Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: SWT "More trains than usual needing repairs" 23/12/25 In "South Western services" [370080/31322/42] Posted by Southernman at 22:59, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Given that this seems to have taken SWR by surprise is fuel contamination a possible cause?
Again? Or is this still an issue of engines being away for servicing that caused a lot of problems in the summer?The issue of sufficient engines being available for service has not gone away. Sometimes worse than others. Appears not to be a solution in the short term unfortunately.
| Re: Carlisle and Settle - AQ23 In "The Lighter Side" [370079/31323/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:18, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
I reckon 3. is somewhere in Czechoslovakia - whereby I'm happy with being awarded just half a point for identifying the country.
In the spirit of full disclosure, I do have the benefit of copies of grahame's itineraries for his travels in Europe earlier this year - but I'm still struggling here.

| Re: Home for Christmas - a dozen pictures of our own area for Christmas Eve - AQ24 In "The Lighter Side" [370078/31325/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:05, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
1. Oldfield Park
I recognised 1. immediately: "It's that small station near Bath Spa"! But then I simply couldn't remember the actual name of it, so I could post an answer here.

Sorry, Timmer - I know it's your local station.

| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [370076/29726/18] Posted by Trowres at 21:19, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
20:06 Westbury to Gloucester due 21:41 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.
This is due to a broken down train.
With the 21:16 Westbury-Swindon being a planned Christmas Eve cancellation, the honour (?) of being the last northbound TransWilts was claimed by the 18:37 from Westbury.
| Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years. In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [370075/31150/31] Posted by eXPassenger at 21:11, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
I do find the N Somerset statement annoying. They are claiming that the bridge was build for the RAF aircraft factory. I have always understood that this was a shadow factory for the Bristol Aircraft Company. The RAF only flew aircraft, they did not build them. Post war Bristol Aircraft used it for their helicopter division which was then sold to Westland. When we first moved to the area there were so many helicopter flights that my yougest daughter referred to any plane as a 'helicopi'. Augusta Westland have since closed the site.
Similarly the Banwell shadow factory was used for aircraft repair resulting in the very wide road between Banwell and the old airfield so aircraft could be towed along it. Post war this site was used for rocket engines by Bristol Aircraft (a joint venture called Bristol Aerojet) before they sold their engine division to Rolls Royce. The site is now a village.
| Re: Carlisle and Settle - AQ23 In "The Lighter Side" [370074/31323/30] Posted by eightonedee at 20:50, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
15 - USA, New York
23 - Finland, Helsinki
| Re: Interrail, summer 2025 - daily diary thread of our travels In "Introductions and chat" [370073/30276/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:45, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
* One guess at the most-visited city among Interrailers (let’s just say it’s home to a very famous tower…)
Pah! We have one of those, in Bristol - within 5 minutes walk of Temple Meads.

| Re: Rail company 'cheapest tickets online' claims - merged topics, ongoing discussion In "Fare's Fair" [370070/27142/4] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:55, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
You have made a good point, ChrisB.
I have therefore expanded the heading of this topic, to 'spread the blame more equally', so to speak.
CfN.

| Re: Home for Christmas - a dozen pictures of our own area for Christmas Eve - AQ24 In "The Lighter Side" [370069/31325/30] Posted by bradshaw at 18:29, 24th December 2025 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
11 Saltash
| Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland In "Buses and other ways to travel" [370068/30034/5] Posted by Oxonhutch at 18:06, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Hadn't realised the Queen Mary was so small

