Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Multiple stabbings on a London bound train in Cambridgeshire - 1 Nov 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [381833/31017/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:52, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Train attack driver's '10 seconds' to change line

Andrew Johnson was driving the train that made an unscheduled stop at Huntingdon - Image © Steve Lammiman/BBC
The driver of a high-speed train where a mass stabbing took place said he had "probably about 10 seconds" to decide to switch to the slow line before making an unscheduled stop.
Andrew Johnson was driving the London-bound LNER service on 1 November last year when the train stopped at Huntingdon in Cambridgeshire.
Giving evidence, Johnson told jurors at Cambridge Crown Court he heard someone on the intercom "screaming 'there's a knifeman stabbing people'".
Anthony Williams, 33, of Peterborough, denies 10 counts of attempted murder on the train. He is also charged with four other attempted murders following earlier incidents in Peterborough and London.
Johnson told jurors the train was running "bang on time" as it travelled at about 122mph (196km/h) in the Abbots Ripton area of Cambridgeshire. He said there was an unusual alarm "which indicated someone was trying to open one of the passenger doors".
"I have five seconds to override or the train will stop immediately," he explained. He said if the train stopped it would take about a mile or 30 seconds to come to a standstill.
Johnson said he picked up the intercom to that door but received no response and thought "Saturday night, someone's messing around".
He said while he was speaking to the train manager to ask her to investigate "someone over-spoke us" and he heard someone "screaming 'there's a knifeman stabbing people'". He thought the "best thing to do was to get to a platform" and the voice of the individual "really drove that home".
Johnson said he had "probably about 10 seconds" to switch to the slow line, adding: "I just knew that was the right option, it just came instinctively." He pressed the urgent button and told a signaller "get me to Huntingdon and get me the police".
Jurors heard Johnson "could hear banging and screaming" on the cab door, and he said: "It was incredibly loud, and people were begging for me to open the door as well." Johnson explained that he had to remain in his seat, adding: "My mind was completely focused on one thing and that was to get the train to Huntingdon."
When the train pulled into Huntingdon at 19:44 GMT, the court heard he had to override the system to open the doors because it was "not a programmed stop for us", taking about 15 seconds. He said he saw passengers on the platform and "they didn't just run, they sprinted like I'd never seen before".
(BBC article continues)

Andrew Johnson was driving the train that made an unscheduled stop at Huntingdon - Image © Steve Lammiman/BBC
The driver of a high-speed train where a mass stabbing took place said he had "probably about 10 seconds" to decide to switch to the slow line before making an unscheduled stop.
Andrew Johnson was driving the London-bound LNER service on 1 November last year when the train stopped at Huntingdon in Cambridgeshire.
Giving evidence, Johnson told jurors at Cambridge Crown Court he heard someone on the intercom "screaming 'there's a knifeman stabbing people'".
Anthony Williams, 33, of Peterborough, denies 10 counts of attempted murder on the train. He is also charged with four other attempted murders following earlier incidents in Peterborough and London.
Johnson told jurors the train was running "bang on time" as it travelled at about 122mph (196km/h) in the Abbots Ripton area of Cambridgeshire. He said there was an unusual alarm "which indicated someone was trying to open one of the passenger doors".
"I have five seconds to override or the train will stop immediately," he explained. He said if the train stopped it would take about a mile or 30 seconds to come to a standstill.
Johnson said he picked up the intercom to that door but received no response and thought "Saturday night, someone's messing around".
He said while he was speaking to the train manager to ask her to investigate "someone over-spoke us" and he heard someone "screaming 'there's a knifeman stabbing people'". He thought the "best thing to do was to get to a platform" and the voice of the individual "really drove that home".
Johnson said he had "probably about 10 seconds" to switch to the slow line, adding: "I just knew that was the right option, it just came instinctively." He pressed the urgent button and told a signaller "get me to Huntingdon and get me the police".
Jurors heard Johnson "could hear banging and screaming" on the cab door, and he said: "It was incredibly loud, and people were begging for me to open the door as well." Johnson explained that he had to remain in his seat, adding: "My mind was completely focused on one thing and that was to get the train to Huntingdon."
When the train pulled into Huntingdon at 19:44 GMT, the court heard he had to override the system to open the doors because it was "not a programmed stop for us", taking about 15 seconds. He said he saw passengers on the platform and "they didn't just run, they sprinted like I'd never seen before".
