Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Neasden - huge waste facility fire shuts Tube and train lines - 28 August 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378839/32426/51] Posted by ChrisB at 20:36, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Or rechargeable batteries at least.....
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06 will be started from Swindon.
It will no longer call at Westbury, Trowbridge, Melksham and Chippenham.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378836/32425/30] Posted by grahame at 19:56, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Here are the correct ones
0 Paddington - stuving
3 Arbroath - broooklea
5 York - Chris from Nailsea
6 Marlow - Mark A
14 Prague hlavní nádraží - DR7835
But these are not
10 - not Swansea
11 - not Fishguard
13 - not Swindon
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378835/32425/30] Posted by PrestburyRoad at 19:08, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
10. A guess - a memento of the copper works in Swansea
| Re: Imber Bus Day - merged topics, ongoing events and discussion here In "Buses and other ways to travel" [378834/17260/5] Posted by Clan Line at 19:04, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378833/32425/30] Posted by JayMac at 19:02, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
13. Swindon?
From the BBC:
Gatwick Airport faced water outage after main burst
Gatwick Airport passengers were left without water after a main burst in a nearby field.
SES Water said that it located a burst main in Horley, with parts of the airport left without water as a result.
A spokesperson for the airport confirmed that the issue had affected water supply in both terminals and was under investigation by SES Water. The water company said it had begun to restore supply.
Flights remained unaffected by the disruption, the airport added.
(BBC article continues)
Gatwick Airport passengers were left without water after a main burst in a nearby field.
SES Water said that it located a burst main in Horley, with parts of the airport left without water as a result.
A spokesperson for the airport confirmed that the issue had affected water supply in both terminals and was under investigation by SES Water. The water company said it had begun to restore supply.
Flights remained unaffected by the disruption, the airport added.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378830/32425/30] Posted by stuving at 18:10, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
0 is at Paddington - specifically on the linking walkway in front of the Paddington Square building. Quite what it links, or will, I'm not sure; it mainly seems to block off Tanner Lane (what was London Street) where the change in ground level is now incompatible with it continuing.
| Re: Neasden - huge waste facility fire shuts Tube and train lines - 28 August 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378829/32426/51] Posted by Mark A at 18:10, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Only a week or so since the one at Bermondsey burned - and for the second time. If this relates to disposable vapes, they're... imposing costs on us all.
Mark
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378828/32425/30] Posted by TonyN at 18:01, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
11. Fishguard harbour
| Re: Derailment, Wickford,14th August 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378827/32365/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:00, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
... particularly if the on-board toilet facility is not available...

| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378826/32425/30] Posted by DR7835 at 17:37, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
14: Czech Republic; The eye-catching "classic" entrance hall to Praha hlavní nádraží /Prague Main Station. (Admittedly the background does give a bit of a clue!).
| Neasden - huge waste facility fire shuts Tube and train lines - 28 August 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378825/32426/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:33, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Huge waste facility fire shuts Tube and train lines
A large fire has broken out at a waste facility close to Wembley Stadium in north-west London, shutting Tube and train lines in the area.
The London Fire Brigade (LFB) said 125 firefighters were tackling the blaze at an industrial estate on Hannah Close in Neasden, with the smoke plumes visible from miles away in central London.
The LFB was alerted just after 11:30 BST and has deployed 20 fire engines to the scene. Residents have been warned to keep their windows and doors shut because of the huge amount of smoke.
Transport for London (TfL) said the entire Metropolitan line has been suspended as a result, while the Jubilee line has been part shut between Willesden Green and Wembley Park.
Rail services to and from London Marylebone are also being delayed or cancelled due to train lines to Aylesbury being blocked, National Rail said.
(BBC article continues)
A large fire has broken out at a waste facility close to Wembley Stadium in north-west London, shutting Tube and train lines in the area.
The London Fire Brigade (LFB) said 125 firefighters were tackling the blaze at an industrial estate on Hannah Close in Neasden, with the smoke plumes visible from miles away in central London.
The LFB was alerted just after 11:30 BST and has deployed 20 fire engines to the scene. Residents have been warned to keep their windows and doors shut because of the huge amount of smoke.
Transport for London (TfL) said the entire Metropolitan line has been suspended as a result, while the Jubilee line has been part shut between Willesden Green and Wembley Park.
