Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [378442/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:30, 19th August 2026 |      |
Every......sodding.......day
Cancellations to services between London Paddington and Reading
Due to a points failure at London Paddington disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Train services between London Paddington and Reading may be cancelled or delayed.
Customer Advice
-
We are sorry for the disruption to your journey today.
-
What has happened?
-
There has been a points failure in the London Paddington area. A points failure is a fault with the movable pieces of track that enable trains to change tracks.
-
| Inflation rate announced - a portent of next year's trains fares? In "Fare's Fair" [378441/32388/4] Posted by grahame at 13:59, 19th August 2026 | |
From Wiltshire Live
Regulated train fares in England could increase by more than 4% next year.
The potential rise is based on the Office for National Statistics announcing that Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation rose to 3.2% in July.
The Government has not confirmed what it will do about fare rises in 2027, but last year’s 4.6% cap was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024.
If that formula is used to set next year’s increase, the cost of train travel will jump by 4.2%. That would mean an annual season ticket from Brighton to London rising by £219 to £5,423.
A flexi ticket for travel two days per week over a year from Leeds to Manchester would increase by £151.35 to £3,754.95. Sir Keir Starmer’s government froze regulated fares this year. About 45% of fares on Britain’s railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh governments.
They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. Unregulated fares are set by operators, but rises in these are expected to be similar.
The Department for Transport has been approached for comment.
The potential rise is based on the Office for National Statistics announcing that Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation rose to 3.2% in July.
The Government has not confirmed what it will do about fare rises in 2027, but last year’s 4.6% cap was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024.
If that formula is used to set next year’s increase, the cost of train travel will jump by 4.2%. That would mean an annual season ticket from Brighton to London rising by £219 to £5,423.
A flexi ticket for travel two days per week over a year from Leeds to Manchester would increase by £151.35 to £3,754.95. Sir Keir Starmer’s government froze regulated fares this year. About 45% of fares on Britain’s railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh governments.
They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. Unregulated fares are set by operators, but rises in these are expected to be similar.
The Department for Transport has been approached for comment.
I feel it's too early to know the formula?
| Bath. Northgate Street / Broad Street changes from 2027 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [378440/32387/5] Posted by Mark A at 13:48, 19th August 2026 | |
In conjunction with the creation of the new site for Bath's costume museum and the road outside, people have been looking at the visuals and have been wondering what happens to the route through the bus gate - through which several Faresaver services pass on the way to the rail and bus stations.
I *think* the intention is:
* The part of Northgate Street closest to the previous post office will close and a paved area will replace it and also the cycle parking island.
* The road past Waitrose will become tidal for vehicles permitted to pass the bus gate - with flow in first one direction and then the other.
* Traffic from Walcot Street into Broad Street, rather than swinging past the church - St Michael's Without - will use Saracen Street - that gap hacked through the buildings between Walcot Street and Broad Street. The tidal flow section aside, that sounds as though it will need a signal controlled turn from the junction.
I may be wrong about part or all of the above, and also I don't know what provision there will be for cycling, delivery routes to various businesses including those in Green Street, emergency services vehicles, ways to accommodate the exit from the Hilton Hotel, and lastly ways to address the ability of queues for the Podium car park to paralyse the flow of buses along Walcot Street.
Mark
| Re: Derailment, Lewes, 13 Aug 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378437/32362/51] Posted by grahame at 13:32, 19th August 2026 | |
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch has released an update into its ongoing investigation into the train derailment at Lewes in East Sussex.
At around 15:54 on the 13th August 2026, 1F34, the 14:24 Southern service from London Victoria to Eastbourne, derailed around 1 mile north of Lewes station.
The service was formed of eight carriages, and the rear three vehicles derailed and overturned, coming to rest on their side on an embankment.
150 people were on the train when the derailment happened. 30 people were injured in the accident; 20 of those required hospital treatment, some with serious injuries.
The first RAIB inspectors arrived on site at 19:11 to secure evidence alongside the British Transport Police.
The RAIB has downloaded the On-Train Data Recorder and is currently analysing this alongside CCTV recordings and signalling data.
