Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379396/32479/24] Posted by REVUpminster at 11:54, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
There is one 175 running today 113 on mileage accumulation and is 80 minutes late at the moment.
There now seems to be a problem with brake applications after the sunflower problems; which incidentally never arose last December in those dark winter days of operation on the Newquay branch.
There is a definite problem between management, unions, and train crew. Will it all magically go away this December?
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379395/32479/24] Posted by REVUpminster at 11:36, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
The 0722 from Barnstaple was meant to be, by now, a 175 five car train but that looks further away than ever. A way was worked out to lock out one unit for some stops.
As for investment by GWR in the south west; they have rebuilt Exeter Depot but that has an indirect effect on better services. They did spend money on Exeter Central because the staircases and ticket gates were a safety hazard, and new doors to the ticket hall at Paignton station untouched by the recent fire.
For twenty years they were reluctant to spend their own money in the Southwest. The (I hate to say it) EU kick started the half hour Paignton service. Government money through various agencies built the new stations and Okehampton line. GWR did run a Sunday summer service (it must have been safe) to Okehampton paid for by Devon County Council. GWR have not paid for the Newquay investment.
Here is an interview from the GWR strategy director that just mentions third party funding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NLuAzRVXU&t=1287s
| Re: To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, apparently In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [379394/32456/31] Posted by TaplowGreen at 10:21, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
FUEL, petrol, paraffin, propane cylinders, gas cartridges, logs, smokeless fuel.
Candles, batteries, mainly AA and D.
FOOD, mainly tins and dried pasta. Chocolate. lifeboat rations.
Bottled drinking water, barrel of rainwater.
Port, spirits.
Durable goods, oil lamps, battery lamps, tools, sheets, blankets, towels, long and short underwear. Large UPS.
No venison or phesant as perishable.
Candles, batteries, mainly AA and D.
FOOD, mainly tins and dried pasta. Chocolate. lifeboat rations.
Bottled drinking water, barrel of rainwater.
Port, spirits.
Durable goods, oil lamps, battery lamps, tools, sheets, blankets, towels, long and short underwear. Large UPS.
No venison or phesant as perishable.
Glad to see that both long and short underwear made the cut - you can't be too careful with these matters!
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [379393/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 10:01, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Another morning of disruption:
Cancellations to services between Oxford and Worcester Shrub Hill
Due to a shortage of train crew between Oxford and Worcester Shrub Hill fewer trains are able to run on all lines.
Train services running through these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until 11:00 10/09.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Due to a fatality earlier this morning in they Hayes and Harlington area, trains and crew are misplaced in the area
Due to a shortage of train crew between Oxford and Worcester Shrub Hill fewer trains are able to run on all lines.
Train services running through these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until 11:00 10/09.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Due to a fatality earlier this morning in they Hayes and Harlington area, trains and crew are misplaced in the area
resulting in:
1W11 0553 London Paddington to Great Malvern cancelled due to a person hit by a train (XC)
1W13 0652 London Paddington to Great Malvern cancelled between Reading and Great Malvern due to a person hit by a train (XC)
08:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 11:27 will be cancelled.
This is due to the emergency services dealing with an incident.
09:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 12:23 will be cancelled.
This is due to the emergency services dealing with an incident.
1W13 0652 London Paddington to Great Malvern cancelled between Reading and Great Malvern due to a person hit by a train (XC)
08:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 11:27 will be cancelled.
This is due to the emergency services dealing with an incident.
09:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 12:23 will be cancelled.
This is due to the emergency services dealing with an incident.
In addition, the 0713 Great Malvern to London Paddington lost 46 minutes between Evesham and Honeybourne, departing Oxford 50 minutes late.
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379392/32479/24] Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:57, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Run the service using an IET! Are IET's even cleared over the Tarka Line? - the web computer says 'No'. A 5-Car 802/0 would be pointless as it only provides 326 seats (if 1st is binned); a 9-Car 802/1 - 647 seats - would do the business. But could it keep to the timetable?
