Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: London Tube strike now called off by the RMT - May 2026 In "Transport for London" [375238/32043/46] Posted by ChrisB at 15:40, 18th May 2026 |      |
From Evening Standard, via MSN update
includes....
"The dispute is not over and more strike action will follow if we fail to make sufficient progress."
The RMT also brought forward planned strikes in June, which were due to take place on the 16 and 18.
They are now set to start on Tuesday June 2 and Thursday June 4.
The RMT also brought forward planned strikes in June, which were due to take place on the 16 and 18.
They are now set to start on Tuesday June 2 and Thursday June 4.
| Re: Bristol narrowboat Redshank named UK flagship of the year - 12 May 2026 In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [375237/32041/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:29, 18th May 2026 | |
Narrowboat engines can themselves be heritage features (I do love the sight and sound of a Bolinder!) ...
... so now we're talking.
This 7 minute clip from YouTube is resonant - including, if I'm not mistaken, the growl of a Rolls Royce Merlin engine overhead at the start.
| Re: London Tube strike now called off by the RMT - May 2026 In "Transport for London" [375236/32043/46] Posted by ChrisB at 15:17, 18th May 2026 | |
From Evening Standard, via MSN
Tube drivers' 4-day week many Londoners would grab but RMT rejects
The RMT union has caused travel misery for Londoners with strikes on the Tube in a dispute over a four-day week.
The “militant” union was due to press ahead with two more rounds of 24-hour walkouts, beginning at 12pm on Tuesday and again at midday on Thursday this week.
But the train drivers’ union Aslef has accepted the deal which has been offered by Transport for London.
The RMT union has caused travel misery for Londoners with strikes on the Tube in a dispute over a four-day week.
The “militant” union was due to press ahead with two more rounds of 24-hour walkouts, beginning at 12pm on Tuesday and again at midday on Thursday this week.
But the train drivers’ union Aslef has accepted the deal which has been offered by Transport for London.
In a memo to members, Finn Brennan, Aslef’s district organiser for the Tube, laid out why the new four-day week would be so good for drivers.
Here is his explanation in full:
The introduction of the 4-day week will be the biggest improvement in working conditions for Underground Train Drivers in decades. It means you will have working conditions that are as good as, or better than, those on any mainline train company.
There has been lots of false information circulated, so it is important that every driver understands the facts about what it means for you.
The 4-day week will be piloted first on the Bakerloo line before rolling out across the combine. Detailed discussions on everything involved are taking place, with both trade unions meeting management every week. When the details are agreed, draft rosters and duty sheets will be produced so that everyone can see exactly what the new working pattern will look like and decide if they want to move to a 4 day week or stay on a 5 day pattern.
The key differences are;
An extra month away from work every year
The 4-day week means you will spend 35 fewer days at work every year. That is more than an extra month off.
Your annual leave entitlement will not change. It will remain at 7.4 working weeks. A week’s leave will now use up only 4 days of your entitlement instead of 5.
An extra rest day each week means roster patterns and duty swaps can be arranged in different ways so you will have more flexibility to block leave together, or take long weekends or mini-breaks if you prefer.
A 32-hour week
Average weekly rostered hours will reduce to 34 hours from the current average of 36.
Your undisturbed meal break will be counted as part of your working hours. Drivers will be the only grade this applies too.
That means you will be working an average 32 hour week, as your rostered hours will be 34 hours less 2 hours (4 x ½ hour meal breaks)
Flexible working arrangements.
There will be no change to your right to request flexible working arrangements. This is a legal entitlement and won’t change in any way.
If you have a flexible working agreement in place, that is not affected by the move to a 4-day week.
Less fatigue
Having a third rest day every week means more time at home and a lot less time spent traveling to and from work. Reducing fatigue and giving you a better quality of life.
As the average rostered week reduces to 34 hours, your longest possible working week will reduce from 42.5 hours now to 38 hours per week. That’s 4.5 hours fewer at work if you do the roughest possible turn all week.
What about Pool Drivers?
Currently all pool drivers are a “line resource” and can work out of any depot on the line. On the 4-day week the majority of pool drivers will be at their home depot only with a partial rest day roster meaning certainty about their shifts and the ability to plan ahead for family commitments etc.
All pool drivers will get an extra rest day every week. And for the first time, one rest day will be rostered in advance so that people can plan ahead.
Saving you money
As well as the time you save traveling to work one day less every week, you will also save money on travel or childcare costs.
There are already 120 drivers across the combine on a four-day week, with over 130 on waiting lists. Instead of only getting 80% of salary, they will have the option of receiving full pay.
Overtime
For the first time drivers will have the opportunity to volunteer for overtime like every other grade.
If you don’t want to work overtime you won’t have to, but you will have the opportunity to make some extra money if you need it, by working one day a week at time and a quarter.
Using an ipad
Instead of having to carry rule books, line information books, DISI and duty books etc, and signing on manually all documents will be available electronically.
The only time you would use it when away from work would be to check duties, just as you would check your diary or messages from syndicates now.
Don't want to do it?
Not a problem. The 4-day week is voluntary. If you want to stay on a 5-day working pattern you can. It's your choice. How this works in practice will be discussed in detail at Trains Council which includes both unions.
The reality is few people will want to keep working an extra day and more hours every week for no extra money and less time off! (After all, why would anyone want to spend more than a month extra at work every year?) But ASLEF will support any member who wants to remain on a five-day working pattern to do so.