(BBC article continues)
| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [381832/32325/3] Posted by Hafren at 22:51, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
More Delay Repay woes....!
Another multi-TOC journey. Can't win with these. When GWR is the first leg the system copes well. However when GWR is the final leg it doesn't. I've tried submitting just the GWR leg and that works where there's a short stub of journey missing (e.g. season ticket from Cathays but claiming from Cardiff Central) but for longer journeys they reject the claim if the earlier legs aren't included, even if fairly irrelevant to hte claim (what abut break of journey – maybe genuinely started mid-ticket!). Recent journey on SE Trains to London then GWR from London. 15 min delay, but quite meaty comp as ticket about £100. Took GWR weeks to reject the claim! Appeal submitted and still waiting; funny they expect me to remember full details a month later! Meanwhile they referred the claim to SE who e-mailed me weeks later asking for details (as only the basic info is passed for data protection reasons).
Then more recently... a routine 15 minute delay on my commute. Not so bothered about £2 or so... except that I sort of am! The big delays are because of big issues – these things happen. The little delays are constant and often don't have a clear reason, and are often fundamentally down to knock-on congestion and lack of resilience. But a snag here is that 15 minute delays are oftne logged as 14 minute – as effectively the time logged is based on an assumed transit time through the signal section, and I suppose defensive driving means especially at termini that the train is that big slower than the calculation assumes. Very frequently this means that a 15 1/4 min delay is shown on RTT as 14 3/4. I generally check RTT and claim if the logged time hits 15 mins there but recently had a 'only 14 minutes' response where even RTT had said 15 – it seems the internal rail systems are working out arrival times slightly differently (presumably based on same signal data but applying subtly different offset).
Fine for a regular who understands why (not decided if I can be bothered to appeal yet) but what about a one-off traveller who has a £100 ticket? From their POV they want their claim for 15 mins – the offer being based on arriving 15 mins late, not 'we think you arrived 15 mins late'. And they don't want the hassle of remembering the nuances of the delay weeks later when the time comes to appealing.
| Re: Amazon delivery driver dies as train strikes van - BBC News 13/07/2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [381831/30449/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:16, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Amazon driver's death 'could have been avoided'

Brandon Hatcher, 23, died at the scene in Teynham - Image © Family Handout/British Transport Police
The death of an Amazon delivery driver at a level crossing in Kent could have been avoided with better signage and crossing design, a rail accident investigation has said.
Brandon Hatcher, 23, was killed at the scene when the van he was driving was struck at a level crossing on Lower Road, in Teynham, on 13 July 2025.
The train was travelling from Ramsgate to London Victoria at about 70mph (114km/h).
Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigators said the driver was likely to have been misled by a green light into believing it was safe to enter the crossing before the exit gate had been opened.
The RAIB said the crossing's signs and lack of road markings did not effectively guide users through the correct procedure.
The user-operated crossing has gates and a miniature stop-light system which displays a green light when no trains are approaching and a red light with an audible warning when one is detected.
Users are instructed to check for a green light before opening the gates, crossing and closing them.
The report found crossings with miniature stop lights were unlikely to receive further safety upgrades, relying instead on drivers following the signs.
David Davidson, chief operating officer for South Eastern Railway said: "We accept the findings outlined in the Rail Accident Investigation Branch report published on Monday. We will study the recommendations closely and are committed to learning every possible lesson from this tragic incident."
Davidson said the company had since changed the site's layout and published guidance for professional drivers using this type of crossing.
A spokesperson for Amazon said: "We are deeply saddened by this tragic incident, and our thoughts remain with Brandon's family and loved ones. We supported the Rail Accident Investigation Branch throughout its work and will consider its findings carefully."
Investigators said training and guidance provided to the delivery driver, who was working on behalf of a logistics company, GG Logistix, had not prepared him to use the crossing safely. GG Logistix has been approached for comment.
RAIB chief inspector Andrew Hall said private user-operated crossings were "a 19th Century concept operating in a 21st Century world".
"Most road users are unfamiliar with this type of crossing and with how to use them safely," he said. Hall noted another delivery van driver was killed at a user-operated crossing in Lancashire in August.
The RAIB made several recommendations, including calls for Network Rail to review the design of user-operated crossings and for the Health and Safety Executive to review guidance for organisations employing drivers.
