Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: 2 car trains (again) In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377106/32239/20] Posted by grahame at 11:05, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
GWR have reduced some trains on Portsmouth - Cardiff to just 2car today
[snip]
If a 2car train can't get on is better than a cancelled one is debatable (you get delay repay if cancelled, system says no if it runs)
[snip]
If a 2car train can't get on is better than a cancelled one is debatable (you get delay repay if cancelled, system says no if it runs)
Out of 15 trains scheduled to leave Portsmouth Harbour for Bristol, 2 cancelled, 4 just 2 carriages in length, 4 are 3 carriages, 2 are 4 carriages and just one is 5 carriages. The length of 1 in unknown.

Now - let me add a couple of comments.
* I suspect that 2 carriages are adequate for the 20:24 from Portsmouth to Cardiff, though the daytime ones at 2 carriages will be "well loaded" and more.
* I cannot share the view that it must be shoddy maintenance or a complete disregard. Ongoing, such conclusions may be valid, but for a specific day there could be other issues. For example, an urgent recall / safety matter that means a sudden need to check lots of trains is - IMHO - a valid and blameless reason for a day when there are not enough trains.
| Re: Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing discussion In "Across the West" [377105/18719/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:40, 16th July 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
Thursday might bbe 'interesting', as might next Monday....along with Sunday pm
Didn’t look too bad at all today.
Sunday might be worse as although we got knocked out the HSS drivers that can make themselves not available would have needed to do so before last nights result was known, as they need to give 5 days notice.
| Re: Dreadful GWR performance figures In "Across the West" [377104/32150/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:34, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
If anyone commutes 5 days we're week (2 return journeys) then statistically going to have about 1 of their 10 journeys cancelled (1 in 9 for EF13).
Nowhere near good enough in my opinion.
Nowhere near good enough in my opinion.
AIUI a Paddington to Great Malvern train that terminates short at Worcester Foregate Street will be flagged as a cancellation even though only a small part of the route and small number of passengers will be affected.
So, it’s likely to be much less than the figure you mention above (but still way too high!)
| Re: Okehampton In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [377103/18334/24] Posted by REVUpminster at 09:32, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
Good video in this report.
https://www.westdevon.gov.uk/communities/okehampton-interchange
Okehampton Inter change is close to opening. Three car 175s seem to becoming more reliable. Maybe they will take over when the station opens. 4 th July never happened.
Video in this shows progress.
https://www.westdevon.gov.uk/communities/okehampton-interchange
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377101/32077/20] Posted by bobm at 09:23, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
More details on the authorities’ response to the strikes here - https://transwilts.org/2026/07/15/solving-the-problem-of-limpley-stoke/
Train services through Melksham are being increasingly disrupted by over height road vehicles hitting a rail bridge at Limpley Stoke.
Although the bridge is not on the TransWilts line, when the line over it has to close for an inspection services from Cardiff to Portsmouth have to divert over the route at the expense of the local service.
Faced with seven strikes since March this year Network Rail is working with the highway authorities to reduce the occurrences. It is thought the extension of the weight limit over the Cleveland bridge in Bath and the city’s Clean Air Zone has led to affected vehicles diverting along the B3108.
Among the measures being looked at are
• Upgraded road signage on approaches to the bridge
• Flashing over height vehicle detection lights, similar to those at White House Road bridge in Swindon
• Exploring funding for collision protection beams
• Updated briefing on the bridge’s structural condition, reinforcing why it remains safe despite its appearance
• Reviewing the late reported bridge strike process within Network Rail’s Route Control
• Updating local instructions and publications to reflect revised response requirements
• Briefing staff on the updated approach to ensure consistency on site
• Pursuing insurance claims when vehicle registration details are available.
In conjunction with GWR, Network Rail is also looking at contingency plans to use when the bridge is closed for inspections.
Although the bridge is not on the TransWilts line, when the line over it has to close for an inspection services from Cardiff to Portsmouth have to divert over the route at the expense of the local service.
