Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375376/31359/18] Posted by Mark A at 09:45, 23rd May 2026 | ![]() |
Wednesday, the day of the WWRUG meeting in Trowbridge (for which the trains were unperturbed by that time) a friend had headed for Weymouth for the day. After a remarkably cool and blustery but enjoyable day by the sea, they headed back to the station to find the 17:28 back to Bristol cancelled (the next being 20:14). For some reason they were given the impression that travel via Southampton was out of the question. After a short bit of hanging around, put in a taxi, they "enjoyed" a somewhat edge of seat ride to Westbury, from where there were trains back to Bristol, and they were back only around 15 minutes late.
*Significant detail* - a number of passengers for the Bristol train had been relying on there being a loo on the train once they were at the station - and the station loos were found to be locked - however a member of staff on request unlocked the accessible loo there and the day was saved.
Mark
| Re: A week back in the UK In "The Lighter Side" [375375/32057/30] Posted by eightonedee at 09:12, 23rd May 2026 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
1 Stratford
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375374/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 08:37, 23rd May 2026 | ![]() |
07:45 Westbury to Swindon due 08:28
07:45 Westbury to Swindon due 08:28 is being delayed between Trowbridge and Melksham and is now expected to be 7 minutes late.
This is due to a late running train being in front of this one.
07:45 Westbury to Swindon due 08:28 is being delayed between Trowbridge and Melksham and is now expected to be 7 minutes late.
This is due to a late running train being in front of this one.
I was very concerned at an alert flashing up this morning and especially for the train that becomes the "Weymouth Wizard" from Swindon, but no worries - this is much more and informational alert than an "oh shit!".
Personally, I would love to "do" Weymouth today - except I am pacing myself; want to keep up on other things and not be tired for when I head out next week.
| A week back in the UK In "The Lighter Side" [375373/32057/30] Posted by grahame at 08:27, 23rd May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Back in the UK last Monday ... and although it's only Saturday, what a variety I have seen in public transport in just five days ... my arrival ...

and some places I have been, or seen out of the window.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Also seen this one, but as it's already been seen in another thread ...

| Re: long term future for overhead wires? In "Across the West" [375372/32056/26] Posted by John D at 08:24, 23rd May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
It's coming up to 9 years since Grayling killed parts of Great Western electrification (it was July 2017)
As photographed above there are a number of masts west of Chippenham doing nothing. I think about third of the mast bases and a few masts were also installed Didcot - Oxford.
Things have moved on with cost control, and the stupidity of not resuming it once costs were controlled has never really made sense as a long term strategy (and even less so in new era of high diesel prices).
Ironically the delay to ordering replacements for 158,159,165,166,168 diesel fleet might benefit a few electrified sections, if it means battery charging is possible, and don't have to fit diesel engines (which require servicing and maintenance of the engines). There is obviously a cost implication of adding diesel generators to replacement fleet (plus ongoing extra operational costs), which could be used to pay for some of the electrification instead.
But doing joined up thinking, or any form of mid or longer term planning seems to be beyond current batch of ministers, who seem to be more into short term thinking and regular U turns
As photographed above there are a number of masts west of Chippenham doing nothing. I think about third of the mast bases and a few masts were also installed Didcot - Oxford.
Things have moved on with cost control, and the stupidity of not resuming it once costs were controlled has never really made sense as a long term strategy (and even less so in new era of high diesel prices).
Ironically the delay to ordering replacements for 158,159,165,166,168 diesel fleet might benefit a few electrified sections, if it means battery charging is possible, and don't have to fit diesel engines (which require servicing and maintenance of the engines). There is obviously a cost implication of adding diesel generators to replacement fleet (plus ongoing extra operational costs), which could be used to pay for some of the electrification instead.
But doing joined up thinking, or any form of mid or longer term planning seems to be beyond current batch of ministers, who seem to be more into short term thinking and regular U turns
Why was it stopped? Was it way behind schedule and/or over budget?
Was going seriously over budget, (and behind schedule) and instead of saying pause and refocus, just took axe to it. Ignored the ongoing alternative costs it created.
It was a time when skills were being outsourced to consultants, so something like a drain cover where a mast was planned, meant leaving it, getting consultants out again, redesigning, expensively coming back later with electrification train. Rather than having skilled and empowered staff doing simple tweak to plan there and then.
The structure at the time was not incentivised to get it finished as efficiently as possible, but was more like see what extra work and revenue can get from it. HS2 contracts were devised in same cost plus era too.
| Re: long term future for overhead wires? In "Across the West" [375371/32056/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 08:13, 23rd May 2026 | ![]() |
It's coming up to 9 years since Grayling killed parts of Great Western electrification (it was July 2017)
As photographed above there are a number of masts west of Chippenham doing nothing. I think about third of the mast bases and a few masts were also installed Didcot - Oxford.
