Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: West of England Line - Soil Moisture Deficit Update - 10 October 2025 In "South Western services" [380950/30889/42] Posted by bradshaw at 15:22, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Now the Environment Agency releases this update on the water supply. I does not look like the emergency timetable will end anytime soon.
Severe drought declared in parts of southern England
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwm243lrgdpgo
| Re: Fewer trains in the South West when nationalised? In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [380949/32155/40] Posted by John D at 15:18, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Not quite sure where to put this (and it is opposite of cuts as per thread title) so happy for mods to find better thread
A speech at TransCity South 2026 said potential for £14bn growth and 238,000 jobs in South West if Rail is improved
The Great Western Route has the potential to become one of the UK's most powerful drivers of economic growth, according to new findings highlighted by Joanna Grew during her opening keynote address at TransCityRail South 2026.
Drawing on insights from the Growing Places report, Joanna Grew outlined how the railway corridor stretching from London Paddington to Penzance could support thousands of new jobs, stimulate investment and unlock significant economic value across the regions it serves.
The report reveals that the Great Western Route could support as many as 238,000 jobs while generating more than £14 billion in annual economic value. The figures underline the critical role that rail infrastructure can play in connecting communities, attracting investment and supporting long-term regional growth.
Addressing delegates from across the rail industry and supply chain, Joanna Grew explored how development around stations has the potential to drive economic regeneration, create employment opportunities and strengthen local economies. The benefits extend well beyond passenger journeys, with improved connectivity helping businesses access talent, markets and investment opportunities more effectively.
The keynote also highlighted the strategic importance of continued railway investment, particularly at a time when regional growth and levelling up remain key priorities across the UK. By maximising the potential of station-led development and transport connectivity, the Great Western Route could become a cornerstone of future economic prosperity.
Drawing on insights from the Growing Places report, Joanna Grew outlined how the railway corridor stretching from London Paddington to Penzance could support thousands of new jobs, stimulate investment and unlock significant economic value across the regions it serves.
The report reveals that the Great Western Route could support as many as 238,000 jobs while generating more than £14 billion in annual economic value. The figures underline the critical role that rail infrastructure can play in connecting communities, attracting investment and supporting long-term regional growth.
Addressing delegates from across the rail industry and supply chain, Joanna Grew explored how development around stations has the potential to drive economic regeneration, create employment opportunities and strengthen local economies. The benefits extend well beyond passenger journeys, with improved connectivity helping businesses access talent, markets and investment opportunities more effectively.
The keynote also highlighted the strategic importance of continued railway investment, particularly at a time when regional growth and levelling up remain key priorities across the UK. By maximising the potential of station-led development and transport connectivity, the Great Western Route could become a cornerstone of future economic prosperity.
https://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/articles/great-western-route-could-unlock-238000-jobs-and-deliver-ps14bn-annual-economic-boost
| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380948/32613/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:17, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
"No offers of a general better level of service" - sure about that?
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
It depends, I suppose, on how you define "better" and how you measure "level".
A train every 15 minutes from Bristol Temple Meads to Bath Spa, calling at Keynsham, Oldfield Park and Bath Spa. Two carrying on via Chippenham and Swindon in the hour (one each to Bedford and London) and two via Westbury to London via Salisbury (all stations to Basingstoke) and to Southampton Central (all stations). A train every hour Swindon to Yeovil, alternating onward to or via Yeovil Junction and Weymouth. All trains at least 5 carriages long (London trains 9 or 10) and with timings to include 15% extra recovery time at key points along the way. ... Is that "better"?
Tickets - singles only, any time and off peak only, with off peak being for journeys starting after 09:30 and before 16:00, and after 19:30, 7 days a week. Season tickets to be replaced by smart ticketing, linked to your credit card or a Cuttlefish card (an overgrown Oyster) card. Railcards available for all, at Bronze, Silver and Gold levels offering 12%, 24%, 36% off all tickets for an annual fee. Holiday (rover) cards available for a week in dynamic geographic areas, no time restrictions.
You set the parameters at "a general better level of service", you are getting rather specific now!