Rail services to and from London Marylebone are also being delayed or cancelled due to train lines to Aylesbury being blocked, National Rail said.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378824/32425/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:11, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
5. York Station (UK), but without the tale of the fox - see also https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=29110.0

| Re: Passport required from next month for UK to Ireland travel. In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378822/32422/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:07, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Further information - Stena also applying the new "rule" too.
From TimeOut
Yet from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/common-travel-area/common-travel-area-accessible?
From TimeOut
Taking a boat from the UK to Ireland this autumn? Double-check that your passport is in date because it’ll soon be the only ID that’ll allow you to make the journey.
At the moment, multiple forms of photo ID (like bus passes, work ID cards and international student cards) are accepted on the ferry journey between Britain and Ireland. But from late September onwards, passengers will need a valid passport, regardless of age or nationality.
Stena Line and Irish Ferries confirmed that passengers on the Holyhead to Dublin and Fishguard to Rosslare services must soon show a passport on departure – no other form of ID will be allowed. The change comes from UK Border Force rules concerning the ‘accuracy and integrity of passenger data before boarding’ and will take effect from Monday September 28.
However, if you’re using Stena Line for services via Belfast, Liverpool, Cairnryan or Heysham, then any form of photo ID is still fine. There are also still no passport checks between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Despite the new rule, the UK, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are all still part of the Common Travel Area, which means that citizens aren’t legally required to show a passport to travel freely between each place. However, Aer Lingus (as of February this year) and Ryanair both demand that passengers going between Ireland and Great Britain must present a passport at departure, not any other photo identification. The lesson? It’s just best to pack your passport for any journey over to the Emerald Isle.
At the moment, multiple forms of photo ID (like bus passes, work ID cards and international student cards) are accepted on the ferry journey between Britain and Ireland. But from late September onwards, passengers will need a valid passport, regardless of age or nationality.
Stena Line and Irish Ferries confirmed that passengers on the Holyhead to Dublin and Fishguard to Rosslare services must soon show a passport on departure – no other form of ID will be allowed. The change comes from UK Border Force rules concerning the ‘accuracy and integrity of passenger data before boarding’ and will take effect from Monday September 28.
However, if you’re using Stena Line for services via Belfast, Liverpool, Cairnryan or Heysham, then any form of photo ID is still fine. There are also still no passport checks between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Despite the new rule, the UK, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are all still part of the Common Travel Area, which means that citizens aren’t legally required to show a passport to travel freely between each place. However, Aer Lingus (as of February this year) and Ryanair both demand that passengers going between Ireland and Great Britain must present a passport at departure, not any other photo identification. The lesson? It’s just best to pack your passport for any journey over to the Emerald Isle.
Yet from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/common-travel-area/common-travel-area-accessible?
British and Irish citizens travelling to GB via Ireland are not required to present a passport as evidence of identity and nationality. British and Irish citizens may present any other document(s) that satisfactorily establishes their nationality and identity
"The lesson? It’s just best to pack your passport for any journey over to the Emerald Isle"
Amen.
| Re: 2 car trains (again) In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [378821/32239/20] Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:05, 28th August 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
I haven’t heard anything about 158s personally.
Here’s more on the Class 175 plan - which explains why less have been in service lately:
“A recovery plan is being put in place which will centre around a dedicated technical investigation team, with specialists from GWR and our industry partners Alstom and Angel.
New processes will also be introduced with enhanced pre-service checks and ensuring the trains complete a significant amount of miles without a fault occurring before they are able to go into passenger service.”
But the facts are that the 175s were fairly fragile with TfW and are from the same family as the 180s which were fairly fragile when with FGW. Having been in storage for a year or two won’t have helped.
So I think just about reliable enough is the best we can wish for!
Here’s more on the Class 175 plan - which explains why less have been in service lately:
“A recovery plan is being put in place which will centre around a dedicated technical investigation team, with specialists from GWR and our industry partners Alstom and Angel.
New processes will also be introduced with enhanced pre-service checks and ensuring the trains complete a significant amount of miles without a fault occurring before they are able to go into passenger service.”
But the facts are that the 175s were fairly fragile with TfW and are from the same family as the 180s which were fairly fragile when with FGW. Having been in storage for a year or two won’t have helped.
So I think just about reliable enough is the best we can wish for!