The RMT union has caused travel misery for Londoners with strikes on the Tube in a dispute over a four-day week.
The “militant” union was due to press ahead with two more rounds of 24-hour walkouts, beginning at 12pm on Tuesday and again at midday on Thursday this week.
But the train drivers’ union Aslef has accepted the deal which has been offered by Transport for London.
The RMT union has caused travel misery for Londoners with strikes on the Tube in a dispute over a four-day week.
The “militant” union was due to press ahead with two more rounds of 24-hour walkouts, beginning at 12pm on Tuesday and again at midday on Thursday this week.
But the train drivers’ union Aslef has accepted the deal which has been offered by Transport for London.
In a memo to members, Finn Brennan, Aslef’s district organiser for the Tube, laid out why the new four-day week would be so good for drivers.
Here is his explanation in full:
The introduction of the 4-day week will be the biggest improvement in working conditions for Underground Train Drivers in decades. It means you will have working conditions that are as good as, or better than, those on any mainline train company.
There has been lots of false information circulated, so it is important that every driver understands the facts about what it means for you.
The 4-day week will be piloted first on the Bakerloo line before rolling out across the combine. Detailed discussions on everything involved are taking place, with both trade unions meeting management every week. When the details are agreed, draft rosters and duty sheets will be produced so that everyone can see exactly what the new working pattern will look like and decide if they want to move to a 4 day week or stay on a 5 day pattern.
The key differences are;
An extra month away from work every year
The 4-day week means you will spend 35 fewer days at work every year. That is more than an extra month off.
Your annual leave entitlement will not change. It will remain at 7.4 working weeks. A week’s leave will now use up only 4 days of your entitlement instead of 5.
An extra rest day each week means roster patterns and duty swaps can be arranged in different ways so you will have more flexibility to block leave together, or take long weekends or mini-breaks if you prefer.
A 32-hour week
Average weekly rostered hours will reduce to 34 hours from the current average of 36.
Your undisturbed meal break will be counted as part of your working hours. Drivers will be the only grade this applies too.
That means you will be working an average 32 hour week, as your rostered hours will be 34 hours less 2 hours (4 x ½ hour meal breaks)
Flexible working arrangements.
There will be no change to your right to request flexible working arrangements. This is a legal entitlement and won’t change in any way.
If you have a flexible working agreement in place, that is not affected by the move to a 4-day week.
Less fatigue
Having a third rest day every week means more time at home and a lot less time spent traveling to and from work. Reducing fatigue and giving you a better quality of life.
As the average rostered week reduces to 34 hours, your longest possible working week will reduce from 42.5 hours now to 38 hours per week. That’s 4.5 hours fewer at work if you do the roughest possible turn all week.
What about Pool Drivers?
Currently all pool drivers are a “line resource” and can work out of any depot on the line. On the 4-day week the majority of pool drivers will be at their home depot only with a partial rest day roster meaning certainty about their shifts and the ability to plan ahead for family commitments etc.
All pool drivers will get an extra rest day every week. And for the first time, one rest day will be rostered in advance so that people can plan ahead.
Saving you money
As well as the time you save traveling to work one day less every week, you will also save money on travel or childcare costs.
There are already 120 drivers across the combine on a four-day week, with over 130 on waiting lists. Instead of only getting 80% of salary, they will have the option of receiving full pay.
Overtime
For the first time drivers will have the opportunity to volunteer for overtime like every other grade.
If you don’t want to work overtime you won’t have to, but you will have the opportunity to make some extra money if you need it, by working one day a week at time and a quarter.
Using an ipad
Instead of having to carry rule books, line information books, DISI and duty books etc, and signing on manually all documents will be available electronically.
The only time you would use it when away from work would be to check duties, just as you would check your diary or messages from syndicates now.
Don't want to do it?
Not a problem. The 4-day week is voluntary. If you want to stay on a 5-day working pattern you can. It's your choice. How this works in practice will be discussed in detail at Trains Council which includes both unions.
The reality is few people will want to keep working an extra day and more hours every week for no extra money and less time off! (After all, why would anyone want to spend more than a month extra at work every year?) But ASLEF will support any member who wants to remain on a five-day working pattern to do so.
| Re: London Tube strike now called off by the RMT - May 2026 In "Transport for London" [375235/32043/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:09, 18th May 2026 | |
I have amended the heading of this topic, in view of the RMT's announcement, for clarity.
| Re: London Tube strike now called off by the RMT - May 2026 In "Transport for London" [375234/32043/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:01, 18th May 2026 | |
An update, from the BBC:
Tube strikes called off by RMT union
A wave of strikes starting on Tuesday by London Underground drivers has been suspended by the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union.
Drivers were due to walk out at 12:00 BST on Tuesday and resume on Thursday in a dispute over the voluntary introduction of a four-day week with condensed hours.
On Monday, the RMT said "at the 11th hour the employer has shifted its position allowing us to further explore our members concerns around the imposition of new rosters, fatigue and safety issues".
Transport for London (TfL) described the suspension as "good news for London". Industrial action planned for 16 and 18 June has been suspended but fresh strikes have been called for 2 and 4 June.
The voluntary introduction of a four-day week with condensed hours has led the RMT to warn that "the dispute is not over and more strike action will follow if we fail to make sufficient progress".