An Office of Rail and Road spokesperson said: "User-worked level crossings present particular safety risks, especially when people may be unfamiliar with how to use them. We expect Network Rail to manage these risks, introducing safety measures or closures where needed."
They added they welcomed the RAIB's report and would "carefully consider" its findings and recommendations. "We will continue working with Network Rail and others to improve safety for crossing users and passengers," they added.
A DfT spokesperson said: "Safety on the railway is our number one priority. We are studying the RAIB report in detail and will work with the industry to take forward any recommendations to ensure it is safe for everyone."

Brandon Hatcher, 23, died at the scene in Teynham - Image © Family Handout/British Transport Police
The death of an Amazon delivery driver at a level crossing in Kent could have been avoided with better signage and crossing design, a rail accident investigation has said.
Brandon Hatcher, 23, was killed at the scene when the van he was driving was struck at a level crossing on Lower Road, in Teynham, on 13 July 2025.
The train was travelling from Ramsgate to London Victoria at about 70mph (114km/h).
Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigators said the driver was likely to have been misled by a green light into believing it was safe to enter the crossing before the exit gate had been opened.
The RAIB said the crossing's signs and lack of road markings did not effectively guide users through the correct procedure.
The user-operated crossing has gates and a miniature stop-light system which displays a green light when no trains are approaching and a red light with an audible warning when one is detected.
Users are instructed to check for a green light before opening the gates, crossing and closing them.
The report found crossings with miniature stop lights were unlikely to receive further safety upgrades, relying instead on drivers following the signs.
David Davidson, chief operating officer for South Eastern Railway said: "We accept the findings outlined in the Rail Accident Investigation Branch report published on Monday. We will study the recommendations closely and are committed to learning every possible lesson from this tragic incident."
Davidson said the company had since changed the site's layout and published guidance for professional drivers using this type of crossing.
A spokesperson for Amazon said: "We are deeply saddened by this tragic incident, and our thoughts remain with Brandon's family and loved ones. We supported the Rail Accident Investigation Branch throughout its work and will consider its findings carefully."
Investigators said training and guidance provided to the delivery driver, who was working on behalf of a logistics company, GG Logistix, had not prepared him to use the crossing safely. GG Logistix has been approached for comment.
RAIB chief inspector Andrew Hall said private user-operated crossings were "a 19th Century concept operating in a 21st Century world".
"Most road users are unfamiliar with this type of crossing and with how to use them safely," he said. Hall noted another delivery van driver was killed at a user-operated crossing in Lancashire in August.
The RAIB made several recommendations, including calls for Network Rail to review the design of user-operated crossings and for the Health and Safety Executive to review guidance for organisations employing drivers.
An Office of Rail and Road spokesperson said: "User-worked level crossings present particular safety risks, especially when people may be unfamiliar with how to use them. We expect Network Rail to manage these risks, introducing safety measures or closures where needed."
They added they welcomed the RAIB's report and would "carefully consider" its findings and recommendations. "We will continue working with Network Rail and others to improve safety for crossing users and passengers," they added.
A DfT spokesperson said: "Safety on the railway is our number one priority. We are studying the RAIB report in detail and will work with the industry to take forward any recommendations to ensure it is safe for everyone."
The full Rail Accident Investigation Branch report is available on their website, at https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/report-12-slash-2026-collision-between-a-passenger-train-and-a-van-at-bax-level-crossing
| Re: Twyford Henley 10/11/26 leaf-fall cancellations In "Thames Valley Branches" [381830/32710/13] Posted by Mark A at 21:43, 10th November 2026 Already liked by IndustryInsider | ![]() |
Thanks for this. The stock *did* venture down to Henley this evening and returned.
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:32386/2026-11-10/detailed#allox_id=0
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [381829/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 20:27, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
Earlier this evening:
1W33 1658 London Paddington to Great Malvern cancelled between Oxford and Great Malvern due to unknown cause (ZW)
and so:
19:45 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 22:24 will be started from Oxford.
It will no longer call at Great Malvern, Malvern Link, Worcester Foregate Street, Worcester Shrub Hill, Worcestershire Parkway Hl, Pershore, Evesham, Honeybourne, Moreton-In-Marsh, Kingham, Charlbury and Hanborough.
This is due to congestion.
It will no longer call at Great Malvern, Malvern Link, Worcester Foregate Street, Worcester Shrub Hill, Worcestershire Parkway Hl, Pershore, Evesham, Honeybourne, Moreton-In-Marsh, Kingham, Charlbury and Hanborough.