| Re: Home for Christmas - a dozen pictures of our own area for Christmas Eve - AQ24 In "The Lighter Side" [370067/31325/30] Posted by brooklea at 17:31, 24th December 2025 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
Confirming number 7 as the most obscure, I offer for number 3. Dorchester West
| Re: Rail company 'cheapest tickets online' claims - merged topics, ongoing discussion In "Fare's Fair" [370066/27142/4] Posted by ChrisB at 17:17, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
The ruling isn't just on Scotrail either.
From the Guardian
Train firms warned over ‘best price’ claims after watchdog bans ads
Advertising regulator said operators and a ticket seller could not prove bookings were cheapest
Train companies have been warned over price claims made on their ticketing websites after the advertising watchdog banned ads run by three sellers.
The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that claims made for fares booked via ScotRail and Greater Anglia’s website, as well as by a third-party ticketing site, My Train Ticket, were misleading.
In all three cases, the ASA said, it found the companies could not provide evidence to show that people would get the lowest available price by booking train tickets through them.
[....continues]
Advertising regulator said operators and a ticket seller could not prove bookings were cheapest
Train companies have been warned over price claims made on their ticketing websites after the advertising watchdog banned ads run by three sellers.
The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that claims made for fares booked via ScotRail and Greater Anglia’s website, as well as by a third-party ticketing site, My Train Ticket, were misleading.
In all three cases, the ASA said, it found the companies could not provide evidence to show that people would get the lowest available price by booking train tickets through them.
[....continues]
| Re: Rail company 'cheapest tickets online' claims - merged topics, ongoing discussion In "Fare's Fair" [370065/27142/4] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 17:08, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
The ruling seems to be saying that because Scotrail sells the tickets at the same price as other outlets rather than less, they're not the cheapest. That seems overly-pedantic and possibly even incorrect to me; it's just a "best price" promise and I wouldn't feel misled unless I found I'd actually paid more than I could have done elsewhere. The Trainline's entire marketing campaign uses the same approach and they seem to get away with it.
| Re: Server slow ... In "News, Help and Assistance" [370064/30293/29] Posted by grahame at 16:52, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Christmas Eve - what a wonderful day for the server to be running slow with what looks like an attempted Denial of Service attack.
Server may be a bit slow as I find out what's broken the recent sweet running

| Re: Llangollen Canal - Whitchurch, Shropshire canal breach: 22 Dec 2025 In "Introductions and chat" [370063/31316/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:34, 24th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
An update, from the BBC:
Boat stranded on canal hole edge pulled to safety

The Pacemaker was left perilously close to tipping into the large hole
A narrowboat that was left teetering on the edge of a giant hole after part of a canal in Shropshire collapsed has been pulled to safety.
Paul Stowe's boat, the Pacemaker, was perilously close to falling into the hole on the Llangollen Canal in Whitchurch, which opened up on Monday after an "embankment failure". Mr Stowe, originally from Solihull, escaped barefoot with his wife, son, and two cats at about 04:10 GMT after he woke and heard rushing water "equivalent to the Niagara Falls".
Shropshire Council said the boat, which the family live on, was rescued at about 22:00 on Tuesday using a specialist winch operation. Once in location, the winch was able to haul the boat along the drained canal away from the breach hole," the authority said in a statement. "The boat is now safely located next to the lift bridge," the council said, adding that it would be refloated in the new year, when a dam would be constructed beyond the boat.
Overnight, water was pumped into dammed sections created by the Canal and River Trust on Tuesday, and as of 06:00 on Wednesday, water levels were recovering. "This means that one of the boats near to the breach site, plus six further up the canal, are now beginning to refloat," it said. "They are expected to be fully afloat by later today."
Mr Stowe previously told the BBC that all of his and his family's possessions were on the boat, and that they had escaped with only the clothes on their backs. He said they had no phones or credit cards, and added his birthday was on Christmas Day. "I'm not sure I'll ever moor in this area again, I'm not sure I'll ever moor on an embankment again," he said. "I'll be honest with you, it's very debatable [that] I'll ever want to go on a boat again."
The authority added that investigations had begun into what caused the collapse. "This will continue after the new year together with the initial plans to recover the two boats in the breach hole and the long and costly process of rebuilding and reinstating the canal."
"Now the initial emergency response, including the concern for boaters' immediate safety, has passed, our teams have been working hard to refill the Llangollen Canal around the site of the breach," said Campbell Robb, chief executive of the Canal and River Trust. "This will mean the boats in the immediate area are refloating, and navigation along other affected areas will be restored."
He said the trust would be providing regular updates and assurance to the local community and boating community in the coming weeks. "Thankfully, breaches of this scale are relatively rare, but, when they do occur, they're expensive and complicated to fix," he said.
The trust previously told the BBC that repairs could take months.