Faced with seven strikes since March this year Network Rail is working with the highway authorities to reduce the occurrences. It is thought the extension of the weight limit over the Cleveland bridge in Bath and the city’s Clean Air Zone has led to affected vehicles diverting along the B3108.
Among the measures being looked at are
• Upgraded road signage on approaches to the bridge
• Flashing over height vehicle detection lights, similar to those at White House Road bridge in Swindon
• Exploring funding for collision protection beams
• Updated briefing on the bridge’s structural condition, reinforcing why it remains safe despite its appearance
• Reviewing the late reported bridge strike process within Network Rail’s Route Control
• Updating local instructions and publications to reflect revised response requirements
• Briefing staff on the updated approach to ensure consistency on site
• Pursuing insurance claims when vehicle registration details are available.
In conjunction with GWR, Network Rail is also looking at contingency plans to use when the bridge is closed for inspections.
| 2 car trains (again) In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377099/32239/20] Posted by John D at 08:44, 16th July 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() |
GWR have reduced some trains on Portsmouth - Cardiff to just 2car today
eg 1F09 with 158 762
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:W34974/2026-07-16/detailed#allox_id=1
Eg 1F14 with 158 767
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G15009/2026-07-16/detailed#allox_id=0
Clearly inadequate and reflection of either shoddy maintenance (not enough trains maintained), or complete disregard for people (customers and staff) using the line.
If a 2car train can't get on is better than a cancelled one is debatable (you get delay repay if cancelled, system says no if it runs)
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377098/32077/20] Posted by John D at 08:37, 16th July 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Drove under it yesterday, and the vegetation at the corner just before the bridge has been cut back completely.
But the approach warning signage from A36 still needs improving, it is easy to miss if not looking for it
| Re: Holiday home in Torquay (Torre) anyone? - be aware of train noise In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [377096/24457/24] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 08:07, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
.....Planning permission was granted 10 years ago but as in the ad for the property a start was made within 3 years (the windows). This is a tactic many developers have used in Torbay, probably elsewhere, .....
Yes indeed; the conversion of a former shop premises in Exeter Fore Street to residential accommodation was granted planning permission around 5 years ago. Thus far the developers have only made a small change to a pre-existing bin store area and that means the planning authority, Exeter City Council, are powerless to take any enforcement action.
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377095/32077/20] Posted by grahame at 07:43, 16th July 2026 Already liked by JohnM | ![]() |
From Winsley Parish Council on Facebook
The Parish Council and our Unitary Councillor Nigel White continue to be frustrated about the increase in overheight vehicles hitting the railway bridge. Over the past few months Nigel has been talking with Network Rail, Wiltshire Highways and National Highways about this issue. All are in support of introducing measures to reduce the likelihood of overheight vehicles attempting to drive under the bridge. Following recent meetings with these organisations, Nigel will provide a more detailed update by the end of this week.
"All are in support of introducing measures" - good. Now will someone, please, actually do something rather than just supporting the idea? Perhaps we should be patient and await Nigel's update over the next 48 hours - perhaps someone is actually going to do something?
| Re: Holiday home in Torquay (Torre) anyone? - be aware of train noise In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [377094/24457/24] Posted by REVUpminster at 07:21, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
https://auction.paulfosh.com/lot/details/189177
https://publicaccess.torbay.gov.uk/view/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage
Planning permission was granted 10 years ago but as in the ad for the property a start was made within 3 years (the windows). This is a tactic many developers have used in Torbay, probably elsewhere, such as Devonshire Park and Holicombe Gas works which are big sites for maybe 400+ homes.
The council don't seem to be allowed to carry forward these sites every year as land supply and developers find easier green field sites and claim there is a land shortage and the council is forced to give planning permission.
It doesn't seem fair to me
| Re: SWR timetable consultation - a suggestion In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377093/32168/20] Posted by grahame at 07:14, 16th July 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
"Direct flows": what a revealing way to present the gains - and stands the argument "This is a duplicate service between Bristol / Bath and London" on its head, lays it on a stretcher, and carries it out of the room.