That's just robbing Peter to pay Paul - IETs are already being pinched from other routes to run (for example) Bristol to Oxford services, resulting in shortforms elsewhere, I presume there is a finite supply or is there a magic train tree? (to go with the magic money tree?)

Given the constant and dismal "more trains than usual in need of repair at the same time" excuse, maybe it just needs someone to extract the digit from the orifice when it comes to maintenance to make more units available?
I think GWR are probably doing the right thing in laying on road transport - at least they're not just leaving people stranded - and surely someone could have foreseen that this service would be under exceptionally high demand during termtime?
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379391/32479/24] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 09:49, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
If, as seems obviously to be the case, this overcrowding is associated with one particular service how difficult would it be to provide an adequate number of coaches to deal with the passenger demand?
A brief look at RTT indicates that the service, 0612 from EXD, is generally run with 2 x 150's or one of a 3-car 158, 165/1 or 166/2. Each of which provides, according to t'interweb, 294, 207, 276 or 288 seats respectively. I have no idea by how much the passenger count could be increased by adopting the Japanese approach to standing passengers!
Possible solutions & Questions:
Recast early morning rolling stock allocations, cancelling a lightly used local service if such a thing exists, so that the 'out & back' service is run with 6 cars and seating capacity is increased to 441, 414, 552 or 576. Does the infrastructure permit 6 car trains? Does GWR have enough early morning on-train staff to allow paired 165/166 services.
Run the service using an IET! Are IET's even cleared over the Tarka Line? - the web computer says 'No'. A 5-Car 802/0 would be pointless as it only provides 326 seats (if 1st is binned); a 9-Car 802/1 - 647 seats - would do the business. But could it keep to the timetable?
Run an additional service roughly 30 minutes earlier or later, or possibly even both, which I guess should be doable with passes at Crediton and Eggesford, to spread the demand. Survey potential passengers to establish which train they would definitely have to use to get to Exeter at their required time and , if necessary, implement queueing at BNP to stop overcrowding - GWR must know the absolute number of pax each type of stock can safely carry.
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379390/32479/24] Posted by IndustryInsider at 09:31, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Unless someone else is paying GWR don't invest in the southwest.
But in the dying days (months, years) of a franchise / management contract, would not any company with shareholders take the same view of investment?
Of course they would.
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379389/32479/24] Posted by grahame at 08:22, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Unless someone else is paying GWR don't invest in the southwest.
But in the dying days (months, years) of a franchise / management contract, would not any company with shareholders take the same view of investment?
| Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379388/32479/24] Posted by REVUpminster at 06:58, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Unless someone else is paying GWR don't invest in the southwest.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [379387/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 06:03, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Reading and London Paddington
Due to the emergency services dealing with an incident between Reading and London Paddington all lines are closed.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled. Disruption is expected until 08:15 10/09.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
The emergency services are dealing with an incident on the railway in the Hayes area.
| Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026 In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [379386/32479/24] Posted by grahame at 04:56, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Reports from the North Devon Line Promotion Group tell me that the 07:23 from Barnstaple to Exeter has so many passengers wanting to use it that there isn't room for them all, and coaches are being laid on direct from Barnstaple to Exeter Central to carry many of the student passengers who have planned to use the train.
report link
I have restrained myself from adding armchair comment from afar onto their social media - but I can't help seeing an irony in a "promotion group" having helped promote a service to the extent it is broken.
| Re: 2 of 3 - rail related but no trains In "The Lighter Side" [379385/32435/30] Posted by grahame at 04:44, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Thanks folks, yes, I got my Germanys and Lithuanias mixed up. Thanks for the nudge. Here is the corrected list
B0 Reading - ChrisB
B1 Arnhem - stuving
B2 Wuppertal - PrestburyRoad
B3 Cattewater (Plymouth) - Chris from Nailsea
B4 Bregenz - stuving
B5 Langogne - stuving (just up the way)
B6 Taunton - Chris from Nailsea
B7 Inverness - eightonedee
B8 (London) St Pancras - TonyN
B9 Zittau - not identified
B10 Silute - not identified
B11 Leven - brooklea
B12 Melksham - Phil
B13 Liege - oxviem
B14 Potsdam - DR7835
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [379384/31163/26] Posted by grahame at 02:43, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
Journeycheck now saying disruption is likely to last until next Tuesday (15th).