This is due to congestion.
and for the record, this morning's busy 0818 Worcester Shrub Hill to Paddington service was short-formed yet again.
| Re: To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, apparently In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [381828/32456/31] Posted by eightonedee at 20:20, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
Quote
You will not be able to flush the toilet. Do not try to in any way as the sewage system will not be working. You should collect your poo in plastic bags, which should be sealed and disposed of with normal household waste, ideally in an outside bin.
You will not be able to flush the toilet. Do not try to in any way as the sewage system will not be working. You should collect your poo in plastic bags, which should be sealed and disposed of with normal household waste, ideally in an outside bin.
Where will we get the bags from, now that they are no longer supplied readily by supermarkets at checkouts, and all responsible suppliers of food and goods are phasing out plastic wrappers?
| Re: Lawrence Hill Station: the intermodal king of Bristol? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [381827/32709/5] Posted by johnneyw at 20:16, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Red Squirrel | ![]() |
*snip* Clifton Down should be better than it is - the station could be a showpiece transport hub, but is instead barely accessible and hidden behind an awful 1970s oversite block. *snip*
Yup. Using Clifton Down Station the other week I looked for a step free access. Checking the map, I can see why I didn't find it. The signage isn't briliant either.
Step free access at Clifton Down Station for platform 2 is indeed a bit obscure as I recall. Think it's to be found along the car parking area between Whiteladies Road and St Johns Road at the side of the old station building (now a pub).... unless it's been fenced or gated off now. If you are wanting to get to Whiteladies Road you then have to get past all the pub's outdoor seating which from memory serves as a bit of a challenge for those less mobile, especially on a busy day.
| Re: LNER’s ‘Simpler Fares’ pilot: the results are in In "Fare's Fair" [381826/32708/4] Posted by Hafren at 20:13, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
I assume the 'any permitted' route includes routeing via Swindon and Bristol Parkway. Probably not particularly efficient for BB but looking at BRFares it's in a fare cluster with other destinations including Parkway, Filton etc, so the Swindon routeing could be very useful for other journeys with the same fare.
| Re: Twyford Henley 10/11/26 leaf-fall cancellations In "Thames Valley Branches" [381825/32710/13] Posted by IndustryInsider at 19:23, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, Mark A | ![]() |
Coincided exactly with rain arriving on the scene after a breezy day, so I expect the conditions deteriorated quickly and were considered ‘reportable’ by the driver.
RHTT’s don’t cover the Thames Valley branches, so contamination is managed manually and locally by the Mobile Operations Managers.
RHTT’s show up as Class 3 trains on RTT, as ‘Departmental’ and often with the suffix Sxx for ‘Sand’.
I might be making that last bit up!

| Re: Lawrence Hill Station: the intermodal king of Bristol? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [381824/32709/5] Posted by Mark A at 18:31, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
*snip* Clifton Down should be better than it is - the station could be a showpiece transport hub, but is instead barely accessible and hidden behind an awful 1970s oversite block. *snip*
Yup. Using Clifton Down Station the other week I looked for a step free access. Checking the map, I can see why I didn't find it. The signage isn't briliant either.
| Re: Twyford Henley 10/11/26 leaf-fall cancellations In "Thames Valley Branches" [381823/32710/13] Posted by Mark A at 17:48, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
Also, would Realtimetrains display the path for a railhead treatment train?
| Twyford Henley 10/11/26 leaf-fall cancellations In "Thames Valley Branches" [381822/32710/13] Posted by Mark A at 17:46, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
How does this work please? Services on the branch ran 100% to time until the 16:45 from Twyford, which was cancelled along with all subsequent services, as a result of poor railhead conditions. Would it have been that that running services up to that point contributed to deteriorating railhead conditions and the train crew would have been aware that a line was about to be crossed?
(Also me: I didn't realise that the likes of the Henley branch were driver-only operated.)
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/detailed/gb-nr:HOT/2026-11-10/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=passenger&order=wtt
| Re: Lawrence Hill Station: the intermodal king of Bristol? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [381821/32709/5] Posted by johnneyw at 17:28, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
If you allow for the short walk down to Gloucester Road from Montpelier Station, the nearest bus stops provide a fair number of different services at frequent intervals. Those same bus stop are also handy for Redland Station, which is also served by the 71 & 72 services, although they aren't spectacularly frequent.