Mark
Mark
Here are some of the numbers on some of those flows ... there are 2024/25 ticketed journeys made with changes needed because there is no direct train but there could be ... the 50,000 or so shown here would, on the old "loose 40% of passengers if they have to change", be 90,000 journeys. Are our railways really happy to loose the income from 40,000 journeys - over half a million pounds of income as these are mostly long distance journeys - by a failure to join up?

How about multiple-change and awkward journeys that would be reduced to single change? I had a look purely at Bradford-on-Avon and came up with:
384 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Gatwick
184 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Twickenham
158 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Surbiton
120 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Guildford
132 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Wimbledon
122 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Richmond
56 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Orpington
42 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and East Croydon
42 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Ashford
40 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Epsom
20 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Ramsgate
14 journeys between Bradford-on-Avon and Tonbridge
They've all been small flows - but my goodness they are mostly challenging journeys with multiple changes at present.
| Re: Introduction Of New, More Secure?, Ticket Gates In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [377092/32237/51] Posted by infoman at 06:25, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
I think its great to have these new barriers replaced,
but I think there are few main station stations that are in need ticket gates.
Preston
Chesterfield
Sheffield
Doncaster
Port talbot parkway
Carmarthan
Llanelli
| Italy: Genoa bridge disaster - 14 August 2018 In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [377091/32238/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 02:17, 16th July 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Families of 43 victims await verdict in Genoa bridge disaster

The 2018 bridge collapse was one of Italy's worst infrastructure disasters - Image © Getty Images
On the morning of 14 August 2018, Claudia Possetti, 47, was in the car with her new husband Andrea, and her two children, aged 12 and 16.
The couple had just married and were driving to the Italian Riviera with the youngsters for a holiday when the Morandi bridge in the northern city of Genoa collapsed beneath them.
Their car was among those that plunged from the viaduct on to the railway tracks below. The four of them were among 43 people killed in one of Italy's worst infrastructure disasters in decades.
Nearly eight years on, Claudia's sister, Egle Possetti, will be among relatives gathering in a Genoa courtroom on Thursday to hear a first-instance verdict in the trial over the collapse. The children's father, who survived them, is also expected to be in court.
"I feel anxious, worried, very emotional," Egle told the BBC. "After so many years, so many hearings, we may be able to see some light. It would be so important for us to know if someone's been held accountable."
(BBC article continues)

The 2018 bridge collapse was one of Italy's worst infrastructure disasters - Image © Getty Images
On the morning of 14 August 2018, Claudia Possetti, 47, was in the car with her new husband Andrea, and her two children, aged 12 and 16.
The couple had just married and were driving to the Italian Riviera with the youngsters for a holiday when the Morandi bridge in the northern city of Genoa collapsed beneath them.
Their car was among those that plunged from the viaduct on to the railway tracks below. The four of them were among 43 people killed in one of Italy's worst infrastructure disasters in decades.
Nearly eight years on, Claudia's sister, Egle Possetti, will be among relatives gathering in a Genoa courtroom on Thursday to hear a first-instance verdict in the trial over the collapse. The children's father, who survived them, is also expected to be in court.
"I feel anxious, worried, very emotional," Egle told the BBC. "After so many years, so many hearings, we may be able to see some light. It would be so important for us to know if someone's been held accountable."
(BBC article continues)
| Re: Memories of schooldays, and what inspired us In "Introductions and chat" [377090/32234/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:58, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
My inspiration then was not in the classroom but out in the open air. On Friday afternoons at Brislington School (Bristol), the sixth form were timetabled 'Liberal Studies' - when we could choose whichever we liked. My choice, with several others, was on the theme of industrial archeology, led by Martin 'Kipper' Lee. He had a PSV license (which he carried with pride) and thus access to the school minibus for the afternoon.
He took us out to Crofton Pumping House on the Kennet & Avon Canal and the railway signal box at Ashton Gate (now long gone), for example. As the teacher in charge of a group of genuinely interested students, he was given favourable treatment and access at such sites. That is why I was given the opportunity to work a traditional signal lever in the box at Ashton Gate, on the line which was still used for goods traffic. I failed miserably, to the mirth of my fellow students and much eye rolling from the signalman and the train driver, who was waiting outside.