This accident took place on the Down Lewes line, where the maximum speed for a train is 70mph. The two Class 387 units on 1F34 were coupled together and were travelling at around 65mph as it approached the point of derailment.
Initial analysis shows that the driver applied the brakes at the point of derailment, and the train began to slow down.
Marks on the rail near the point of derailment are consistent with the wheels of the derailed carriages climbing over the rails.
CCTV images from 1F34 and other services show that track geometry irregularity existed on the approach to the derailment.
The RAIB says that there is also evidence of previous track maintenance activity in the area.
Several reports of rough riding in the area were also received by the RAIB following the accident.
The embankment that the railway runs on is constructed of clay and alluvial/alluvium deposits, both of which the RAIB says are sensitive to variations in the water content.
However, the RAIB says that there is no evidence to indicate that an embankment slip occurred before the accident – although it does say that there is evidence of some previous movement.
The investigation is continuing to look at
the exact mechanism by which train 1F34 derailed
the status of the track at this location and how it was inspected and maintained
the condition of the embankment, including the presence of any coincident risk factors (such as sustained hot weather, nearby structures, and vegetation), and how it was inspected and maintained
the weather conditions in the area on the day of the accident, and in the weeks and months preceding it
the effectiveness of any mitigation measures intended to address the risks of operating trains in hot weather
the condition of train 1F34 and the crashworthiness performance of the rear three vehicles of the train during the derailment
the emergency response to the accident
any relevant underlying factors, including any actions taken in response to previous relevant safety recommendations.
The RAIB have released the site back to Network Rail to allow for repairs to take place and the train to be recovery.
The service was formed of eight carriages, and the rear three vehicles derailed and overturned, coming to rest on their side on an embankment.
150 people were on the train when the derailment happened. 30 people were injured in the accident; 20 of those required hospital treatment, some with serious injuries.
The first RAIB inspectors arrived on site at 19:11 to secure evidence alongside the British Transport Police.
The RAIB has downloaded the On-Train Data Recorder and is currently analysing this alongside CCTV recordings and signalling data.
This accident took place on the Down Lewes line, where the maximum speed for a train is 70mph. The two Class 387 units on 1F34 were coupled together and were travelling at around 65mph as it approached the point of derailment.
Initial analysis shows that the driver applied the brakes at the point of derailment, and the train began to slow down.
Marks on the rail near the point of derailment are consistent with the wheels of the derailed carriages climbing over the rails.
CCTV images from 1F34 and other services show that track geometry irregularity existed on the approach to the derailment.
The RAIB says that there is also evidence of previous track maintenance activity in the area.
Several reports of rough riding in the area were also received by the RAIB following the accident.
The embankment that the railway runs on is constructed of clay and alluvial/alluvium deposits, both of which the RAIB says are sensitive to variations in the water content.
However, the RAIB says that there is no evidence to indicate that an embankment slip occurred before the accident – although it does say that there is evidence of some previous movement.
The investigation is continuing to look at
the exact mechanism by which train 1F34 derailed
the status of the track at this location and how it was inspected and maintained
the condition of the embankment, including the presence of any coincident risk factors (such as sustained hot weather, nearby structures, and vegetation), and how it was inspected and maintained
the weather conditions in the area on the day of the accident, and in the weeks and months preceding it
the effectiveness of any mitigation measures intended to address the risks of operating trains in hot weather
the condition of train 1F34 and the crashworthiness performance of the rear three vehicles of the train during the derailment
the emergency response to the accident
any relevant underlying factors, including any actions taken in response to previous relevant safety recommendations.
The RAIB have released the site back to Network Rail to allow for repairs to take place and the train to be recovery.
| Re: NPPF revisions - more homes can be built near stations? In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [378435/32385/40] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 12:07, 19th August 2026 | |
All very well having a station within easy walking distance, but without other local amenities it will tend to be nothing but a dormitory, with residents catching the train to work if it goes the right way and driving everywhere else. The main complaint from existing residents - after the loss of countryside - is often that such developments will overload local schools, doctors, sewage processing etc without any compulsion for the developer to include these things.
| Re: West of England Line - Soil Moisture Deficit Update - 10 October 2025 In "South Western services" [378434/30889/42] Posted by grahame at 11:56, 19th August 2026 | |
Have written to our M.P twice in his early days of arrival.