The Pacemaker was left perilously close to tipping into the large hole
A narrowboat that was left teetering on the edge of a giant hole after part of a canal in Shropshire collapsed has been pulled to safety.
Paul Stowe's boat, the Pacemaker, was perilously close to falling into the hole on the Llangollen Canal in Whitchurch, which opened up on Monday after an "embankment failure". Mr Stowe, originally from Solihull, escaped barefoot with his wife, son, and two cats at about 04:10 GMT after he woke and heard rushing water "equivalent to the Niagara Falls".
Shropshire Council said the boat, which the family live on, was rescued at about 22:00 on Tuesday using a specialist winch operation. Once in location, the winch was able to haul the boat along the drained canal away from the breach hole," the authority said in a statement. "The boat is now safely located next to the lift bridge," the council said, adding that it would be refloated in the new year, when a dam would be constructed beyond the boat.
Overnight, water was pumped into dammed sections created by the Canal and River Trust on Tuesday, and as of 06:00 on Wednesday, water levels were recovering. "This means that one of the boats near to the breach site, plus six further up the canal, are now beginning to refloat," it said. "They are expected to be fully afloat by later today."
Mr Stowe previously told the BBC that all of his and his family's possessions were on the boat, and that they had escaped with only the clothes on their backs. He said they had no phones or credit cards, and added his birthday was on Christmas Day. "I'm not sure I'll ever moor in this area again, I'm not sure I'll ever moor on an embankment again," he said. "I'll be honest with you, it's very debatable [that] I'll ever want to go on a boat again."
The authority added that investigations had begun into what caused the collapse. "This will continue after the new year together with the initial plans to recover the two boats in the breach hole and the long and costly process of rebuilding and reinstating the canal."
"Now the initial emergency response, including the concern for boaters' immediate safety, has passed, our teams have been working hard to refill the Llangollen Canal around the site of the breach," said Campbell Robb, chief executive of the Canal and River Trust. "This will mean the boats in the immediate area are refloating, and navigation along other affected areas will be restored."
He said the trust would be providing regular updates and assurance to the local community and boating community in the coming weeks. "Thankfully, breaches of this scale are relatively rare, but, when they do occur, they're expensive and complicated to fix," he said.
The trust previously told the BBC that repairs could take months.
| Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [370062/231/28] Posted by Noggin at 15:16, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Is Portishead 3 years away ?
Yesterday DfT published a WECA update which on page 21 shows competition as October 2027 (just under 2 years time)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/693c0aedcfacd5e888491ed1/weca-crsts-annual-monitoring-report-24-25.pdf
Yesterday DfT published a WECA update which on page 21 shows competition as October 2027 (just under 2 years time)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/693c0aedcfacd5e888491ed1/weca-crsts-annual-monitoring-report-24-25.pdf
Thank you for this, very enlightening. I hadn't realised we had WECA to thank for the various Bristol bridge renovations.
| Re: Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing discussion In "Across the West" [370061/18719/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 14:55, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Whilst GWR have their own issues with crew shortage, spare a thought for Crosscountry customers who'd planned on using their long distance services today, numerous cancellations & shortened journeys due to crew shortages leaving many hopelessly stranded for Christmas.
Detailed discussions in other forums.
| Re: Rail company 'cheapest tickets online' claims - merged topics, ongoing discussion In "Fare's Fair" [370060/27142/4] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 14:49, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
ScotRail's 'cheapest tickets' claim is misleading, watchdog rules