Those were happy days. CfN.

He took us out to Crofton Pumping House on the Kennet & Avon Canal and the railway signal box at Ashton Gate (now long gone), for example. As the teacher in charge of a group of genuinely interested students, he was given favourable treatment and access at such sites. That is why I was given the opportunity to work a traditional signal lever in the box at Ashton Gate, on the line which was still used for goods traffic. I failed miserably, to the mirth of my fellow students and much eye rolling from the signalman and the train driver, who was waiting outside.
Those were happy days. CfN.

Sounds like you had a great teacher there.
If you had a go at the level crossing gates at Ashton Gate as a schoolboy, failure would not be a surprise. If memory serves, the gates were quite long and would have been heavy to swing. And, for a youngster, the levers in the frame, whatever the colour, would have been a bit heavy, I'm sure.
I hate to think of the elf and safety paperwork now, even if we had the infrastructure.
I have quoted selectively above, just so I can cover a few points.
Yes, Martin Lee was a brilliant teacher, very knowledgeable and enthusiastic about industrial archaeology - but I never found out why he was nicknamed 'Kipper'. I just went along with others, who all knew him affectionately as 'Kipper Lee'.
None of us had a go at moving the level crossing gates, but we were all invited up into the signal box to actually operate the levers.- that would be impossible now, allowing a group of 17-year-olds to do that. The Elf-n-Safety paperwork prohibiting it would indeed run into hundreds of pages!
For me, the rather embarrassing aspect of my inability to work a signal lever there was that my girlfriend at the time was one of those fellow students laughing at my ineptitude.

| Re: Holiday home in Torquay (Torre) anyone? - be aware of train noise In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [377089/24457/24] Posted by grahame at 22:15, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
Back on the market
Paul Fosh Auctions & Lettings
Yesterday at 17:30
Located in the sought-after coastal town of Torquay, a prime tourist hotspot, this truly one-of-a-kind investment with planning permission for conversion into a holiday home is coming up in auction.
* Lot 56: Former Signal Box, Torre Station Newton Road, Torquay, Devon, TQ2 5EU
* Rare Grade II listed signal box
* Full planning approved for holiday home conversion
* Three-storey layout with characterful design potential
* Lot 56: Former Signal Box, Torre Station Newton Road, Torquay, Devon, TQ2 5EU
* Rare Grade II listed signal box
* Full planning approved for holiday home conversion
* Three-storey layout with characterful design potential
| Re: Introduction Of New, More Secure?, Ticket Gates In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [377088/32237/51] Posted by ChrisB at 21:40, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
From Gov.uk
Press release - £33.4 million to fund new gateline improvements
- new ticket gates for stations across England with £33 million to crack down on fare evasion and deliver a fairer railway
- funding to tackle deliberate fare evasion to recover up to £400 million lost annually and reinvest in better journeys for passengers
- passengers already seeing the benefits of a simpler and fairer ticketing system ahead of the creation of Great
British Railways with expanded Pay As You Go and digital ticketing trials
As part of the government’s landmark rail reforms, new ticket gates will be installed at stations and platforms across England, targeting fare dodger hot spots to crack down on deliberate ticketless travel and make sure fares go towards improving the services passengers depend on.
Passengers will benefit from a fairer railway with £33.4 million of funding to support the rollout of a range of gate types at stations which currently have none, including new taller gates to prevent barrier jumping and more of the standard waist-high gates currently used across Great Britain and on the London Underground.
Fare evasion puts up to £400 million of rail revenue at risk each year and every pound lost to fare dodging is one that can’t be spent on improving services – whether maintaining the network, upgrading carriages, or improving wifi. These new gates will help protect revenue and put it back to work where it belongs: delivering better journeys for passengers.
Great British Railways (GBR) will be focused on creating a fairer deal for passengers, including tackling fare evasion and simplifying the complex web of ticketing to deliver more reliable and affordable services. Changes are already underway with the expansion of contactless Pay As You Go technology, digital ticketing trials across the East Midlands and South Yorkshire and the incoming GBR app, where passengers will be able to buy tickets, check train times and access a range of support all in one place.