Ticketing suggestions seem sound, and you would have thought that with one organisation rather than numerous TOCs consistency would be much easier in that context, but we'll see. I doubt anything that reduces overall revenue will gain much traction given her other comments about reducing subsidy!
Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................
| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380947/32613/51] Posted by grahame at 13:13, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
"No offers of a general better level of service" - sure about that?
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
It depends, I suppose, on how you define "better" and how you measure "level".
A train every 15 minutes from Bristol Temple Meads to Bath Spa, calling at Keynsham, Oldfield Park and Bath Spa. Two carrying on via Chippenham and Swindon in the hour (one each to Bedford and London) and two via Westbury to London via Salisbury (all stations to Basingstoke) and to Southampton Central (all stations). A train every hour Swindon to Yeovil, alternating onward to or via Yeovil Junction and Weymouth. All trains at least 5 carriages long (London trains 9 or 10) and with timings to include 15% extra recovery time at key points along the way. ... Is that "better"?
Tickets - singles only, any time and off peak only, with off peak being for journeys starting after 09:30 and before 16:00, and after 19:30, 7 days a week. Season tickets to be replaced by smart ticketing, linked to your credit card or a Cuttlefish card (an overgrown Oyster) card. Railcards available for all, at Bronze, Silver and Gold levels offering 12%, 24%, 36% off all tickets for an annual fee. Holiday (rover) cards available for a week in dynamic geographic areas, no time restrictions.
| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380945/32613/51] Posted by GBM at 13:11, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Prof Glaister says: "When the public is hoping for a better level of service, more reliability, fewer breakdowns and lower fares, what they're really asking for is more money to be put into the railway.
Sure, that's what the public are hoping for. But let's look
1. There are no offers of a general better level of service, though there may be some bright spots. Indeed nothing much is said about level of service and could we be in for another Beeching, or Serpell? That could save money. I won't give any pointers in the South West ... but I could look at East Anglia and and ask about lines such as those through Berney Arms, East Tilbury and Emerson Park, and to such places as Sheringham, Sudbury and Southminster and wonder about their economic case.
2. More reliability and fewer breakdowns could be achieved by reducing the number of services run and increasing running times, could it not? Swiss timekeeping has an excellent reputation, but I've made a number of journeys where we have paused to make up time. And modern technology (I've see demos) can hide that slowing down by programming the trains to run slower than they could - not awaiting time at stations but running a little slower between
3. "Fare Simplification" is what is suggested, and can be achieved, can't it, by simply scrapping some of the lower fares? Let's get rid of super off peak - no, it's not in headlines terms putting "fares up" but it'll sure as heck make a substantial difference in our parts to weekend travellers!
[/quote]
"No offers of a general better level of service" - sure about that?
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
[/quote]
I'll have some of what she's on! (please)

| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380944/32623/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:57, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
I have seen it referred to elsewhere as the 'dismalisation' of our currency - I merely included that in my heading for this new topic.

I agree with you about the withdrawal of lower denomination coins. Who actually uses 1p or 2p coins these days? In Wetherspoons, for example, I see anyone paying with cash and receiving 1p in change puts it straight into the charity collection tin on the bar.
Cash does indeed still have its uses. In Nailsea, for example, one of the Chinese takeaways is 'cash only' for transactions of less than £10, and in Melksham there is a barbers which is 'cash only' for everything.
CfN.

| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380943/32623/1] Posted by Red Squirrel at 12:23, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Incidentally, why ‘dismalisation’ CfN? Old money was a bit of fun, but the ‘new’ stuff is a lot more practical isn’t it?
It strikes me that had £sd survived, we would by now be on the brink of withdrawing denominations below the shilling anyway - can anyone think of anything that costs less than 5p? And then there’s the general abandonment of cash: without the need to fiddle for change, I suspect a lot of people are quite vague about the precise cost of things below £1.
That having been said, I have of late brought cash back into my life - partly for contrarian reasons. I am surprised how often people gaspin amazement when you try to pay them with, er, money.
| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380942/32613/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 12:20, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Prof Glaister says: "When the public is hoping for a better level of service, more reliability, fewer breakdowns and lower fares, what they're really asking for is more money to be put into the railway.
Sure, that's what the public are hoping for. But let's look
1. There are no offers of a general better level of service, though there may be some bright spots. Indeed nothing much is said about level of service and could we be in for another Beeching, or Serpell? That could save money. I won't give any pointers in the South West ... but I could look at East Anglia and and ask about lines such as those through Berney Arms, East Tilbury and Emerson Park, and to such places as Sheringham, Sudbury and Southminster and wonder about their economic case.
2. More reliability and fewer breakdowns could be achieved by reducing the number of services run and increasing running times, could it not? Swiss timekeeping has an excellent reputation, but I've made a number of journeys where we have paused to make up time. And modern technology (I've see demos) can hide that slowing down by programming the trains to run slower than they could - not awaiting time at stations but running a little slower between
3. "Fare Simplification" is what is suggested, and can be achieved, can't it, by simply scrapping some of the lower fares? Let's get rid of super off peak - no, it's not in headlines terms putting "fares up" but it'll sure as heck make a substantial difference in our parts to weekend travellers!
"No offers of a general better level of service" - sure about that?
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
| Re: Server slow ... In "News, Help and Assistance" [380941/30293/29] Posted by grahame at 12:16, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
That dog loves you. Or, you're the source of food. Or both. In any case, looks to be well grounded.
Mark
Mark
Both - but at food times or when we are eating, the quest for food manifests in a different way. There is a comfort on his part which we are proud of; Lights (Lightning) came to us - I think the term is - scared of his own shadow and attached to Lulu as his sole safety from a fear of everything. Kennelmates. She sometimes places her head similarly ...

| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380939/32325/3] Posted by grahame at 11:30, 15th October 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, GBM, Mark A | ![]() |
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.

I have to admit that change feels sensible - in that we have manoeuvred ourselves into a cancellation and compensation culture. At the same time, this is just replacing the treatment with another one, and the best solution would be to fix the malaise in the first place - they should be able to reduce the number of claims by running most / more / a higher proportion of trains and connections on time.
| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380938/32325/3] Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:21, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.

| Re: Ideas for a day out? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380937/32559/31] Posted by Mark A at 11:12, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Thanks for those insights. For a while, my go-to check on the performance of the online booking engines was a quick search for rooms in the closed and derelict for some time Glenfield Hotel in Ullapool. Some site or other would usually have something on offer even after its site was redeveloped for housing.
Mark
| Re: Server slow ... In "News, Help and Assistance" [380936/30293/29] Posted by Mark A at 11:01, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
That dog loves you. Or, you're the source of food. Or both. In any case, looks to be well grounded.
Mark
| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380934/32325/3] Posted by John D at 10:56, 15th October 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
ORR has just released Delay Repay report for first four 4 weekly periods this year (1 April - 22 July)
GWR 549,707 claims, second highest volume by Operator after Avanti, and up hefty 52% on same periods previous year
Cross Country 202,954 claims, up 59% on year before
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/52abf1ay/delay-compensation-claims-factsheet-2026-27-rail-periods-01-04.pdf
These increases seem huge to me, although possibly claiming is bit easier, but it clearly reflects the shoddiness of the service.
| Re: Ryanair - routes, schedules, incidents and issues (merged posts) In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380933/29076/51] Posted by grahame at 10:43, 15th October 2026 Already liked by rogerw | ![]() |
From The Rotherham Bugle on Facebook
We’ve all been there. You face a long flight and there’s a spare seat next to you - and then you get that sinking feeling as you see someone lumbering down the cabin. Well a new service from Ryanair hopes to put an end to that.
For a sliding scale of additional charges, you can now choose who sits next to you. Want to avoid someone whose arse is wider than the seat? That’s £50. Want to sidestep anyone with questionable personal hygiene? That’s another £30. Or how about giving a wide berth to anyone who eats through the entire flight, wants to get up for the bog twenty times, talks too much or falls asleep on take off and snores like a pig for the entire flight? That’s £25 each for any of those.
It isn’t all about avoiding people though as a spokesperson for Ryanair explained. “For an extra £200 we can sit you next to a fit bit of stuff and for another £50 we can stick your wife and kids at the other end of the plane” he said.
Ryanair says initial reaction has been good. “We find people are quite happy to pay extra for things that should really come as part of the basic ticket price.” he said.
For a sliding scale of additional charges, you can now choose who sits next to you. Want to avoid someone whose arse is wider than the seat? That’s £50. Want to sidestep anyone with questionable personal hygiene? That’s another £30. Or how about giving a wide berth to anyone who eats through the entire flight, wants to get up for the bog twenty times, talks too much or falls asleep on take off and snores like a pig for the entire flight? That’s £25 each for any of those.
It isn’t all about avoiding people though as a spokesperson for Ryanair explained. “For an extra £200 we can sit you next to a fit bit of stuff and for another £50 we can stick your wife and kids at the other end of the plane” he said.
Ryanair says initial reaction has been good. “We find people are quite happy to pay extra for things that should really come as part of the basic ticket price.” he said.
| Re: Ideas for a day out? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380932/32559/31] Posted by grahame at 09:48, 15th October 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
**snip** Booking.com **snip** commission fee of around 9%.
Scottish B&B person who had had a portmanteau career before running a B&B business that having husbanded its reputation had grown along with the old stationmaster's house there - and now also included a freestanding holiday home constructed in part on ground that he'd cleared by removing a scoop into the long-abandoned railway embankment that bordered his land. He indicated that yes, the booking sites took a substantial bite out of the transaction, and for the holiday cottage this was 22%.
Booking Agency Commissions ... indeed, that 9% quoted was low, and the 22% is high from my (historic) memory. Sounds a lot - ranging from "high" to "profiteering" perhaps? But yet, I'll give you a modified view, increasingly historic but not totally replaced. We paid, in commission, somewhere between those quoted figures when we ran Well House Manor. We did so with full prior knowledge, and willingly. How do you reach people from far, far away to come to your little B&B in an obscure town in Wiltshire?
The days are gone of advertising in magazines and holiday brochures, the walk ins to the TIC have faded to zero, and money spent on advertising and a commission to the TIC are no longer paid. So the move to the online booking agencies can be viewed as a changed cost and not a new one.
Whilst we preferred the commission rates to be lower rather than higher (who wouldn't?) we did not resent the agency payments. Worth it for a good, easy to use and secure service that sold rooms only at times we otherwise had a surplus without having to field loads of enquires for rooms when they aren't available (negative marketing effect). We had control over what and when we offered, and indeed "Late Rooms" only offered them quite close to the date, required payment up front / not cancellable, and sometimes applied a minimum stay; Saturday night only available as part of a stay of 2 or more nights.
Potential direct customer question "We know you pay a commission to Late Rooms - will you take our booking, please, at a slightly lower rate than is offered there?" Suprisingly, no, not if you're looking for just a night or two as a first time guest. Our agreement with Late Rooms was that we had to offer the lowest rate there. But there was much more to it; the agency booking with "no cancels" reduced our no-shows and late drop outs. And it secured payment ahead of time and saved us the admin that was done by the central agency. And a "can you do it cheaper / direct" request was a flag of a potentially "squeaky wheel" customer - double edges sword there, since it could also indicate a thoughfulness on the part of the potential guest.
Are there are parallels, these days, in taxi bookings and Uber, and in split ticketing, where the obvious / rack rate price can be bargained for / undercut as we look to save money?
| Re: Server slow ... In "News, Help and Assistance" [380931/30293/29] Posted by grahame at 08:56, 15th October 2026 Already liked by Western Pathfinder, JohnM, PrestburyRoad, GBM | ![]() |
A day later ... here are the loadings