Nick Dent, director of customer operations for London Underground, said: "We are pleased that RMT has withdrawn its planned industrial action this week. Our proposal for a voluntary four-day week is designed to improve both work-life balance for drivers and the reliability of service for customers. We look forward to further discussions on the implementation of these proposals with all of our trade unions."
No service had been expected on the Circle and Piccadilly lines or parts of the Metropolitan and Central lines. But many Tube drivers were set to turn up to work as usual, including members of the Aslef train drivers' trade union, which has accepted the proposals, labelling them "exactly the sort of deal every trade union should be trying to achieve".
Aslef has agreed to the voluntary compressed four-day week, saying it gives participating drivers an extra 35 days off a year "in return for some fairly minor changes to working conditions".
The RMT had branded it a "fake four-day week that amounts to five days' work compressed into four". Their concerns include reduced flexibility, shift length and resulting fatigue impacting safety.
A wave of strikes starting on Tuesday by London Underground drivers has been suspended by the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union.
Drivers were due to walk out at 12:00 BST on Tuesday and resume on Thursday in a dispute over the voluntary introduction of a four-day week with condensed hours.
On Monday, the RMT said "at the 11th hour the employer has shifted its position allowing us to further explore our members concerns around the imposition of new rosters, fatigue and safety issues".
Transport for London (TfL) described the suspension as "good news for London". Industrial action planned for 16 and 18 June has been suspended but fresh strikes have been called for 2 and 4 June.
The voluntary introduction of a four-day week with condensed hours has led the RMT to warn that "the dispute is not over and more strike action will follow if we fail to make sufficient progress".
Nick Dent, director of customer operations for London Underground, said: "We are pleased that RMT has withdrawn its planned industrial action this week. Our proposal for a voluntary four-day week is designed to improve both work-life balance for drivers and the reliability of service for customers. We look forward to further discussions on the implementation of these proposals with all of our trade unions."
No service had been expected on the Circle and Piccadilly lines or parts of the Metropolitan and Central lines. But many Tube drivers were set to turn up to work as usual, including members of the Aslef train drivers' trade union, which has accepted the proposals, labelling them "exactly the sort of deal every trade union should be trying to achieve".
Aslef has agreed to the voluntary compressed four-day week, saying it gives participating drivers an extra 35 days off a year "in return for some fairly minor changes to working conditions".
The RMT had branded it a "fake four-day week that amounts to five days' work compressed into four". Their concerns include reduced flexibility, shift length and resulting fatigue impacting safety.
| Re: First day report and ramblings - Bristol <-> Oxford, 6 days a week, 18.5.2026 In "Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West" [375233/32045/22] Posted by grahame at 14:23, 18th May 2026 | |
And after using the train ...
The incoming train from Bristol - the 09:08 - arrived 4 minutes late having had to wait for the platform and disgorged - at a guess - between 30 and 50 passengers before shunting. The return train also had to await a platform, and left somewhat to my surprise from platform 4, 3 minutes late then had to wait to cross over to the line towards Didcot leaving it 7 or 8 minutes late for the rest of the journey.
39 in standard class from Oxford, and no signs of huge crowds joining 1st class. Goodly number more by the time we got to Bath Spa. Train manager checking tickets has a word with a young lady with an expired (well expired, by the sound of things) railcard with an advance ticket. Oops; young lady was shocked at the replacement price, and I don't think the new ticket was actually sold. She was with others and they appeared to laugh it off when the train manager was into the next carriage.
Traffic from Oxford was what I would describe as "what you might expect on a typical early day". No hoard of rail advocates (in fact I think I was the only one), lots of relatively young leisure traffic, including significant baggage - a bit touristy. Middle of the day, school term-time, no regular buildup yet. From Oxford it needs time to build up. Swindon west (in this direction) it was already providing a useful service; not sure how much that is just abstraction from the services from London. No catering - and that was announced.
Although I did not use my Interrail pass (home country days are valuable), I did look to plan it out in their app which is generally very good. However, the train did not appear there and I was recommended a change at Didcot. I suspect that's because it was announced so late, and it will appear in the planner in a week or two. Connecting two major overseas tourist cities, I wonder if being missing from Interrail, Eurail and perhaps Britrail may suppress numbers until corrected.
| First day report and ramblings - Bristol <-> Oxford, 6 days a week, 18.5.2026 In "Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West" [375232/32045/22] Posted by grahame at 13:53, 18th May 2026 | |
Today is a day of celebration - the through train service from Bristol to Oxford is back, six days a week, running every two hours. Until 2004, this useful service was provided by Thames Trains who were swallowed into First Great(er) Western, as were Wessex Trains and it was "optimised" away. Twenty years ago, Wessex Trains were swallowed up too and my own local service through Melksham was reduced to unusable. How times have changed; rail passenger number have increased, the wider community benefit of a decent rail service is now appreciated, and this is another step towards a network service fit for passenger purpose.
Initially, Bristol to Oxford runs every 2 hours, six days a week. Proposals are for it to run every hour - that's from May 2027. A service that only runs every 2 hours is "thin" and will hugely benefit when it's stepped up to every hour, though if "pushed" you can make the journey already at intermediate times doing what we jokingly call the "Didcot Dance" - rushing to make tight connections or doing a slow elegant movement when they don't work.