First reply came 4 months later.
For the second enquiry, I've received no acknowledgement 6 months on!
More Parliamentary researchers than usual needing repairs perhaps?
First reply came 4 months later.
For the second enquiry, I've received no acknowledgement 6 months on!
More Parliamentary researchers than usual needing repairs perhaps?
There is no requirement on MPs to reply to - or even acknowledge emails. If they want to help make a difference, if they want you to re-elect them next time, a certain responsiveness and politeness helps. But there are some who find other ways of garnering votes more effective, or perhaps are going to retire at the next election anyway.
We have been through the whole gambit here.
Melksham was hooked into the constituency to our east when I first got involved with rail campaigning, where the big rail issues were Pewsey and Bedwyn to London and I had to draw a map of the railway network to show out MP how we fitted in.
We were then hooked into the constituency to the north and our first MP was excellent; he lost the seat on a big national swing, and his replacement for the Chippenham constituency concentrated on - err - Chippenham Station with significant service connectivity loss at Bradford-on-Avon and Melksham bumping along with a thin and unreliable service quite out of scale for a town of the size.
We are now in a constiituency named after our town, and with an MP for whom we are not a rather awkward town tacked on, and with a customer / voter care understanding and approach, and a good team. Thank goodness. All MPs are busy (a few, cynically, busy doing nothing for their MP position) and it still augers well to be polite, correct, complete and helpful - and not rant nor write too much to ask for help / support.
| Re: West of England Line - Soil Moisture Deficit Update - 10 October 2025 In "South Western services" [378432/30889/42] Posted by GBM at 11:14, 19th August 2026 Already liked by Mark A | |
IIRC West Coast Railways ran the Oxenholme to Windermere service during the covid years - why not invite them to run an Axminster to Exeter St David's shuttle? At least during the morning and afternoon peaks.
I wrote a long rant to SWR about the lack of any commuter services during either peak between Axminster and Exeter. Surprisingly, I received a response within a week. It was a long, probably cut and paste job from a press release, talking about SMD and the lack of rolling stock, but failed to even mention the possibility of a shuttle service. I await a response from my MP.
Have written to our M.P twice in his early days of arrival.I wrote a long rant to SWR about the lack of any commuter services during either peak between Axminster and Exeter. Surprisingly, I received a response within a week. It was a long, probably cut and paste job from a press release, talking about SMD and the lack of rolling stock, but failed to even mention the possibility of a shuttle service. I await a response from my MP.
First reply came 4 months later.
For the second enquiry, I've received no acknowledgement 6 months on!
More Parliamentary researchers than usual needing repairs perhaps?
| Re: NPPF revisions - more homes can be built near stations? In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [378430/32385/40] Posted by GBM at 10:26, 19th August 2026 Already liked by JohnM, Mark A | |
The two line station picture (number 2) - Melksham in 2030?
| Re: Burnham urged to extend railcard discounts to over 30s In "Fare's Fair" [378429/32369/4] Posted by GBM at 10:22, 19th August 2026 | |
Hmm. 
I'm fairly (pun intended!) happy with my 'Old Gits' Senior Railcard, as I still travel by rail sometimes these days, in my retirement. My wife doesn't have one, but she only travels on trains about three times a year, so it wouldn't make financial sense for her to also buy one.
The other cards we do have are senior citizen bus passes, which are excellent - we can travel in to Bristol free, without having to run a car, pay for 'Park & Ride' or any of that malarkey, for example.
CfN.
In Cornwall, old gits passes are available to use 24x7 with no time restrictions.
I'm fairly (pun intended!) happy with my 'Old Gits' Senior Railcard, as I still travel by rail sometimes these days, in my retirement. My wife doesn't have one, but she only travels on trains about three times a year, so it wouldn't make financial sense for her to also buy one.
The other cards we do have are senior citizen bus passes, which are excellent - we can travel in to Bristol free, without having to run a car, pay for 'Park & Ride' or any of that malarkey, for example.
CfN.