Things have moved on with cost control, and the stupidity of not resuming it once costs were controlled has never really made sense as a long term strategy (and even less so in new era of high diesel prices).
Ironically the delay to ordering replacements for 158,159,165,166,168 diesel fleet might benefit a few electrified sections, if it means battery charging is possible, and don't have to fit diesel engines (which require servicing and maintenance of the engines). There is obviously a cost implication of adding diesel generators to replacement fleet (plus ongoing extra operational costs), which could be used to pay for some of the electrification instead.
But doing joined up thinking, or any form of mid or longer term planning seems to be beyond current batch of ministers, who seem to be more into short term thinking and regular U turns
As photographed above there are a number of masts west of Chippenham doing nothing. I think about third of the mast bases and a few masts were also installed Didcot - Oxford.
Things have moved on with cost control, and the stupidity of not resuming it once costs were controlled has never really made sense as a long term strategy (and even less so in new era of high diesel prices).
Ironically the delay to ordering replacements for 158,159,165,166,168 diesel fleet might benefit a few electrified sections, if it means battery charging is possible, and don't have to fit diesel engines (which require servicing and maintenance of the engines). There is obviously a cost implication of adding diesel generators to replacement fleet (plus ongoing extra operational costs), which could be used to pay for some of the electrification instead.
But doing joined up thinking, or any form of mid or longer term planning seems to be beyond current batch of ministers, who seem to be more into short term thinking and regular U turns
Why was it stopped? Was it way behind schedule and/or over budget?
| Re: long term future for overhead wires? In "Across the West" [375370/32056/26] Posted by John D at 08:11, 23rd May 2026 | ![]() |
It's coming up to 9 years since Grayling killed parts of Great Western electrification (it was July 2017)
As photographed above there are a number of masts west of Chippenham doing nothing. I think about third of the mast bases and a few masts were also installed Didcot - Oxford.
Things have moved on with cost control, and the stupidity of not resuming it once costs were controlled has never really made sense as a long term strategy (and even less so in new era of high diesel prices).
Ironically the delay to ordering replacements for 158,159,165,166,168 diesel fleet might benefit a few electrified sections, if it means battery charging is possible, and don't have to fit diesel engines (which require servicing and maintenance of the engines). There is obviously a cost implication of adding diesel generators to replacement fleet (plus ongoing extra operational costs), which could be used to pay for some of the electrification instead.
But doing joined up thinking, or any form of mid or longer term planning seems to be beyond current batch of ministers, who seem to be more into short term thinking and regular U turns
| Re: long term future for overhead wires? In "Across the West" [375369/32056/26] Posted by grahame at 07:09, 23rd May 2026 | ![]() |
As I read it, it's all on "stop" at the moment - no money and no concrete plans to resume. Personal view - it is seen as more important to get people from Acton to Solihull as quickly as possible in 10 years time than it is to complete jobs which in some cases were already started. But yet with advancing technology, that just might make sense.
Works started and - would you describe them as abandoned? - at Thingley Junction.

Personal view - from my armchair - would be the Didcot to Oxford and Cocklebury Lane and Parkway to Temple Meads would be the next sensible steps. So many services would then be able to go pure electric; does not cut the need for power (moves it away from the train) but at least it can be sustainable and not fossil, trains last longer, have better performances curves, and can still electrically do London - Cardiff even when Badminton is closed for engineering or flooding.
Also makes sense for freight to get electric to Westbury and the quarries - via Pewsey and via Melksham - nd that brings in more electric passenger trains too.
| long term future for overhead wires? In "Across the West" [375368/32056/26] Posted by infoman at 05:20, 23rd May 2026 | ![]() |
Not sure if there are any plans for overhead Electrification in the West region.
Maybe
Stapleton road bank
Chippenham to Bristol
Cardiff to Swansea(possible on to LLanelli and Carmarthen
Although over head wires never look pleasant,especially in pretty view areas
Three places in this neck of the woods I would never like to see overhead wires is St Ives Newquay and Falmouth
with the Severn Beach line and Portishead lines.
Just wondering if the scheme on the Greenford branch could be introduced with underneath charging points at the the terminating station on the five routes mentioned.
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375366/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 21:39, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
The train that operates our Westbury - Swindon services via Melksham has failed and there is no replacement train available. Melksham services are cancelled for the remainder of the day.
Adding up numbers from Wikipedia, GWR have 220 different trains that could be used to provide the service (the number does not include battery trains, purely electric units, or the sleepers)
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375365/31359/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 21:02, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Westbury and Swindon via Melksham
Due to a broken down train between Westbury and Swindon the line is closed. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Train services between Westbury and Swindon via Melksham will be cancelled.