This "hourly for regional services" should be a minimum, and it is now commonly appreciated that the Swindon to Westbury service through Melksham should also run hourly. We celebrated a return from 2 to 8 trains each way per day from 2014 - another victory for common passenger sense. But infrastructure and freight services mean that the service can't simply and reliably be stepped up in the same way as Bristol to Oxford.
Sunday services should - these days - be similar to those of Monday to Saturday. But yet, GWR's staff arrangements are such that if they were to schedule such a service, it would be beyond the number of staff they have; other services are already reduced at present because of a lack of staff who volunteer to work Sundays. And the service really should go onwards from Oxford - or at least connect - to Bletchley then Milton Keynes or Bedford. The railway has been re-instated but it's waiting - and has been waiting far too long - for staffing issues to be resolved.
However, a celebration today of the return of a 6 day per week usable service from Oxford to Bristol. We have waited - far - too long. And I look forward to seeing next steps on Westbury - Swindon and Bristol - Oxford.
I live in Melksham. What does it mean for us? It means that, once again, sleeping at home and doing a day's work in Oxford would be practical for me; the 07:21 from Melksham connects at Chippenham, and the 17:03 from Oxford connects at Chippenham on the Wayback, with an 18:09 arrival. On Saturday, the 08:02 connects to Oxford. Coming back it's the dance, though. For passengers from Melksham to Bristol the 07:21 now provides a much better connection at Chippenham, and the new 17:12 return is far better connecting back than the 17:00. Off peak / evening peak / weekend fares are sensible. Morning peak fares are silly for historic reasons, and need sorting out, as (for the new passenger) does the difference between "not via London" and "not via Reading" tickets. The wording "Any permitted" - itself a tautology and misleading, is not used on any tickets for this journey; there should be an "any reasonable route" standard which lets you get on the train that will get you there fastest, irrespective of where you have to change.
I am not a great one for first or last days - but I am taking the opportunity of catching the 11:03 from Oxford to Bath - a real boon between the two tourist cities (report in follow up this afternoon). It doesn't connect onwards into Melksham, but as I'm on my way back from mainland Europe with a heavy pack, I'm doubling back at Bath onto the 272 bus that calls opposite my home; later this month, that nearer option will be gone for six months of road works in Bath. Public Transport remains a changing and developing world and it's been good to see, over the last 10 days, the good and the not-so-good elsewhere in Europe too.
While writing, what other service in our area, culled when trains were not as busy, is needed back? How about the trains that ran until a few years ago from London to Trowbridge, Bradford-on-Avon, Bath and Bristol? This one should be a no brainer for a joined up GBR - there are already Waterloo - Salisbury and separate Salisbury - Bristol trains running, both with class 158/159 class trains and it shouldn't be beyond the wit of the timetabling experts to join them up!
Finally, a "Thank you" to friends in the rail industry and regulation have put the Bristol to Oxford service back. The community, long asking for this sensible move, really appreciates it.
Of late, the team at GWR have been - it seems - concentrating on the changes that are coming with GBR and - sorry - it feels like the good community relations we've had are somewhat on the back burner. Natural perhaps as the GWR staff can no longer consult and make changes within the remaining First group term, but unanswered emails and selective data still hurt. There would be no harm in a polite and explained "sorry - we can't". We are seeing a greater political interest, with more feedback and follow up via MPs in those constituencies where the MP is engaged - so that helps Melksham, Chippenham, Bradford on Avon and Avoncliff, and the case for Corsham too (which this new service would call at). Across the rest of West Wilts, we feel we are on "ignore" and it is difficult to judge how to best campaign for what, I suggest, everyone wants - an improved (for both passengers and financially) service. It would be so easy, as First staff become civil servants, for them to prioritise looking good for their new bossed and for their own careers over passengers. If any of you are reading this, we understand your plight; please understand our conundrum and help us work forward to mutual goals.
| Row over seafront cycling ban in Weymouth In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [375231/32044/50] Posted by CyclingSid at 13:51, 18th May 2026 | |
I think we have been here before.
‘I’m not anti-cycling at all. But…’ Row over seafront cycling ban in Weymouth erupts after local claims young cyclists are riding “no hands on the handlebars at excessive speed” in no-bike zone – but others say “99% of people” respect the restrictions
It feels like it’s been a while since we covered a good/bad old-fashioned cycling ban now on the live blog. And this one even features the classic caveat of the anti-cycling scoundrel: ‘I’m not ant-cycling, but…’
This week’s debate focuses on Weymouth Esplanade, which since 2018 has imposed a ban on people riding bikes between 10am and 5.30pm, from 1 May to 30 September (replacing the complete ban introduced in 2009).
It was kicked off by Jonathan, a “furious” letter writer to the Dorset Echo, who complained that “dangerous” cycling was putting pedestrians on the promenade at risk – after coming across one youth riding no-hands the other day.
It feels like it’s been a while since we covered a good/bad old-fashioned cycling ban now on the live blog. And this one even features the classic caveat of the anti-cycling scoundrel: ‘I’m not ant-cycling, but…’
This week’s debate focuses on Weymouth Esplanade, which since 2018 has imposed a ban on people riding bikes between 10am and 5.30pm, from 1 May to 30 September (replacing the complete ban introduced in 2009).