Don't worry, it'll all be fine once it's renationalised under GBR

| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378820/32425/30] Posted by Mark A at 15:58, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
6, Marlow?
| Re: Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378819/32425/30] Posted by brooklea at 15:53, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
3. Arbroath
| Re: Holiday home in Torquay (Torre) anyone? - be aware of train noise In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [378818/24457/24] Posted by RichardB at 14:52, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
I see bidding got to £57,000 but that didn't meet the reserve so it was unsold. Will be interesting to see what happens from here.
| Railways but no trains - 1 of 3 In "The Lighter Side" [378817/32425/30] Posted by grahame at 14:49, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Pictures taken by ... myself on my travels .. showing the great variety that are railways. I have lots of pictures with trains in them, but this series - over three days does not feature trains. Just at or near railway stations. For the UK ones, can you tell me the station; for the overseas ones, can you tell me the country and there's a bonus for the actual place.
0.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

| Re: Derailment, Wickford,14th August 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378816/32365/51] Posted by JohnM at 14:37, 28th August 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
77mph (decreasing) for 1.5 miles in a carriage not running on rails must be pretty scary.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [378815/31371/14] Posted by ray951 at 14:13, 28th August 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby, rogerw, eightonedee | ![]() |
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham due 18:23 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:34
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:34
18:51 Evesham to Oxford due 19:50 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:35
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:35
Is this now the least likely to run as advertised service on the GW network? Why is it even in the timetable? They could just add it as a special excursion on the days when they can be a*s*d to run it
35% cancellation in the last 4 weeks.
1636 Oxford - Didcot also on 35% over the last 4 weeks which of course then forms the 1704 DID to Evesham.
As we all know since electrification was cancelled GWR has not had enough diesel trains. Cancelling the half complete electrification to Oxford was one of the most stupid decisions made. Thanks Chris Grayling, who has plenty of form with stupid decisions.

| Re: Passport required from next month for UK to Ireland travel. In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378814/32422/51] Posted by Western Pathfinder at 13:36, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Just a short note .please check your drivers license,whilst you may be entitled to drive until well into the future,the photo card does need to be renewed and the picture updated every so often 10 years at this time.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [378813/31371/14] Posted by ChrisB at 12:59, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
Probably the most popular train on the Evesham-Oxford section!
Certainly in term time.
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [378812/31371/14] Posted by Witham Bobby at 12:55, 28th August 2026 Already liked by JohnM | ![]() |
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham due 18:23 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:34
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:34
18:51 Evesham to Oxford due 19:50 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:35
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:28/08/2026 11:35
Is this now the least likely to run as advertised service on the GW network? Why is it even in the timetable? They could just add it as a special excursion on the days when they can be a*s*d to run it
| Re: Passport required from next month for UK to Ireland travel. In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378811/32422/51] Posted by ChrisB at 12:36, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
That latter paragraph is a currently, now option without referring to end September. It will surely be updated nearer the time.
Graham's 1965 timetable and people's reflections on the issues with it made me think: do we see the same practices in the current era, and to what extent?
That does prompt the question 'Current era?' - one measure would be 'Post 1997 and the arrival of the privatised railway' - an era that has seen strong growth for rail travel - a growth that in some cases wasn't anticipated in the way individual franchises were structured.
An alternative current era would be 'The Covid pandemic and after'.
Against a background of growth, what's not been seen is a wholesale shredding of infrastructure (Those photos of Devizes, 1965 and several other examples, not least the Great Central main line) - and the later smattering of irksome reductions such as Westbury's missing platform, or the Bradford junction north curve - these were pre-privatisation changes at a time when managed decline was still an anticipation.
Not so the Maindee curve, by Newport. Along with the buoyant services it carried, it was a victim of the new structure of the privatised railway, its singling will no doubt be quoted as a reason the railway cannot possibly reinstate the much-used services onto the Marches line from the west country and from Wiltshire.
https://www.branchline.uk/rail_chronology/Maindee-letter.pdf
Managing excess passenger flows using the timetable - in the west, with capacity on the network constrained by the shortfall in trains the railway's not at all averse to that and it's Weymouth that's the shining star in that dark firmament. The timetable's been habitually squatting on the potential for growth in passenger numbers to Weymouth - especially so since the loco-hauled stuff ended.
What could really improve things for summer trips to Weymouth would be to jiggle a few trains around on other days so that they actually connect at Westbury - something workable down in the morning and back late(r) afternoon.
The underlying question must be 'How should the railway handle seasonal flows - and in a graceful manner?' The answer shouldn't be 'In July, deploy the winter minimum viable product' as business doesn't grow, and existing passengers suffer (hi, Cambrian Coast Line). Neither can it be a large strategic reserve of things on wheels that for most of the year do not turn them. Timetabling a summer-only higher capacity train but then very frequently turning it short of its branch line destination isn't exactly brilliant either (waves to Newquay).