Customer Advice
What has happened?
-
The train that operates our Westbury - Swindon services via Melksham has failed and there is no replacement train available. Melksham services are cancelled for the remainder of the day.
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375364/31359/18] Posted by Mark A at 20:42, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
GWR account on Bluesky.
"Due to a broken down train at Melksham"
Mark
https://bsky.app/profile/gwr.com/post/3mmhmoduamo2a
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375363/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 18:53, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
18:37 Westbury to Swindon due 19:21
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
| Re: West Wiltshire Rail User Group meeting, Trowbridge, 20 May 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375362/32018/18] Posted by John D at 18:37, 22nd May 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
The mention of GWR/Chiltern - might this be the battery train?
It might be a multi-mode train
GWR could just about get away with battery EMU▸ , but realistically anything over about 60 miles (or 30miles out and 30 back) off an electrified line, especially in cold winter or very hot summer day is pushing it. Battery technology is improving so maybe this will go up a bit to nearer 80 miles.
If looking at regional train (say 5-6 cars, capable of 100-110mph on electric, maybe 90-100mph on diesel or battery, with seats and comfort suitable for 3+ hour journeys) then as GWR operate to Portsmouth, Weymouth, Gatwick really needs to be dual voltage.
But a quick look at a map, will show that routes like Cardiff-Exeter, Exeter-Basingstoke, Bristol-Great Malvern/Worcester etc are too far for the battery. So either got to add few miles of electrification where charging can happen, or fit train with diesel generator set too.
Chiltern probably need ability to work off Metropolitan line 4th rail. I think this is now 500v outer rail, -250v centre rail, but at least it is effectively 750v not the old 600v (400 and -200)
To be honest, if GBR▸ (or its shadow version) had ordered 70-100 of these, a cascade would probably solve 90% of train shortages or types coming up for renewal.
So yes, SWR» doesn't really need anything different to GWR regional fleet, or even others like Cross Country Cardiff-Nottingham. Can see why it is one type desperately needed (have built high speed bimodes, lots of commuter electric units in last 10 years, but no regional units for 34+ years). Nothing really that can work on part electrified routes that's mid to long distance, but not full intercity high speed
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375361/31359/18] Posted by IndustryInsider at 18:08, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06 will be starting late from Westbury.
This is due to congestion.
17:45 Swindon to Westbury due 18:26
17:45 Swindon to Westbury due 18:26 will be starting late from Swindon.
This is due to congestion.
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06 will be starting late from Westbury.
This is due to congestion.
17:45 Swindon to Westbury due 18:26
17:45 Swindon to Westbury due 18:26 will be starting late from Swindon.
This is due to congestion.
First one ran on time.
Second one left 11 minutes late (waiting sensibly for connections from London and Oxford), but looks like it only got a short way before returning to Swindon for some reason.
| UK sees hottest day of year as bank holiday travellers face queues In "Across the West" [375360/32055/26] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:58, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
UK sees hottest day of year as bank holiday travellers face queues
The UK is experiencing the hottest day of the year so far, with temperatures forecast to continue to climb above 30C over the bank holiday weekend.
Temperatures reached 28.4C at Heathrow in west London, Cranwell in Lincolnshire and Cambridge on Friday afternoon, the Met Office confirmed. The current May record is 32.8C.
Amber health alerts have been issued for parts of England as families attempt a half-term getaway.
Transport networks are expected to be busy over the bank holiday weekend. Passengers travelling to Europe from the Port of Dover earlier faced delays of several hours, due to the introduction of a new entry and exit system.
There have been warnings of potential congestion on roads to the port between Friday and Sunday, with some 18,000 cars expected to pass through.
(BBC article continues)
The UK is experiencing the hottest day of the year so far, with temperatures forecast to continue to climb above 30C over the bank holiday weekend.
Temperatures reached 28.4C at Heathrow in west London, Cranwell in Lincolnshire and Cambridge on Friday afternoon, the Met Office confirmed. The current May record is 32.8C.
Amber health alerts have been issued for parts of England as families attempt a half-term getaway.
Transport networks are expected to be busy over the bank holiday weekend. Passengers travelling to Europe from the Port of Dover earlier faced delays of several hours, due to the introduction of a new entry and exit system.
There have been warnings of potential congestion on roads to the port between Friday and Sunday, with some 18,000 cars expected to pass through.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: West Wiltshire Rail User Group meeting, Trowbridge, 20 May 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375359/32018/18] Posted by ChrisB at 17:54, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
It's Latin....