It was kicked off by Jonathan, a “furious” letter writer to the Dorset Echo, who complained that “dangerous” cycling was putting pedestrians on the promenade at risk – after coming across one youth riding no-hands the other day.
...and so on and so on https://road.cc/news/cycling-live-blog-15-may-2026
I know Weymouth is Graham's go to seaside place, but I have been put off by this sort of thing. Anyway keeps rif-raf like me out the place! But you are always welcome to come to Portsmouth and Southsea.
| Re: Wolf Rock Lighthouse - video clip from YouTube In "The Lighter Side" [375230/32040/30] Posted by JayMac at 12:17, 18th May 2026 | |
I've been subscribed to keeping_a_lighthouse since his second video. Excellent nascent channel.
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375229/32039/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:07, 18th May 2026 | |
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375228/32039/46] Posted by grahame at 11:59, 18th May 2026 | |
"Please give up this seat to passengers with reduced mobility". Does not apply to me - I can no longer stand for more than a few minutes, but that is not a reduced mobility.
It is in my view, and if I were still mobile (I'm now a wheelchair user), I would be offering my seat...
My view would be that the wording should be "please give up this seat to passengers less able to stand" which - after all - is closer to the purpose of having seats available ...
I got a seat - the wheelchair one - at Liverpool Street. No wheelchairs to be seen on this train. Chris - you would have had it in proper priority
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375227/32039/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 11:55, 18th May 2026 | |
I have a recurring back problem, which means that sometimes I actually prefer to stand rather than take a seat.
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375226/32039/46] Posted by ChrisB at 11:45, 18th May 2026 | |
"Please give up this seat to passengers with reduced mobility". Does not apply to me - I can no longer stand for more than a few minutes, but that is not a reduced mobility.
It is in my view, and if I were still mobile (I'm now a wheelchair user), I would be offering my seat...
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375225/32039/46] Posted by grahame at 11:41, 18th May 2026 | |
Now I think that age and health problems justify me in taking a bus seat designated for less-able people and I usually get one, especially on outward journeys into town. But then the bus starts to fill up, with some passengers obviously more infirm than I. On my last bus ride, about half of those on board seemed worthy of designated seats, posing the moral dilemma of whether I should offer mine.
I felt that way when I got on a full and standing Elizabeth Line service at Stratford this morning an I looked at the priority seats. "Please give up this seat to passengers with reduced mobility". Does not apply to me - I can no longer stand for more than a few minutes, but that is not a reduced mobility. "Please give up this space if a wheelchair user needs it" - no, I am not. Hmm ...
Of course, the person occurring the "reduced mobility" seats may have had reduced mobility - hidden diasbilies are just that - but I did feel I spotted a hole in their designation. Disabled railcard, yes. Reduced ability to stand, yes. Able to use a priority seat, no.
| Re: London Tube strike now called off by the RMT - May 2026 In "Transport for London" [375224/32043/46] Posted by ChrisB at 11:36, 18th May 2026 | |
Bus Controllers are also walking out at the same time in another dispute which could affect their running.
| London Tube strike now called off by the RMT - May 2026 In "Transport for London" [375223/32043/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 11:33, 18th May 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby | |
From the BBC:
Tube strike set to go ahead after failed talks
Image © BBC/Harry Low
Another wave of industrial action is due to take place as London Underground drivers walk out in a dispute over the voluntary introduction of a four-day week with condensed hours.
Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) voted to oppose the changes. The union says Transport for London "has not made any attempt to engage in negotiation meetings to resolve this dispute".
TfL described the strikes, which start at 12:00 BST on Tuesday, as "disappointing" and said drivers "can remain on a five-day working pattern".
No service is expected on the Circle and Piccadilly lines or the Metropolitan line between Baker Street and Aldgate and the Central line between White City and Liverpool Street.
A second 24-hour walkout will begin at 12:00 on Thursday, causing disruption into Friday.
Many Tube drivers are set to turn up to work as usual, including members of the Aslef train drivers' trade union - which has accepted the proposals, labelling them "exactly the sort of deal every trade union should be trying to achieve".
An RMT spokesperson said: "Despite promises of talks, TfL has not made any attempt to engage in negotiation meetings to resolve this dispute. London Underground is still pushing implementation plans through a forum that excludes senior managers and union officials, instead of engaging in proper negotiations. Our strike action remains on as we continue to seek a negotiated settlement."
Aslef has agreed to the voluntary compressed four-day week, saying it gives participating drivers an extra 35 days off a year "in return for some fairly minor changes to working conditions".
"It will be the first strike in the history of the trade union movement designed to stop people having a shorter working week and more time off," an Aslef spokesperson said.
Claire Mann, TfL's chief operating officer, said: "It is disappointing that the RMT is planning this strike action despite our best efforts to resolve this dispute. We have been clear that our proposals for a four-day week are designed to improve work-life balance and are entirely voluntary. Any Tube driver who doesn't wish to opt in to the new four-day working pattern and associated changes to working arrangements can remain on a five-day working pattern."
Image © BBC/Harry Low
Another wave of industrial action is due to take place as London Underground drivers walk out in a dispute over the voluntary introduction of a four-day week with condensed hours.
Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) voted to oppose the changes. The union says Transport for London "has not made any attempt to engage in negotiation meetings to resolve this dispute".
TfL described the strikes, which start at 12:00 BST on Tuesday, as "disappointing" and said drivers "can remain on a five-day working pattern".