The Rail Minister, Lord Peter Hendy, said:
"Fare evasion is not a victimless crime – it undermines confidence in the railway and means passengers lose out on millions in revenue, which should be invested to improve services for everyone.
"By stopping fare dodgers before they reach the platform, we’re protecting taxpayer cash, supporting investment in the network and ensuring the railway works better for the millions of passengers who do the right thing every day by paying their way.
"As we deliver significant reform across our railways in the lead-up to Great British Railways, we are creating a truly joined-up railway, which is more accountable and better equipped to deliver the reliable, modern railway passengers deserve, to create jobs, growth and homes"
The new ticket gates will have passengers in mind with options to scan digital tickets, insert paper tickets or ‘tap out’ where contactless travel is available and follow wider changes coming in across the railway to improve ticketing and stop fraud. Earlier this year, the government announced that under Great British Railways, passengers will be able to claim Delay Repay directly from wherever they buy their ticket, making it quicker and easier to apply for compensation.
Operators allocated funding to support the delivery of new gates include:
- Avanti West Coast: Stafford, Liverpool Lime Street
- East Midlands Railway: Market Harborough
- Greater Anglia: Witham, Rayleigh, Ware, Hertford East and Manningtree
- Thameslink Southern Great Northern: Royston, Stevenage, Elephant and Castle, Worthing and Gipsy Hill
- TransPennine Express: Manchester Piccadilly
- West Midlands Trains: Tamworth, Nuneaton, Worcester Foregate Street and Worcester Shrub Hill
This is the first stage of a wider programme to increase the number of ticket gates in use across England, with the potential for further rollout across the UK in the future. Delivery of the new ticket gates is expected by mid-2028, with the first phase of rollout in place during the first half of 2027.
- new ticket gates for stations across England with £33 million to crack down on fare evasion and deliver a fairer railway
- funding to tackle deliberate fare evasion to recover up to £400 million lost annually and reinvest in better journeys for passengers
- passengers already seeing the benefits of a simpler and fairer ticketing system ahead of the creation of Great
British Railways with expanded Pay As You Go and digital ticketing trials
As part of the government’s landmark rail reforms, new ticket gates will be installed at stations and platforms across England, targeting fare dodger hot spots to crack down on deliberate ticketless travel and make sure fares go towards improving the services passengers depend on.
Passengers will benefit from a fairer railway with £33.4 million of funding to support the rollout of a range of gate types at stations which currently have none, including new taller gates to prevent barrier jumping and more of the standard waist-high gates currently used across Great Britain and on the London Underground.
Fare evasion puts up to £400 million of rail revenue at risk each year and every pound lost to fare dodging is one that can’t be spent on improving services – whether maintaining the network, upgrading carriages, or improving wifi. These new gates will help protect revenue and put it back to work where it belongs: delivering better journeys for passengers.
Great British Railways (GBR) will be focused on creating a fairer deal for passengers, including tackling fare evasion and simplifying the complex web of ticketing to deliver more reliable and affordable services. Changes are already underway with the expansion of contactless Pay As You Go technology, digital ticketing trials across the East Midlands and South Yorkshire and the incoming GBR app, where passengers will be able to buy tickets, check train times and access a range of support all in one place.
The Rail Minister, Lord Peter Hendy, said:
"Fare evasion is not a victimless crime – it undermines confidence in the railway and means passengers lose out on millions in revenue, which should be invested to improve services for everyone.
"By stopping fare dodgers before they reach the platform, we’re protecting taxpayer cash, supporting investment in the network and ensuring the railway works better for the millions of passengers who do the right thing every day by paying their way.
"As we deliver significant reform across our railways in the lead-up to Great British Railways, we are creating a truly joined-up railway, which is more accountable and better equipped to deliver the reliable, modern railway passengers deserve, to create jobs, growth and homes"
The new ticket gates will have passengers in mind with options to scan digital tickets, insert paper tickets or ‘tap out’ where contactless travel is available and follow wider changes coming in across the railway to improve ticketing and stop fraud. Earlier this year, the government announced that under Great British Railways, passengers will be able to claim Delay Repay directly from wherever they buy their ticket, making it quicker and easier to apply for compensation.
