and turnstiles, repair the 1888 boathouse and renovate the pavilion buildings began in February.
Bell said: "We're about a quarter of the way down on the build now. It brings to life we're doing it, we're refurbishing and restoring the pier. It will reopen next year. It's one of the biggest heritage projects in the country at the moment. I'm really confident we're going to deliver and it's going to make a huge difference to Weston-super-Mare. The benefit it'll have in terms of heritage, culture, tourism and the wider economy in Weston will far outweigh the cost of doing it," he added.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: High Streets - thriving, changing, dying in 2026? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380226/32553/31] Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:47, 30th September 2026 | ![]() |
My view from Nailsea (a town of over 20,000 residents): I'll try to keep this brief, as most of the points have been covered in posts above.
Nailsea High Street is a shadow of what it used to be, when we first moved here, over thirty years ago. Long gone are the independent family butchers, bakers, greengrocers.
Similarly, long gone are the 'big four' Banks, and Nationwide Building Society, each closing down over the years. We now have a 'banking hub', sponsored by the Post Office - but that's only available for pre-booked face-to-face appointments with a representative from a bank, not for any financial transactions.
Many of the previous independent shops in the High Street are now Turkish barbers (I've lost count of them), Chinese takeaways (there are now two, after a Chinese restaurant directly across the street from one of them closed), two nail bars and a myriad of charity shops.
Car parking is now subject to a charge, which the feedback I get from my occasional chats with a couple of businesses has had a detrimental effect on their trade.
Nailsea High Street is a shadow of what it used to be, when we first moved here, over thirty years ago. Long gone are the independent family butchers, bakers, greengrocers.
Similarly, long gone are the 'big four' Banks, and Nationwide Building Society, each closing down over the years. We now have a 'banking hub', sponsored by the Post Office - but that's only available for pre-booked face-to-face appointments with a representative from a bank, not for any financial transactions.
Many of the previous independent shops in the High Street are now Turkish barbers (I've lost count of them), Chinese takeaways (there are now two, after a Chinese restaurant directly across the street from one of them closed), two nail bars and a myriad of charity shops.
Car parking is now subject to a charge, which the feedback I get from my occasional chats with a couple of businesses has had a detrimental effect on their trade.
I think you've done a very good job there of describing the decline of the typical English High Street over the last decade.
The Banks, family owned/better quality retailers (and pubs) are closing/moving online (to be fair in many ways reflecting the behaviour of their customers), and it seems to be accelerating.
But hey, boom time for Turkish barbers and vape shops!
