ScotRail has been ordered to withdraw claims that it offers the "cheapest tickets" on its website after a watchdog ruled this was misleading.
In August, adverts on its journey planner claimed it was "unbeatable on price" and customers should "book direct for the best price".
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld a complaint from long-time campaigner George Eckerton in finding that ScotRail had no evidence to back up those claims.
The rail operator said it has changed the wording on the website, and remains committed to offering great value for money.
Following the ruling, Mr Eckerton told BBC Radio Scotland's Lunchtime Live programme he hoped it would "set a precedent for how we market rail travel in Scotland and across the UK" from now on. He said: "If you say you sell the cheapest possible fare, it actually needs to be cheaper than anywhere else, and that wasn't case. It's an inherently complex system – I get that. But that doesn't mean that we can't make it clearer through marketing and sell people the best fare for their circumstances. Hopefully ScotRail and others can reflect on how we sell train tickets across the UK, because I think we should be honest with passengers."
His complaint to the ASA referred to an advert which appeared on the ScotRail website's journey planner section in August. It featured statements such as "get cheapest tickets" and "book direct for our best price". Another page titled "find the right ticket" featured a tab labelled "buy tickets". That tab could be clicked on to reveal a drop-down box with a journey planner, under which text stated "unbeatable on price".
ScotRail said the claim "book direct for our best price" referred to the fact that consumers who booked directly with ScotRail always paid the lowest price it offered. A spokesperson said the rail industry operated under regulated fares with a centrally-controlled fares database from which all accredited retailers sourced their ticket prices. They said they applied no additional booking fees to those standard fares, unlike some third-party retailers and competitors, which meant they could guarantee their best price when a consumer booked with them directly.
The ASA ruling said: "As stated, we considered the overall impression of the ad was that consumers would be able to find the cheapest ticket for a particular journey on the ScotRail website. As such, we considered that the claims 'get cheapest tickets', 'book direct for our best price', and 'unbeatable on price' discouraged consumers from searching elsewhere for cheaper tickets. However, they provided no evidence that, through purchasing tickets separately on the ScotRail website, they would always beat competitors' prices."
The ASA said that the ad must not appear again and told ScotRail to ensure they do not mislead consumers by claiming they could offer the lowest price available if that was not the case. The ruling came as part of a wider piece of work related to online ads in the rail industry concerning "lowest" or "cheapest" price claims, with ruling against Abellio Greater Anglia and mytrainticket.co.uk also published.
George Eckerton had also complained to the UK government about price claims made by the rail operator Northern, which were subsequently changed without the need for ASA involvement. Mr Eckerton, who has spent the past 10 years campaigning for cheaper rail travel in Scotland, said: "I complained to ScotRail but didn't get much more of a response (other) than, 'we'll consider it'. I just hope that going forward, and in the spirt of Christmas, we can all learn and move forward."
Claire Dickie, ScotRail's commercial director, said: "Our aim is always to provide clear, accurate information to customers, and we regret that the website messages did not fully reflect the ASA's requirements. We take great care to ensure all promotional material meets advertising standards and expectations and will further review our processes to make sure we maintain the highest standards of compliance."