Yes, Lawrence Hill has much potential, Clifton Down should be better than it is - the station could be a showpiece transport hub, but is instead barely accessible and hidden behind an awful 1970s oversite block. Portway Park and Ride also has plenty of potential, especially now the bus junction onto the A4 Portway has been upgraded.
Portishead could provide good interchange opportunities too, though I'm not aware of plans to ensure this happens; Bristol Brabazon not so much as far as I can tell - looks to be about 200m from the m4 bus stop!
| Re: Padlocking your luggage to the train to prevent theft In "Across the West" [381819/32706/26] Posted by grahame at 16:40, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Mark A, Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
I had no problem whatever (apart from lugging the sheer weight of the thing).
I've just had a word with said thing; it's not thrilled as the aspersions over its weight.
| Re: LNER’s ‘Simpler Fares’ pilot: the results are in In "Fare's Fair" [381818/32708/4] Posted by grahame at 15:18, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
Single leg pricing (i.e. the end of return tickets) does make sense.
I just looked up Trowbridge to Bristol Brabazon fares for opening day, and I am offered ...

11 fares - and I think just two or three singles could be a sensible set
* Advanced fare
* Off Peak
* Anytime
with people adding in another ticket from the same three standards of coming back.
The $64,000 question is what the pricing should be. Off peak single at half the off peak day return, anytime single at half the anytime day return - sensible. Just remove the return fares - near way of putting prices up while saying that you have not increased prices.
The lower priced off peak tickets are "any permitted" - the other off peak tickets are "via Bath Spa". Yes, I am scratching my head over that one!
| Lawrence Hill Station: the intermodal king of Bristol? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [381817/32709/5] Posted by Mark A at 14:36, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
Wondering which of Bristol's stations make the best connections to the bus network, not sure if that would be Clifton Down or Lawrence Hill - though it would be mean to exclude Bristol Parkway. Concerning Lawrence Hill, it's impressive to see the frequency of services calling at a bus stop that's pretty well minimum viable product - though it does have a shelter.
To add my two pennorth: for a good suburban service around Bristol, we need more stations and more trains. At the moment the stations side of the equation is doing better than the trains side, in part due to the failure of the 175s to feed the cascade that would allow us here to use the old stuff from Devon and Cornwall.
Ashley Down and Bristol Brabazon are good modern accessible stations which start out with too few trains calling, but they will soon have more - possibly many more, with 4tph at Ashley Down a distinct possibility within a few years. That will not only rival the local bus services - the 70 and the 17/18/24 on Muller Road - but will also make connections at Filton Abbey Wood much better.
Clearly something needs to be done soon about fares, though, to allow easy interoperability between bus and train and also to fix the disparity between the Severn Beach line and the rest of the burgeoning local network.
| Re: Automatic can use multi-operator if train cancelled In "Fare's Fair" [381815/32502/4] Posted by Fourbee at 12:16, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
However, there was been no clarification on Network Railcard discount travel outside of the L&SE area, but seeing as everything else is to be ignored, then that restriction can probably be ignored too.
I cannot see the rail industry - even it's most pedantic jobsworth - throwing the book at a Waterloo to Exeter traveller who purchased a ticket and got it discounted using his Network Railcard, but then has been left with no option but to travel via Westbury and Taunton because The Mule is blocked at Crewkerne. The press would have a field day!
| LNER’s ‘Simpler Fares’ pilot: the results are in In "Fare's Fair" [381814/32708/4] Posted by GBM at 11:58, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
From Roger French latest blog
https://busandtrainuser.com/2026/11/10/lners-simpler-fares-pilot-the-results-are-in/
The Department for Transport has published a review it commissioned from consultants, Systra, into LNER’s two current fare pilots – ‘Single Leg Pricing’ and the so-called ‘Simpler Fares’.
The good news is Single Leg Pricing comes out of the review much more positively than the Simpler Fares trial which for yours truly, as a fairly regular passenger on the East Coast Main Line, comes as no surprise at all.
...........................continues.............
I think we really do need a Coffee shop Forum "helpful hints" section, as little gems like this are invaluable in enhancing our day to day lives?
Along the lines of Viz’s ‘Top Tips’ presumably?