Probably best not to let TG see that.
Oops - too late!

Now (03:00 on 10th) saying "until end of 11th"
Noting some peak hour long distance trains have added calls today at one or two of Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford, and that does seem logical. Hope they have the capacity.
| Re: Named train - but where did it run? In "The Lighter Side" [379383/32475/30] Posted by grahame at 02:31, 10th September 2026 | ![]() |
The Inter City - Paddington to Cardiff? (Or was it actually the Inter-City?)
I have it as Paddington via Birmingham to Wolverhampton and Chester. Some other services in the pattern carried on to Birkenhead (Woodside). But it may have varied over the years - I just have a spring 1965 snapshot from the period that many services and lines were in their death throws, but still not quite dead.
A follow up - because a very important principle has been raised on my social media discussion of this in a public response:
A correspondent writes (here)
A bit of honesty here. The train is well used, it needs to be frequent to be used more but it's never been over crowded and often runs, like now with plenty of free seats. But throwing false bits of info into the mix is never a good option to take to increase service levels. (and this is coming from some who has used the service not an arm chair critic).
I couldn't agree the principle more - I have, I hope, always looked to be 100% truthful and complete in making cases. In this case, it would appear that I haven't been sufficiently clear in what I wrote so it came across as a false reflection of where we are today.
As chair or MTUG, totally agree your sentiment. Capacity - as noted - was an issue in 2017 / into the first half of 2018, on the 17:35 (as it was) from Swindon. It was cured once GWR retired their class 153 trains which were used for many services until then. Not been an issue since except on very rare occasions when disruption elsewhere decants loads of long distance passengers onto our train. From time to time I walk through the train taking a rough count and it's averaging just over 100 passengers using that service on the single line sections that's not duplicated by other passenger trains. In the early days there was also a capacity on the summer / weekend train that extends to Weymouth for day trips; that's a hard one to predict but we have muted publicity. Plenty of seats Swindon to Westbury, gets full and standing and sometimes very full south of Yeovil.
Covid and changing work patterns hit us bad, probably because so many of our passengers were daily commuters into jobs that can be done remotely or indeed automatically. It has built back up, but the peak is no longer as sharp as it was, as work hours have become much more flexible; on the busiest section of the line, you'll find the 15:29 and 19:00 from Chippenham carrying far more passengers that the 18:00 (was 17:50) which is good for load balancing.
There was absolutely no intent to mislead readers into thinking we have a capacity issue on any individual train these days - sorry if it read like that. Issues holding back growth remain frequency, reliability, and the customer experience in particular at Melksham Station.
Huge THANK YOU for using the service; please continue to do so, and let us know of any other issues. You would also be very very welcome to be more actively involved.
Covid and changing work patterns hit us bad, probably because so many of our passengers were daily commuters into jobs that can be done remotely or indeed automatically. It has built back up, but the peak is no longer as sharp as it was, as work hours have become much more flexible; on the busiest section of the line, you'll find the 15:29 and 19:00 from Chippenham carrying far more passengers that the 18:00 (was 17:50) which is good for load balancing.
There was absolutely no intent to mislead readers into thinking we have a capacity issue on any individual train these days - sorry if it read like that. Issues holding back growth remain frequency, reliability, and the customer experience in particular at Melksham Station.
Huge THANK YOU for using the service; please continue to do so, and let us know of any other issues. You would also be very very welcome to be more actively involved.