Mark A....your luck might eventually be in for your Bristol service
Gradual blurring of TOC boundaries: lots of background work with GWR on future operation of various routes
across Wessex but changes will take time
across Wessex but changes will take time
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375358/31359/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:50, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06 will be starting late from Westbury.
This is due to congestion.
17:45 Swindon to Westbury due 18:26
17:45 Swindon to Westbury due 18:26 will be starting late from Swindon.
This is due to congestion.
I don't argue that the capacity is needed. But the project is a farce, and, beyond the capacity that it might produce, has very little benefit (unless you're a consultant or civil engineering contractor. In which case you're right royally coining it)
The biggest blunder is cancelling phase 2 ie North of Birmingham to Manchester
As we're over £100 billion to get from Acton to Solihull, how much would the bill have been by now had phase 2 been included?
I don't argue that the capacity is needed. But the project is a farce, and, beyond the capacity that it might produce, has very little benefit (unless you're a consultant or civil engineering contractor. In which case you're right royally coining it)
The farce was the Trumpian gold plating by previous Prime Ministers especially when then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson gave HS2 the official green light in February 2020, he highlighted its "extraordinarily fast journey times". While speaking in the House of Commons, Johnson stated that the new high-speed trains would "travel at speeds up to 225 miles per hour". Also the succession of start building in without all the consents and outline decisions being done.
The option to upgrade the existing WCML was never and option, it went through that in the early 2000's and by 2020 all the capacity had been used.
The biggest blunder is cancelling phase 2 ie North of Birmingham to Manchester
| Re: West Wiltshire Rail User Group meeting, Trowbridge, 20 May 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375355/32018/18] Posted by Western Pathfinder at 15:35, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
Interesting to see that the last part is in Italian!…or Latin .
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [375353/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:11, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
........and also the second one of the day a little further West in the Thames Valley.....I guess now it's a little warmer we have to expect the infrastructure/service to start melting down.......literally as well as figuratively
Still, cracking BBQ weather! Just in time for the Bank Holiday weekend!
Cancellations to services between Reading and Newbury
Due to a points failure between Reading and Newbury some lines are blocked.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled, delayed or revised. Disruption is expected until 19:00 22/05.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [375352/31163/26] Posted by NickB at 13:34, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
Due to a points failure between Reading and London Paddington fewer trains are able to run on some lines.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until 15:15 22/05.
| Re: West Wiltshire Rail User Group meeting, Trowbridge, 20 May 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375351/32018/18] Posted by GBM at 12:23, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
The mention of GWR/Chiltern - might this be the battery train?
| Re: Wokingham station - improvements, resignalling and siding - merged posts In "South Western services" [375350/11448/42] Posted by GBM at 12:04, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
Incidentally, since when were OS grid coordinates called X and Y?[/i]
Since never, but unfortunately I assume the days of our schoolchildren being taught something as useful as Ordnance Survey map reading are long gone.
| Re: West Wiltshire Rail User Group meeting, Trowbridge, 20 May 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375349/32018/18] Posted by grahame at 11:28, 22nd May 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
| Re: Manvers Street, Bath, disrupted for reconstruction works for 6 months from May. In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375348/31887/5] Posted by Mark A at 09:15, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
For the next six months in Bath, how are faciilities being provided for personal needs breaks for bus staff on the routes affected, anyone?
Mark
| Re: Manvers Street, Bath, disrupted for reconstruction works for 6 months from May. In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375347/31887/5] Posted by Mark A at 09:14, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
On the Manvers Street northbound stop - that useful one when leaving the train - the industry seems to be slowly removing its remaining bus services - starting with the 11 to Bathampton. The notice for that *does* have a map but it took me a moment to interpret it as it doesn't show the railway station. Possibly for good reason as the bus will now only stop at the far end of Dorchester Street, so, Number 11 bus passengers who've been on a train - "Welcome to Awkwardsville".
There's also, now, the 'Notice' version of that web page which is mapless - but in common with their web page on this forthcoming disruption, a map would illustrate the extent to which the bus network is disrupted and exactly how much walking people will need to do to make connections. (Both below...)
Stars of the show is Stagecoach's 620 bus, which continues to run to the bus station albeit via a diversion - and usefully stops at a couple of stops on the diversion too - as does the 700 that runs a very occasional service to the decidedly poor area surrounding Julian Road and also the prosperous part of the city up at Sion Hill.
Mark


| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [375346/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:11, 22nd May 2026 | ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Newbury and Reading
Due to a fault with the signalling system between Newbury and Reading trains have to run at reduced speed on some lines.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled or delayed by up to 25 minutes. Disruption is expected until 11:45 22/05.