Here is an example report
an example of the sort of visitors we have
The IP address 72.63.193.154 is a public IPv4 address registered to Verizon Business (Fios/MCI Communications) in the United States. It appears to be a residential or small-business dynamic IP address that has likely been compromised by a botnet or malware to send unauthorized spam
and here is the webmaster team working on it this morning

No big panics, by the way - ongoing stuff that needs ongoing watching
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [380930/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 08:46, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
06:43 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 08:44 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
09:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 12:48 will be started from Worcester Shrub Hill.
It will no longer call at London Paddington, Reading, Oxford, Hanborough, Charlbury, Kingham, Moreton-In-Marsh, Honeybourne, Evesham, Pershore and Worcestershire Parkway Hl.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
09:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 12:48 will be started from Worcester Shrub Hill.
It will no longer call at London Paddington, Reading, Oxford, Hanborough, Charlbury, Kingham, Moreton-In-Marsh, Honeybourne, Evesham, Pershore and Worcestershire Parkway Hl.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
| Re: West of England Line - Soil Moisture Deficit Update - 10 October 2025 In "South Western services" [380927/30889/42] Posted by bradshaw at 08:15, 15th October 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
From SERUG
South Western Railway have just released the latest West of England Line update - you can read it by opening the link below. It includes a video on the current Soil Moisture issues and also a more general video on the wider issues operating services on the line.
https://youtu.be/sk6TYNy8qH0?si=9r55a533zLh_Md4_
I’m afraid I still refer to the 50p coin as a ‘ten bob bit’, much to the annoyance of my kids.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [380923/31163/26] Posted by NickB at 07:08, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Delays due to [checks magic 8-ball] safety inspection of the track.
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380922/32623/1] Posted by broadgage at 05:44, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
The 50 new pence coin was introduced well before decimalisation, in place of, and having the same value as a ten shilling note.
Within memory they were sometimes known as "ten bob coins"
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [380921/31163/26] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 05:16, 15th October 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
Another bluddy train strike, then.