For newer readers, the 153 was/is a single carriage train. It was replaced by a 150 which is two carriages on most services, with occasional 158s - also 2 carriages. The 150s have migrated west, an these days we have a 158, a 165 or a 166 which are two or occasionally 3 carriages. All of these trains start getting a bit tight at 100 passengers per carriage and on current length this is ONLY hit when there is service disruption and (for example) everyone from Westbury via Reading or via Bradford-on-Avon gets decanted onto the train via Melksham to get past a short notice blockage.
P.S. A few 143 (and 142?) units in the mix a decade or so ago too.
FUEL, petrol, paraffin, propane cylinders, gas cartridges, logs, smokeless fuel.
Candles, batteries, mainly AA and D.
FOOD, mainly tins and dried pasta. Chocolate. lifeboat rations.
Bottled drinking water, barrel of rainwater.
Port, spirits.
Durable goods, oil lamps, battery lamps, tools, sheets, blankets, towels, long and short underwear. Large UPS.
No venison or phesant as perishable.
| Re: 2 of 3 - rail related but no trains In "The Lighter Side" [379380/32435/30] Posted by DR7835 at 22:59, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
Or B9 and B10, possibly?
Agreed. When I previously identified B9 as Germany I didn't think that I'd been there. When Grahame revealed the name I realised that I had and took another close look at the photo. If you look at the gap in the trees to the left of of the picture you can just make out a wagon in the Zittauer Schmalspurbahn depot sidings!
Dave
Yes, very interesting. Note that it stopped at Stapleton Rd and then Bath, presumably bypassing Temple Meads via Rhubarb Curve. In the days before Bristol Parkway, Stapleton Rd performed a similar role to BPW - hence the running-in board showing ‘Bristol - Stapleton Road’.
| Re: Change to Number 8 service at Temple Meads In "Buses and other ways to travel" [379378/32445/5] Posted by Red Squirrel at 22:32, 9th September 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
I went round Temple Meads on the new route on Tuesday. I agree that it’s surprisingly far from the Eastern Entrance to the new stop - I suspect this may be in part due to the fact that UoB planned to build an additional building in front of the Sloane Robinson Building, which may have blocked the route to a closer bus stop location. Not sure if these plans are completely canned, or just postponed.
The new No.8 loop will give a good, frequent service to Avon St - which must be a good thing. I’m guessing people will soon get the hang of the changes.
For now, while Avon St is shut, it’s worth riding the 8 round the diversion. In order to pass under Kingsland Rd bridge, it seems like the bus has to slow down to allow the air to flow round it… expect bumps and scrapes.
| Re: Named train - but where did it run? In "The Lighter Side" [379377/32475/30] Posted by Merthyr Imp at 22:21, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
The Inter City - Paddington to Cardiff? (Or was it actually the Inter-City?)
| Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland In "Buses and other ways to travel" [379376/30034/5] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:54, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
So, in rather basic terms, that was a ferry farting?

Methane is an odorless, flammable gas produced by gut microbes during the fermentation of food, and it makes up about 0% to 30% of a typical human fart.
Thank you for your very detailed and useful work in producing such figures, IndustryInsider.
Chris from Nailsea.

| Re: Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [379374/19893/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:20, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
An update, from the BBC:
Learner drivers still forced to wait months to book tests
Learner drivers have to wait an average 20 weeks, or around five months, before booking a practical test, according to new figures, despite attempts to reduce delays.
The data from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) for August is only a marginal improvement from 20.2 weeks in July. The average wait time between booking and sitting a test is unchanged at 11.1 weeks.
The DVSA initially had a target of reducing the average waiting time to seven weeks by the end of last year. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander pushed the target back to summer 2026, but subsequently admitted even that would not be possible.
The DVSA made a number of changes to its practical driving test booking system earlier this year. Only the learner driver themself is now able to book their driving test, blocking an instructor or third parties from booking using the learner's details.
There is also a geographical restriction which means a learner can only book a test at their three local test centres, rather than one at the other side of the country if they found a test available. The number of times a would-be driver can swap a test date has also been restricted.
(BBC article continues)
Learner drivers have to wait an average 20 weeks, or around five months, before booking a practical test, according to new figures, despite attempts to reduce delays.