I don't know the answer but in the West it would be good if the railway was in a position to step up and provide more for the journeys that, in a car, are awkward. Even on the major axes I'm rather missing the time when the GWR's marketing stated, albeit with a hyperbolic ambition 'With our new timetable we intend to empty the M4'.
| Re: Derailment, Wickford,14th August 2026 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378809/32365/51] Posted by stuving at 11:36, 28th August 2026 | ![]() |
RAIB have announced an enquiry into this incident.
Derailment of a passenger train at Wickford
Investigation into the derailment of a passenger train at Wickford, Essex, 14 August 2026.
Rail Accident Investigation Branch Published: 28 August 2026

At around 14:08 on 14 August 2026, a passenger train derailed around 2.1 miles (3.4 kilometres) south-east of Wickford station, while travelling between Southend Victoria and London Liverpool Street.
The train, operated by Greater Anglia, was formed of two class 720 electric multiple units coupled together, each consisting of five vehicles. The rearmost vehicle derailed and its wheels subsequently ran on the sleepers and ballast for around 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometres). The train remained upright throughout and there were no reported injuries to the 62 people estimated to be on board.
Preliminary analysis of the on-train data recorder (sometimes referred to as ‘the black box’) obtained from the front vehicle recorded that the train was travelling at around 77 mph (124 km/h) when it derailed. The driver reported seeing a kink in the track which rocked the driving cab as the train passed over it. Forward-facing CCTV recovered from the train involved shows a misalignment in the track at the same location as the driver’s report and the point of derailment.
The train driver was in the process of reporting the track condition to the signaller when they received an emergency call from another train passing in the opposite direction and applied the train’s brakes.
The train involved in the accident sustained damage and the train passing in the opposite direction received minor damage from flying ballast. There was significant damage caused to the track, signalling and overhead electrification equipment.
Our investigation will examine the sequence of events leading up to and during the derailment. It will also consider:
the actions of those involved and the factors that may have influenced them
the status of the track at this location and how it was maintained
the effectiveness of any mitigation measures to address the risk of operating trains in hot weather
the performance of the train during the derailment
any underlying management factors.
Our investigation is independent of any investigation by the railway industry or by the industry’s regulator, the Office of Rail and Road.
We will publish our findings, including any recommendations to improve safety, at the conclusion of our investigation. This report will be available on our website.
You can subscribe to automated emails notifying you when we publish our reports.
Investigation into the derailment of a passenger train at Wickford, Essex, 14 August 2026.
Rail Accident Investigation Branch Published: 28 August 2026
At around 14:08 on 14 August 2026, a passenger train derailed around 2.1 miles (3.4 kilometres) south-east of Wickford station, while travelling between Southend Victoria and London Liverpool Street.
The train, operated by Greater Anglia, was formed of two class 720 electric multiple units coupled together, each consisting of five vehicles. The rearmost vehicle derailed and its wheels subsequently ran on the sleepers and ballast for around 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometres). The train remained upright throughout and there were no reported injuries to the 62 people estimated to be on board.
Preliminary analysis of the on-train data recorder (sometimes referred to as ‘the black box’) obtained from the front vehicle recorded that the train was travelling at around 77 mph (124 km/h) when it derailed. The driver reported seeing a kink in the track which rocked the driving cab as the train passed over it. Forward-facing CCTV recovered from the train involved shows a misalignment in the track at the same location as the driver’s report and the point of derailment.
The train driver was in the process of reporting the track condition to the signaller when they received an emergency call from another train passing in the opposite direction and applied the train’s brakes.
The train involved in the accident sustained damage and the train passing in the opposite direction received minor damage from flying ballast. There was significant damage caused to the track, signalling and overhead electrification equipment.
Our investigation will examine the sequence of events leading up to and during the derailment. It will also consider:
the actions of those involved and the factors that may have influenced them
the status of the track at this location and how it was maintained
the effectiveness of any mitigation measures to address the risk of operating trains in hot weather
the performance of the train during the derailment
any underlying management factors.
Our investigation is independent of any investigation by the railway industry or by the industry’s regulator, the Office of Rail and Road.
We will publish our findings, including any recommendations to improve safety, at the conclusion of our investigation. This report will be available on our website.
You can subscribe to automated emails notifying you when we publish our reports.