However, that does NOT include the Truro Park and Ride (despite many intending passengers telling the driver it says they can use it on the website).
| NPPF revisions - more homes can be built near stations? In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [378427/32385/40] Posted by grahame at 08:53, 19th August 2026 Already liked by GBM | |
From the Guardian
Thousands more homes could be built within 10 minutes of transport hubs, including on green belt sites, under a loosening of planning policy announced by Angela Rayner on Monday.
The housing secretary will set out changes to national planning guidance for England that will include an order for councils to have a “default yes” approach to housing developments that are within a reasonable walking distance of well-connected train and tram stations.
If a proposed development is on green belt land, then the government’s “golden rules” state that they must have higher levels of affordable housing, new or improved green spaces, and be supported by the right infrastructure.
The approach was put out to consultation under Rayner’s predecessor, Steve Reed, but the guidance will be confirmed as part of the new national planning policy framework (NPPF) this week.
[snip]
The new NPPF is aimed at providing clearer national policies for plan-making and decision-making, meaning that conflicting local policies will carry less weight when they are inconsistent with national policies.
Other changes will include:
* Stronger support in principle for development, meaning a more explicit presumption in favour of building in sustainable locations.
* Pubs will get protection from being turned into housing or offices with developers having to prove there is no reasonable prospect of keeping a pub as a going concern, including evidence that it was marketed for sale for at least a year.
* A requirement for at least 40% of homes to be accessible on bigger developments and stronger protections for community facilities.
* Stronger support for growth and infrastructure including support for AI growth zones and datacentres.
The housing secretary will set out changes to national planning guidance for England that will include an order for councils to have a “default yes” approach to housing developments that are within a reasonable walking distance of well-connected train and tram stations.
If a proposed development is on green belt land, then the government’s “golden rules” state that they must have higher levels of affordable housing, new or improved green spaces, and be supported by the right infrastructure.
The approach was put out to consultation under Rayner’s predecessor, Steve Reed, but the guidance will be confirmed as part of the new national planning policy framework (NPPF) this week.
[snip]
The new NPPF is aimed at providing clearer national policies for plan-making and decision-making, meaning that conflicting local policies will carry less weight when they are inconsistent with national policies.
Other changes will include:
* Stronger support in principle for development, meaning a more explicit presumption in favour of building in sustainable locations.
* Pubs will get protection from being turned into housing or offices with developers having to prove there is no reasonable prospect of keeping a pub as a going concern, including evidence that it was marketed for sale for at least a year.
* A requirement for at least 40% of homes to be accessible on bigger developments and stronger protections for community facilities.
* Stronger support for growth and infrastructure including support for AI growth zones and datacentres.
Lisa and I were at a meeting last night ... and from a speaker there, we understand that there is now a requirement on developers and others putting plans forward to liaise and agree (where possible?) with neighbouring plans in order to avoid or at least reduce conflicts and barriers between neighbouring developments. I also understand from other sources that powers are removed / reduced for local councillors wanting to "call in" contentious plans in their areas to planning commitees.
For major projects and for regional planning, the changes to the NPPF (this is not the first) and other planning laws and regulations are a significant nuisance and added cost. Witness the Wiltshire Local Plan which looked good ... but by the time it came to the inspectors was so out of date as to not be acceptable; a decade of work "thrown away", a gap left in local guidance, and a reduction (but not an extinguishing) of the Neighbourhood Plan.
There seems to be contradiction in the government lines here ... on one hand, it's all about devolving things to the regions, but on the other hand the regions are having their authority to decide their own direction overruled by central government.
A West Country scene to be changed by central government?
And some others ...
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [378426/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 08:36, 19th August 2026 | |
07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 09:43 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
| Re: How do steam railways tackle lineside fire risks? In "Heritage railways, Railtours, buses, canals, steamships and other public transport based attractions" [378425/32278/47] Posted by grahame at 08:02, 19th August 2026 | |
From the BBC
A heritage railway service has paused its steam engine trips after two fires, one of which was "most likely" caused by a passing train.
Two blazes broke out on Thursday - the UK's hottest day of the year so far - near Normanhurst Park in Darley Dale at 16:21 BST, and near Church Road in Derbyshire.
Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service said the first fire spanned a grassland area of roughly 100m by five metres, while the second fire - involving vegetation at the side of railway track - was found to have likely been caused by sparks from the passing train.