Along with a ‘Bunker of the Month’ competition perhaps?
| Re: To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, apparently In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [381812/32456/31] Posted by Witham Bobby at 11:32, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
With Evesham being the location (at Wood Norton) of the BBC's "secret" Armageddon headquarters and broadcasting hub, I used earnestly to hope and expect that the Ruskies would vapourise us all in the first of the 8-minute attacks and hence avoid all this "Protect and Survive" nightmare
| Re: Shortages out of Paddington feel almost routine these days In "Introductions and chat" [381811/32695/1] Posted by Witham Bobby at 11:28, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
In my time machine, I'm going back a few years to save some of the Swindon Class 123 DMUs. Perfect for jobs such as Bristol - Oxford and Exeter Cardiff limited stops. And very nice units too. Far more comfortable than any of today's offerings, and, I'd guess more likely to turn up. Shame about the asbestos
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [381810/31163/26] Posted by Witham Bobby at 11:13, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
[SNIP]
As an aside, has the term "relief lines" been retired in favour of "slow / stopping" lines or has the advice been written using the term felt most appropriate for the customers?
[SNIP]
Most of the railway companies, back in the day, used the words "fast" and "slow" lines. The Western difference gave "Main" and "Relief" where there were four roads. I think it's better - doesn't get confusing when you could have a slow train on the fast line being overtaken by a fast train on the slow.
It's still retained in the NR Sectional Appendix covering what was largely Great Western territory. Shame about the very clear, but prosaic"Line 1", "Line 2" etc of the tracks outside Paddington. Although I recognise the clarity and the fact that most (all?) the tracks are bi-di
gov.uk has some information on the scripts to be used on the radio in times of a nationwide power cut:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-health-advice-from-uk-cmos-during-a-national-power-outage/water-and-sanitation-scripts-for-broadcast-media
Would anyone like to check if there's a "how to" video online?
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-health-advice-from-uk-cmos-during-a-national-power-outage/water-and-sanitation-scripts-for-broadcast-media
You will not be able to flush the toilet. Do not try to in any way as the sewage system will not be working. You should collect your poo in plastic bags, which should be sealed and disposed of with normal household waste, ideally in an outside bin.
Would anyone like to check if there's a "how to" video online?

The best way is to poo into a bucket, lined with a plastic bag. Don't trust the bucket to bear your weight, but sit on a chair with the seat removed. If available apply sawdust, cat litter, or dry earth to reduce smells.
Wee in a separate container that is emptied outside.
I think we really do need a Coffee shop Forum "helpful hints" section, as little gems like this are invaluable in enhancing our day to day lives?
A similar issue with Ashley Down station which opened just over 2 years ago. Still only ONE service per hour in each direction, and there can be cancellations on some days too. And also not expected to be upgraded to two services per hour until Henbury station is finally expected to be built and open in 2028! Not sure how many people living in the Ashley Down area use it to commute to work in town. Probably more reliable to use the more frequent 70 bus instead. I think really they could fairly easily increase the frequency of services to TWO services per hour to and from this station by incorporating a stop there in say the Bristol-Gloucester or Bristol-Worcester Foregate Street services too, rather than just the Bristol Temple Meads-Filton Abbey Wood/Bristol Brabazon services.
So as someone who lives 5 mins away from Ashley Down (ASD) and does use it frequently, I can chime in here.
Yes, the hourly service currently isn't good enough. Added to the fact you often get cancellations due to "more trains than usual needing repair" - which at this point is just gaslighting as it is actually "the usual number of trains needing repair". And I can also say that the fact the Sunday timetable is different (until December anyway) in that the shuttle doesn't exist so is replaced by stops on the Cardiff - Taunton / Exeter trains, and the shuttle is often dropped when there are engineering works (replaced with stops on other services) has caused a fair amount of confusion with local residents who aren't as in the know.
However what I will say is GWR are good at adding stops at ASD to other services when there are cancelations and when there are things on at either the Memorial Ground (Bristol Rovers) or the County Ground (Gloucestershire Cricket and every now and again international cricket). This proves it can be done so I do agree with you that adding a stop there on a non Filton / Brabazon shuttle would be useful - though I'd also be happy enough if they were to do the shuttle half hourly and maybe then the TfW burns services in a few years time can add one or two more trains per hour too.