ScotRail has been ordered to withdraw claims that it offers the "cheapest tickets" on its website after a watchdog ruled this was misleading.
In August, adverts on its journey planner claimed it was "unbeatable on price" and customers should "book direct for the best price".
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld a complaint from long-time campaigner George Eckerton in finding that ScotRail had no evidence to back up those claims.
The rail operator said it has changed the wording on the website, and remains committed to offering great value for money.
Following the ruling, Mr Eckerton told BBC Radio Scotland's Lunchtime Live programme he hoped it would "set a precedent for how we market rail travel in Scotland and across the UK" from now on. He said: "If you say you sell the cheapest possible fare, it actually needs to be cheaper than anywhere else, and that wasn't case. It's an inherently complex system – I get that. But that doesn't mean that we can't make it clearer through marketing and sell people the best fare for their circumstances. Hopefully ScotRail and others can reflect on how we sell train tickets across the UK, because I think we should be honest with passengers."
His complaint to the ASA referred to an advert which appeared on the ScotRail website's journey planner section in August. It featured statements such as "get cheapest tickets" and "book direct for our best price". Another page titled "find the right ticket" featured a tab labelled "buy tickets". That tab could be clicked on to reveal a drop-down box with a journey planner, under which text stated "unbeatable on price".
ScotRail said the claim "book direct for our best price" referred to the fact that consumers who booked directly with ScotRail always paid the lowest price it offered. A spokesperson said the rail industry operated under regulated fares with a centrally-controlled fares database from which all accredited retailers sourced their ticket prices. They said they applied no additional booking fees to those standard fares, unlike some third-party retailers and competitors, which meant they could guarantee their best price when a consumer booked with them directly.
The ASA ruling said: "As stated, we considered the overall impression of the ad was that consumers would be able to find the cheapest ticket for a particular journey on the ScotRail website. As such, we considered that the claims 'get cheapest tickets', 'book direct for our best price', and 'unbeatable on price' discouraged consumers from searching elsewhere for cheaper tickets. However, they provided no evidence that, through purchasing tickets separately on the ScotRail website, they would always beat competitors' prices."
The ASA said that the ad must not appear again and told ScotRail to ensure they do not mislead consumers by claiming they could offer the lowest price available if that was not the case. The ruling came as part of a wider piece of work related to online ads in the rail industry concerning "lowest" or "cheapest" price claims, with ruling against Abellio Greater Anglia and mytrainticket.co.uk also published.
George Eckerton had also complained to the UK government about price claims made by the rail operator Northern, which were subsequently changed without the need for ASA involvement. Mr Eckerton, who has spent the past 10 years campaigning for cheaper rail travel in Scotland, said: "I complained to ScotRail but didn't get much more of a response (other) than, 'we'll consider it'. I just hope that going forward, and in the spirt of Christmas, we can all learn and move forward."
Claire Dickie, ScotRail's commercial director, said: "Our aim is always to provide clear, accurate information to customers, and we regret that the website messages did not fully reflect the ASA's requirements. We take great care to ensure all promotional material meets advertising standards and expectations and will further review our processes to make sure we maintain the highest standards of compliance."
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [370059/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 14:42, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:00
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:00 will no longer call at Melksham.
This is due to a late running freight train.
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:00 will no longer call at Melksham.
This is due to a late running freight train.
| Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland In "Buses and other ways to travel" [370058/30034/5] Posted by TaplowGreen at 14:41, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Beautiful vessels. Thank God they weren't commissioned by the SNP, they'd probably still only be half built.
| Re: Carlisle and Settle - AQ23 In "The Lighter Side" [370057/31323/30] Posted by grahame at 12:25, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
So far - correctly identified
1. Lithuania (but where?)
2. Portugal (Regua)
3.
4. Poland (but where?)
5. Belgium (Leuven/Louvain)
6. Latvia (Riga)
7. Slovenia (but where?)
8. Denmark (Tonder)
9. Scotand (Kirkaldy)
10.
11.
12. Republic of Ireland (Manulla Junction)
13. Hungary (Budapest)
14. Netherlands (but where?)
15.
16. England (York)
17.
18. Croatia (Zagreb)
19. Canada (New Brunswick)
20. France (Périgueux)
21.
22. Estonia (Balti Jaam, Tallinn) - I have few intermediate pictures and, yes, a repeat
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. Northern Ireland (Belfast / Lanyon Place)
28.
29.
30. Wales (Barry)
| Re: Carlisle and Settle - AQ23 In "The Lighter Side" [370056/31323/30] Posted by stuving at 12:04, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Well, I can still see eight or nine where the train at least shows its nationality more or (mostly) less overtly. Of course the train might have gone abroad, and one does appear to have done that.
For example, if 1 is Lithuania, then 6 is Latvia (and Riga too). And 22 is Estonia, just on the colour! And not only is that Tallinn, but aren't we back to Balti jaam?
| Re: Home for Christmas - a dozen pictures of our own area for Christmas Eve - AQ24 In "The Lighter Side" [370055/31325/30] Posted by grahame at 11:37, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
Identified and correctly so far:
1. Oldfield Park - RobT
2. Penzance - Prestbury Road
4. Oxford - stuving
5. Maidenhead - Electric Train
6. Okehampton - Oxonhutch
8. Broughton Gifford (near Melksham) - John D
9. Worcester Foregate Street - TonyN
10. Falmouth Town ("The Dell") - old original
| Re: Home for Christmas - a dozen pictures of our own area for Christmas Eve - AQ24 In "The Lighter Side" [370054/31325/30] Posted by grahame at 11:36, 24th December 2025 | ![]() |
No7. Bradford On Avon I think.
And while I'm here
Wishing everyone a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year .
And while I'm here
Wishing everyone a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year .
Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year too, and thank you for all your inputs, caring ear and voice of wisdom. Sorry to say, though, that No. 7 - perhaps the most obscure in the quiz - is not Bradford-on-Avon