Peak Rail, which run services on the Midland Railway line, said the withdrawal of steam-hauled trains would continue "until further notice".
Two blazes broke out on Thursday - the UK's hottest day of the year so far - near Normanhurst Park in Darley Dale at 16:21 BST, and near Church Road in Derbyshire.
Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service said the first fire spanned a grassland area of roughly 100m by five metres, while the second fire - involving vegetation at the side of railway track - was found to have likely been caused by sparks from the passing train.
Peak Rail, which run services on the Midland Railway line, said the withdrawal of steam-hauled trains would continue "until further notice".
The main (Network Rail) network in England has suspended steam operation as have some heritage lines - Peak Rail, and the Bluebell (outside station areas), for example.
| Old Wiltshire pictures In "Railway History and related topics" [378424/32384/55] Posted by grahame at 07:21, 19th August 2026 Already liked by GBM | |
(from Facebook post - advert for a book, but I'm sure copyright will have expired!)
(from the Market Lavington museum)
(from the Peggy Gye collection at the Lavington museum)
| The night tube, from 19th August 2016 In "Transport for London" [378423/32383/46] Posted by grahame at 06:56, 19th August 2026 | |
Ten years ago today - The Night Tube and London Overground Night Service provides through-the-night services on Friday and Saturday nights on the Jubilee and Victoria lines, much of the Central, Northern, and Piccadilly lines, and a section of the Windrush line. The service began on the night of Friday 19 August 2016. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_Tube
Click on the image to get a map of the whole night tube network
Image copyright Reserved (by poster) (?) By Sameboat - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41141986
| Re: HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) - Government proposals, alternative routes, discussion In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378420/5138/51] Posted by IndustryInsider at 23:58, 18th August 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, Oxonhutch, GBM | |
HS2 Old Oak Common platform construction completed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa8PO80GIfw
Posting not only because the fact the structure of the platforms in complete for the HS2 bit, but also because the GWML station platforms are now starting to take shape and you can clearly see that from some of the drone footage contained within the video.
| Re: Burnham urged to extend railcard discounts to over 30s In "Fare's Fair" [378419/32369/4] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:57, 18th August 2026 | |
Hmm.
I'm fairly (pun intended!) happy with my 'Old Gits' Senior Railcard, as I still travel by rail sometimes these days, in my retirement. My wife doesn't have one, but she only travels on trains about three times a year, so it wouldn't make financial sense for her to also buy one.
The other cards we do have are senior citizen bus passes, which are excellent - we can travel in to Bristol free, without having to run a car, pay for 'Park & Ride' or any of that malarkey, for example.
CfN.
| Re: Volo TV HST carriage In "Across the West" [378418/2159/26] Posted by grahame at 22:42, 18th August 2026 | |
I was reminded of Volo by this BBC Article
American Airlines to bring back TV screens on US flights
American Airlines wants its flyers to have screens – and not just the ones its passengers bring on board with them.
The carrier says it will restore seatback displays across its domestic fleet, reversing a years-long strategy of removing them from most US routes.
[snip]
Its move follows years of complaints from passengers, who said that relying on personal devices left them with drained batteries, awkward viewing angles, and patchy Wi-Fi.
It also comes as US carriers try to steady demand in a cooling market.
American Airlines wants its flyers to have screens – and not just the ones its passengers bring on board with them.
The carrier says it will restore seatback displays across its domestic fleet, reversing a years-long strategy of removing them from most US routes.
[snip]
Its move follows years of complaints from passengers, who said that relying on personal devices left them with drained batteries, awkward viewing angles, and patchy Wi-Fi.
It also comes as US carriers try to steady demand in a cooling market.
So operators are trying to improve their product to attract more customers, even if they have to spend money to do so. Do we see the converse at times on our public transport in the UK, where trains are bursting at the seams even with poor luggage, cycle and legroom, and so improving these is deemed an unnecessary expense?
| Re: Virgin Cross Channel? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378416/32375/51] Posted by Noggin at 22:33, 18th August 2026 | |
Second your hunch with Trenitalia.
They are supposedly planning to start services into Germany with the Frecciarossa 1000's by early next year.