No service is expected on the Circle and Piccadilly lines or the Metropolitan line between Baker Street and Aldgate and the Central line between White City and Liverpool Street.
A second 24-hour walkout will begin at 12:00 on Thursday, causing disruption into Friday.
Many Tube drivers are set to turn up to work as usual, including members of the Aslef train drivers' trade union - which has accepted the proposals, labelling them "exactly the sort of deal every trade union should be trying to achieve".
An RMT spokesperson said: "Despite promises of talks, TfL has not made any attempt to engage in negotiation meetings to resolve this dispute. London Underground is still pushing implementation plans through a forum that excludes senior managers and union officials, instead of engaging in proper negotiations. Our strike action remains on as we continue to seek a negotiated settlement."
Aslef has agreed to the voluntary compressed four-day week, saying it gives participating drivers an extra 35 days off a year "in return for some fairly minor changes to working conditions".
"It will be the first strike in the history of the trade union movement designed to stop people having a shorter working week and more time off," an Aslef spokesperson said.
Claire Mann, TfL's chief operating officer, said: "It is disappointing that the RMT is planning this strike action despite our best efforts to resolve this dispute. We have been clear that our proposals for a four-day week are designed to improve work-life balance and are entirely voluntary. Any Tube driver who doesn't wish to opt in to the new four-day working pattern and associated changes to working arrangements can remain on a five-day working pattern."
It is interesting how the 'official line' of the train drivers' union ASLEF differs from the stance of the RMT: open criticism, actually.
| Re: Bristol narrowboat Redshank named UK flagship of the year - 12 May 2026 In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [375222/32041/31] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 11:05, 18th May 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, Witham Bobby, GBM | |
Narrowboat engines can themselves be heritage features (I do love the sight and sound of a Bolinder!) so I was briefly worried that something of interest had been lost. This page though https://bristolpacket.co.uk/about/redshank/ confirms that while the previous engine could indeed be described as traditional, it wasn't the original from new and was a fairly standard and still commonplace Lister.
I do worry about a segment of rail enthusiasts who delight in diesel engines being as noisy as possible and throwing out a huge plume of dirty fumes, aka "thrash" and "clag". Nothing is more likely to turn public opinion against diesel fuel.
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375221/32039/46] Posted by Marlburian at 10:45, 18th May 2026 | |
Back in 2012, a member of Romania's yachting team insisted that I take his seat on a bus on the outskirts of London and in the next few years such offers increased; once I was strap-hanging on the Tube and ducked my head to look out of the window, prompting a young lady in the seat below me me to offer it to me. In those days I could smile "no thanks" and boast of ten-hour walks and half-days of voluntary environmental work.
Now I think that age and health problems justify me in taking a bus seat designated for less-able people and I usually get one, especially on outward journeys into town. But then the bus starts to fill up, with some passengers obviously more infirm than I. On my last bus ride, about half of those on board seemed worthy of designated seats, posing the moral dilemma of whether I should offer mine.
| Prevention of reading and replying In "News, Help and Assistance" [375220/32042/29] Posted by Phantom at 10:45, 18th May 2026 | |
I have had an ongoing problem now, that appears on both my work laptops and my mobile phone - so different servers and web browsers.
When I open this site, I always click the "Update topics" and "Recent unread topics" hyperlinks to show me the updated posts etc.
But after I open the 4th / 5th page I get a holding warning page telling me I am unable to post or view anymore.
I then get this page on anything I view, and have to leave the site for about an hour before I can try again.
I wasn't sure if this was something that can be looked into please?
It means that if I find a thread that I want to reply to, I get stopped by this contact page
Grateful for any assistance or advice
| Re: Wolf Rock Lighthouse - video clip from YouTube In "The Lighter Side" [375219/32040/30] Posted by GBM at 09:33, 18th May 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | |
An adjacent reference, so slightly off topic.
In the same geographic area however,
I was fortunate enough to fly out to the Seven Stones Light many years ago during a routine maintenance visit.
Wasn't there to work, just a quick look around the ship itself.
My Father had designed her and she was built by the yard he worked for (Philip and Son at Dartmouth).
I worked at Landsend Radio, and we used to take several daily weather reports from the Stones to pass on to the Met Office.
The Wolf light must have been automated as I don't recall any communications from her.
Wolf light recently featured in the Saving Lives at Sea (BBC2, Series 10, Episode 10 when the Sennen and Penlee Lifeboats went out to the Wolf as a bulk carrier Mazarine grounded on the light.
| Re: HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) - Government proposals, alternative routes, discussion In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375218/5138/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:26, 18th May 2026 | |
Reads like an obituary.
| Re: New Oxford - Bristol direct service, ongoing developments and discussion In "Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West" [375217/28355/22] Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:11, 18th May 2026 | |
The people of Chippenham greeting the arrival of the inaugural service to Oxford with wild enthusiasm this morning! (from elsewhere on social media)
| Re: New Oxford - Bristol direct service, ongoing developments and discussion In "Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West" [375216/28355/22] Posted by bobm at 09:09, 18th May 2026 | |
Among those at Swindon to join the first Oxford bound train were Swindon South MP and Secretary of State for Transport Heidi Alexander, Mark Hopwood MD of GWR and Will Stone Swindon North MP.
| Re: Mid Cornwall Metro - Newquay, St Austell, Truro & Falmouth In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [375215/27102/25] Posted by RailCornwall at 08:36, 18th May 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby, Mark A | |
I hope there's reason behind it but the apparent lack of connectivity with services on the main GWML at Par appears shocking, Some Newquay services in the mornings departing Par three minutes before the arrival of services from Penzance will appear annoying and thats being kind.
| Re: If it's Sunday it must be ... In "The Lighter Side" [375214/32036/30] Posted by grahame at 07:57, 18th May 2026 | |
3 could be Hengele, and 2? well I've seen that picture before . . . Oh yes 2 minutes ago on this very same forum.