Operators allocated funding to support the delivery of new gates include:
- Avanti West Coast: Stafford, Liverpool Lime Street
- East Midlands Railway: Market Harborough
- Greater Anglia: Witham, Rayleigh, Ware, Hertford East and Manningtree
- Thameslink Southern Great Northern: Royston, Stevenage, Elephant and Castle, Worthing and Gipsy Hill
- TransPennine Express: Manchester Piccadilly
- West Midlands Trains: Tamworth, Nuneaton, Worcester Foregate Street and Worcester Shrub Hill
This is the first stage of a wider programme to increase the number of ticket gates in use across England, with the potential for further rollout across the UK in the future. Delivery of the new ticket gates is expected by mid-2028, with the first phase of rollout in place during the first half of 2027.
| Re: Dreadful GWR performance figures In "Across the West" [377087/32150/26] Posted by John D at 21:23, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
GWR have now uploaded period 03 performance figures
Cancellations are even worse than previous period in some areas
EF03 London-Cotswolds 10.38% cancelled
EF10 Bristol suburban 9.11% cancelled
EF13 South Wales - South Coast 11.3% cancelled
https://www.gwr.com/-/media/gwr-sc-website/files/publications/performance-report/gwr-performance-report-period-2703.pdf
If anyone commutes 5 days we're week (2 return journeys) then statistically going to have about 1 of their 10 journeys cancelled (1 in 9 for EF13).
Nowhere near good enough in my opinion.
| Re: Railway bridges struck by road vehicles - many incidents, ongoing discussion In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [377086/8910/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:17, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
Yet another one - from the BBC:
Trains delayed as lorry crashes into railway bridge at Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Suffolk Police closed the road while efforts were made to retrieve the large lorry - Image © Marie Cee
Train services were delayed and motorists came to a halt after a lorry crashed into a railway bridge before overturning onto its side.
The large blue heavy good vehicle struck the bridge on Orttewell Road at the junction with Barton Road, in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, at 13:33 BST on Wednesday.
Greater Anglia said services between Ipswich and Cambridge had to operate at reduced speeds "to ensure the safety of the railway". It added that disruption to be expected until Network Rail engineers sent to the scene to inspect the structure were able to confirm it was safe for trains to travel over it.

The large lorry overturned as it struck the bridge in Bury St Edmunds
A spokesperson for the train company said: "Greater Anglia and Network Rail are sorry if your journey has been affected by this disruption. Advance purchase tickets holders will be allowed to travel on earlier or later trains if their booked service is cancelled."
Suffolk Police confirmed officers and other emergency services personnel, including firefighters and paramedics were called to the scene. They had received a report of a lorry that had "toppled over", a spokesperson said. The road was closed and no injuries were reported.

Suffolk Police closed the road while efforts were made to retrieve the large lorry - Image © Marie Cee
Train services were delayed and motorists came to a halt after a lorry crashed into a railway bridge before overturning onto its side.
The large blue heavy good vehicle struck the bridge on Orttewell Road at the junction with Barton Road, in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, at 13:33 BST on Wednesday.
Greater Anglia said services between Ipswich and Cambridge had to operate at reduced speeds "to ensure the safety of the railway". It added that disruption to be expected until Network Rail engineers sent to the scene to inspect the structure were able to confirm it was safe for trains to travel over it.

The large lorry overturned as it struck the bridge in Bury St Edmunds
A spokesperson for the train company said: "Greater Anglia and Network Rail are sorry if your journey has been affected by this disruption. Advance purchase tickets holders will be allowed to travel on earlier or later trains if their booked service is cancelled."
Suffolk Police confirmed officers and other emergency services personnel, including firefighters and paramedics were called to the scene. They had received a report of a lorry that had "toppled over", a spokesperson said. The road was closed and no injuries were reported.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [377085/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 19:37, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
Delays to services between Reading and Oxford via Didcot Parkway
Following a points failure at Didcot Parkway all lines are now open. Disruption is expected until 20:00 15/07.