If that goes to plan (and they've got deep enough pockets), then being able to combine a solid service in the London/Paris/Brussels/Amsterdam axis with eastern connections into Germany could give Trenitalia massive economies of scale and the benefit of a single ticket.
In Germany, Trenitalia would presumably have the luxury of not having to serve smaller stations (which are politically difficult for DB to drop) and might be able to pick a few cherries like a direct Amsterdam <> Hamburg service.
If all that happens, will be interesting to see how Flix responds - as for in the UK, I've long thought that a road/rail hub in Ebbsfleet would be ideal for Flix, with a counterpart in Calais or Brussels.
| Re: Burnham urged to extend railcard discounts to over 30s In "Fare's Fair" [378415/32369/4] Posted by PhilWakely at 22:32, 18th August 2026 | |
Easiest thing to do is make the Network Railcard valid across the whole network. The network in Network Railcard has been redundant since 1997 anyway; it's most confusing to people aged 30-60 who are duped into buying one and then discover is not actually valid on the network.
I am surprised at the number of people that do not read the Ts&Cs for the Network Railcard and assume it covers the entire Network. I was in Scotland a couple of years ago and a couple in front of me in the queue at Fort William Ticket Office expected a discount on a Mallaig service with that railcard.
| Re: West of England Line - Soil Moisture Deficit Update - 10 October 2025 In "South Western services" [378414/30889/42] Posted by PhilWakely at 22:29, 18th August 2026 | |
IIRC West Coast Railways ran the Oxenholme to Windermere service during the covid years - why not invite them to run an Axminster to Exeter St David's shuttle? At least during the morning and afternoon peaks.
I wrote a long rant to SWR about the lack of any commuter services during either peak between Axminster and Exeter. Surprisingly, I received a response within a week. It was a long, probably cut and paste job from a press release, talking about SMD and the lack of rolling stock, but failed to even mention the possibility of a shuttle service. I await a response from my MP.
| Re: Derailment, Lewes, 13 Aug 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378413/32362/51] Posted by grahame at 22:01, 18th August 2026 | |
From the BBC
Minister visits derailment site amid funding plea
The rail minister has visited the site of a derailment in East Sussex amid calls for more investment in transport in the South East.
Rail Minister Lord Hendy met Lewes MP James MacCleary and senior representatives from Network Rail, Greater Thameslink Railway, British Transport Police and contractors following the derailment near Lewes.
Twenty people were injured when three carriages on the 14:24 BST Southern service from London Victoria to Eastbourne left the tracks at Landport on Thursday.
MacCleary said while he could not pre-empt the investigation, concerns about infrastructure must be considered. Lord Hendy said regulators ensured Network Rail had enough money to maintain the railway.
[snip]
After meeting Lord Hendy, MacCleary said the South East had been overlooked "for too long" when it comes to transport investment.
"Despite repeated calls for greater support, the region has missed out in recent budget decisions," he said. "I hope this incident serves as a turning point."
Lord Hendy said funding was spread across the UK, adding: "I certainly don't think there's any cause to suppose that any particular part of the nation is disadvantaged by that."
[snip]
The RAIB is expected to give initial findings this week.
The rail minister has visited the site of a derailment in East Sussex amid calls for more investment in transport in the South East.
Rail Minister Lord Hendy met Lewes MP James MacCleary and senior representatives from Network Rail, Greater Thameslink Railway, British Transport Police and contractors following the derailment near Lewes.
Twenty people were injured when three carriages on the 14:24 BST Southern service from London Victoria to Eastbourne left the tracks at Landport on Thursday.
MacCleary said while he could not pre-empt the investigation, concerns about infrastructure must be considered. Lord Hendy said regulators ensured Network Rail had enough money to maintain the railway.
[snip]
After meeting Lord Hendy, MacCleary said the South East had been overlooked "for too long" when it comes to transport investment.
"Despite repeated calls for greater support, the region has missed out in recent budget decisions," he said. "I hope this incident serves as a turning point."
Lord Hendy said funding was spread across the UK, adding: "I certainly don't think there's any cause to suppose that any particular part of the nation is disadvantaged by that."
[snip]
The RAIB is expected to give initial findings this week.