In terms of the does anyone use it question though - yes people absolutely do! Its worth saying that whilst the 70 is more frequent, the time it takes means it is often just as quick to wait for the next train! (E.g. you could get the 07.29 #70 bus from Sefton Park Road and get to Temple meads at 07.58 assuming no delays, or you could get the 07.52 train from Ashley Down and get to Temple Meads for 08.01). It also doesn't help the reliability of the 70 hasn't been great recently, and whilst as I said above the train does suffer the same fate, at least there if I miss a connection because the train didn't show up / was late I can get money back, but if I miss a connection because the bus doesn't show I am stuffed. As already said by another commentor the station numbers we have from last year show it at the equivalent of ~100k per year (based on ~50k in its first 6 months of being open) and I wouldn't be surprised if the full years figures which will be released soon will be higher than that as people get used to it being there. Certainly my experience is that the rush hour services at least (especially the 07.52 to Temple Meads and both the 17.04 and 18.04 to Filton) have got busier over the last 2 years since the station opened. It also helps that the timetable, whilst sparse, does work well for some journeys. E.g. Ashley Down to Cardiff Central and the return actually provides a pretty good connection at Filton most of the time (of course disruption does mess that up quite badly when it does happen though).
For Bristol Brabazon, I note fill in buses too ... perhaps all-mode ticketing and connections are better there? Way back in the days I was with TransWilts, we produced an integrated corridor timetable and perhaps the Bristol folks will be doing so? Should be easier - at least for three weeks both buses and trains will be First operations.
It is a bit frustrating because a good all mode ticket does exist (the Freedom travelpass), but is poorly advertised and is only available as a paper ticket.
It isn't available digitally, nor is integrated with either First bus's tap on tap off payment method or GWR's payg option - despite the GWR payg option having its zones and fares based on the Freedom Travelpasses zones and pricing!
| Re: Padlocking your luggage to the train to prevent theft In "Across the West" [381807/32706/26] Posted by broadgage at 09:51, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
Many years ago maybe 10+ years ago a younger and fitter broadgage sat upon a thief to detain it until the police arrived.
So doing rendered the quite coach VERY noisy, as they "squealed like a stuck pig" there is a report about the incident somewhere on this forum
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [381806/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 09:36, 10th November 2026 | ![]() |
The Green 175’s are waiting to be returned to Wolverton - too many defects identified.
(Incidentally, there is an IET that has been repainted into GBR livery at Eastleigh).
(Incidentally, there is an IET that has been repainted into GBR livery at Eastleigh).
It looks like it's to do with the air conditioning unit. Laira cannot fix it. The trains have been stuck on a siding since arriving at Laira on 1 October 2026
Cannot see Mark Hopwood being on radio Cornwall again in the near future.
| Re: Delay repay delay In "Your rights and redress" [381805/32556/6] Posted by grahame at 07:40, 10th November 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby, GBM, johnneyw, TonyN, Oxonhutch | ![]() |
''Don't panic, Captain Wainwaring!' It will all be well when GBR take over the running of our railways.



Post includes AI generated content (?)
I am, of course, a bit personally jealous of a service that runs even hourly!. In our town, miss the 15:14 back from Swindon and the next one's 17:45.
There is, of course, the half-hourly Faresaver BUS service x34 from Chippenham railway station to Melksham Market Place, as a 'Plan B'.

Yes ... and although the x34 from Chippenham RAILWAY Station runs every half hour from 14:41 to 17:38 only on Mondays to Fridays, three times from 16:05 to 17:35 on Saturdays and 9 times from 09:25 to 18:25 on Sundays. Daytime Monday to Saturday runs from Chippenham BUS Station only, and no service any day of the week after the last bus has left from the railway station. Need to know, and normally no through ticketing, no waiting if the connecting train is drawing in even as the last bus leaves. In the opposite direction, Melksham Market Place is about a 15 minute walk from the railway station, 3 early buses Monday to Friday (last service 08:15), two services Saturday (last service 08:05) and (on request to driver) Sunday services from 08:50 to 17:49 call at Chippenham Railway station. On weekdays, it's a commercial service meeting the main regular flows, and on its Sunday a supported service - interesting to see the different perspectives. If you know how it works and it works for you, good. But there are so many potential journeys untapped outside the hours that it runs.
For Bristol Brabazon, I note fill in buses too ... perhaps all-mode ticketing and connections are better there? Way back in the days I was with TransWilts, we produced an integrated corridor timetable and perhaps the Bristol folks will be doing so? Should be easier - at least for three weeks both buses and trains will be First operations.