Train services between Reading and Oxford via Didcot Parkway are returning to normal but some services have been delayed.
| Re: Memories of schooldays, and what inspired us In "Introductions and chat" [377084/32234/1] Posted by CyclingSid at 18:58, 15th July 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Railway related school memories. The Shoreham (Sussex) toll bridge, have never found out why railway staff collected the tolls (same at Hayling Island). Once again the smell of creosote on a wooden bridge in summer. Closely connected to the Shoreham to Christ's Hospital branch, in its last throes. The Beeding cement works up the valley and the geology connected with, good for the chalk with clay coming by underground pipeline from Henfield (?).
Doing my cadet force Cert T at Longmoor Military Railway. A week "playing" with signal boxes (and levers), ground frames, loose shunting in the marshalling yard (the shunting pole was some way taller than me) and driving a small diesel engine on a non-passenger service. And more, a week of bliss, as said I hate to think of the elf and safety paperwork now, even if we had the infrastructure.
| Re: 'Hogwash' - an interesting phrase ... In "The Lighter Side" [377083/32233/30] Posted by CyclingSid at 18:33, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
It originally referred to the slops, kitchen scraps, and refuse given to pigs.
Which we are not allowed to do now. Especially with swine flu on the continent.
| Re: Memories of schooldays, and what inspired us In "Introductions and chat" [377082/32234/1] Posted by Witham Bobby at 17:10, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
I have taken something of a liberty here in splitting the above post off to start a new topic - simply to justify my adding my own schooldays reminiscences. 
My inspiration then was not in the classroom but out in the open air. On Friday afternoons at Brislington School (Bristol), the sixth form were timetabled 'Liberal Studies' - when we could choose whichever we liked. My choice, with several others, was on the theme of industrial archeology, led by Martin 'Kipper' Lee. He had a PSV license (which he carried with pride) and thus access to the school minibus for the afternoon.
He took us out to Crofton Pumping House on the Kennet & Avon Canal and the railway signal box at Ashton Gate (now long gone), for example. As the teacher in charge of a group of genuinely interested students, he was given favourable treatment and access at such sites. That is why I was given the opportunity to work a traditional signal lever in the box at Ashton Gate, on the line which was still used for goods traffic. I failed miserably, to the mirth of my fellow students and much eye rolling from the signalman and the train driver, who was waiting outside.
Those were happy days. CfN.


My inspiration then was not in the classroom but out in the open air. On Friday afternoons at Brislington School (Bristol), the sixth form were timetabled 'Liberal Studies' - when we could choose whichever we liked. My choice, with several others, was on the theme of industrial archeology, led by Martin 'Kipper' Lee. He had a PSV license (which he carried with pride) and thus access to the school minibus for the afternoon.
He took us out to Crofton Pumping House on the Kennet & Avon Canal and the railway signal box at Ashton Gate (now long gone), for example. As the teacher in charge of a group of genuinely interested students, he was given favourable treatment and access at such sites. That is why I was given the opportunity to work a traditional signal lever in the box at Ashton Gate, on the line which was still used for goods traffic. I failed miserably, to the mirth of my fellow students and much eye rolling from the signalman and the train driver, who was waiting outside.
Those were happy days. CfN.

Sounds like you had a great teacher there
We had Mr Lessware, who was ex-RAF. He'd been in Bomber Command in WWII and beyond that he told us nothing. I later learned that he was awarded a DFC
As befits a pilot, he took us boys to somewhere up above Wotton-under-EDge and we had the most fantastic day out on gliders. The gliders were launched skywards on a winch. Yours truly enjoyed a couple of flights and a lot of tractor driving to recover the tow rope. Different times. I can't even begin to imagine the amount of paper that would be generated by such an excursion today
If you had a go at the level crossing gates at Ashton Gate as a schoolboy, failure would not be a surprise. If memory serves, the gates were quite long and would have been heavy to swing. And, for a youngster, the levers in the frame, whatever the colour, would have been a bit heavy, I'm sure
| Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [377081/231/28] Posted by Mark A at 15:33, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
Useful to compare and contrast with Leven, Tweedbank. Both terminus stations, lengthy island platforms with two faces.