Yeah ... no. 2 turned out to be the only "art at station" picture I had for my major Munster post. Sorry - 3 is not, quite, Hengele but not far from there. A different international station!
| Re: If it's Sunday it must be ... In "The Lighter Side" [375213/32036/30] Posted by rogerpatenall at 07:43, 18th May 2026 | |
3 could be Hengele, and 2? well I've seen that picture before . . . Oh yes 2 minutes ago on this very same forum.
| Bristol narrowboat Redshank named UK flagship of the year - 12 May 2026 In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [375212/32041/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 06:18, 18th May 2026 | |
From the BBC:
Electric narrowboat named UK's flagship of the year
Skipper Jude Taljaard said the makeover had made Redshank "beautiful"
A 90-year-old narrowboat that was converted to fully electric propulsion has been named the UK's flagship of the year.
Redshank, which takes passengers on tours around Bristol Harbour and on the River Avon, was awarded the title by maritime body National Historic Ships UK.
In 2023, having barely left the water in its lengthy service, the boat's traditional diesel engine was replaced with lithium battery packs, allowing it to operate all day on electric power.
Skipper Jude Taljaard said Redshank was "paving the way for future boat conversions".
Redshank received the award on 12 May and to mark the occasion her operator, Bristol Packet Boat Trips, was offering trips for just £1 on Sunday.
Built in 1936 and first christened "Reading", the vessel had a long career shipping cargo such as coal, timber and even lime juice between Birmingham and London. In 1954 it was sold to another operator and renamed Redshank, but continued its work carrying goods between UK cities.
Simon Stevens, of National Historic Ships, said: "Before motorways and lorries came along, this was how you got your cargo from A to B - from the collieries to the sea and vice versa.
Redshank has been working Britain's waterways for 90 years
"They carried bricks, manure - a whole range of things.. They were literally just iron buckets - elongated iron buckets to carry stuff."
In 1970, as the age of canal freight came to a close, Redshank carried its final commercial load, and four years later she was bought to the West to work the waterways around Bristol.
There are now five boats in the Bristol Packet fleet, and Taljaard said he loves Redshank's new incarnation as an electric vessel. "Before it was very smelly, very loud. Now it's this beautiful electric boat," he said. "It's green and we are paving the way for future boat conversions - making sure other people can see how to turn a boat like this into something green for the future."
Skipper Jude Taljaard said the makeover had made Redshank "beautiful"
A 90-year-old narrowboat that was converted to fully electric propulsion has been named the UK's flagship of the year.
Redshank, which takes passengers on tours around Bristol Harbour and on the River Avon, was awarded the title by maritime body National Historic Ships UK.
In 2023, having barely left the water in its lengthy service, the boat's traditional diesel engine was replaced with lithium battery packs, allowing it to operate all day on electric power.
Skipper Jude Taljaard said Redshank was "paving the way for future boat conversions".
Redshank received the award on 12 May and to mark the occasion her operator, Bristol Packet Boat Trips, was offering trips for just £1 on Sunday.
Built in 1936 and first christened "Reading", the vessel had a long career shipping cargo such as coal, timber and even lime juice between Birmingham and London. In 1954 it was sold to another operator and renamed Redshank, but continued its work carrying goods between UK cities.
Simon Stevens, of National Historic Ships, said: "Before motorways and lorries came along, this was how you got your cargo from A to B - from the collieries to the sea and vice versa.
Redshank has been working Britain's waterways for 90 years
"They carried bricks, manure - a whole range of things.. They were literally just iron buckets - elongated iron buckets to carry stuff."
In 1970, as the age of canal freight came to a close, Redshank carried its final commercial load, and four years later she was bought to the West to work the waterways around Bristol.
There are now five boats in the Bristol Packet fleet, and Taljaard said he loves Redshank's new incarnation as an electric vessel. "Before it was very smelly, very loud. Now it's this beautiful electric boat," he said. "It's green and we are paving the way for future boat conversions - making sure other people can see how to turn a boat like this into something green for the future."
| Re: Some good examples of how they do it in Germany In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [375211/32037/52] Posted by grahame at 06:13, 18th May 2026 | |
From my own recent travels in Germany, I would say that the two things that really set an example that GBR could learn from are the train information at stations/on trains and (but not in all main stations) the extended hours and variety of catering and retail outlets.
Indeed
However, signage for getting around stations internally was in my experience (based on experience at Aachen, Osnabruck, Hannover, Hamburg HBF and Lubeck) patchy or poor. In particular, Osnabruck, with its complex two level structure for a station of its size was apparently lacking in simple signage getting you between platforms on different levels and to the retail/main entrance.