The data from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) for August is only a marginal improvement from 20.2 weeks in July. The average wait time between booking and sitting a test is unchanged at 11.1 weeks.
The DVSA initially had a target of reducing the average waiting time to seven weeks by the end of last year. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander pushed the target back to summer 2026, but subsequently admitted even that would not be possible.
The DVSA made a number of changes to its practical driving test booking system earlier this year. Only the learner driver themself is now able to book their driving test, blocking an instructor or third parties from booking using the learner's details.
There is also a geographical restriction which means a learner can only book a test at their three local test centres, rather than one at the other side of the country if they found a test available. The number of times a would-be driver can swap a test date has also been restricted.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: Improvements at South Eastern In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [379373/32478/51] Posted by Hafren at 20:37, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
Part of me has a twinge of jealousy - but just a twinge. I am happy for the people who live and want to travel along the corridor, and I am delighted at the example being set.
It shows me that innovative changes can be made at a timetable recast - and could be done in the recast that SWR (rather than SER) are preparing for December 2027 - it sets a precedent for improvements, such as joining up the Bristol -> Salisbury service to the Salisbury -> Waterloo service
It acknowledged that services from residential areas into the centre of London to different termini throughout the day are a useful / wanted / required service, and with that is a reminder that Paddington is not Waterloo and that services from Bath and Westbury to both termini will be servicing different markets rather than competing with each other
It confirms the need for two trains an hour - or four or six per hours in the inner suburbs - for a Metro service suitable for daily lives in the areas
Based on previous experience, there may be teething troubles and I really hope that SER have the stock, staff and track capacity to deliver at least 90% of the trains they promise - but then with the frequency timetabled, if a train is cancelled there will be another one along at a maximum of 30 minutes later. What a contrast to my home station where a cancellation leaves the next one not along until 120 minutes later, and because that's likely to be the same train or crew it's liable to be cancelled too. Give us the 30 minute service and we'll fill the trains, especially with the 80% uplift in new house numbers that's planned
It shows me that innovative changes can be made at a timetable recast - and could be done in the recast that SWR (rather than SER) are preparing for December 2027 - it sets a precedent for improvements, such as joining up the Bristol -> Salisbury service to the Salisbury -> Waterloo service
It acknowledged that services from residential areas into the centre of London to different termini throughout the day are a useful / wanted / required service, and with that is a reminder that Paddington is not Waterloo and that services from Bath and Westbury to both termini will be servicing different markets rather than competing with each other
It confirms the need for two trains an hour - or four or six per hours in the inner suburbs - for a Metro service suitable for daily lives in the areas
Based on previous experience, there may be teething troubles and I really hope that SER have the stock, staff and track capacity to deliver at least 90% of the trains they promise - but then with the frequency timetabled, if a train is cancelled there will be another one along at a maximum of 30 minutes later. What a contrast to my home station where a cancellation leaves the next one not along until 120 minutes later, and because that's likely to be the same train or crew it's liable to be cancelled too. Give us the 30 minute service and we'll fill the trains, especially with the 80% uplift in new house numbers that's planned
It strikes me that a lot of this is just reverting to the patterns or at least overall frequencies (in many case relatively recent changes IIRC) pre-Covid. However I'm also aware that the other former Southern Region TOCs scaled back some of their rolling stock numbers (e.g. SWR losing 442s) post-Covid; not sure if similar happened with SE but there could be fresh resourcing changes even if this mimics a mid-term historic pattern.
| Re: 2 of 3 - rail related but no trains In "The Lighter Side" [379372/32435/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:36, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
Or B9 and B10, possibly?
| Re: 2 of 3 - rail related but no trains In "The Lighter Side" [379371/32435/30] Posted by stuving at 20:25, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
I think you have the station names for C9 and C10 swapped over, Graham!