At Tweedbank, there's the issue, when it's time to do so, of how to take the railway onward through the (virtual) fourth wall. Portishead's unlikely to see an extension but it is certainly going to have a wall. How much of the forthcoming structure will need to go in the bin in the unthinkable situation that demand outstrips supply sufficient for the station to need a second platform is anyone's guess.
Mark

| Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [377080/231/28] Posted by Red Squirrel at 13:30, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
I don’t remember any mention of passive provision for additional platforms at either station. Pill will have an old ‘spare’ platform on the Portbury branch, but a new set of points would be needed at the Portishead end to allow trains to access it.
Interestingly the latest animated renderings show the line being served by 2-car Class 165’s - there’s ambitious for you!
You can see the renderings at source here: https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/first-look-at-new-portishead-and-pill-stations-as-railway-restoration-progresses
| Re: New TfW services to Bristol in December timetable In "Shorter journeys in South and West Wales" [377079/32236/23] Posted by Red Squirrel at 13:23, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
Real time trains has some new services (some are extensions of services to/from south west Wales to Cardiff) running through to Bristol from December 2026 timetable
Example Fishguard to Bristol
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:L00529/2026-12-14/detailed
Looks like they will be worked by class 197 DMUs
In England looks like like stations served are Filton Abbey Wood, Stapleton Road and Bristol Temple Meads.
Slightly intrigued by including Stapleton Road, but it is fairly east to park for free nearby so maybe it is for people travelling to Cardiff who object to paying for parking
I think this is first phase of proposed services calling at some new stations (usually referred to as Burns stations) along South Wales main line.
There is a rumour that rail growth in Wales will mean additional new trains will be ordered, so possibly bi-modes will get ordered for Burns station services
Example Fishguard to Bristol
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:L00529/2026-12-14/detailed
Looks like they will be worked by class 197 DMUs
In England looks like like stations served are Filton Abbey Wood, Stapleton Road and Bristol Temple Meads.
Slightly intrigued by including Stapleton Road, but it is fairly east to park for free nearby so maybe it is for people travelling to Cardiff who object to paying for parking
I think this is first phase of proposed services calling at some new stations (usually referred to as Burns stations) along South Wales main line.
There is a rumour that rail growth in Wales will mean additional new trains will be ordered, so possibly bi-modes will get ordered for Burns station services
Stapleton Road is likely to become increasingly important as an interchange, both to/from the Severn Beach line but also for Abbeywood/Brabazon services. I’m not sure that parking is likely to be a factor.
| Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [377078/231/28] Posted by Noggin at 13:19, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
However I am unable to copy the URL from my browser bar, to here.
Right click on URL->copy->paste it into thread
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/first-look-two-new-stations-11059308
Thank you - so is there passive provision for second platforms at Pill and Portishead or are we going to be stuck with a single platform when it inevitably turns into a roaring success and a higher frequency of service is needed?
| Re: SWR timetable consultation - a suggestion In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377076/32168/20] Posted by Mark A at 12:58, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
"Direct flows": what a revealing way to present the gains - and stands the argument "This is a duplicate service between Bristol / Bath and London" on its head, lays it on a stretcher, and carries it out of the room.
Mark
| Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [377075/231/28] Posted by chuffed at 11:40, 15th July 2026 | ![]() |
Many thanks for doing that Chris B.
| Re: New TfW services to Bristol in December timetable In "Shorter journeys in South and West Wales" [377074/32236/23] Posted by grahame at 09:59, 15th July 2026 Already liked by JohnM, GBM | ![]() |
Looking at other services for the new timetable I note:
Getting 'not found' pages for both those links 
Sorry - my (coding) bad - it was expanding the MKM and DMH abbreviations within the URLs. Fixed.