As - Osnabruck! I know it well enough to ignore the direction signs. But thinking about it, last Tuesday taking cousins from Long Beach through there, they looked a bit "wondering" to put it mildly. Mind, it was the 4th change of the day. Hamburg HbF I similarly know, Lubeck I found easy enough.
Another aspect I liked was the regional liveries applied to local trains, albeit that some are a little garish. My favourite (as you may gather from an earlier post) is the blue Schleswig-Holstein one, with a slogan proclaiming with regional pride "Schleswig-Holstein - der Echte Nordern" - "Schleswig-Holstein - the northern corner". Can we have something like that for our Thames Valley and South-west local trains, please GBR?
They make for an area and a nice variety element. How independent are the operations though?
| Re: HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) - Government proposals, alternative routes, discussion In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375210/5138/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 05:42, 18th May 2026 | |
From the BBC:
HS2 failings blamed on high-speed focus and political pressure
The HS2 rail line failed due in part to a focus on achieving the highest possible speeds and political pressure, a review is expected to find.
The scheme has been undergoing a "reset", and in March Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander asked HS2 bosses to look at lowering top speeds to save money.
This latest report into HS2, expected to be published this week, is authored by former National Security Adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove and has considered the implications for the civil service and public sector. Its findings are expected to agree with a previous review, external that HS2's so-called "original sins" included changing political priorities and ballooning costs.
The review is also expected to highlight the "gold-plating" of the high-speed concept, "resulting in [a] bespoke and highly engineered design".
In the coming days, Alexander is expected to confirm that trains won't start running by the current target date of 2033 and will also provide an updated price tag for the project. It has been widely expected that costs will exceed £100bn.
HS2's main purpose was to increase capacity on the rail network but it has suffered rising costs and delays.
Under the initial plans, first confirmed in 2012, the rail line would have run from London to Birmingham, and then on two separate lines to Leeds and Manchester.
However, in 2021, the government said it was cancelling the eastern leg going to Leeds. Two years later, the section between Manchester and Birmingham was also ditched.
In June 2025, Alexander said that after "a litany of failure" she was "drawing a line in the sand" and the government would get HS2 delivered.
Mark Wild, chief executive of the project's delivery company HS2 Ltd, was tasked with carrying out comprehensive "reset".
Earlier this year the transport secretary said she was "determined to explore every opportunity" to "bring down costs and delivery timetables" including reducing the top speeds of trains on the line.
HS2 had been designed to allow trains to run up to 360 km/h (224 mph), which would have made the line faster than any other conventional railway in the world. Most high-speed trains in the UK run at around 220 km/h, while HS1, the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, reaches speeds of up to 300 km/h.
Although it will be years before the railway opens, HS2 is in its peak construction phase. A number of key structures have been completed, for example the 10-mile tunnel under the Chilterns, and the Colne Valley viaduct.
As part of efforts to get the project back on track, HS2 Ltd has previously said it would slow or pause work such as the line towards Handsacre, so it could focus spend on areas which had fallen behind; notably the central section across Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire.
The HS2 rail line failed due in part to a focus on achieving the highest possible speeds and political pressure, a review is expected to find.
The scheme has been undergoing a "reset", and in March Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander asked HS2 bosses to look at lowering top speeds to save money.
This latest report into HS2, expected to be published this week, is authored by former National Security Adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove and has considered the implications for the civil service and public sector. Its findings are expected to agree with a previous review, external that HS2's so-called "original sins" included changing political priorities and ballooning costs.
The review is also expected to highlight the "gold-plating" of the high-speed concept, "resulting in [a] bespoke and highly engineered design".
In the coming days, Alexander is expected to confirm that trains won't start running by the current target date of 2033 and will also provide an updated price tag for the project. It has been widely expected that costs will exceed £100bn.
HS2's main purpose was to increase capacity on the rail network but it has suffered rising costs and delays.
Under the initial plans, first confirmed in 2012, the rail line would have run from London to Birmingham, and then on two separate lines to Leeds and Manchester.
However, in 2021, the government said it was cancelling the eastern leg going to Leeds. Two years later, the section between Manchester and Birmingham was also ditched.
In June 2025, Alexander said that after "a litany of failure" she was "drawing a line in the sand" and the government would get HS2 delivered.
Mark Wild, chief executive of the project's delivery company HS2 Ltd, was tasked with carrying out comprehensive "reset".
Earlier this year the transport secretary said she was "determined to explore every opportunity" to "bring down costs and delivery timetables" including reducing the top speeds of trains on the line.
HS2 had been designed to allow trains to run up to 360 km/h (224 mph), which would have made the line faster than any other conventional railway in the world. Most high-speed trains in the UK run at around 220 km/h, while HS1, the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, reaches speeds of up to 300 km/h.
Although it will be years before the railway opens, HS2 is in its peak construction phase. A number of key structures have been completed, for example the 10-mile tunnel under the Chilterns, and the Colne Valley viaduct.
As part of efforts to get the project back on track, HS2 Ltd has previously said it would slow or pause work such as the line towards Handsacre, so it could focus spend on areas which had fallen behind; notably the central section across Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire.
| Re: Would you give up your seat on the London Tube for me? In "Transport for London" [375209/32039/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 05:29, 18th May 2026 | |
Again, I'm going off at something of a tangent, but I do like this nine minute clip, 'Darkest Hour | Winston Churchill Takes the Tube', from YouTube.