| Re: 2 of 3 - rail related but no trains In "The Lighter Side" [379370/32435/30] Posted by grahame at 17:31, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
B0 Reading - ChrisB
B1 Arnhem - stuving
B2 Wuppertal - PrestburyRoad
B3 Cattewater (Plymouth) - Chris from Nailsea
B4 Bregenz - stuving
B5 Langogne - stuving (just up the way)
B6 Taunton - Chris from Nailsea
B7 Inverness - eightonedee
B8 (London) St Pancras - TonyN
B9 Silute - not identified
B10 Zittau - not identified
B11 Leven - brooklea
B12 Melksham - Phil
B13 Liege - oxviem
B14 Potsdam - DR7835
| Re: 3rd and final (for now) "Rail related but no trains" In "The Lighter Side" [379369/32437/30] Posted by grahame at 17:05, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
To complete ...
C0 Mora - Chris from Nailsea
C1 Neibull - not identified
C2 Rotterdam Centraak - stuving
C3 London Bridge - rogerpatenall
C4 Beauly - eightonedee
C5 Corfe Castle - bradshaw
C6 Enniscorthy - not identified
C7 Dublin Connolly - Oxonhutch
C8 Haparanda - not identified
C9 Milan - eightonedee
C10 Antwerpen Centraal - stuving
C11 Bad Doberan - not identified
C12 Castlebar - stuving
C13 Göschenen - DR7835
C14 Bewdley - DR7835
| Re: To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, apparently In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [379368/32456/31] Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:17, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
Indeed, I have long felt it sensible to keep a reserve of food, water, fuel and other supplies.
We are vulnerable not only to extreme weather, but also to industrial disputes, wars, coups and revolutions overseas, and other emergencies.
We are vulnerable not only to extreme weather, but also to industrial disputes, wars, coups and revolutions overseas, and other emergencies.
Venison, pheasant, Port, paraffin, toilet rolls?
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [379367/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 16:03, 9th September 2026 | ![]() |
Further update on today's problems which are still continuing:
Cancellations to services between Oxford and Hereford via Worcester Shrub Hill
Due to vandalism of railway equipment at Evesham trains have to run at reduced speed. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Train services between Oxford and Hereford via Worcester Shrub Hill and Great Malvern may be cancelled, delayed or revised.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Network Rail advises that the signalling in the Evesham area has been affected due to vandalism.
-
What are we doing about it?
-
We are working with Network Rail to be able to return to running our normal timetable as soon as possible.
-
What are your options?
-
We are sorry for the disruption to your journey today, these are the current options available to you:
-
Option 1: If there are other rail companies or local public transport operators who may be able to help you make your journey, we will provide details here.
-
Option 2: Replacement transport provided by us such as a buses, coaches or taxis, have not been requested at this time. We will continue to monitor the need for this as the situation develops and provide updates here.
-
Option 3: If your train is cancelled, you may travel on either of the two services before, or two services after, your original train. If these are peak services or less flexible, you can still travel with your original ticket, at no extra cost.
-
Option 4: Consider postponing your journey until our service returns to normal.
Due to vandalism of railway equipment at Evesham trains have to run at reduced speed. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Train services between Oxford and Hereford via Worcester Shrub Hill and Great Malvern may be cancelled, delayed or revised.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Network Rail advises that the signalling in the Evesham area has been affected due to vandalism.
-
What are we doing about it?
-
We are working with Network Rail to be able to return to running our normal timetable as soon as possible.
-
What are your options?
-
We are sorry for the disruption to your journey today, these are the current options available to you:
-
Option 1: If there are other rail companies or local public transport operators who may be able to help you make your journey, we will provide details here.
-
Option 2: Replacement transport provided by us such as a buses, coaches or taxis, have not been requested at this time. We will continue to monitor the need for this as the situation develops and provide updates here.
-
Option 3: If your train is cancelled, you may travel on either of the two services before, or two services after, your original train. If these are peak services or less flexible, you can still travel with your original ticket, at no extra cost.
-
Option 4: Consider postponing your journey until our service returns to normal.














